Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 842 comments are related to the topic:
Why doesn't a system of laying the favourite in every race work?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 21 of 22  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 842
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 12:57
Hi - if you read the post above I explain what I do / would do and why.

yesterday matching was difficult. Today could be easier - who knows ? Utlimately racing has its ups and downs and returns to the mean averages. Thats why to an extent it's predicatable and why this method works.
Like I say, if you cant get matched the stake to get back the margin/spread. I explained that bit as well.

ok?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 13:10
Yesterday wasnt great but it was just about ok.

Some days are spectacular where by you gain 20% and others you can lose 20% of your bank.
It always evens out.

But if you beat bookies SP by 16% using the ideas I have explained then it works.

04-06-2014

Start Bank 100 
Stake target 2.5% of bank
Total races 42
Favs 18/42, SR 42.86%,
Ave SP 2.54 (100/2.54 = 39.37%)
Ave Margin SP 2.23  (100/2.23 = 44.84%)


14:10 Font        5/2F      3.1    --    94.75, 1, 1, 1, owed 5.25, Stk 2.5
14:20 Nott        7/4JF     1.235    --    94.16, 2, 2, 2, owed 5.84, Stk 2.5
14:30 Sout        8/1      --8--    9    96.54, 1, 3, 3, owed 3.46, Stk 2.5
14:40 Font        8/11F      1.61    --    95.01, 2, 4, 4, owed 4.99, Stk 2.5
14:50 Nott        7/1      --7--    7    97.39, 1, 5, 5, owed 2.61, Stk 2.5
15:00 Sout        11/10F      1.92    --    95.09, 2, 6, 6, owed 4.91, Stk 2.5
15:10 Font        1/1F      1.84    --    92.99, 3, 7, 7, owed 7.01, Stk 2.5
15:20 Nott        9/2      --4.5--    9    95.36, 2, 8, 8, owed 4.64, Stk 2.5
15:30 Sout        5/6F      1.7    --    93.61, 3, 9, 9, owed 6.39, Stk 2.5
15:40 Font        4/1F      4.36    --    85.21, 4, 10, 10, owed 14.79, Stk 2.5
15:50 Nott        8/1      --8--    5    87.59, 3, 11, 11, owed 12.41, Stk 2.5
16:00 Sout        7/1      --7--    7    89.96, 2, 12, 12, owed 10.04, Stk 2.5
16:10 Font        9/4      --2.25--    7    92.34, 1, 13, 13, owed 7.66, Stk 2.5
16:20 Nott        4/1      --4--    6    94.71, 0, 0, 13, owed 5.29, Stk 2.5
16:30 Sout        2/1F      2.68    --    90.51, 1, 1, 13, owed 9.49, Stk 2.5
16:40 Font        12/1      --12--    8    92.89, 0, 0, 13, owed 7.11, Stk 2.5
16:50 Nott        9/2      --4.5--    7    95.26, 0, 0, 13, owed 4.74, Stk 2.5
17:00 Sout        10/11F      1.76    --    93.36, 1, 1, 13, owed 6.64, Stk 2.5
17:10 Font        14/1      --14--    6    95.74, 0, 0, 13, owed 4.26, Stk 2.5
17:20 Nott        5/1      --5--    6    98.11, 0, 0, 13, owed 1.89, Stk 2.5
17:30 Sout        9/2      --4.5--    10    100.49, 0, 0, 13, owed 0, Stk 2.51
17:40 Font        1/1F      1.84    --    98.38, 1, 1, 13, owed 2.11, Stk 2.51
17:50 Punc        2/9F      1.18    --    97.93, 2, 2, 13, owed 2.56, Stk 2.51
18:00 Kemp        7/2      --3.5--    11    100.31, 1, 3, 13, owed 0.18, Stk 2.51
18:20 Punc        3/1F      3.52    --    93.98, 2, 4, 13, owed 6.51, Stk 2.51
18:30 Kemp        9/2      --4.5--    8    96.37, 1, 5, 13, owed 4.12, Stk 2.51
18:40 Ripo        10/1      --10--    8    98.75, 0, 0, 13, owed 1.73, Stk 2.51
18:50 Punc        12/1      --12--    22    101.14, 0, 0, 13, owed 0, Stk 2.53
19:00 Kemp        7/1      --7--    14    103.54, 0, 0, 13, owed 0, Stk 2.59
19:10 Ripo        5/6F      1.7    --    101.73, 1, 1, 13, owed 1.81, Stk 2.59
19:20 Punc        5/1      --5--    25    104.19, 0, 0, 13, owed 0, Stk 2.6
19:30 Kemp        8/1      --8--    13    106.66, 0, 0, 13, owed 0, Stk 2.67
19:40 Ripo        1/1F      1.84    --    104.42, 1, 1, 13, owed 2.24, Stk 2.67
19:50 Punc        7/4F      2.47    --    100.5, 2, 2, 13, owed 6.16, Stk 2.67
20:00 Kemp        7/4F      2.47    --    96.58, 3, 3, 13, owed 10.08, Stk 2.67
20:10 Ripo        14/1      --14--    7    99.12, 2, 4, 13, owed 7.55, Stk 2.67
20:20 Punc        9/1      --9--    18    101.65, 1, 5, 13, owed 5.01, Stk 2.67
20:30 Kemp        11/4F      3.31    --    95.49, 2, 6, 13, owed 11.17, Stk 2.67
20:40 Ripo        2/1      --2--    8    98.02, 1, 7, 13, owed 8.64, Stk 2.67
20:50 Punc        4/6F      1.56    --    96.53, 2, 8, 13, owed 10.13, Stk 2.67
21:00 Kemp        9/2      --4.5--    12    99.06, 1, 9, 13, owed 7.6, Stk 2.67
21:10 Ripo        6/1      --6--    5    101.6, 0, 0, 13, owed 5.07, Stk 2.67


This was based on simple ratchet staking.

You can get matched in running, reduce the stake by dutching, or stake to get back the difference between what the odds should be and what you matched.
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 14:35
Thanks for your responses Lex.

2.30 I was unmatched but you layed at 8/1 ?

also what are the figures after the odds, 3rd/4th columns ?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:32
the 2.30 had a 8/1 winner eg the fav lost Laugh

3rd column is the price you needed to be matched at if it was favourite
4th column is the bank after the result.
the other bits are secret Laugh
owed is... er.. what I'm owed
and 'Stk'  is probably the stake.

the bank did reach 106.66 which explains the stk =  2.67

simples Cool
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:37
Heres another eye opener .... did you know that if you raised your bank by only 2.5% every day for a month you would double it?

if you cant win £2.5 with a £100 bank every day you're a peanut.

100     2.5
102.5   2.56
105.06  2.62


etc etc  - dont forget the commission - yawn... Laugh
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 15:38
aaah ok thanks. Whats the number before the running bank total,sometimes theres no number just a dash ?

--9-7--9--5776 etc ? or is that the secret bit ?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:39
and thats 400k a year.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:40
if I told you I would have to shoot you...  Laugh
By:
kenilworth
When: 05 Jun 14 15:47
Impossible to win £2.50 every day from
any bank.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:49
dont be silly kenilworth.
Its almost impossible not to.
By:
DOUBLED
When: 05 Jun 14 15:49
nothing is impossible imo Cool
By:
kenilworth
When: 05 Jun 14 15:54
It's possible to average £2.50 per day
but not to win that amount every day.
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 15:55
2.30 southwell 7/4 fav unmatched,but you staked 2.5 on something.what was it ?
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 15:56
tell me then shoot me,at least i'd die happy Happy
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 15:56
ok, I'll agree with that - mostly.  some days everything goes wrong and sometimes youre Midas.
My biggest regret is lacking discipline.

fast women and slow horses has long been my downfall   Laugh
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 15:59
i wouldnt call that a downfall
By:
kenilworth
When: 05 Jun 14 16:00
DOUBLED
Joined: 15 Feb 03
Replies: 947
    05 Jun 14 15:49
   
nothing is impossible imo


You proved that some time ago when
you turned a decent level stake profit
into a loss by using a magical staking
plan if my memory serves me correctly,
and that takes some doing.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:05
look at the next at ling 16:10  whats fav? would you lay a 5.5 fav anyways? its unlukely to win, but if it does it could upset you for the day!

What would you do TTT ? come on, have a think....
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:10
Money coming for Daisy boy 4.0  now...  seriously overbet. Is it a well plotted gamble or is it Billy Hill's  traders having a melt down? would you risk laying it?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:11
or can you think 'out of the box' ?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:12
off at 3.5 ISP Ive laid it at 3.0's - why?
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:15
What's that smell??? its me !   Daisy boy losses - phew ...!

But do you see why I laid it? and what if it dont get matched and what if it did and it won?


if you can answer that, I reckon you're on my wavelength - (not necessarily a good thing though!)
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 05 Jun 14 16:28
i cant think full stop,never mind out of the box.

If not matched you lose nothing,if it wins you pay out at 2/1
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:40
if not matched you lost a winner, add it to your ratchet
if matched and won, you got a winner cos it was value.


or lay at BSP and stake to get back the spread.

if you dont like the risk dont bet or go for a big spread.

yep I know... its bonkers.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:42
funny old thing stats...no favs for 8 races then up pops ski slope 5/4 at 16:40 lingers. Its short cos the bookies know that despite the form its statisitaclly very strong.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:43
Lex is right again and it won. Did I lay it ? yes.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:46
16:50 Southwell Rainbow rock is also solid. so lay it well below ISP - do I care if it wins? nope.
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:49
BTW I play lots of angles. I quite like Elysian to place....
By:
Lex
When: 05 Jun 14 16:55
thats enough for now. I'm off to change me shorts....Laugh
By:
sheppy123
When: 07 Jun 14 12:19
Hi Lex!Happy

Do you actually have to watch the race for your system to work???
By:
Lex
When: 07 Jun 14 14:43
No. Lay them all at BFSP then stake to get back as required next day.
But you can't ratchet at all effectively and you're staking more than required so you would use a bigger bank/smaller %
Remember only stake to get back the spread not the whole loss.
By:
sheppy123
When: 07 Jun 14 16:33
That's rocket science to me Lex!Laugh

You've given me some hope though so thanks!Happy

Hope you didn't lay Australia???
By:
Lex
When: 07 Jun 14 17:46
if you remember "no favs for 8 races"  so I actually backed it.
By:
Beat The OverRound
When: 25 Jun 14 04:58
Boy oh boy this has risen from the ashes like a geriatric phoenix, or perhaps I'm Lazarus.

I don't agree with some of Lex's ideas, BUT remember Tame The Tiger and Kenilworth from way back, there is something Lex has said that I was trying to impart years ago.....

Some days all your lays will get matched and it will seem like they are all winners :(
You say it's rubbish and give up the ghost.
Other days you break even.
A few days later you fill the bag with them all getting matched and going down the gurgler.
Also you don't want to be laying below sp at the final furlong in my opinion, you want it to either be overbet early and something happens, or cancel it.
A day, a few days, even a week is not enough trialling.
Build some stats with minimum stakes and see how you go for the month.


P.S. BaconT, my PM earlier was to laying the field at SP. Sorry different topic.

Now, IF you feel that all your in running lay bets are winning, what should you do?
Back them pre off or at SP and lay in running for half the stake at reduced odds.

You see over time you will lose all the back stake on non winners, BUT because you have laid the winners at even much greater reduced odds (Back / Lay difference PLUS reduced odds)
You can alter the stakes similar to LEX, not in martingale fashion, but on a daily basis.
Never go race to race EVER. One can also do exactly the same in the place market, so you have two bites of the cherry.
Carte Blanche is not the answer, favourite price, track and race type, distance, odds movement all play a part in the actual staking, still can be done every race, just staked according to RISK.
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 03 Aug 14 11:44
Happy
By:
moneyforoldrope
When: 25 Sep 14 23:27
let me get this straight.

If i have 1 million pounds in my account, i know nothing about horse racing, but decide i'd like to make £50 per day, I would not be able to do this laying each fav until one comes in for me accounting for the losses incurred on each bet up to that point?

If the answer no then the issue isnt the system but the staking plan.

I'm not advising this, i bet for fun but it seems to me that if u have a bank big enough to incur potential losses then youll be fine if u can work out how much of a losing run your bank can take, yes u will never know but all you're asking is one fav to lose, thats it, DONE!
By:
moneyforoldrope
When: 27 Sep 14 15:30
Anyone?
By:
Keefter
When: 28 Sep 14 06:41
Martingale system moneyforoldrope. It's been visited many many times. If you were to hit a run of winning favourites it would spiral out to amounts you would struggle to get on quite quickly. For simplicity assuming every fav is even money after 8 winning favs in a row you are now betting over 12k, get to 12 winning favs in a row and you've passed the 100k mark. How common is it to get get 12 winning favs in a row? pretty uncommon i would imagine. you would need to optimise the system to deal with specific odds ranges, I would say all favs priced 1.50 to 2.00 and I would use some sort of adapted fibonaci sequence for the betting. why does it have to be a daily thing though? if you just do until you win and start over? eventually in the long long term you will go bust or will fail to get your giant bet matched.
By:
Lex
When: 28 Sep 14 17:17
there has never been 10 conseq winning favs in uk or ire horse racing. not ever.
By:
Keefter
When: 29 Sep 14 15:29
Catterick meeting in October 2001 when 8 winning favs won on the trot. The last race fav winning at Windsor the day before, and the first race fav winner at a Wolverhampton evening meeting the same day as Catterick saw 10 favs winning on the trot.
Page 21 of 22  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com