|
By:
dusty Dies the Law allow for retribution?
|
|
By:
Was the perp who had just assaulted 3 police at an airport restrained?
|
|
By:
We've already established that you think hitting women is 'good', PP. So any further explanation is lost on you.
You're gonna have to back that up and do it well. |
|
By:
PP they make things up when they have no argument
|
|
By:
Was the perp who had just assaulted 3 police at an airport restrained?
He was tasered and went down like a sack of spuds. Yeah, he was restrained. |
|
By:
Nobody is defending hitting women!
|
|
By:
You want me to quote what you wrote a few minutes back to you, PP. Don't go all sleepy joe on us.
|
|
By:
Tasers are short bursts, if one shot is enough why are there so many instances of numerous shots required?
The perp was not restrained, had shown intent and the coppers colleagues had been punched to the ground, control of these criminals had to take precedence. |
|
By:
You do Crippen
Must be difficult to control your thoughts How many times have you been banned…… including Charlie made me do it? |
|
By:
yes please cider. Please post the bit where I said hitting women is good, there's a good chap and maybe I won't report you for libelling me.
|
|
By:
and that's why you taser someone and then put the cuffs on. That's literally how it works.
|
|
By:
I mean, really. You only just typed it, ffs.
Just a bit of a good old fashioned scrap |
|
By:
As I alluded to, hitting women flush in the face to cause maximum damage does not fall into the the 'good' bracket in my world. You're entitled to your opinion that it was good, I just vehemently disagree with it.
|
|
By:
These are armed police, there are protocols of engagement. If the copper believed there wernt sufficient colleagues to cuff the criminal then their options are limited as they can’t release the gun.
|
|
By:
ok, and how does what I wrote equate with me saying hitting women is good? last chance. getting a bit bored now.
|
|
By:
It also appears to show the officer stamping on the head of the man as he was lying face down on the floor, with a woman kneeling beside him.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said on Friday the Greater Manchester Police officer had been advised he was under criminal investigation for assault. The officer was also served with a disciplinary notice to inform him he was being investigated for potential gross misconduct for a number of alleged breaches of police professional standards, including his use of force, a spokesman said. IOPC regional director Catherine Bates said: “We can confirm we are conducting a criminal investigation into the use of force during events which took place on July 23 at Manchester Airport. We are arranging to interview a police constable under criminal caution as soon as possible. |
|
By:
So no need for the Police to investigate the thug copper dusty?
WRONG again dusty! |
|
By:
What a tool you are WD
It is protocol that as soon as something like this happens either a civil investigation or a criminal investigation is carried out, I could find the relevant orders if I can be arsed to show you. Emphasis on ‘investigtaion’ |
|
By:
this 'old fashioned scrap' clearly shows vermin hitting a woman straight in the face, presumably hospitalising her. You wrote it was 'good'.
what more can I do? are you retracting that statement? perhaps you hadn't at that point actually watched the footage of women being beaten, tbf to you. |
|
By:
WD is just a lackey stooge who simply wants the police to be guilty because it was a white officer.
|
|
By:
Are you also calling gif the GHIC policeman to have his foot cut off?
Perhaps you should go and live in one of these countries you do admire! Yoh have a log in common |
|
By:
So you think "good old fashioned" means I think it was good? That the actions of all parties in it were decent and honourable. Good in that way.
Can you please stop acting daft and either apologise or make a proper accusation. |
|
By:
If someone is resisting arrest then until the cuffs are on pretty much all proportionate options should be open to the police.
We ask the police to go to these situations on society's behalf. The very least we can do from the comfort of our arm chairs is back them. Yvette Cooper is failing our brave police officers. |
|
By:
Kicking a man who is motionless on the floor is not proportionate Nobby
|
|
By:
How very curious
It’s the first I’ve heard this…but allegedly somebody been on disability benefits for 2 years while in Pakistan Blimey, time really isn’t being kind to some supporters in this case it seems, the more we know the worse it seems to get. Now apparently the suggestion is due to conduct on the plane from Pakistan. |
|
By:
Kicking a man who is motionless on the floor is not proportionate Nobby
This is after said motionless man has thumped 2 women police officers in the face multiple tomes. |
|
By:
Moral of the story, if you don't want kicking in the face don't assault the police in the lawful execution of their duties.
|
|
By:
Rubbish
Someone does something it says something to your mum then you have every right to deliver justice. Once justice is delivered you then have to face the Law and the consequences. Some of you cannot differentiate between justice and the Law. Others are so blinkered by their prejudices they cannot even comprehend the situation |
|
By:
Vigilante justice has no place in a civilized society.
|
|
By:
They're lucky the English are soft, and the police are run by lefties.
Play up like that with armed police in other countries and they'd have been shot. |
|
By:
Whisperingdeath quite happy for vigilante justice and women police officers being thumped repeatedly in the face but loses his mind when the police fight back
What a to55pot |
|
By:
WD
wtf are you waffling on about? If the police said something to their mother is a green light for assaulting a police officer? What constitutes a difference between ‘justice and the law’? Is this a virtue signalling justice? Like the placards of protesters that read ‘no justice no peace’? I’d love to hear the social justice handbook that allows for assaulting 3 police officers tbh. As for the kick, that is dependent on whether it is considered reasonable force based on the likelihood the policeman’s interpretation there was a danger by the person’s actions towards the loss of a gun. Considering what happened there looks plenty of reason to make sure the guy isn’t in a position to continue an assault. Leveraged against the severity of what the claim of losing the gun could bring. |
|
By:
This looks like a high stakes game of poker by those alleging the force wasn’t reasonable and requires taking out of context
Well the fact a big deal has been made has brought scrutiny across the board Scrutiny which the ‘lawyer’ nor the family seem to have expected. |
|
By:
Cider clearly doesn't understand English and it's use.
Is he really a Russian? |
|
By:
*its
|
|
By:
Though confusing it's and its is really a good indicator that someone is a native speaker.
|
|
By:
Phone edy, cheers.
|
|
By:
It’s not just that he doesn’t understand English. He doesn’t understand English Law and he is also blinded by his prejudices.
|
|
By:
![]() Don't think Cider's difficulties here are really down to a lack of comprehension, but rather him likely just deliberately mispresenting PorcupineorPineapple's words and intentions. |
|
By:
To55pot Nobby?
Is that really the best you can do? I did credit you with a little more intelligence than the 3 word slogan brigade. I apologise for being so wrong. Why don’t you try shut up big nose? |