|
By:
US is massive. EU is less important to US than it is to UK because of geography.
you keep using the US as an example as if their situation corresponds to ours. It really doesn't. |
|
By:
In aviation Britain wants to adhere to the highest possible standards
|
|
By:
good. not sure why you say that, but it seems a good thing.
maybe Airbus can stay after all? |
|
By:
If they can tell us what the problems are and why they cannot stay then we will be getting somewhere
So far neither the ceo of airbus, or even yourself bp can say what they are When you can get back to us , thanks |
|
By:
Here is an interesting announcement by JCB, has it been reported by Brussels Broadcasting Co yet?
https://www.jcb.com/en-gb/news/2018/06/50-million-investment-in-new-british-plant |
|
By:
bigpoppapump
29 Jun 18 17:26 Joined: 16 Dec 02 | Topic/replies: 5,446 | Blogger: bigpoppapump's blog if we are outside the EU, they demand we adhere to their standards before they'll play. Thus - you can think you're taking back control - but you cannot really (unless you destroy panEU business). ^ Of course if we want to sell into another country we have to apply their standards for the things we sell them. For the EU, for China, for Japan, for USA etc etc. But that does not mean every UK company not selling to the EU (or anywhere else) has to have their standards. This is the point. |
|
By:
pan-Eu supply chains apply to complex manufacturing like Auto and Aerospace. This is the point.
They cannot stay here if they cannot make their stuff, and their components are not always available locally. Don't get me wrong - a weak pound and a different regulatory environment may help some manufacturing, but it will destroy others. Appreciate you guys "wont have" this, but it's true. |