Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2391 comments are related to the topic:
2000 GUINEAS (2014)

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 7 of 60  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 60 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,391
By:
pedrobob
When: 25 Mar 14 12:23
O'Brien Dewhurst runners since 2000:

year    sp    pos    horse name
2000    11/4    4    Mozart
2000    11/1    5    Freud
2000    200/1    10    Cashel Palace
2001    4/6    1    Rock Of Gibraltar
2001    13/2    2    Landseer
2001    8/1    3    Tendulkar
2001    66/1    7    Shah Jehan
2002    66/1    6    Ontario
2002    20/1    12    Great Pyramid
2002    100/30    2    Tomahawk
2002    33/1    7    Marino Marini
2003    40/1    5    Troubadour
2003    10/1    11    Antonius Pius
2004    15/2    2    Oratorio
2005    8/11    2    Horatio Nelson
2006    3/1    2    Holy Roman Emperor
2006    200/1    15    Naigani
2006    200/1    12    Mount Parnassus
2007    100/1    8    Greatwallofchina
2008    200/1    13    Egypt
2008    6/4    7    Rip Van Winkle
2009    20/1    2    Fencing Master
2009    4/1    4    Pure Champion
2009    66/1    14    Lord High Admiral
2009    33/1    1    Beethoven
2010    25/1    2    Roderic O'Connor
2011    15/8    2    Power
2012    16/1    3    George Vancouver
2012    14/1    5    The Ferryman
2013    20/1    6    Friendship
2013    10/11    1    War Command
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 12:33
cheers Pedro.

Just trying to see if what he might be doing with War Command is unprecedented for them. It looks that way to a degree but they often have multiple runners in each race! But WC has been given all the traditional Guineas races from the yard, Coventry Stakes (Henrythenavigator, Power, War Command etc) and Dewhurst.

Mmm. Will Australia even run? DevilDevil
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 12:34
Does anybody genuinely think that if Coolmore really had faith in War Command being a top notch miler they'd send him to France just to leave the way clear for a horse they've hyped up that might not be able to deliver?
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 12:40
That's why i'm wondering if Australia runs, Figgis. LaughCrazy
By:
pedrobob
When: 25 Mar 14 12:49
I think O'Brien is rare amongst trainers in admitting his mistakes.... and he has admitted to plenty in the way he handled St Nicholas Abbey, So You Think, Rip Van Winkle to name but just a few of the recent ones.

Withdrawing a comfortable Dewhurst winner from the Guineas this far in advance suggests he really does believe Australia is the next Pegasus. But as pointed out before, Aidan gets plenty confused between having to make statements in his Coolmore breeding PR role and being objective about a horse's capability on the racecourse
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 12:50
I'm sure he's an intended runner, sint. I wouldn't rule out War Command running too, unless the betting on here is actually informed money rather than speculative. I just don't believe for one minute that Coolmore would swerve Newmarket with War Command if they thought he had a better chance of winning than Australia just on the outside chance that Australia could win a triple crown. Whether they turn out to be right is another matter but for me they think Australia has a better chance, simple as that.
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 12:59
I never bought the SNA excuses. If you read the comments after SNA's Guineas failure apparently he was clocking times just as good as their best milers, not only that but he was doing it so easily, O'Brien seemed mystified by the flop. It was later that he came out with the explanation that it was entirely his own fault for rushing SNA, which doesn't really fit with what had previously been said. O'Brien often takes the blame for his runners' poor performances as it makes financial sense. It didn't stop him running their next Derby hope in the Guineas only 2 years later.
By:
pedrobob
When: 25 Mar 14 13:00
Willie Mullins is a far better and more objective judge than Aidan.

Even he got blindsided in his love of the Hurricane and made a monumental error in sending not one, but two, possible winners of the Champion Hurdle elsewhere.

If I remember correctly, Aidan said Camelot was his best ever? Scrambled home in the worst Guineas in years, beat a shocking Derby field, couldn't beat a handicapper in the Leger, stuffed in the Arc and by a Group 2 horse twice in Al Kazeem as a 4yo.
By:
Sandown
When: 25 Mar 14 13:06
pedrobob

Yes, it was my list of AOB hype statements. TBH I don't think that AOB sets out to hype/mislead. I think that he is just genuinely enthusiastic about horses and has forgotten what he might have said previously.He doesn't have a metric of superlatives. And until the horse actually wins major races and posts top top figures he really can't be rated the best ever, can he?

And I don't believe that they necessarily  have a poor opinion of WC either. If Australia doesn't make it i'm sure that WC would be switched and from their WC comments they would still be confident of winning. It's just that they rate Australia very highly and maybe say 10bs plus better than WC. That would still make WC an above average 2000 gns winner. I'm sure that WC will prove himself a good G1 winner but possibly not a "great."
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 13:07
Ped, whether he says Australia is his best flat horse ever is immaterial to me, I won't believe it until I see any evidence of it, and I doubt I will. The same for when he said stuff about Camelot. The point is that they thought Camelot was the best of that crop and he was.
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 13:07
Yeah Figgis i'm just being mischievous. The more I think about it, the more I think both horses will run. It just depends how ready Aiden will have WC. He might use it as a prep for the Irish Guineas like he's done with many others.
By:
unclepuncle
When: 25 Mar 14 13:10
Figgis
25 Mar 14 11:34

Does anybody genuinely think that if Coolmore really had faith in War Command being a top notch miler they'd send him to France just to leave the way clear for a horse they've hyped up that might not be able to deliver?


Yes - 100%.

If they think Australia can win the Guineas and Derby if they route War Command elsewhere then it makes perfect commercial sense given that it will give them a superstar stallion prospect (by Galileo out of Ouija BoardLove) and would of course be another boost for Galileo who they own as well. Coolmore are interested in making stallions, the racing is secondary.
By:
pedrobob
When: 25 Mar 14 13:10
RP after the Irish Derby

30Jun12 Curragh   ( 12 Sft/Hy ,RPR119 )
Camelot is a great horse and won there despite Joseph saying that he absolutely hated the ground. We´ve never had one like him and wouldn´t it be something to dream about now to go for the Triple Crown, but the lads will have to talk about that.
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 13:17
Especially as they have lost Montjeu and SNA, Uncle. Losing SNA in the summer was a huge loss for them given he'd have been the new kid on the block.
By:
Sandown
When: 25 Mar 14 13:20
There is a 2 week gap between Nwmt and Longchamp and 2 weeks then until the Curragh. If it comes up soft at Nmkt, would they still run Australia there? Perhaps they would be more prepared to chance WC at Nwmkt and wait for Long/Curragh with Australia.

If Australia isn't quite ready, would they risk him at Nwmkt or would they wait? if WC is ready, would they switch him back to Nwmkt.

As I have already said, this is not yet a done deal.
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 13:45
I'm with Sint regarding the ground. I can't see some cut bothering the horse at all, in fact, given his stamina I think a bit of cut would help his chances over the Newmarket mile. I think jockey and trainer were talking more about very soft or heavy ground, and for me nobody in their right mind would ideally run a top class horse on heavy ground unless it was a known mudlark. O'Brien referenced the Camelot Irish Derby run where it was definitely heavy. We don't know what the ground will be like on Guineas day, but if history is any guide the race is nearly always run on ground no worse than good. The softest I've seen in many years was the day Camelot won, described as 'good to soft' but was just about 'soft' on my scale. If the ground was similar to that I believe they'd still run Australia.
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 13:58
They went to great lengths to save SNA. Now, he was a loved horse by the yard i'm sure, but clearly it was because of his breeding prospects that they gave him several surgeries. I remember tweeting at the time Coolmore posted some pics of his leg after the surgery on Twitter and saying they should have really let the horse go peacefully. His leg was in a right state. They must be keen to add another high-class stallion to their books in the coming seasons.
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 14:02
Hills' only entry in the 2000 Guineas is Cable Bay, last seen filling the runner-up spot behind War Command in the Dewhurst Stakes at Newmarket.

However, he is unlikely to step up in trip on the Rowley Mile.

"I don't think we'll be aiming him towards the Guineas," said the trainer.

"We want to take our time with him and we're quite keen to stick at seven furlongs for the time being.

"Something like the Jersey (Stakes) at Royal Ascot might be a target."
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 14:12
It's also debatable that they'd consider WC a better prospect if it came up soft, given the excuses made about the slow ground when he won the Dewhurst, this despite the clock pointing to good ground. It depends how literally you take the comments. If WC had won in the same style on ground described as 'good to firm' what's the betting that the ground being a bit too quick would've been an excuse put forward? I'd go 2/7 Wink
By:
Sandown
When: 25 Mar 14 14:45
If it comes up soft at nwmkt I don't think either will run. There has to be uncertainty over whether australia will be ready in time and if he isn't and the ground was OK i think WC might be risked even if not quite ready. It might be his best chance of a domestic classic but not Australia's . Think Australia would be diverted to the curragh if they stick to a mile or even switched to Leopardstown.
By:
Figgis
When: 25 Mar 14 14:58
I do think too much is being made of this 'best ever flat horse' he's trained stuff. Sure it provides a talking point but I think it can also make people who have a natural distaste for hype (myself included) want to oppose the hype. The probability is that he won't have to be his best horse ever in order to win this year's Guineas. It's also not clear what he means by such comments anyway. I think a trainer would be influenced by a horse's physique, its temperament, the ease of its work, etc. It doesn't necessarily mean it's the fastest horse he's trained, which would be my own definition of the best.
By:
Sandown
When: 25 Mar 14 15:04
AOB's comments about Australia being the best Flat horse etc etc really do make me incredulous, especially given the horses's modest success so far.

Is he really saying that all of his G1 winners below could be regarded as inferior?


Ireland:
1000 Guineas (5):

Imagine, Classic Park, Yesterday, Halfway To Heaven, Misty For Me.

2000 Guineas (9):

Black Minnaloushe, Desert King, Saffron Walden, Rock of Gibraltar, Henrythenavigator, Mastercraftsman, Roderic O Connor, Power, Magician.

Champion Stakes (7):

Giant’s Causeway, High Chaparral, Oratorio, Dylan Thomas (x 2), Cape Blanco, So You Think.

Derby (10):

Desert King, Galileo, High Chaparral, Dylan Thomas, Soldier Of Fortune, Frozen Fire, Fame And Glory, Cape Blanco, Treasure Beach, Camelot.

Matron Stakes (1):

Lillie Langtry.

Moyglare Stakes (6):

Quarter Moon, Necklace, Sequoyah, Rumplestiltskin, Misty For Me, Maybe.

National Stakes (8):

Desert King, Beckett, King of Kings, One Cool Cat, Hawk Wing, George Washington, Mastercraftsman, Power.

Oaks (3):

Alexandrova, Peeping Fawn, Moonstone.

Phoenix Stakes (12):

Johannesburg, One Cool Cat, Fasliyev, Spartacus, Minardi, Lavery, George Washington, Holy Roman Emperor, Mastercraftsman, Alfred Nobel, Zoffany, Pedro The Great.

Pretty Polly Stakes (2):

Peeping Fawn, Misty For Me.

St Leger (2):

****, Septimus.

Tattersalls Gold Cup (6):

Black Sam Bellamy, Powerscourt, Duke Of Marmalade, Fame And Glory, So You Think x 2.

France:
Criterium de Saint Cloud (4):

Ballingarry, Alberto Giacometti, Recital, Fame And Glory.

Criterium International (3):

Mount Nelson, Jan Vermeer, Roderic O Connor.

French 1000 Guineas:

Rose Gypsy.

French 2000 Guineas (3):

Landseer, Aussie Rules, Astronomer Royal.

Grand Criterium (7):

Hold That Tiger, Rock of Gibraltar, Second Empire, Ciro, Oratorio, Horatio Nelson, Holy Roman Emperor.

Grand Prix de Paris (2):

Scorpion, Imperial Monarch.

Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe (1):

Dylan Thomas.

Prix de la Salamandre:

Giant’s Causeway.

Prix du Moulin:

Rock of Gibraltar.

Prix Ganay (2):

Dylan Thomas, Duke Of Marmalade.

Prix Jacques Le Marois:

Excelebration.

Prix Lupin:

Ciro.

Prix Marcel Boussac (2):

Rumplestiltskin, Misty For Me.

Prix Maurice de Gheest:

King Charlemagne

Prix Morny (3):

Johannesburg, Fasliyev, Orpen

Prix Royal Oak:

****.

Italy:
Gran Criterium (2):

Spartacus, Sholokhov.

Gran Premio del Jockey Club:

Black Sam Bellamy.

U.A.E.:
Dubai Sheema Classic (1):

St Nicholas Abbey

North America:
Arlington Million (2):

Powerscourt, Cape Blanco.

Breeders Cup Juvenile Turf (2):

Wrote, George Vancouver

Breeders’ Cup Juvenile:

Johannesburg.

Breeders’ Cup Turf (4):

High Chaparral x 2, St Nicholas Abbey, Magician

Canadian International (2):

Ballingarry, Joshua Tree.

Joe Hirsch Turf Classic:

Cape Blanco.

Keeneland Turf Mile (2):

Landseer, Aussie Rules.

Man O War Stakes (1):

Cape Blanco.

Queen Elizabeth II Challenge Cup:

Together.

Secretariat Stakes (2):

Ciro, Treasure Beach.

England:
1000 Guineas (2):

Virginia Waters, Homecoming Queen.

2000 Guineas (6):

King of Kings, Rock of Gibraltar, Footstepsinthesand, George Washington, Henrythenavigator, Camelot.

Ascot Gold Cup (5):

**** x 4, Fame And Glory

Coronation Cup (7):

****, Scorpion, Soldier Of Fortune, Fame And Glory, St Nicholas Abbey (3).

Coronation Stakes (2):

Sophisticat, Lillie Langtry.

Derby (4):

Galileo, High Chaparral, Camelot & Ruler Of The World

Dewhurst Stakes (3):

Rock of Gibraltar, Beethoven, War Command.

Eclipse Stakes (5):

Hawk Wing, Giant’s Causeway, Oratorio, Mount Nelson, So You Think.

Fillies Mile (2):

Listen, Sunspangled.

Golden Jubilee Stakes (1):

Starspangledbanner.

Juddmonte International (4):

Giant’s Causeway, Duke of Marmalade, Rip Van Winkle, Declaration Of War

July Cup (3):

Stravinsky, Mozart, Starspangledbanner.

King George VI & Queen Elizabeth Diamond Stakes (3):

Galileo, Dylan Thomas, Duke Of Marmalade.

Lockinge Stakes (1):

Hawk Wing.

Middle Park Stakes (4):

Johannesburg, Minardi, Ad Valorem, Crusade.

Nassau Stakes (2):

Peeping Fawn, Halfway To Heaven.

Nunthorpe Stakes (2):

Stravinsky, Mozart.

Oaks (4):

Shahtoush, Imagine, Alexandrova, Was.

Prince of Wales’s Stakes (2):

Duke Of Marmalade, So You Think.

Queen Anne Stakes (3):

Ad Valorem, Haradasun, Declaration of War.

Queen Elizabeth II Stakes (3):

George Washington, Rip Van Winkle, Excelebration

Racing Post Trophy (7):

Saratoga Springs, Brian Boru, High Chaparral, Aristotle, St Nicholas Abbey, Camelot, Kingsbarns.

St James‘s Palace Stakes (6):

Black Minnaloushe, Giant‘s Causeway, Rock of Gibraltar, Excellent Art, Henrythenavigator, Mastercraftsman.

St Leger (4):

Milan, Brian Boru, Scorpion, Leading Light.

Sun Chariot Stakes:

Halfway To Heaven.

Sussex Stakes (4):

Rock of Gibraltar, Giant’s Causeway, Henrythenavigator, Rip Van Winkle.

Yorkshire Oaks (2):

Alexandrova, Peeping Fawn.

Share
ROSTERS: Ireland | USA | Australia | National Hunt
CONTACT US: Ireland | USA | Australia | National Hunt
Privacy policy
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 16:48
Landseer did the French Guineas and Coventry Stakes double so there is a precedent as far as Ballydoyle goes. I was not aware of that, before my betting days, so it's interesting.
By:
sintonian
When: 25 Mar 14 17:10
What's also interesting is the fact all 3 of AOB's French Guineas winners had a prep race beforehand in the Prix Fontainbleu, so if WC does go to France it's worth bearing in mind for betting purposes. Seems quite significant to me.
By:
pedrobob
When: 26 Mar 14 12:32
No idea what share he still retains, but I wonder what Joe Allen, breeder and still part owner of War Command thinks of being treated like a second class citizen by Coolmore?

He must be very keen to get a British classic winner to promote his stallion War Front in Europe?
By:
Sandown
When: 26 Mar 14 13:03
The "Lads" will make the final decisions on who runs where, not AOB, so its still more than possible that a change of plans might occur. Wouldn't be the first time with Coolmore.
By:
sintonian
When: 26 Mar 14 13:42
I agree. Far from done and dusted.
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 14:18
I think the plan has been influenced by last year's events, their/O'Brien's opinion on which was the better horse at home and what they saw on the track. I'd guess what Australia showed at Leopardstown was what they'd been expecting all along. I still think War Command could earn his place if he started impressing at home and making them question who was the better 3yo. If he doesn't then they'll probably stick to the French Guineas plan. I don't believe that they will stick to relying on Australia in the Guineas just because of some idealistic breeding opportunity that goes against opinion of which horse has the better winning chance. Of course, none of this means their opinion will be proved right, WC could go on to be the better miler, personally I doubt it but until he does nobody can say they are wrong.
By:
pedrobob
When: 26 Mar 14 14:42
I don't believe that they will stick to relying on Australia in the Guineas just because of some idealistic breeding opportunity that goes against opinion of which horse has the better winning chance.

As others have pointed out, Figgis, Coolmore are not about gambling or winning prizemoney. What pays the substantial bills of their worldwide racing empire are stallions and their breeding operation. So if War Command represents a serious impediment to creating a triple crown wining stallion, then of course they will send him elsewhere.

War Command (which Coolmore does not even own outright) has probably no chance of landing a triple crown... whereas if Australia proves good enough to win the Guineas, with his breeding he will be trading odds on for the Derby and likely to have stamina stout enough to last a Leger distance.

Trained by anyone else in the whole wide world including Gosden, Paul Cole, Botti, Varian, Hannon etc  all responsible for the other players in the market, it would be 90% certain the Group 1 Dewhurst winning War Comannd in different ownership without the same bloodstock objectives  ... would be headed for Newmarket.
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 15:08
As others have pointed out, Figgis, Coolmore are not about gambling or winning prizemoney. What pays the substantial bills of their worldwide racing empire are stallions and their breeding operation. So if War Command represents a serious impediment to creating a triple crown wining stallion, then of course they will send him elsewhere.

No argument with the first part of that. However, unless War Command is really their "best flat horse ever", if Australia is the inferior horse then he must have no better than a moderate chance of winning a typical Guineas. To suggest they'd sacrifice War Command on that flimsy basis appears very unlikely to me, although I do admire your faith in the horse compared to theirs Wink. We'll only know for sure when we see more of WC this year.
By:
unclepuncle
When: 26 Mar 14 15:48
They don't really know who is best - nobody really knows until horses meet on the track and even then it's down to what happens on a given day and can easily be reversed in future (e.g. Kauto and Denman).

As Pedro says if War Command were trained by anyone else it would be 100% (not 90%Devil) certain to go to Newmarket. All the talk about Australia being the most amazing horse ever is purely done for the breeding catlogues - even if he were to get injured and never race again they can use these quotes to swell his price.

It's all very similar to Rock Of Gibraltar and Hawkwing. The Rock was a top 2 year old and had won the Dewhurst but we all know which one of the two was being talked about by Coolmore as the best thing they had ever seen. And if The Rock and High Chap had stayed at home Hawkwing would have done the Guineas/Derby double, so Coolmore don't want to jeopardise Australias chance of doing that.
By:
pedrobob
When: 26 Mar 14 15:52
there is not a stand out in this Guineas, as you clearly agree Figgis.

Plenty will hinge on how much they strengthen up, train on and come to hand. Unlike you, I think the winner will have to run at least 3-4 lengths quicker to than they do as a backend Group 1 winning 2yo in October, not just a length.

So it is absolutely incredible that having done no serious or fast work (according to a quote in 2013, O'Brien said his en masse opening Curragh gallop was the first "decent" work of the spring), War Command has seemingly been already removed from the Guineas, a race he has on the formbook (at least everyone else's but yours) every chance of winning and is entitled to be favourite for.

War Command is the youngest of the top 10 in the market I think, yet must be near the biggest and hold at least as much scope for improvement as any, despite taking the Coventry Stakes by 6 lengths and being the latest foaled in at least the last 25 years to win that race. Only five April foals won in that period and only two past 8th April - Dawn Approach (23rd Apr) and War Command (27th Apr)

War Command had a similar 2yo career and rates a similar horse to Dawn Command. Can you imagine Jim Bolger deciding that horse (11/8 fav on the day) was not even good enough to take to Newmarket?


Coventry Stks winners and foaling dates

1989    01-Jan    Rock City    Willie Carson    Richard Hannon
1990    12-Feb    Mac's Imp    Alan Munro    Bill O'Gorman
1991    08-Apr    Dilum    Alan Munro    Paul Cole
1992    15-Feb    Petardia    Walter Swinburn    Geoff Wragg
1993    30-Mar    Stonehatch    John Reid    Peter Chapple-Hyam
1994    04-Feb    Sri Pekan    Richard Quinn    Paul Cole
1995    24-Feb    Royal Applause    Walter Swinburn    Barry Hills
1996    04-Apr    Verglas    Willie Supple    Kevin Prendergast
1997    29-Jan    Harbour Master    Christy Roche    Aidan O'Brien
1998    09-Feb    Red Sea    Richard Quinn    Paul Cole
1999    09-Feb    Fasliyev    Michael Kinane    Aidan O'Brien
2000    05-Mar    Cd Europe    Steve Drowne    Mick Channon
2001    28-Feb    Landseer    Jamie Spencer    Aidan O'Brien
2002    05-Feb    Statue of Liberty    Michael Kinane    Aidan O'Brien
2003    19-Feb    Three Valleys    Richard Hughes    Roger Charlton
2004    27-Feb    Iceman    Kieren Fallon    John Gosden
2005    17-Jan    Red Clubs    Michael Hills    Barry Hills
2006    07-Apr    Hellvelyn    Ted Durcan    Bryan Smart
2007    28-Feb    Henrythenavigator    Michael Kinane    Aidan O'Brien
2008    20-Mar    Art Connoisseur    Jamie Spencer    Michael Bell
2009    08-Feb    Canford Cliffs    Richard Hughes    Richard Hannon
2010    09-Feb    Strong Suit    Richard Hughes    Richard Hannon
2011    06-Mar    Power    Ryan Moore    Aidan O'Brien
2012    23-Apr    Dawn Approach    Kevin Manning    Jim Bolger
2013    27-Apr    War Command    Seamie Heffernan    Aidan O'Brien
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 15:55
Uncle, it wasn't just Coolmore talking about Hawk Wing, though, the majority opinion was in agreement, along with the form experts and ratings services as far as I can remember. I also remember Rock of Gibraltar shortening considerably in the betting in the days leading up to the race, reportedly because he had started to improve at home. My view is the same would happen if WC started to show similar.
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 16:12
I agree the matter of a 2yo training on is an all important factor ,but if winning the Guineas depended on horses needing to make as much physical and speed improvement as you suggest then the likelihood is that the race would be much less predictable than it has been. I'd say in most years it's possible to have the winner in quite a small shortlist, Makfi, who I couldn't rate and Cockney Rebel being the only ones that were outside the range for me recently.

As for WC being rated similar to Dawn Approach, I can't agree at all but that's a matter of opinion. I'd say if Bolger thought he had something better than Dawn Approach he probably would've run that horse instead, he didn't though. As I said before, if WC goes on to show he's a very good miler then the conspiracy theorists will be proved right, until then I see it as just that, a conspiracy theory.
By:
Stevie Gerrard
When: 26 Mar 14 16:12
The french guineas is a decent prize too.
In Hawk Wing and the Rock's year they also had Landseer coventry winner and 2nd in the dewhurst as one for the French.
This year they don't seem to have as much strength in depth and if they believe Australis is there number 1 then
it seems wise to have WC go for the french if they feel the ground is quick enough.
Don't forget last year Hannon sent Olympic Glory for the french and kept Toronado for the english.
S
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 16:27
To go back to the arguments against Brigust last year, the doubters said that Australia's position in the market was based on hype, the horse wouldn't have the speed for the Guineas, they had a far better candidate in War Command and it was highly unlikely he would even be aimed at the Guineas. Faced with the likely prospect that at least the final point of those arguments is going to be wrong there now pops up an extra argument that Coolmore only want Australia to win (whether he's good enough or not) and don't want the better animal, WC, to mess those plans up. Time will tell, but maybe, just maybe Brigust was right and the simple fact is that the whole affair can be taken at face value and Coolmore do actually believe Australia to be superior?
By:
Masterminded
When: 26 Mar 14 16:27
I wouldn't be shocked if he won it but I'm surprised Australia is now as short as he is. He didn't look a particularly good work horse the other day so unless it was just on off day I'd be surprised if he is the type of horse to be burning up the gallops. He's also looked a little idle in his early runs which would suggest that.

The positives for Australia is that he has a super pedigree and from what I've seen he's a great looker. His beating of Free Eagle was impressive as far as being a potential Derby Horse for which I have backed him but it certainly didn't scream Guineas winner at me. I was also hoping he would run in the Racing Post Trophy where AOB sends his best Derby prospects but he was likely seen as too immature for a race like that. If this is the case I think it's going to be an incredible training performance to have him ready to win a Guineas first time out.

I'm not sure what they are thinking regarding War Command but I do know as a stallion prospect they would much rather have a 2000 gns/Derby/triple crown horse by Galileo out of Ouija Board than a War Front Guineas/Insert G1 over a mile winner. This is probably where the hype come forms rather than the actual ability level. Tell me this if you swapped the pedigrees of War Command and Australia which one would be the best ever?

I do fancy him to win the Derby but he's a much better bet for that than the Guineas IMO. I hope he runs well whatever the case and certainly don't mind him winning but unless this is an awful Guineas I can't understand his price now.
By:
pedrobob
When: 26 Mar 14 16:37
if winning the Guineas depended on horses needing to make as much physical and speed improvement as you suggest then the likelihood is that the race would be much less predictable than it has been....

Or more likely, it is simply young immature, horses growing heavier, stronger and faster. And doing so at a similar rate, so of course the Grp 1 winning autumn form still holds up a few months later in the spring?

I think most Guineas winning trainers would find the suggestion laughable that their charges are only running one length quicker at Newmarket in May than they did the previous October.

Otherwise 150 years of the Rous WFA scale just gone out the window...
By:
Sandown
When: 26 Mar 14 16:39
I want to bang on the head any suggestion that somehow WC is a moderate animal because he has been written in for the French Gns and not the English Gns. Just a couple weeks ago AOB was full of praise for "an exciting horse.. powerful, plenty of scope.." who has won the G1 Dewhurst, the best of the juvenile races with a great record of finding future big race winners. He is by War Front, a stallion that Coolmore have bought into and will be keen to promote. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him run in the Kentucky Derby even. If for any reason, Australia does not make the gig at Newmarket, I expect to see WC be switched, unless it comes up very soft. No doubt AOB fancies his chances of taking the first colts classics in 3 countries as well as the English and Irish Derbies... plus the Kentucky versionGrin
By:
Figgis
When: 26 Mar 14 16:46
As I stated before, the wfa scale lumps together gains in stamina as gains in ability. When the official scale underrates a horse as a 2yo, such as Footstepsinthesand, Golan, etc, the explanation is that the 2yo improved by leaps and bounds over the winter, yes that can happen but more often it's that the 2yo was underrated in the first place. The same explanation will be put forward if Be Ready proves as good as I think he is. If he doesn't I will have no hesitation in saying I got it wrong, for me, admitting when I was wrong is vital to getting things right, not a weakness.
Page 7 of 60  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 60 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com