By:
ahosang, who is AAPL's target market in the US? With the exception of 43+ million on SNAP I would venture a guess everyone else is and has been AAPL's target market. Buying an ipad doesn't require the same capital outlay as say buying a luxury car or even a luxury watch. The "market target" numbers are heavily skewed, not in terms of disposable income but in terms of mass, towards the middle class buyer. And that's precisely the class that's currently been decimated. Their home is no longer an ATM machine, their disposable income has shrunk because of inflation and their economy needs to create 250K new jobs every month just for the unemployment situation to stay even. It isn't, they are still bleeding jobs. The unemployment number improved slightly because people are falling off the back end and they are no longer counted in the statistics.
Having said all that, FED induced LIQUIDITY has been the overriding reason the US markets have levitating despite poor fundamentals. The USD has been sacrificed to keep the markets up. How far down (so far in an orderly way) would the USD have to go until the FED blinks? And to me THAT will have far more reaching implications on US equities including AAPL than people maxing their credit cards lined up to buy the latest shinny hyped thing from Apple. |
By:
Silly Melanie
Big mac flipper |
By:
Thanks for the reply menelaus. Good point about the mass market.I think it's close between the financial squeeze and the possible status of the products as social necessities.
|
By:
$330 breached
|
By:
$330 breached
|
By:
NYSE closed
AAPL $325.90 |
By:
Did I mention I was MASSIVELY short AAPL? I'm asking because you may have not heard me from all the laughter in the background from the apple fanboys when I posted that.
Have a nice weekend. |
By:
what is your target price for cashing out? When apple goes bankrupt?
|
By:
Menelaus, you supposedly have been short 4 or 5 months, the price has only recently dipped 3 or 4 percent and you think you have made money??
Fees, theta, premium etc would have eaten through that 3 percent long ago. More importantly you've irrationally clung to a stock that's done no worse than the average while other tech stocks like Sony and Nokia (AAPLs competition) have been plummeting. Feel free post your position and exit strategy anytime... |
By:
polybot, you lie.
I went short AAPL at around $342 in April, not 4-5 months ago. I loaded up short positions right after their last earnings statement with the stock shooting to $350+ when I believed we hit top for the year. Perhaps you weren't reading my posts carefully enough. It closed at $325+ Friday. I would throw that calculator you are using away and buy a new one if a drop from $350 to $325 works out to a 3-4pc drop. You enjoyed the ride up with AAPL for all the wrong reasons and evidently without even understanding why. I suspect the ride down will have you equally puzzled. But it sounds like you are a buy and hold type of investor, so with more printed money coming down the pike equities will rise again. What a $ will buy you by then however is a different story.... But look at the bright side, you made lots of virtual dollars in that silly "no lose" game you devised and you were the sole participant... |
By:
The post is still up:
Menelaus Joined: 03 Feb 05 Replies: 663 21 Apr 11 12:49 "There is no substance to the rumors that iphone4 has reception issues" - Steve Jobs, June 24, 2010 "The dropped calls complaints are blown out of proportion. There is no problem with the iphone4 reception if it's held properly" - Steve Jobs, July 6, 2010 "There is a design problem with the antenna of iphone4 and we've already taking steps to correct it" Steve Jobs, July 16, 2010 Yes, I believe everything that Apple says, absolutely everything........ Hmmmm..."Staggering" demand but ipad sales are down. And the apple fanboys I think missed this part of the call because they erupted in orgasmic rapture with the Q2 beat: * APPLE SEES Q3 EPS ABOUT $5.03, EST. $5.25 It's your last chance to go short this week, fanboy. There you have it. Check the date on my post, check the stock price at the time and MORE IMPORTANTLY check the advise I was giving you. I hope you learned a lesson from this polybot. |
By:
And while I'm on a roll, stop littering this forum with rubbish analysis about valuations, P/E ratios, and other such rubbish. You still don't get it, that type of analysis was valid pre-2007, not today. That approach to investing is so far in the rear view mirror I can't even see it anymore. What drives markets today is FED/CB liquidity, easy money, plain and simple. Repeat that under your teeth until it sinks in. Then you're getting it.
|
By:
|
By:
Menelaus
How about going on record now as to what your proposed exit target is ? Too revealing perhaps ? |
By:
Not too revealing at all.
I'm watching the 200DMA which can be breached this week if the market continues it's bearish trend and the price drops below $325 (major support). If it does, it's very likely we'll see some more sell-off until the next level of support which is $315. If we breach $325, I'm switching on my "greed" mode and wait before I close my short positions. If not, I might bail out with my profit. Bare in mind, all this while I keep an eye for any announcements out of the Eccles Building from those who are the true market movers these days. So far they've stayed mum, and I believe they'll stay mum for a while yet. We'll see how it plays out. I will update again later in the week. |
By:
"Menelaus 14 Apr 11 12:50
Here's my position: MASSIVELY short AAPL" Just to clarify, this was the week BEFORE earnings and the price was around 332-336, THEN it went to 350+ and you were ****-ting your pants all the way. You'll be lucky if you escape with minimal losses, meanwhile check the charts for RIMM, SNE, NOK. Looks like you backed the wrong horse again. |
By:
"What drives markets today is FED/CB liquidity, easy money, plain and simple. "
So why would one stock drop 50 percent while another in the same sector barely moves? I won't name them but you can guess. |
By:
Just a reminder, this is what the calls looked like at earnings as it started it's climb to 350, i can only imagine the horrific state of your shorts then, and not much better now they've been stewing for months.
DAYS QTY DELTA DESCRIPTION P/L DAY P/L OPEN MARK MARK CHNG AVG PRICE OPT ► 29 +xx 783.84736 AAPL 100 MAY 11 295 CALL 16.27% 48.27% 56.1 7.4 37.8375 |
By:
polybot, I've seen sore losers on here but you've certainly have become their banner boy. I put up the post telling you to go short when the stock shot up to $350+ ("your last chance to short") but you are still fantasizing about me "****ting my pants". Are you feeling well, or are you only reading what you want to read in my posts?
One stock just happened to become HFT's plaything whereas the other one didn't, that's all. Everyone needs a good cover and what better cover than an excellent branding strategy and a blind devotion by the fanboys like you. My shorts are in great shape UNLESS the FED surprises me with more easy money and it shoots over $350 overnight. It won't happen. This is a MASSIVE win and risk FREE at this point. And again, stop littering the forum with worthless rubbish analysis that means nothing. The markets will go up, or down depending what happens in the Eccles building. Evidently you still don't get it. In time, you will. |
By:
Angry comedian . ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
|
By:
"Menelaus 14 Apr 11 12:50
Here's my position: MASSIVELY short AAPL" You may be holding that chart upside down menelaus, check again. You may have told me to short at 350 but looks like you were short below 335. And I was too busy selling the may calls at the time, so no time to look into your shorts. You might get lucky though, if AAPL drops to 300 you may turn a small profit for your 3 months work, your landlord will be pleased to finally get some rent. |
By:
Yes, of course, "you were too busy selling the may calls at the time", so busy in fact that you didn't have time to post it. There's no point in debating anything with you polybot. You are a fanboy to the core and will twist every bit of information posted on here to suit your position.
When the stock was on a tear on the way up, you rode it for all it was worth, never bothering to take profits off the table all the way to the top. The stock hits top for the year and although at the time you broke out in orgasmic rapture claiming that it's heading to $400 and posted about it, now we find out that you "were selling may calls". Aftertiming trades is easy. Winning in "no lose" silly paper games you make up on here is also easy. Convincing us that you have a clue about what you are doing other than just be fortunate enough to be at the receiving end of Bernanke's largess...and not even knowing it.....is a different story. I told you to load up on shorts when the stock topped after the last earnings report. I re-posted that since you seemed confused but you're still clinging to your version of the truth and slinging insults my way. It's telling by the way that the insult you thought appropriate was "your landlord will be pleased to finally get some rent" relating no doubt to your own personal situation as a renter. It may shock you to find out that some of us live in rather luxurious, fully owned and paid for years ago, homes in the best neighborhoods of London. It's called having a great paying job. A real job with steady income, not just sitting behind a computer monitor trying to get lucky trading the market. And it seems in your case you'd need epic luck just to break even. If the 200DMA is breached and AAPL closes below $325, look at below fanboy. You may have to sell your iphone, imac, ipad and whatever other irubbish you own to feed yourself. |
By:
yer we believe you , ha ha ,
|
By:
fanboy, we can trade insults ad infinitum on here, I assure you I can spar with the best of them, but fundamentally I only have ONE question for you.
Since you have been consistently spewing "go long Apple" on this forum and you were presenting predictions by "analysts - who tend to be conservative", most indicating Apple heading to $425 and sometimes well beyond, how many calls have you bought at around $352 and will be expiring worthless the next few months? Your posts are below: polybot Joined: 20 Oct 03 Replies: 1165 19 Apr 11 11:49 Looks like I'm long AAPL. polybot Joined: 20 Oct 03 Replies: 1165 21 Jan 11 07:09 analysts tend to be conservative... 19-Jan-11 Ticonderoga raises target from $450 to $550 19-Jan-11 Piper Jaffray raises target from $438 to $483 19-Jan-11 UBS raises price target from $415 to $465. 19-Jan-11 Barclay raises target from $420 to $450 19-Jan-11 BofA Merrill raises price target from $425 to $450 19-Jan-11 JP Morgan raises target to $450 19-Jan-11 Goldman Sachs raises target to $450 19-Jan-11 Susquehanna raises price target from $390 to $445. 19-Jan-11 Deutsche Bank raises Price Target to $440 19-Jan-11 Kaufman Brothers raises target from $415 to $438 19-Jan-11 Canaccord Genuity raises target to $432 19-Jan-11 Janney Capital raises target to $430 19-Jan-11 Wedbush raises target from $405 to $430 19-Jan-11 RBC Capital raises target from $395 to $425 19-Jan-11 CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets: Target raised to $425 19-Jan-11 Oppenheimer raises target from $395 to $425 19-Jan-11 Stifel Nicholas raises target from $400 to $420 19-Jan-11 Citi raises target from $390 to $415 19-Jan-11 Morgan Stanley raises target from $375 to $410 19-Jan-11 BMO Capital: Target from $355 to $405. 19-Jan-11 Gleacher & Co raises target to $400 18-Jan-11 Cramer raises target price to $400. 19-Jan-11 Needham: Target raised to $375 |
By:
the therapy looks like its a failure,
is your medication wearing off melly? |
By:
i know for sure, as since he s been on my watch list, that polybot was buying apple shares in the low 100s. wheter he s still long or not, or if he could have optimized the exit i m not too sure, but in my book he s one of the few to follow.
menelaus, i remember v well your call to exit apple at around 335 and at around 350; so im sure it went all right for you too. but what kind of options do you have? as im assuming the premia on those cannot be too cheap ( 20 vol? im guessing ...so an atm put 1mth is around 8/10 dollars i guess ? _) or did you have longer term options and you re enjoying the rebound in the vix? for me options on stocks are not very effective, especially on the put side. smile too high for the risk off premium but in fact the real leverage you get it on the calls. |
By:
thats exactly correct JW. Options are very ineffective.Many traders get into options early on but I don't know any sophisticated traders that use options as their main vehicle.
The issue being time value diminution. Melly is clueless and a fraud .If infact he had still puts on AAPL he would be underwater since when he entered over 2 months ago the time premium would have been huge.That would all have eroded by now. Now melly , you go and look up time value and options on google and form your retort. |
By:
Benny says "I don't know any sophisticated traders that use options as their main vehicle."
I'm going to let polybot respond to this comedic remark. The real sad part about this forum is that it is literally "open" to everyone. All the way from those with a genuine understanding of finance, economics, the markets, the role of the FED and central banks and well......money, and there's many posters like that on here, all the way to an epic ignoramus who feels the need to poison EVERY thread with his ignorance like Benny. AAPL closed at the all important $325 level today. Bounced after printing as low as $321+ virtually 30 minutes earlier where from a technical standpoint the chart looked very bearish. I believe the bearish trend is intact and I will continue staying short. Not that I want to blow my own horn but it's pretty hard not to when you have the forum's ignoramus showing up spewing rubbish every time I post but I made a massive "time to short NFLX" suggestion to Whippet. I'll let Whippet confirm or deny if there's any doubt. |
By:
Pricing of options is beyond me and I would assume well beyond you too Mrben.
Menelaus I think, or at least I hope, might have a slightly better grip on this tricky subject than either of us do. But that doesn't mean he gets it right any more than you or any others do. There is a lot of well documented researtch out there that actually shows that people who follow certain subjects more closely and knowledgeably than the general layman, don't actually get things more right overall. Funny that. I just wish Menelaus would stop just posting in his " my way or the highway " style. That's just plain stupid and does his reputation for intelligent objectivity no good at all. I much prefer JW's style of posting. I believe he's definitely as well informed and involved in day to day mkts. as Menelaus, but he is nowhere as absolute in his opinions. But Menelaus is a good read, if you can strip out the arrogance. |
By:
FAFH, point taken, and I shall consider it as constructive criticism.
|
By:
Btw Menelaus that research I refer to was not specifically aimed at your bete noire Mr B of the Fed. Though you would probably think it is a prime example.
I just realised something. Do you think Mrben's user name is some sort of play on the current Fed Chairman ? Geez I hope not. |
By:
I hope not too
Have a good night FAFH, I have to get up early tomorrow, very busy day at the office. All the best. |
By:
Menelaus, here's the full quote with the bits you deliberately left out, obviously no mention of buying at higher levels. Would have bought more today but the price wasn't any lower than back in April.
"polybot 19 Apr 11 11:49 resumed sub 330 buys in AAPL yesterday (only got down to 327 the other week), the plan was blocks at dollars increments, started 326 but next stop straight to 321, so another 5 blocks that cost a little less than expected. I may use the unexpected savings on a small bet on some SLV puts, just a few contracts for fun. Not really involved in metals so something to keep me interested. The open interest on those Jul25s now at 117215, was the million dollar trade a genuine move? a cunning plan? Looks like I'm long AAPL and soon to be short (at least a tiny bit) silver." |
By:
Meanwhile, the one and only trade (still vague and woolly with no details or plan, odd that) you ever "disclosed" is at best up 2 or 3 percent over 3 months, despite all your aftertiming!
Meanwhile, RIMM plummeted another 15 percent after hours today, you really haven't got a clue. |
By:
To answer your one question in case it's not obvious, i wouldn't be buying calls at 350 if i was paying under 330 for shares, and as stated many times, I was SELLING calls at 350, and yes, the returns would make you weep when you look at your own sad imaginery returns.
|
By:
polybot, whatever.......
It's getting very tiring debating with someone with a closed mind. Here's the undisputed fact that you continue to skirt. When the stock hit top right after the earnings announcement you were spewing "buy, buy,buy" and my position was "sell,sell,sell". The stock is about $30 (8pc) lower today but you still argue that you had the right side of the trade. I'm amazed at your gall really. AAPL puts were very cheap and totally mispriced. Why? Because just about every numb skull analyst out there, you know, the ones who "tend to be conservative" thought the party can go on forever and had the stock price going to the moon. Why? Because they saw the fanboys were lining up around the block to buy ipads not realizing the significant downdraft in the US economy that would impact those fanboys, not realizing that even gullible fanboys would eventually catch on that there are no new products just i2,i3,i4,iadinfinitum versions of essentially the same gadget, not realizing that competitors are catching up in places where Apple got the jump on them, not realizing the Android juggernaut is for real and getting bigger and better, not realizing that the markets still see Steve Jobs as Apple and unfortunately he has terminal cancer (now if Apple ever stop parading Steve at every one of their conferences, although he is clearly incapable of even standing up on his own two feet more than just a few minutes and looks about five stone underweight, then the market's perception might change - they know though, the day the launch a new product of yet another "new version" WITHOUT Steve on the podium, their stock will sink 5pc the SAME DAY), not realizing that Apple would be impacted by the same supply chain interruptions out of Japan as every other major electronic products mfgr. DESPITE Apple's assurances to the contrary that they have since retracted, and last and the most important, NOT REALIZING BERNANKE'S MONEY PRINTING ORGY THAT LIFTED ALL MARKETS WAS SOON COMING TO AN END. Here's some friendly advice for you. If you bought into "the apple party never ends" mantra the calls you bought at the top will be expiring worthless. If you own AAPL stock, and you haven't bought with leverage, you don't have to answer margin calls and you don't need the cash for your day-to-day sustenance, then hold on. More money printing is the ONLY way out this mess the masters of the universe have created and the markets again will levitate. That's in nominal terms of course, in real terms, there's no free lunch, someone has to eat the losses. I'll leave it up to you to figure out who that someone might be...... |
By:
Closed positions.
AAPL $323 shorted on three different occasions at a weighted average at about $348 (7pc decline) NFLX $247 shorted at about $273 (9.5pc decline) I think there's more downside but there's a FOMC meeting next week and I'm not willing to risk profits over Bernanke's next move to continue to save the banks. There's a lot of talk of capping the interest rate on the 2-yr which in turn the Chairman believes will drive the long bond rates down. Nothing like intentionally mispricing risk to cure the ailing global economy........NOT! But then again the plan was never to save the economy, the plan was, is and always will be to save the banks and preserve a fiat monetary system that benefits those with the ability to create money out of thin air. I'll take new positions AFTER I hear what the FED has to sat next week. I need to also get this off my chest, for someone who consistently gets a lot of things right on this forum, I seem to get a disproportionate share of abuse. I suspect however, like Fine As Frog Hair said, that it must be because of my humble personality, consensus building approach and enormous tolerance of those who I feel are not as savvy in debating these complicated economic matters. :-) One should always maintain the ability to laugh at one's self, myself included . Have a great weekend everyone. |
By:
I definitely remember melly saying he was shorting apple near the top, it was trading somewhere between $330-$355 when he said he had done it, it is up to all of you if you believe he got a price of $348, I don't really care. Also the NFLX was called correctly as well.
However what I have brought up before, and poly is now perhaps eluding to, is why AAPL? Your reasons for shorting it (all correct btw) will affect a number of other companies as well. AAPL will probably fall, but other companies will fall more. I am willing to bet that my NFLX will fall more than your AAPL. Lets see what happens. |
By:
Whippet, thanks for the confirmation ( I think?) but there is one thing in your post that puzzles me. Where's does the "my NFLX" come from?
You posted asking what people thought about shorting NFLX. You got two responses. Polybot laid out some analysis but avoided taking a position. My response was succinct "now is a good time to short NFLX". The tread ended without you acknowledging either response, nor posting that you had indeed decided to short NFLX. Now "your" short NFLX will do better than "my" short AAPL!?!? Astounding bravado...... My " massive short AAPL" call was up here for all to see, and I got ridiculed for it. If you put up a post telling the forum you were shorting NFLX then please put it up again, it seems I may have missed it. And if you can't, then I will once again, in my uncompromising style call.....AFTERTIMING. Here's the thread I'm referring yo: http://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/27599037/tech-bubble-mk-ii---greatest-shorting-opportunity-of-all-time |
By:
Menelaus
It would appear you have shorted at good prices. Congrats. But your job is still only half done unfortunately. Don't get greedy. As is being commonly observed, by you in particular, there is currently a huge disconnect between the US stock mkt and the US economy. I personally would not sleep well with large short US equity positions. But I'm a wimp at heart. |