|
By:
how much more humiliation can australia take now England declaring under 400
|
|
By:
the answer is to score 500 and leave England 170 to get
|
|
By:
australia might has well pack up there bags and forfeit the 5th test match this declaration is a new low for them
|
|
By:
Aussies will have to face 2-3 overs before lunch
|
|
By:
easy money rogers not to score 50
|
|
By:
Pushed out the odds on the near certainty of a draw.
![]() |
|
By:
two if England take a wicket, in the first 2 overs
|
|
By:
The financial impact of the match not going into tomorrow will be horrendous as I assume Saturday and Sunday takings will have to be refunded.Also if test matches are only going to last for 3 days future tv contracts will be for much smaller amounts.
|
|
By:
Play every match in Bangaldesh... it either rains for 4 days or the team batting first score 500-4 declared.
|
|
By:
England don't care about refunds they want to thrash Australia
|
|
By:
Odds to lose a wicket before lunch?
|
|
By:
2.75
|
|
By:
I price it 2.10
|
|
By:
lol no chance. They will leave anything outside off stump
|
|
By:
wouldn't mind some 1.9 they don't lose one
![]() |
|
By:
looked close
|
|
By:
Whisperingdeath 07 Aug 15 12:16
johnnythebull 07 Aug 15 11:54 the 'enforcer' to get his maiden test century to really cap things off?Grin Johhny, I think " The best white ball bowler in the world " had a big hundred against Pakistan unless that match was voided for their spot fixing. ur entirely correct WHISPERING,just looked it up..i just naturally assumed,w/o checking,that seeing the position he bats at that he wouldn't have scored a century guys on this forum know their onions..btw what's become of him? |
|
By:
positive start
|
|
By:
broad has warner in knots here
|
|
By:
Australia survive
|
|
By:
broads century was not voided it still in the record books
|
|
By:
it was like 3 balls they fixed. It didn't effect any of the match
|
|
By:
For the 1st time, England have taken a 300+ runs lead, when their 1st innings total is less than 400 while batting 2nd.
|
|
By:
whats the lowest score ever declared in a first innings of a test match
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Bags of wickets do occur frequently on this ground in Ashes matches
|
|
By:
Session wickets of : 9,8,6, and 4 lots of 5 wickets have fallen here prior to yesterdays 10 wicket in the morning session.
|
|
By:
Last 3 games the average wicket per over ratio. Morning session 12.25 overs per wicket, Afternoon Session 8 overs per wicket, Evening Session 10.25 overs per wicket
|
|
By:
Andy Maher reckons England attack is a 1 way streak "Wood, Finn, Stokes, Ali. You take Broad out of the equation and there's not much there to strike fear. Surely we dig in here"
|
|
By:
I reckon Australia score 450-500 here. Smith or Warner to get a biggie
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
lol why would you delare then
|
|
By:
Australia vs England, 3rd Test, Melbourne (1937): It was the first time in the history of Test cricket that both the teams declared their first innings. Australia declared on 200 for 9 after the rain interrupted their innings. On a spiteful pitch, fuelled by rain, England slid to 76 for 9 before their captain Gubby Allen decided to declare to test Australian batting on the wet pitch. But the plan backfired as Australia batted through day three and four, with English failing to grip the wet ball. Don Bradman blasted 270 runs and Australia scored 564 runs in their second outing. England were bowled out for 323 and lost the match by 365 runs.
Australia vs England, 1st Test, Brisbane (1950): This was the first series between the arch-rivals after the famous 1948 series in which Australia were crowned as 'The Invincibles'. Australian skipper Lindsay Hassett opted to bat and the flip of the coin ultimately decided the outcome of the match. On a good surface, Australia put up a below-par total of 228 in their first innings. Just after the close of day one, there was a massive storm followed by a heavy downpour. Play could not take place for next two days and when England came out to bat, the pitch had become treacherous. Several England batsmen took blows before the innings was declared on 68 for 7; trailing by 160. Australia too fared poorly in their second innings were reduced to 32 for 7 at which point Hassett declared the innings which is the lowest declared total in Tests as yet. England needed 193 runs to win but were dismissed for 122 as Australia won the Test by 70 runs and took 1-0 lead. The win set the tone for the hosts who went on to clinch the series 4-1. |
|
By:
hate to be chasing around 110-150 or thereabouts last on this
|
|
By:
Remember Poms have lost before declaring to the Aussies back in 2006/07 summer in Adelaide
|
|
By:
Aussies get to 61/0 in 2nd innings without a loss
|
|
By:
Draw down to 34.
|
|
By:
I'm watching the England price and wondering at what point it might be worth backing them again.
Can Aus really win from here? Theoretically yes but a lot has to go right for them. |
|
By:
15.2
Stokes to Warner, FOUR, full at the stumps, punched straight of mid-on who can't stop it with a dive and the 1,000,000th legal delivery in Tests England goes to the boundary |