|
By:
which is good in a way, because neither do I
![]() |
|
By:
once in a calendar year? - i can barely remember yesterday yet alone, er, yesterday?
|
|
By:
Oh My God.
Come on let us have a sensible option (not Biased) to vote for and bury this in the sand once and for all, one way or another. You can't be as bad as this lot. Something tells me you must be Kinnock Reg ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Is a yearly limit of say 20 rest days to cover all holidays a silly suggestion
![]() |
|
By:
Yep, I thought I was being generous.
|
|
By:
you callin me a welsh windbag pete?
![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Your naps are better than your ideas china
![]() ![]() I feel like jumping off a bridge after listening to you lot. Apologies if anyone has lost a relative/friend this way. |
|
By:
Yours adds up to 46 a year pete doesn't it
![]() |
|
By:
These guys though it was a good idea
![]() |
|
By:
Tie yourself on a bungie Shane and I will sponsor you a quid.
|
|
By:
It is better than the existing 172.
|
|
By:
I'm sure this has been discussed before and someone will point out the downsides, which I'm sure there are many
![]() What if you didn't lose a £ for not posting or for losing and only winning naps contributed to the score? There would be little point keep picking odds on shots and naps would perhaps be more adventurous. Perhaps apply this only to the Premiership and keep all other leagues as is? With regards to the current situation. I feel if people advise, in advance, they are on holiday or unable to post an instruction should stand. If they just can't be arsed then they should lose a £.I think it at least shows courtesy to the settlers. Actually why did it change to automatic LRF for non posters? |
|
By:
Too much confusion for Settlers Sir but good points raised.
|
|
By:
We could start by just asking whether or not competitors approve of the LRF as it stands.
Unless a clear majority indicate not then it could be left alone. |
|
By:
Interesting idea for not losing regardless
Not sure i heard that one before The LRF was introduced to make it easier for settlers who were subject to high folluting convoluted instructions |
|
By:
Good suggestion KC.
|
|
By:
The only problem I have with LRF is, as I alluded to, people who just don't bother can gain. I think the crucial thing is that people should let the settler know they are not going to be around. If they get lucky and cop a good winner then so be it
|
|
By:
The problem with Sir Rembrandt's suggestion about odds-on shots ( and believe it or not I agree there is a bit of a problem ) is that it penalises people who put theirs up early. If you put up a 2-1 shot and the 1-2 fav is withdrawn that doesn't seem fair to me.
I think you'd better go with KC's suggeation re LRF. The odds-on thing is not the same issue. |
|
By:
Yep, totally agree Salmon, despite what people may think and my many grumbles about long odds on shots it really doesn't bother me if people choose an odds good thing, at least they have took the time to look.
At the end of the day if someone is beating the book by picking shorties nothing but applause is deserved. Though it does baffle me when relegation is out of the question why people do not go for promotion or the Championship? It is this LRF that IMO is the only thing that lets this League System down. |
|
By:
I have said enough on the issue and would welcome views from HKF and other members plus Reg will be getting sick of me by now so I am sure at the end of the day our leaders will find a suitable way forward. Good Night all and best of luck to everyone for the next 2 days except HKF
![]() |
|
By:
china castle idea seems "sensible" re 20 limit for year....say starting on 1st APRIL
![]() ......Though must be a pain in the xxxx keeping a record of it! |
|
By:
It is quite sensible but it's asking too much of the settlers. Remember most people will be in different divisions over the course of a year.
|
|
By:
When settling I felt that it was unfair that someone who didn't post was able to have a winner and move up the table at the expense of someone who had made the effort to post.
I would suggest that if someone is going away they are put on to the LRF as they are now (max 10 per month as currently) as long as they post in advance that they want the LRF and for what time period. At least then they have made a positive selection rather than being too idle to post. |
|
By:
bettysboy not many replies as title of thread says last race bleedin favs and that could mean someone just having a moan etc in general so why would all competitors as such bother to read it... a vote would need to be put on each separate divisions for a couple of days then hopefully you would get a quite high turnout imo
|
|
By:
good point and good night all.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
By:
I put Last Race Fav once, early on in the new system.
It won - Woo-hoo! However because I'd put an illegal selection, I got -£1 Those that didn't bother to take part in the competition, got their winning points |
|
By:
right boys....read the whole thread and gonna try to post a thought on all main points arising (you know I can never resist this!
![]() ). May come out as a jumble but have tried to do forumite - their point - my thoughts.All in a chronological order from start of thread. Here goes..... |
|
By:
China Castle max of 10 free days per month including Sundays, no LRF OK by me - means that anyone that gets a good priced early winner still has to keep posting
allows for holidays, business trips, family crises, computer failure. Then at end of month it's your decision as to whether to post but still compulsory with no duplicates on last day Shane cap LRF at 2/1 No - you either use LRF as is or bin it feast or famine you can post while on holiday you are obviously not married or don't go on very adventurous hplidays! do you seriously expect people to have to/want to pick a horse while they away? DFC Ironman laziness causes non posting I agree that LRF seriously encourages non-posting. Paying 1/3 odds….no way, just bin LRF. pay out LRF at third odds And who really wants to try to pick one out on a Monday when there are maybe 2 meetings with all Class 5 or worse racing Good reason to have 10 post free days per month as I see it! Holidays should be covered by allowing a designated tipster from the RP Naps table only and must be identified to the settler the day before you use them and once you have asked for it you cannot change your mind. The Norfolf Mafia no post -1 drastic for people that work away or take holidays - post free days is a better way? soldier of fortune must post if you are serious about the competition it isn't a serious competition - if I am on holiday or away on business I don't expect to have to post mates can post for them other people posting for you is one of the things that bugs me…if you can't sign in and post under your own name then you shouldn't be taking part I can't have RPR or R Goodfellow as my champion but I could get a mate to pick one for me…..how does that stack up? Steamship free days I agree but how many, or you select a champion for Naps table as we used to Shane again Sundays not compulsory free days cover this, some people will always post a Sunday good thing so there will always be some settling to be done salmon spray we don't all have 'pocket access to (quick internet) Agree - but having a holday and still being expected to post is the key fault I see. A holiday is a holiday! potlessagain too many shorties you pays your money and takes your choice. Not my cup of tea but if people want to pick 30 odds on shots and have a relatively high strike rate then it's up to us that are more adventurous to pick some better naps to out score them! Reged 10 free days max, last day compulsory I vote for this one poppydog LRF means late nights for settlers yeah - silly rule; but the old system did mean they had to be very aware of instructions so a bit of swings & roundabouts here alleged22 selections in the night before suits me fine as I do this anyway but really really can't see it being popular petemac no LRF and 3 rest days + 10 days holiday pretty good! I would say 5 rest days per month. Also 20 days holiday/business leave (no more than 10 in a single month), all with specific prior notification to the settler sirRembrandt only count days where you post can't get my head around why this seems 'wrong' but it seems a very strange way to run a naps table. would say that all divisions should operate to same rules and therefore same strategies apply |
|
By:
seems legible to me but then again I know what it's supposed to say!
Night! |
|
By:
So - in summary, my suggestion:
Ditch LRF Have max of 10 free non-postings per month. Everyone has to log in and post their own horse under their own user name. Last day rules to continue as is. Those that complain about 10 free days are missing the point…. You enter because you think you are better than your peers and wish to show this. Therefore, if you can post and they can't then you surely have the advantage as their monthly profit will stay the same and yours will surely go up when you selection bolts home? |
|
By:
^^^^^Have max of 10 free non-postings per month.^^^^^
How many f*cking days holiday do people have? |
|
By:
Well they already get 10 every month under the LRF rule....
|
|
By:
Have max of 10 free non-postings per month.
The point I was trying to make was, Have max of 10 free non-postings per year. |
|
By:
I thought it better to retire from this comp rather than keep pi55ing people off moaning about rules and
the negativity of others but as its being discussed here are my 6 eggs LRFs. a situation where someone can climb the table by not posting is completely wrong. if you cant post you should lose a pt NRs.a situation where someone can climb the table by selecting a NR is also completely wrong. minus a pt this should stop people deliberately trying to find NRs. 1HR rule.reducing it to half an hour would be a great help to some and no disadvantage to the others NO DUPLICATES LAST DAY.you should be allowed to pick what horse you fancy on EVERYDAY of the month,i can only assume this rule was first introduced to stop people copying the selectons of those below them to prevent them from being leapfrogged.shameful behavior imo.theres nothing to prevent this happening on all other days of the month so I see little point of it enforced on the last day only. the main problem in this comp I think is that there are too many people who are better at bending rules and exploiting loopholes than they are at picking winners. |
|
By:
Hi guys just waded through this thread .. its only my opinion .. but it will help the settlers
1 no last race fav 2 if you dont post any day -- 1 point thats it ....keep it simply . |
|
By:
Who gives a f*ck what you think?
|
|
By:
& i got banned for ?
FFS ![]() |
|
By:
Next month I'm rejoining and I'm going to pick the LRF (or the BF fav 1 hr before) so you can all cry and gnash your teeth when I win the Prem in a few months time.
![]() |
|
By:
TNM is just a mad stalker I seem to have picked up madhatter. I don't report his unwelcome attentions as I assume he will soon be picked up and returned to Rampton ( Geriatric Unit ).
|