|
By:
It's how some people roll.
|
|
By:
It’s depressing
No wonder we had 14 years of Tory Government. |
|
By:
Seems a bizarre route to take as it's an unwinnable
argument, at best. Making cider look stupid again. |
|
By:
If police execute people rather than arresting them
then any criminal will have a sound defence to resisting arrest charges. |
|
By:
I wouldn't get in police car as I feared policeman would rape and murder me.
I feared being detained by police as he might kick me in head and stamp on my head, so I fought hard to resist, but was overwhelmed and then my fears were realised... |
|
By:
Don't need tv drama, we saw plod commit a crime.
|
|
By:
Wot about the gun excuse?
You really are clueless in this and the Law dusty |
|
By:
This is getting too bizarre
‘Execute’, ‘assassination’… Had the Pakistanis remained in the country they had just travelled from they would have statistically been 50 times more likely to have been killed by the police. Yet here apparently they are justified in assaulting 3 police officers on the defence perhaps something bad was said to them. What a bunch of clowns you are. |
|
By:
If there was a clear risk their weapons would be taken then they weren’t following protocol and shoukd no longer be allowed to carry weapons!
You people will hang your hat on potential argument and see it **** full of holes. |
|
By:
Ok
So to make sure their guns could never ever be at risk of being taken….perhaps the police need to be more direct, is that your stupid ass argument? |
|
By:
Be more like, erm Pakistani police perhaps
Just knock the fkr unconscious bundle them in the back of a van and them never ever be seen again? |
|
By:
You have no argument
You do not understand the Law You have no understanding of Police Protocol You are blinded by your prejudices |
|
By:
The victims lawyer sweeps in with a priceless "cyst on the brain" diagnosis, stunning emotive racecard and sympathy joker played early.
£££££££$$$$$$$$ ching ching eat your heart out George Floyd. Expecting a speedy mental health disorder before half time !. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
WD
You have embarrassed yourself enough man Justice v law ffs Where the stopwatch apparently starts when the ‘lawyer’ says it does and all proceeding actions must be stricken from the evidence Because police apparently are both too learnt in their actions to allow for the possibility a civilian could threaten a gun, and too brutal in them making sure they don’t. All the while no acknowledgement whatsoever that Pakistan coppers kill civilians at a rate in excess of 50 times more than UK coppers. You are a total fool. |
|
By:
*too lenient
|
|
By:
Oh I understand that he's a revenge and punishment freak.
That's different to not understanding the use of good in the phrase good old fashioned |
|
By:
Let’s see what happens to the copper.
|
|
By:
He may elect for trial by jury.
That'll be an event and a half. |
|
By:
ChatGPT knows the English language so well.
If someone writes "Just a bit of a good old fashioned scrap" does that mean they think it was a good thing? ChatGPT: The phrase "Just a bit of a good old fashioned scrap" typically implies that the person is referring to a physical fight or altercation. In this context, the word "good" doesn't necessarily mean that the person thinks the fight was a positive or good thing overall. It could just be a colloquial way of describing a traditional or typical physical confrontation. |
|
By:
I really couldn’t be arsed doing this but it seems I must.
The Criminal Law Act 1967, Section 3 provides for the use of force in the prevention of a crime….where a person’s use of force is REASONABLE within the CIRCUMSTANCES I.e. you can’t cherry pick the kick without looking at what had just happened. This is based on whether the subjective opinion of the copper seamed reasonable. (3 coppers had just been punched to the ground and were clearly resisting arrest) The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 determines whether force was lawful based on either civil or criminal perspective. In the case of criminal, self defence is based on what the individual thought, and on a sliding scale synopsis relative to how reasonable that thought was. So you see mr thicky, it’s impossible to separate what had just happened with what reasoning the copper gave, based on the fact the perpetrator showed no signs of compliance (he wasn’t on the floor based on his own actions, his own actions were to resist arrest and assault 3 officers) |
|
By:
Cider clearly doesn't understand English and it's use. (sic)
:) |
|
By:
But you don't, and it's funny you repeatedly
fail to use it correctly, causing you to argue a point that is caused by your lack of understanding. We all produce typos but some fess up rather than argue over being correct. |
|
By:
This morning can vouch for that
|
|
By:
hint:
'old fashioned scrap' is not the same as: 'good old fashioned scrap' Let's see some examples of an 'old fashioned scrap', good or otherwise, which involve men hospitalising women with multiple haymakers, and sucker punching other men. |
|
By:
Of course it is you numpty, you really are thick.
|
|
By:
We all produce typos but some fess up rather than argue
Not when we're accusing others of failing to understand English. At that point it becomes quite embarrassing, in my view. Also made me :) so there is that. |
|
By:
But you clearly don't understand English and are still
arguing. My good old fashioned typo was instantly acknowledged. |
|
By:
good
adjective to be desired or approved of good uk/ɡʊd/ us/ɡʊd/ ADJECTIVE very satisfactory, enjoyable, pleasant, or interesting Introduction to adjectives Adjectives describe nouns to tell you more about something. |
|
By:
I know what an adjective is.
Do you? |
|
By:
If you are truly embarrassed by your poor English then get
better at it. Simples. |
|
By:
More :)'s
:) |
|
By:
If you've never come across the phrase good old fashioned then,
on top of previous dodgy English, you should be embarrassed. |
|
By:
I have come across the phrase 'good old fashioned'.
I have also come across the phrase 'old fashioned' An adjective is used to: to tell you more about something. ie good emphasises positivity. It did in my education, anyway. eg 'good old days' Implies positivity. 'old days' Does not. |
|
By:
But you don't understand that good old fashioned does not mean good and old fashioned.
A good old fashioned racist, a good old fashioned dunce... |
|
By:
But you don't understand that good old fashioned does not mean good and old fashioned.
More :)s :) |
|
By:
Laughing just highlights how thick you are.
It won't make you right. Just thick. |
|
By:
Let’s see what happens to the copper.
Let's see what happens to the thugs who assaulted emergency service workers going about their work |
|
By:
Yes Nobby
That’s how things are supposed to work. Let them all present their evidence. |
|
By:
Are you going me to call me a To55pot again?
|