Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 3862 comments are related to the topic:
......... Brexit just goes from bad to wurst......

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 81 of 97  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | ... | 97 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3,862
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 22:56
It doesn’t matter if STI s reduces during lockdown
That is completely irrelevant to covid
By:
Foinavon
When: 01 Dec 23 22:59
It's an independent test of lockdown compliance lfc, the transmission mechanisms are different.
By:
Foinavon
When: 01 Dec 23 23:03
The results are fogged because the clinics were restricting access to testing and treatment. Other factors as Donnie suggests such as dormancy may also be a cause of resurgency following the end of lockdown.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:03
It's irrelevant to covid, yes very probably
(unless std victims turned out to have worse
covid outcomes)

But it's behaviour of crowds and compliance with
lockdown, and modelling std rates may well, in time,
show what actual lockdown compliance was.

It's also interesting to scientists to see how
infectious diseases behave.

We've already seen its likely that not having
flu for 2 years makes it a bit worse when we finally
get reinfected.....see China right now.
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 23:04
Foin it’s not an independent test of lockdowns

It’s just a test that says if you don’t have sex you won’t get STi s

That has zero bearing on covid and lockdowns
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:05
I think hiv victims were on list for longer isolation
if they are imuno compromised.
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 23:07
To be an HIV victim you have to do something

To catch covid you don’t
By:
Foinavon
When: 01 Dec 23 23:08
People behave differently, many will have observed the rules and those will include people who probably wouldn't normally be seeking new sexual contacts anyway. A proportion would have flouted the rules and the incidence of new cases would have been a measure of that.
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 23:09
And that’s what makes the view that lockdowns had
such a dramatic effect .. very very doubtful
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:13
That there is so much observable data
tells us lockdowns had a big effect.

Cracking the data by removing anomolies
is helped by the effect of lockdown on diverse
diseases spread in diverse manners.

Plenty more to be found.
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 23:17
The data doesn’t tell us that the data tells us
lockdowns were a response to rising infections and deaths
The pressure to bring in the lockdowns at those times - 3
were understandably immense .. but in each of those cases
the data tells us deaths and infections were already in decline

If you think of it that makes sense more sense
By:
Foinavon
When: 01 Dec 23 23:19
The other aspect is that if there was an effect, how great was it and was it worth the enormous ongoing cost? Vulnerable people would have self-isolated anyway or reduced to amount of external contact to a minimum. Some in large multigenerational households would not have had that luxury but even with lockdown the risk is still multiplied by the number of individuals in the household and how careful they all were.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:20
But you start from a wrong position
and can't even think of potential in the data.

So pretty much you are a one legged man
in an arse kicking contest.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:20
Ha ha, to lfc again.
By:
Foinavon
When: 01 Dec 23 23:23
Yes, I realise but no need to spoil an interesting discussion. That's it for tinight as far as I'm concerned. a demain.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 01 Dec 23 23:23
The other aspect is that if there was an effect, how great was it and was it worth the enormous ongoing cost? Vulnerable people would have self-isolated anyway or reduced to amount of external contact to a minimum. Some in large multigenerational households would not have had that luxury but even with lockdown the risk is still multiplied by the number of individuals in the household and how careful they all were




Yes of course and some did.

So research needs to incorporate that

Or at least model it to a high degree.




Looking at known other diseases will be
vital to that.


Anyway it's one to keep an eye on, and as above
hopefully yet more good comes from study of the data.
By:
lfc1971
When: 01 Dec 23 23:59
If you think of it cold infections come in waves
Maybe twice a year over three , four , five … years
They come ,build ,fade away ,return build fade away etc

Covid will have been the same - maybe a more congested timeframe as a new virus

And it came , built steadily , and then worryingly quickly .. lockdown due to understandable fear
But the data strongly suggest that wave was already falling before lockdown
Then as might be expected naturally a second wave .. which would recede , and then
a third before Christmas or over winter etc ..
So the lockdowns were in response to the natural cycle of covid / just as we have natural waves of cold infections
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 07:56
Lockdowns were a reaction to those natural cycles not
the cause of them
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 02 Dec 23 09:39
With children still at school and workers allowed to travel on public transport without masks the lockdowns were a joke.
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 09:58
You are right SNC ,we have such liberal views on stuff like civil liberties ,human rights..........such weak law enforcement ,such wokery. That when it comes to something like a lockdown we are truly pathetic.
Remember you can walk into a shop and grab anything and walk out ,fck a statue into a harbour ,deface a war memorial ,block the M25 all with all but a miniscule chance of a feeble fine or slap on the wrist.
The Chinese enforced a lockdown but do we want to go there ,as always the right way is probably somewhere in the middle.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 02 Dec 23 10:04
To stop a virus you need a month of total isolation but that is impossible to enforce so each lockdown was a waste of time.
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 10:06
That’s what we did - we made a sensible compromise
and at certain times did have a policy of lockdown as best we could - yes it meant on occasion
some were able to be working from home or indeed on the golf course instead of working
It was not a question of civil liberties
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 10:09
Token gesture.......I knew a bunch of builder boys all young and fit ,only time they wore a mask was to go into shop for pies ,**** etc..........they all used the very same mask on the van dashboard......all got covid together.....all went to pub after work.........all spread the virus as they went.
Many millions of essential workers ,never had a day off ,hardly even noticed the chaos and death.
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 10:13
Yes there are question marks as to just what effect the lockdowns had
if any maybe negligible  .. but that doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t have been
introduced - if they hadn’t the usual suspects would be accusing the government of murder
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 10:17
By the way those builders were idiots
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 02 Dec 23 10:18
By electing Boris as PM the UK voted for gross incompetence & corruption and boy did we get it.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 02 Dec 23 10:20
The builders may well be idiots but the politicians who thought kids couldn't catch or spread covid at school were even bigger idiots.
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 10:21
Introducing them fine but we do not have the will to enforce them.
Take for example the binmen.......three lads complete their round all trying valiantly to social distance ,then jump into a 1.5 cubic metre cab and and drive home together and then back to their families.
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 10:24
They all caught covid ..

As long as they were careful not to pass it on to anyone elderly family member or general population etc
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 10:26
The fact is they all caught covid
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 10:42
Someone on here alluded to how we isolate cattle etc for foot and mouth etc ,draconian penalties, discipline and it is easier.Herds isolated from each other and stringent hygiene everywhere.
You cannot do that with humans in this country ,humans have millions of interactions daily,people basically did as they wished .That is why it spread so quickly .
The lessons of the "black death" have not been learnt..........people moved from the contaminated capital to "safety" spreading it as they went.
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 11:05
That’s what might have caused the rapid spread in Italy
When it started it was in the north and people moved
south to relatives where it was unknown initially for safety
and it spread quickly
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 11:12
Actually restrictions only applied initially
to the northern part of Italy
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 11:17
There was a Scottish politician with a positive covid test and she still travelled home from London regardless ,now she might have been intelligent and aware ,others were not.
Was she fined or imprisoned ,wsf....community service.
By:
lfc1971
When: 02 Dec 23 11:21
We forget just how chaotic it was in some countries

The broader restrictions came just hrs after the
authorities announced 9,172 had been infected
1,598 more than the day before and 463 deaths
the majority overwhelmingly old and sick
Permission had to be sought to move about the country
Schools , universities closed,  prison visits and day release
banned - setting off riots across the country at 27 prisons
Guards were held hostage and several inmates died at Modena
By:
sageform
When: 02 Dec 23 18:24
lfc I would love to see some of the evidence for some of your posts in the last 24 hours. So far as I know there are no confirmed transmissions of Covid outdoors and anyone (myself included) who followed the advice and doubled the distances apart was at almost no risk of catching Covid or even a common cold. I have not been in a heated room with more than 10 people in it since March 2020 and don't intend to. I have not caught any infections in that time. I accept that those working in the NHS and in jobs that forced them into contact with others were bound to catch it.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 02 Dec 23 18:26
UK could rejoin the EU ‘in some form’, Tory manifesto author says

Rachel Wolf said shifting geopolitics and UK demographics could see a new relationship with Brussels


.... Race to be pro euro for next election
By:
flat16
When: 02 Dec 23 18:46
There are many remainers and rejoiners in the Conservative party as there are many leavers in both parties.
Indeed the ultra conservative CBI was the richest and loudest lobbyist for remain ,the BBC the most influential propagandist ,with the TUC not far behind.......strange bed fellows indeed.
By:
sageform
When: 02 Dec 23 19:30
90% of people still don't understand the difference between the EU and Europe. Of course the UK should have close ties to Europe-we are geographically part of it and if possible we should have free trade deals with each of the member states. That does not mean that we need to rejoin the rancid organisation with a very expensive bureaucracy in Brussels. And when an EU leader starts saying that we should rejoin, you can rest assured that they are doing so solely to get more money from the UK to help reduce their ever growing deficit. If German companies wish to have less red tape when trading with the UK they should take it up with the German government and insist on a change in the rules. The EU is the best example of the emperor with no clothes ever seen. It has no income of its own, no tax raising powers, no police force, no armed forces but still manages to bully people into submission.
By:
TCat
When: 02 Dec 23 19:47
Over 200 Tory MPs campaigned to Remain; the Tory PM led the campaign to Remain. The reason I opposed the referendum whilst being against the EU is Brexit was always going to be a shambles whilst a majority of MPs opposed leaving which they still do.
Page 81 of 97  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | ... | 97 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com