|
By:
How's your mental health?
|
|
By:
Good morning my very own forum stalker....its another wonderful day here in sunny spain, sorry to have blocked you .....but good to know I'm in your head
|
|
By:
sorry to have blocked you
Brave Sir Robin ran away. |
|
By:
Should Paula Venerial Face criminal charges ?
|
|
By:
Would be a vote winner case.
|
|
By:
Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry
Exclusive: Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu |
|
By:
Some very good points being made on here.
Pity about the boring spats on pages 4-6 Is lfc Paula Vennels brother? |
|
By:
Police are planning to deploy 80 detectives for their criminal inquiry into the Post Office scandal, the Guardian has learned, but victims will face a long wait to discover if charges will follow.
The investigation will examine potential offences of perjury, and perverting the course of justice by Post Office senior leaders as well as the tech company Fujitsu. |
|
By:
What’s the point. They would be better off adding the c200 million cost of this to the compensation package.
But we live in a democracy and have to be seen to drag this on for years until it fizzles out and the CPS decide there is not enough evidence to pursue the 1 or 2 people who are still alive and compos mentas. |
|
By:
Plenty of evidence!
We need to see those deemed guilty in a Court of Law. Why would you accept perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice? |
|
By:
Plenty of evidence!
We need to see those deemed guilty in a Court of Law. Why would you accept perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice? |
|
By:
Seems to be sufficient to charge them tomorrow.
2 years investigation... |
|
By:
I suppose they want to charge each and every one of them.
Not just those already shown up in enquiry. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
So it seems ministers wanted to get rid of Vennels in 2014, because she didnt have a clue, perhaps she was telling the full truth in the enqiry, and that she just didnt know what the hell was going on , imo she was ceo in name only and just was incompetent
|
|
By:
elisjohn • June 7, 2024 9:29 AM BST
So it seems ministers wanted to get rid of Vennels in 2014, because she didnt have a clue, perhaps she was telling the full truth in the enqiry, and that she just didnt know what the hell was going on , imo she was ceo in name only and just was incompetent I suspect Vennels was the perfect person in the position for the people who put her there. Either didn't have a clue or was that blindly loyal and institutionalised to the Post Office. I think she stated her main aim was to stop the Post Office costing the government as much money / make it more profitable, this definitely wouldn't have been helped if 100's of wrongful convictions were paid compensation. On top of that I think the accounting teams believed that the missing money went back into the Post Office profits. A lot of stuff may have been swept under the carpet previously, but when you walk in a room and the carpet is bulging and about 5 foot higher then the rest of the floor, then there is no excuse as CEO to not look under it and finally clean the house. |
|
By:
Vennells knows when to forget and when to remember.
She's complicit, don't feel sorry for her. |
|
By:
A lot of ladies in top jobs causing havoc these days, they seem to fare no better than the men used to.
|
|
By:
----you-have-to-laugh--- • June 7, 2024 10:32 AM BST
Vennells knows when to forget and when to remember. She's complicit, don't feel sorry for her. Completely agree. |
|
By:
Get them all!
Van de Booger and the rest of the posse |
|
By:
Get them all!
Van de Booger and the rest of the posse |
|
By:
"Its a trusted brand "
Said Vennels ![]() |