|
By:
Cannot understand this plunge on labour all of a sudden.
|
|
By:
Surely the mad backer had to manipulate market at some
point to make greens and labour closer together,.. To benefit refuk, who need them to be almost equal. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Greens got a good chance because they are the only party advocating for wealth taxes. Might be in government in 9 years time if other parties don't wake up. If there was any party I wouldn't want implementing wealth taxes it would be the Greens.
|
|
By:
Possibly an issue if it comes wedded with Islamist support. It's pretty niche, mebbe not with another 9 years tbf.
|
|
By:
Leo Kearse summed the Greens up perfectly in his clip critical of their party political broadcast made in Urdu.
|
|
By:
Why exactly is it that the 'Green' party is explicitly soliciting for Pakistani support?
I realise it's a colour match, but it must be more than that. Is it because the regressive nature of that ideology balances off with the alleged progressive ideology of the actual Green party ? |
|
By:
The pub in my parents' village closed last week. Always packed on a Sunday for dinner reservations and been there for at least 50 years, but the budget has fecked them over. Tax wealth, not work and business. Taxing businesses and income more generally doesn't work.
|
|
By:
Green Party most popular part now allegedly with under 30s. That's only going to increase. It's inevitable. No one else is listening and things are only going to get worse.
Their immigration policies are precisely why you wouldn't want them in government. |
|
By:
Oh I agree with the penal budget but that was the purpose. They want pubs to close. It's nothing to do with achieving more tax revenue.
Obviously it's the monumental wastage that's the critical issue, not collecting more tax. Pretty much every town in the country has kids getting taxis and ubers into school. Paid for by the government. |
|
By:
Have a read of this lol
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/benefit-and-pension-rates-2026-to-2027/proposed-benefit-and-pension-rates-2026-to-2027 lines and lines and lines of different ways to give away money The greens won't do anything about it, they want more. More for foreigners and shirkers. |
|
By:
A large proportion of older voters will be dead in 9 years. The 30 year old who want change and support Green aren't going to change affiliation because things for them are only going to get worse. And new voters are going to vote Green.
I've always thought Reform will win the next election, but it will be one term only, and after that they'll be finished |
|
By:
First thing that needs to go is the triple lock. Free prescriptions for over 60s will need to go and the retirement age will need to go up again
|
|
By:
The 30 year olds are probably pro immigration. And probably have no comprehension that's the reason owning a property is out of their reach. After having a taxpayer sponsored 3 year holiday in the name of advanced education !
|
|
By:
Birth rate 1.41 in 2024 and falling. We are in a whole load of pain in the future. We'll need immigration to plug those gaps in the future and that will make us even more religiously diverse
|
|
By:
Far too many people go to University and this Labour government are making it a class issue. That's unfortunate and it will hit them and help The Greens
|
|
By:
The birth rate has fallen due to liberalists policies. Making women work and mass immigration preventing people getting suitable housing to raise a family.
I've said this to you before. You are not daft. How does importing millions of adults who don't work help with anything? They all need to be supported by the state as well. We have a monumental amount of adults of working age not working full time. Let me know when that's not the case, then we might consider importing people who actually work full time. |
|
By:
If you have a leak, the first thing needed is to turn the water off. Then you can set about cleaning up. Then you can carry out appropriate repairs to stop it leaking again in the future.
|
|
By:
Making women work
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
We have a monumental amount of adults of working age not working full time
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Dunno man.
Do you want to force people to work or not? |
|
By:
Yes it's kind of biology, women can't work and raise children properly at the same time. Your smiley's are appropriate if you don't think that is correlated with the decline in birth rate.
You'll find that there is a correlation in cultures where women don't work full time, and having large families. |
|
By:
at the time of the 2021 Census, 62.9% (37.5 million) of the overall population of England and Wales was of ‘working age’ (between 16 and 64 years old)
As of the fourth quarter of 2025, there were approximately 25.5 million full-time workers in the United Kingdom. 37.5 million - 25.5 million = 12 million. will be a small variance due to the dates, and some full time workers over 64. |
|
By:
Why is it only women who can raise children?
|
|
By:
oh and for some reason one of the data sets leaves out parts of the UK. but it won't be too far off
|
|
By:
Women have been working full time since the war when the birth rate was nearly 2.5
How on earth are people going to afford a house and children on one wage when they can't afford them on two? Thatcher's decision to sell off the council houses, was arguably the worst political decision of my lifetime, and there have been many many dreadful ones |
|
By:
Why is it only women who can raise children?
I don't fancy your chances of breastfeeding. |
|
By:
What are the impacts of mass immigration, CB? As well as escalating housing costs.
|
|
By:
Evidently there are numerous factors but many of them can be sourced to having too many people in the country.
And (rather bizarrely) some people appear to think the solution to that is importing even more ![]() |
|
By:
In the last 50 years GDP per capita has roughly doubled. That means per person we should be twice as well off as we were 50 years ago. But 50 years ago the rivers were clean, you could get an appointment with an NHS dentist, Local and National Government and individuals weren't in piles of debt. There was a good supply of council houses, and many more families could afford to have one parent looking after their kids full time.
So where has that doubling in GDP gone? Can only be in one place, and that is wealthy individuals. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
![]() Nobody right minded thinks men would be better at raising children than women. Try getting custody in a divorce, that tends to meet with the real world. |
|
By:
Lordy, the real world's just outside your window. Do please try to disengage your mind from your algorithm and taste it once in a while.
|
|
By:
I'm talking about the future regarding immigration which is inevitable due to the birth rate, not the current situation. This is where we will be heading in maybe 15-20 years ....
"South Korea is actively seeking immigrants, particularly skilled workers, to combat its severe labor shortage and the world's lowest fertility rate. The country needs over 894,000 additional workers in manufacturing, services, and high-tech industries over the next decade, focusing on attracting international students, professionals, and foreign talent." |
|
By:
Badly behaved kids certainly wouldn't have got subsidised ubers to school 50 years ago.
|
|
By:
As I covered, we waste an inordinate amount of money on unproductive things.
Including pushing half a trillion on lockdowns, which I believe you supported. |
|
By:
UK Official Development Assistance (ODA): 1970 to 2023
The line starts at £186 million in 1970 and ends at its highest point of £15,374 million in 2023 lol |
|
By:
No I didn't support lockdown
|
|
By:
I'd have let more old people die, because the driver should be life expectancy, and life expectancy will reduce because of lockdown. But, I fully understand the public and media pressure to do so was immense, and to oppose that pressure was exceptionally difficult.
I also think the cost of lockdown should be borne by those it mostly protected, the older generation, not future generations |
|
By:
another reason for wealth taxes.
|