Tradefair & Financials
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 339 comments are related to the topic:
AAPL - is anyone paying attention?
AAPL - is anyone paying attention?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 339
|
By:
I'm expecting some more references to dog shhit.
|
|
By:
You know allright Menelaus, you know now.
I'll donate £50,000 to a charity of your choice if the trade exists. - menelaus 10.23 last night. I admire you for posting that, and you're right, a man's good name is worth any amount. "Who steals my purse steals trash, but if you jack my good name I lose my soul," to paraphrase Shakespeare. Of course, I don't want you to pay £50,000, that would be disproportionate (and what would you tell your wife) and I understand that you were in "keyboard warrior" mode at the time. You're forgiven that lapse. Pay £500 to the worthy charity SANE and post the evidence here (no rush, you can take a week). |
|
By:
biscuits, was the statement altered in ANY way? Yes, or no?
|
|
By:
@ the "passing through" psychopath
How does it feel to start your day, everyday, by sniffing my balls? |
|
By:
My name and address was erased, otherwise the document is completely unaltered.
I refer you to an earlier response that you provoked from me, don't ever suppose that I think enough of you to lie to you. Just pay up. |
|
By:
Really, "otherwise" everything is okay?
Would you accept payment from anyone who claimed he had just one counterfeit fiver in their pocket? I don't think so. |
|
By:
It's a contract note from Rowan Dartington. If you need to make an utter fool of yourself, drop an email to John Scott tomorrow,identifying yourself Menelaus, and I'll give him permission to verify the trade.
There's only one way to protect your self-respect Menelaus, donate £500 to SANE by this time next week. |
|
By:
My self respect is intact mate, I'm not the one "erasing" but claiming "otherwise" everything is okay.
And no, you're not sending me on a merry-go-round just to get your kicks. Why is the burden on me to prove anything when you first attempt at offering proof was a fail? I'll say it again, only you know if the trade or what you posted is real. Erasing and claiming "trust me everything else is okay" doesn't however embolden your case. If it is real, I can only conclude what I already posted, that you somehow came into money. Clueless mugs like you are usually found lining up for soup at the Church mission, not trading the markets. |
|
By:
So you disown your own words. You can't stand behind them, so anything you have written before is rendered bogus, anything you write in the future cannot be taken at face value,your words mean nothing, because you crawl away from them under pressure. Your character must then impact on the real world, where you cannot be trusted in your professional nor in your personal life. You're hollow. Anything you post from here on out means nothing, because there's nothing behind the bluster.
Crawl away, you effusive onanist. I've seen more backbone in a tin of sardines. |
|
By:
You made a very magnanimous victory offer UB.
Menelaus has just shown his true colours. Nobody is really surprised by this outcome. Even ignoring the dishonoured bet, we have not even seen a hint of an apology from him for calling you a liar. It would in truth have been more surprising if it hadn't all ended this way. He's a shallow person with not a shred of decency in him. |
|
By:
You're busted on this thread Menelaus, you haven't got any honour, you haven't got any balls, you're exposed for the invertebrate onanist that you are.
PS Are you coming to the betfair Xmas do? If you do, I'll come too, and you will apologize supine on the carpet to me. |
|
By:
You ALTERED the statement that took you forever and a day to put up. That's makes everything you say and do beyond that point SUSPECT. Everything else you say beyond this point is eye wash. End of story.
And you can call me all the names you wish under the sun, that doesn't make you any less clueless. @ white space trash : I have one halfwit sniffing my balls on here everyday, I don't need a second. |
|
By:
Was that simple enough for both of you to understand, or did I use too many words?
|
|
By:
Yep we understand everything about you.
Perhaps the best analogy in the context of this thread, is that you are truly a rotten apple. Keep posting away. You've been called out on a very basic point of honour, and you have failed miserably. As you say, end of story. |
|
By:
Hmmmm, just as I thought, too many words for the pea brained white space numbskull.
|
|
By:
A word of advice.
I think it would be in your best interests to try to let this thread die out soonest. |
|
By:
You ALTERED the statement that took you forever and a day to put up. That's makes everything you say and do beyond that point SUSPECT.
But, you've already acknowledged that he had to erase certain personal details. He's given you a perfectly reasonable option to verify that the trade is real, and yet you don't take it. Your reputation is in tatters. |
|
By:
Really? I acknowledged "he had to"? A little pressumptuous on your part, no?
He ALTERED it, that by definition makes it SUSPECT. Would you accept a cheque from someone who admits the cheque has been altered in some way? I don't think so. Why should I accept at face value anything this mug says? The "reasonable option" entails me putting an effort into something it is the counterfeiters job to rectify and prove not mine. Again, I hope that wasn't too many words. |
|
By:
But, given that you admit how simple it is to photoshop anything - even a few short time limit here would be pointless - the only way that you can possibly verify anything is to do what he has suggested (email the broker). You presumably have been aware of that all along, and so your original charity offer, if you were never prepared to do your part in convincing yourself of his veracity, was not honestly made.
|
|
By:
BTW, it's 'presumptuous'. Perhaps stick to simpler words in future.
|
|
By:
Thanks for pointing out the spelling mistake, at least it proves that you are not totally useless.
And WRONG, speed is of the essence when trying to prove something is genuine. He could have immediately posted that within minutes if not seconds, had it not required "alterations". It's suspect, get over it, or go play some honest three card monte down the street if you are that naive. |
|
By:
No, the doctoring would take seconds. He's given you the only reasonable option to verify the claim. If you don't want to take it, and prefer to renege on your offer, I suggest you leave this forum for good and never come back.
|
|
By:
Are you coming to the Christmas dinner?
|
|
By:
If the irony was lost on you in my generous "offer", then you are thicker than I thought. Read my post again.....SLOWLY. Once the big delay set in, I knew what will get put up was subject to doctoring. I was right.
As far as you Xmas party question goes, I saw a man in a bowler hat this morning on the way to work. |
|
By:
Nope ? My good advice was ignored .
Well I suppose you are, after all, fully entitled to decide on the the length of, and how public or private, the funeral of your reputation is. It's quite simple. You made a bet. You lost. You didn't pay up. On a sports betting site that is the ultimate no-no. I would suggest you seriously consider packing up and transferring your posting forays to another site, where your reputation is as yet unknown and trust in anything you say is intact. It isn't on here forever from this day on, that's for sure. |
|
By:
Oh FFS, someone please stop this numbskull , hlafitted POS who is obsessed on coming on top of all of my posts.
It's not having to tip toe through the sh1t he drops on here that's bothering me, it's having to hold my nose all the time that gets me. |
|
By:
Come on Contrarian mate, you're slipping, I spelled halfwitted wrong FFS.
|
|
By:
Oh FFS, someone please stop this numskull, halfwitted POS who is obsessed with being top dog.
( nice dog analogy put in there just for you ). You can run Menelaus but you can't hide. You obfuscate all you want, but the bottom line is that you've been exposed. The emperor has no clothes. |
|
By:
"==You can obfuscate --- ".
Seeing that we're all becoming pedantic on here about typos etc. |
|
By:
Hmmmm, I need to think of another word, this chap passed the halfwitted marker long ago.
|
|
By:
Contrarian
Have you yet noticed, as most of us others have on here, that Menelaus slips in the word " mate" when he losing arguments ? Btw in response to your observation on his use of the phrase " my bad", I believe that is some sort of lame attempt for him to appear to be some sort of cool dude with street cred, or someting juvenile like that. |
|
By:
...looooong ago.
|
|
By:
Menelaus
Have you ever taken a hint in your life ?. Or perhaps I should ask have you ever recognized a hint in your life ?. You're pretty much getting them from everyone on here. You can't really be that insensitive, can you ? |
|
By:
feck, may be I have all wrong. May be it wasn't looooong ago, he was born that way.
|
|
By:
I think you were certainly born your way.
Couldn't have been taught to you by any education system I'm aware of. |
|
By:
I can't see your posts you dumb feck, *that's* the whole point. I know you are p1ss1ng on my posts but I couldn't give a rats a$$ what you have to say.
You are talking to yourself.  |
|
By:
Biscuits
You over value the knave. Ask him to donate what amounts to his true merit. That will be commensurate with what remains of his tattered honour. A penny should do it. Make sure they refund his change though. Fair is fair. |
|
By:
Only one question remains:
WHY? |
|
By:
chatlame will answer your question......oh, wait....
|
|
By:
They can all now see you are butt naked. You thought you were the king. You are. The king of comedy.
|