|
By:
Sounds like Elvis followed the rules on reserves
"Only in abandonment" ![]() |
|
By:
Course he would.
My vote is Optional |
|
By:
Ive got three from Dundalk
|
|
By:
My lot are too shrewd
![]() |
|
By:
There's a vote?
Suspend |
|
By:
Still havent sussed your fancy type stuff
|
|
By:
You mean this Reg?
|
|
By:
Optional - Sunday rules
|
|
By:
Weaver - optional
Shane - optional Reged - suspend momms? |
|
By:
This is tricky. We now have an unlevel playing field today for all those who selected at Dundalk before the Optional announcement was made.
Give me 10 minutes to think about this. |
|
By:
That's the point I would make MoMM. It's not entirely fair on those who have already posted
|
|
By:
Here me out here guys-elvisss has played the game as fairly as possible by stipulating a further selection in the event of a n/r -how many others put up a reserve selection knowing in all likelihood the meeting would be off-no one by looks of it.So why should the early posters get an unfair advantage over later posters who might not be able to access computer until such time .Easiest solution in future to avoid any grey areas is to stipulate that a n/r is replaced with last race fav unless forumite comes back on to make a replacement selection .Fairest solution all round as far as i can see as it will affect all the "n/r" posters in that they dont get the chance to sit one out whereas later posters have to make a selection.Seems pretty straightforward to me in interests of fairness but would like to read other peoples views
|
|
By:
yes shane. know its something lke [header1] head [/header1] but ...
|
|
By:
Your text here
You can atler the text to any you wish from excel, also just alter 20 for size. |
|
By:
That didn`t quiet work Reg
|
|
By:
head
|
|
By:
nope ... deffo missing sommat
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I`ll PM it Reg
|
|
By:
Ok. My feeling is that it MUST be the same for everyone. Those who selected at Dundalk before they knew today wa Optional are now disadvantaged, and that can't be right.
My vote would be to cancel today. I know that the Dundalkers who have winners will curse us and those who have losers will thank us so it's a no-win situation, but it HAS to be the same for all players. And let's face it losers at Dundalk are far more probable than winners! |
|
By:
You`ll see easily enough with the PM i`ve sent Reg. Just doesn`t allow you to without complicating it in a regular post.
|
|
By:
Dubai, I hear what you're saying and it's an option. But don't forget that as it stands at the moment today has been declared optional so later posters no longer have to make a selection.
|
|
By:
If Betfair had a market resting on your vote momms, i`d have had my full bank on you going that way
![]() 2-2 now. |
|
By:
Well at least I thought about it first.
![]() |
|
By:
Where`s FCH when you need him
![]() Seriously, we need to make a call by 1:00 |
|
By:
One way or another.
|
|
By:
Well I think MoMMs point is a strong one ... it is now unfair on those have posted under mandatory rules.
|
|
By:
MOMM -Im talking about for the future -why should the early poster gain an advantage over the later poster?.I personally think you would see a marked increase in the amount of posters who come back on and repost knowing that if they dont then they are on LRF -Almost without exception no one at present comes on to reselect do they?.If its implemented across the boards then todays headaches for the settlers could easily be resolved for example and no one could say it was a major disadvantage for them to be on LRF .Surely has to be better than current situation which is clearly unfair to the later posters as it stands
|
|
By:
Just looking at all 4 divisions, the Prem and Div1 aren't affected by this at all. No-one has gone for Dundalk.
Div2 affects only 1 player Div3 affects 3 or 4 players hth, as they say ![]() |
|
By:
Good point Dubai.
But later posters it could be argued have a slight advantage for example watching the market. |
|
By:
Early posters have the DIADVANTAGE of not being able to follow market moves or take into account n/rs.
|
|
By:
After more careful consideration and also considering we have to make a final decision now.
Suspend today |
|
By:
Seconded
|
|
By:
I agree whole-heartedly Dubai. It's exactly what I proposed on the Settling Instructions thread re non-runners defaulting to LRF. But I was a lone voice crying in the wilderness.
![]() It's nice to have some company at last. ![]() |
|
By:
Can`t see many opting for Dundalk between now and later.
|
|
By:
*DISADVANTAGE.
Fwiw my opinion would be cancel the whole thing for today. Not much point practically everybody being put on the LRF at Dundalk and I'm buggered if I'm going to study the rancid stuff. |
|
By:
Feckin ell, let`s not go back there momms
![]() |
|
By:
So is that a wrap then guys and gals?
|
|
By:
LRF ot FRF wouldn`t have covered Dundalk salmon.
|
|
By:
Ebdani - 6.20 Dundalk
|