Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 605 comments are related to the topic:
2017 2000 Guineas

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 15 of 16  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 605
By:
impossible123
When: 05 May 17 17:07
Nothing to worry, Al Wukair is in every bookie's website though.
By:
sinfin
When: 05 May 17 17:29
its also on oddscheckers day of the race market but not the anti post list
By:
lordnoise
When: 05 May 17 21:07
Just looking at Churchills breeding and noticing that previous O'Brien 2000 winner Gleneagles was by Galileo out of a Storm Cat mare too. If you were determined to find a 'chink' in Churchills armour however the 2015 Guineas is talked about as not being a great renewal and there are a couple of Galileo/Storm Cat fillies beaten in the 1000 Gns (Misty For Me and Ballydoyle). Another interesting breeding note is that the Fabre trained Territories second to Gleneagles in 2015 was out of a Machiavellian mare like Al Wukair ...
By:
lordnoise
When: 05 May 17 21:41
Gleneagles pre-Guineas form                                                                             OR      TS      RPR
05Oct14    Lon 2yG1 167K    7f    Gd    9-0    1d/9 btn Full Mast 9-0    9/4    J O'Brien    —            78    114
14Sep14    Cur 2yG1 148K    7f    GF    9-3    1/5 by 1½L Toscanini 9-3    1/3F    J O'Brien    113    83    116
24Aug14    Cur 2yG2 51K    7f    GF    9-3    1/5 by ¾L The Monarch 9-3    8/13F    J O'Brien    107    76    116
24Jul14    Leo 2yG3 33K    7f    GF    9-3    1/3 by ¾L Tombelaine 9-3    4/7F    J O'Brien    —    42    105
29Jun14    Cur 2yMd 11K    7f    GF    9-5    1/11 by 2½L Stevie's Wonder 9-2    EvensF    J O'Brien    —    66    92
06Jun14    Leo 2yMd 10K    7f    Gd    9-5    4/10 btn 3¼L Convergence 9-2    11/8F    C O'Donoghue    —    23    81

Churchills pre-Guineas form

DATE        DIST.    GNG.    WGT / HDGR    POS. FINISH DIST / WINNER or RUNNER-UP / WGT    SP    JOCKEY    OR    TS    RPR
08Oct16    Nmk C12yG1 284K    7f    Gd    9-1    1/7 by 1¼L Lancaster Bomber 9-1    8/11F    R L Moore    —            100    121
11Sep16    Cur 2yG1 149K    7f    Y    9-3    1/7 by 4¼L Mehmas 9-3    4/5F    R L Moore                    111    104     120
21Aug16    Cur 2yG2 57K    7f    Y/Sft    9-3    1/4 by 2L Radio Silence 9-3    1/4F    J A Heffernan            109    87    111
21Jul16    Leo 2yG3 26K    7f    GF    9-3    1/6 by nk Alexios Komnenos 9-3    2/5F    R L Moore    —            76    106
18Jun16    Asc C12yL 45K    7f    GS    9-3    1/13 by ½L Isomer 9-3    8/11F    R L Moore    —                    91    100
22May16    Cur 2yMd 8K    6f    Sft    9-5    3/11 btn 2½L Van Der Decken 9-5    2/1F    R L Moore    —            34    79
By:
Charlton2005
When: 06 May 17 07:44
i still can't make out how he has managed to get a rating of 122 and the racing post ratings have him running to 121 i just don't know where this rating has been found, i can only presume the national stakes beating the sprinter mehmas 4l has sealed the deal but the runner up is clearly better on better going and didn't get home that day...lockheed a nice type although beaten in lesser grade also holds the form down and who also would prefer better ground he ran third but both the placed horses prefer better ground and churchill clearly doesn't mind ground with cut

agree. I was looking at this last night. His last run was 121 but the 2nd was 116 on that and his two other best runs were 110. So really churchill should be 115 on that ( 2 less than wukair). so the only race that has him at 121 is beating mehmas. however similar logic applies looking at the 3rd/4th in that race. def overrated in my opinion and nowhere near a 6/4 chance in reality.

gl all
By:
Charlton2005
When: 06 May 17 07:48

Jack Bauer '24' 04 May 17 01:48 Joined: 30 May 02 | Topic/replies: 6,034 | Blogger: Jack Bauer '24''s blog
Since then Frankel, Dawn Approach and Gleneagles have all won.


so 5/16. abit rough and ready but that seems about right. when i see 100/30 ill say we are at the right price
By:
Charlton2005
When: 06 May 17 07:50
Jack Bauer '24'
Date Joined:    30 May 02
Add contact | Send message
04 May 17 16:59 Joined: 30 May 02 | Topic/replies: 6,034 | Blogger: Jack Bauer '24''s blog
Not going for the Dante then?

Laugh
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 06 May 17 12:09
Backed and traded Lancaster Bomber for a free bet. In addition backed Churchill win and Al Wukair and Barney Roy both each way to net a small profit.
By:
A_T
When: 06 May 17 12:23
Churchill is obvious it's the only one that's even run in a G1 before -  but that means the others are unexposed and could be anything. However the fact Ballydoyle has no other serious entry would appear to show confidence in it. Price is too short though for a horse 6 months without a race so I'll go with a (hopefully) progressive type Al Wukair.
By:
kincsem
When: 06 May 17 12:23
Backed Top Score.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 13:13
I'm pretty confident after what I saw of Churchill last year, in particular the National Stakes, he isn't an exceptional miler. However, he might not need to be here as there doesn't appear to be a potential outstanding miler among the opposition. I have him closely matched with his main opponents in the betting but average improvement from last year would put him clear of the pack. Unlike his main opponents he'll be a fresh horse and his trainer has proved more adept than most at having them ready for the big day. That said, with three runners breathing down his neck also capable of progress and the possibility he may not have improved since last year I reckon his price is too short. At around 6/4 I think the long term advantage is in favour of the layers with this type of situation. I'll wait to see how he compares in the paddock and if the next three in the betting appear to have thrived or gone backwards since the trials, with the intention of laying him just to win an average stake.
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 13:19
I'm going to disagree with you on this one Figgis, just about the value. The more I've considered the race, the more I think Churchill is an even money shot, not because he's exceptional but because his three apparent rivals all have big questions to answer. I'd lay him at evens but back at 6-4.
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 13:20
Meant to say lay him at any odds on price.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 13:26
Howellsy, that's fair enough, but don't you think there also has to be at least some doubt about Churchill considering he hasn't run since last year?
By:
Graeme83
When: 06 May 17 13:40
1- churchill
2 - Larchmont lad
3 - spirit of valor
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 13:41
Hard to say there's no doubt, but the percentage call for me is to assume he'll replicate the Dewhurst form with a few pounds more for the mile. I trust son of Galileo, as opposed to the American breds which have let the side down a few times. I can't see a logical reason for him to not train on, being by Galileo. It'll be interesting to see the betting close to the off.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 13:55
described by his trainer as "probably the most imposing colt we've trained"

It seems every year now O'Brien describes the latest Coolmore hope as "the best", "the fastest" or "the most" something or over. Maybe he's right this time, to my untrained eye Churchill certainly looked imposing. I have to wonder, though, when a trainer kind of falls for a horse's looks if it colours his overall judgement of it. Churchill is obviously a decent horse and it must be nice to see such a fine looking animal go through his paces at home. Personally, speed wise I have Churchill some way behind O'Brien's previous best 2yos. Anyway as I said he might not need to be exceptional today.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 13:58
*something or other
By:
Graeme83
When: 06 May 17 15:12
Fav by 2 lengths or more 7/2. I know he's not exhuberant, but to me it's a fair price.
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 15:21
Bit of a drift!
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 15:31
Looks like Churchill doesn't hold as much of a physical advantage as he did last year, although that was probably to be expected and he looked well enough to me, I've laid him anyway.
By:
impossible123
When: 06 May 17 16:02
Churchill had a lovely passage aided and abetted by stablemate Lancaster Bomber who ran above his form; Epsom Derby or Irish 2000G and the St James's Palace Stakes.
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 16:06
Or an annoying little injury which doesn't quite go away and forces a retirement.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 16:09
Churchill always looked to be travelling best, did it well enough and was a worthy winner. Not a bad time but I have it as the worst since Haafhd a few years ago, hence the relatively bunched finish. How much that was purely due to the early pace I don't know at this stage. Looking forward I'm still not convinced Churchill is an outstanding miler but as he is likely to get a pretty easy ride mopping up the Irish Guineas and/or the SJP probably facing pretty much the same opposition it will be difficult to oppose him in the near future. I'll probably have to wait till he meets his elders. Well done winners.
By:
impossible123
When: 06 May 17 16:10
Be sporting, no one wants an injury to any horse, supporter or not. If sound, and enjoys the game let the horse runs otherwise retire them eg Air Force Blue.

Barney Roy was rather unlucky, and did not seem to enjoy the dip.
By:
A_T
When: 06 May 17 16:19
Dante next?
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 16:30
Be sporting, no one wants an injury to any horse, supporter or not

Yeah Howellsy you unsporting sour grape merchant Wink

Even though you'd stated the horse was a bet at 6/4 Grin
By:
impossible123
When: 06 May 17 17:02
I doubt it now having won this race - there is no need - but could go straight to Epsom Derby if the Coolmore boys choose similar to Australia; then the St James's Palace Stakes (SJPS). If by passing the Epsom Derby the Irish 2000g is a near certainty, wuth the SJPS next.

If no stand-out candidate from Coolmore for the Epsom Derby Churchill's chance of running there will be enhanced; Coolmore fielded 5 in 2016, 3 in 2015 and 4 in 2014.

Lancaster Bomber ensured a decent pace today and left a space for Churchill on the inside soon after the false rail to cut-in at the 3f pole, and that helps greatly - Barney Roy and  Al Wukair did not have this assistance.
By:
Howellsy
When: 06 May 17 17:06
What can you do Figgis!? Anyway, I think everything went right for Churchill today - no matter how 'seasoned' the horse is, it does help when the jockey seems to have learnt that the stands' rail might not be a disadvantageous place to be. I guess there are several factors to consider but all things being equal I'd expect Barney Roy to beat Churchill in Ireland - however, it might just be prudent to wait until Ascot. A messy race at the Curragh with that dog leg might not be what's needed next for BR. It does set up the season somewhat.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 17:22
Yes I agree that Moore was better positioned given the way the race was run and kept it suitably simple. Possibly the second and third were a little disadvantaged but I thought Churchill had more natural easy speed and I'm not sure the others were disadvantaged enough to excuse being beaten a length. Much will depend on how each horse takes the race and develops from here and I don't have any firm opinion on that.
By:
impossible123
When: 06 May 17 17:53
I think the two unlucky horses were Barney Roy and Al Wukair - they were done by a lack of pace and position. Does anyone think at least one of these two horses can overturn the result with Churchill either in the Irish 2000G or the St James's Palace Stakes at Ascot especially if the ground was softer?; I think the win of Churchill were mainly down to the smooth passage he had, and the false rail. If so, connections of Churchill could take the Epsom Derby route instead, I'd imagine.
By:
lewisham ranger
When: 06 May 17 17:54
I'm surprised you wanted to lay Churchill figgis. Call it aftertiming although I did say on here that I thought the horse would win beforehand.

Just the horses looks, the fact that it was trained by the master of the 2000, his breeding, the fact that the jockey was so effusive about him, everything screamed 2000 guineas winner. I think the horse is a finder. I don't think it's deceptive and in fact he does just do enough. Anyone taking him on in future is foolhardy, imo.
By:
lewisham ranger
When: 06 May 17 17:56
and what older horses would you take him on with? name a great older miler, I can't think of any. You'd have to be a significantly better horse than Churchill to beat him because he'll always battle.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 18:08
I thought the horse would win beforehand

As I said before, the forum is split between the will win or should win punters and ones who think more about what chance they think the horse has and price it should be. Gun to my head Churchill was the most likely winner but not as short as a 6/4 shot. If Air Force Blue had won last year then his backers, of which there were many, would have said everyone who opposed him had overlooked the obvious. I rated Churchill nearer a 2/1 chance, maybe I was wrong, but 2/1 chances are expected to win 1 in every 3 opportunities so it's not exactly a shock when they win, even to their layers. Air Force Blue was a 4/5 shot last year, he was beaten so people would say afterwards that he was a poor bet, but 4/5 shots are expected to be beaten 4 out of every 9 times so that doesn't prove anything on its own.

Anyone taking him on in future is foolhardy, imo

As with all of my bets it will depend on his price at the time.
By:
Figgis
When: 06 May 17 18:27
and what older horses would you take him on with? name a great older miler, I can't think of any

Impossible to say as we're not even into Royal Ascot. Gleneagles was supposed to be O'Brien's best ever miler but he did diddly squat after he'd beaten his own age group.

You'd have to be a significantly better horse than Churchill to beat him because he'll always battle

Significantly better? Do you think a horse can bridge, say, a length and a half difference in ability just through battling qualities?
By:
unclepuncle
When: 06 May 17 20:24
Well done backers.

The race couldn't have worked out better for him, and it was obvious after a furlong that Lancaster Bomber would tow him to the cut away at the 2f marker and then Ryan would cut to the rail and quicken up. Equally though you also have to be good enough to take advantage and Churchill clearly was.

I expressed reservations about the track for Al Wukair and Barney Roy and if they were to meet Churchill on a more conventional flat track (not likely to happen) I'd fancy Al Wukair to come out on top. The fact they gave up an obvious (odds on?) chance of winning the French version shows just how much more prestigious the English version is. Maybe Teresa May can use that in her Brexit negotiations.Laugh

Eminent may well have bounced having had a hard race in the Craven, and after all the talk about him wanting further they made the classic rookie mistake ofthey trying to ride him handy, but of course that just nullified his finishing effort which had previously been his calling card. He still wasn't beaten all that far and may have his day in something like the Eclipse.
By:
jedi sophie
When: 07 May 17 11:56
Moore ride exemplary, very much like Gleneagles win, jockeys on 2nd,3rd all over the shop as Moore went for home!Best horse won though,no doubt!
By:
ffs
When: 08 May 17 15:28
I'll after-time this and say yes I was confident about Churchill, particularly because of Course form - but in fact not overly so, as the trials did throw up proper horses - did my proper punting in the Jockey Club Stakes and had a Churchill win, Lancaster e/w and RV forecast -

Going Forward though ..

Firstly) Either one / both of Barney Roy and Eminent can't have given their true running as they were asked to go again after minimal rest,

Secondly) My impression of Eminent is predictably that he's much more like a Derby horse, the way he ran through the line in his previous race, the way he was readily outpaced by Churchill

Thirdly) Barney Roy didn't handle the dip - which was the crucial factor in backing Churchill (if you doubted Eminent), for all that he looks v forward

Fourthly) The only horse to gain ground on Churchill was the lightly-built Al Wukair who has potentially the most of the others up his sleeve for the rest of the season

Finally) Churchill won snug. He took 2L out of Lancaster Bomber when asked to go on and from then he just idled, Have no doubts if something came to eyeball him he'd have found again.
By:
Figgis
When: 21 May 17 13:33
So we finally get to see Caravaggio again today. Something still not quite right here for me. Okay we can put the earlier dithering down to stamina doubts but this is a horse unbeaten as a 2yo who has already won a Gp1, so why drop him down to Gp3 level? I can understand a Derby type horse given a run in lower class as he'd need the experience but this runner doesn't lack experience. Is it just that he's ring rusty? Surely not if we believe all the comments O'Brien has made about the speed he's showing. Anyway he has so much in hand today that he should win whether needing the run or not, I just wonder about him going forward and have niggling doubts that he may not train on.
By:
Figgis
When: 21 May 17 16:55
Well Caravaggio won as his form entitled him to. I could see no improvement on last year, beating Psychedelic Funk the same margin he beat him in the Coventry. It was only a prep race though so you wouldn't expect him to do too much, and the fact he took a bit of time to pick up I don't see as anything to worry about. He appeared much more powerful than his opponents as a 2yo, galloping all over them, but this time I just wasn't anywhere near as impressed with him physically during the run. I don't know, maybe I'm being unduly negative about him as a 3yo but the doubts remain.
Page 15 of 16  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com