Forums

Irish Sports

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 234 comments are related to the topic:
Will Thursday Be Britains Independence Day.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 234
By:
Ozymandius
When: 24 Jun 16 15:55
From what I can see the people who wanted to leave are the people with nothing to lose, the ones with most of their life's lived, the ones with knobb jobs, and the ones who have scrounged from the state all their life.
The people running big business , the brains of society , the people who get out of bed in the morning and work their socks off, they wanted to remain , but they have been outnumbered by the anti mindset, the handout men , and surely it cannot be a good thing in the short term or for that matter , the long term either.


Great Post.

Callit sent me a frightening graph of where the biggest % of No Vote came from....basically Mail, Express and Sun readers.  Bravo!
By:
Ozymandius
When: 24 Jun 16 15:58
you always seem to hanker for a Britain that is long gone Wildman; the days of Leyland and coal mining and pints of bitter and a more innocent pastime of watching football on the terraces and the craic in Kilburn and Cricklewood. These are long gone and the march of self-imposed multi-culturalism has changed that way of life inexorably - that genie is never going back in the bottle.

This referendum was more about immigration and fear than money - the money arguments from "Leave" were spurious and ignored. Most sane articles point out numerous unknowns and very few are fiscally beneficial to the UK. The "United" in the UK is now a thing of the past and dreaming of things past that might be again is simply foolish. This will probably cause a knock-on effect within Europe and it's hordes of ultra-right elements waiting for their own "independence" moment and a very narrowly-defined (former) "quality of life".

Inspirational leaders are needed I was about to say but I'm not so sure after the failure of the Obama fantasy. Today we get Farage, Johnson and Trump.


Eloquent and spot on.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 16 16:50
Ozy,weeping buckets....Laugh
By:
luckyme
When: 24 Jun 16 17:40
Ozy
I have tried to explain before, the Libtards cannot force hundreds of thousands of extra people onto the services, social, health, policing and housing then just expect the masses to lie down and take it up the ar$e.
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 24 Jun 16 23:45
Lots of uneducated dole merchants outed the UK absolute joke but it may be good for Ireland or certainly the ISFC
By:
workrider
When: 25 Jun 16 00:19
What a statement from you ,how dare are you! Millions of well educated people have had enough ,Champange Socialists drove them to dispar ,hung them out to dry for eons .The same people the Liberals championed came to dispise them ,now the facists of the left turn their backs on the people .Sure whats new anyway , the left wing users have been found out at last . It was the LEFT WINGERS who put them on the dole in the first place..Spin doctors required ,the people saw through them in the end . About time the left wing facists were found out ,turncoats of the highest order ,turning on their own kind .The left will NEVER recover from this GREAT lie .
By:
Racingqueen
When: 25 Jun 16 01:45
some great posts/points from Royal Academy on this thread imho.

To be honest i would be surprised if a 2nd referendum was not held and its 1.01 to pass.
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 25 Jun 16 08:48
Ok Workrider i am going to try to be nice to you here mate, You simply have no idea what you're talking about my friend hence i stopped reading your post after a 2 lines and that is a pretty nice way to put it. Anyway do you live in the country my friend? No you don't, do you work in the country? Do you pay your taxes here? Did you have a vote? Do you have a mortgage here? No you didn't to all those, so all you know is what is feed to you via the media most of it probably Murdoch's, i can draw my own conclusions as to what is going on from living amonst the people here, my office was the scenes of despair yesterday, how class A uneducated fools from Middlesborugh or the S Wales valleys and the like voted us, the hard working well placed people who make the biggest contribution to society, out is far beyond comprehension.

Now all we are hearing is that these low achievers in life did not know what they voted for and even better did not know that their vote would count. The only good thing is that these people who let me add were net gainers from the EU, are shown to be so simple of mind they actually don't realise they will be hardest hit from going out and it serves them right. So i'll dare to say all i want my friend as a person who contributes to the society i live in.
By:
GANT007
When: 25 Jun 16 09:14
Fair play to Rocketfingers, spot on as usual........Mock a large section of society in the UK and champion the same society here in Ireland. Cuckoo Cuckoo.

When are you applying for your Irish passport?.
By:
workrider
When: 25 Jun 16 09:58
Rocket ,You are lost in a maze ,one minute you are crying Racist because someone gets put out of some nightclub or other ,then the very people you pretend to support, you kick them in the teeth because they had the teremity to have a different opinion than you .I worked in the UK for 7 years , longer than you've been there , so yes I do know what its like, I pay several visits every year , I got to know more about the people than you mate , you like most of the left are stuck in cloud coo koo land , stuck in some dingy backwater are we Rocket? .Time you took your head out of the sand and came into the real world ,going on as if you were the UKs trade minister ffs and you only a wet day in UK .
By:
Racingqueen
When: 25 Jun 16 10:49
I think Farage is inspirational as is Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders.

Wilders and Le Pen are simple racists.

I say that as a euro sceptic
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 25 Jun 16 11:20
Sorry i really don't want to fall out with you my friend but i really don't think you have an iota what you're talking about workrider so you need to calm down and listen to someone who contirbutes to society over here and has a vested interest in what goes on. You are making me laugh, so i do apologise for laughing at you i have not heard something like what is below since school.

"I got to know more about the people than you mate"  I have more friends than you hahaha,ok if you think you have more friends than i have then who am i to say otherwise so i'll let you have that one my friend :).

Now listen workrider i'm happy to debate the referendum but on the condition you try and read and most importanly think about it, Ok. Enjoy your annual holiday/long weekend in the UK, i am meant to be heading to Windsor today, so i need to run.
By:
neill d
When: 25 Jun 16 11:45
Wildman you'll like this if you haven't already heard it before.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjUA3RU4B8E
By:
jumper
When: 25 Jun 16 13:00
http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/generation-emigration/i-m-in-shock-i-feel-lost-irish-in-britain-respond-to-brexit-1.2698214?utm_source=morning_digest&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_digest

No sense of balance from The Irish Times this morning. I am in the UK 2 to 3 times every month, for 3/4 days at a time, sometimes a week, working, mostly in or around London, sometimes in the midlands. I know many other Irish doing the same and those that live there full time. This article only takes one side. I would say 50/50 in views from all I know in the UK, the Irish that is - so, broadly in line, more or less, with the final vote.

Total liberal clap trap. This is really just propaganda masquerading as journalism. Trying to paint the UK as if it was Germany in the 1930s. The Irish Times has reached a new low. I would expect this of the Indo. Glad I don't buy papers anymore.

Any parent reading this who knew no better would think their children are now in fear of being deported/imprisoned or harassed.
By:
rock piper
When: 25 Jun 16 13:16
A awful lot of pontificating on here from men none of whom called the result correctly and failed to take advantage of one of the best betting opportunities you are ever likely to see, and ye could have yeer  feet up now enjoying the view of the UK disintegrating. I admit I was wrong on leave shortening up before voting but that was because I expected the market to come to its senses.

Conditions in the UK today are a consequence of neo liberalism/globalisation or whatever you want to call it, which Britain has implemented with far more enthusiasm than anywhere else, the Tory party has no intention of abandoning it, immigration is central to that project and the leave campaign has already rowed back on reducing numbers, they will instead control it more closely. In practice that would mean bringing in people from places like India who can be barracked and paid rates closer to the third world that India. That is if they don't row back on Brexit itself,Liam Fox is asking for a period of reflection before article 50 is invoked, there is no plan, they didn't expect to win and some of them didn't want to win, it was just a bit of populist rhetoric they took pleasure in indulging, and if Boris Johnson is reading this he knows who I am talking about.

Those posters on here railing against neo-liberalism should ask themselves what is the only current alternative to that project, and if that alternative comes to pass, will they not be among the first men in the ovens, because if the Stromtroopers want to identify time wasting malingerers who blow their benefits every week they will start reading this forum.
By:
rock piper
When: 25 Jun 16 13:39
Liam Fox has apparently changed his mind and said he wants article 50 invoked straight away, Boris is still in no haste though. Pull the trigger FFS and let the fun begin.
By:
GANT007
When: 25 Jun 16 14:28
Boris wants to head boy again. He doesn't give two hoots about the EU ,one way or the other.
By:
workrider
When: 25 Jun 16 18:03
This is what the UK saved itself from on Thurs....The audits have been kept secret from most MEPs, allowing the abuses to continue unchecked Photo: EPA
Bruno Waterfield By Bruno Waterfield, Brussels6:00AM BST 20 Oct 2011
A series of reports by the parliament’s internal auditor found that significant breaches of the rules were common among the 7,000 unelected officials who work for the EU’s assembly.
Staff are allowed to authorise their own expenses and pay allowances to family members, despite the auditor warning of the risk of “conflicts of interest”.
The reports, covering three years, identify instances of officials being given double payments or allowances to which they are not entitled.
Officials are failing to secure the best value for money for taxpayers when awarding contracts, while extensive funds are being given to the assembly’s political parties without any proper audit of how it is being spent, according to the reports.
Despite these findings, the audits have been kept secret from most MEPs, allowing the abuses to continue unchecked.
Related Articles
Britain refuses to sign off on EU budget 22 Feb 2012
European Parliament's budget by numbers 20 Oct 2011
EU fraud analysis 20 Oct 2011
European Parliament secret internal audits: key points 20 Oct 2011
Only 14 senior MEPs, who make a committee known as the “bureau”, which administers the assembly, have seen the reports. They have been required to sign a confidentiality clause barring them from disclosing the problems.
The three most recent completed reports, covering 2007, 2008 and 2009, have now been released to this newspaper following the threat of legal action and the intervention of senior MEPs who believed they should be made public.
Klaus Welle, the parliament’s secretary-general, tried to block the release by arguing that public exposure of the audits would “disrupt decision-making”.
But Diana Wallis, a Liberal Democrat member of the bureau, said openness would help MEPs to improve the working of the parliament.
“We had had plenty of time to look at the internal audit report and implement recommendations, and therefore I believe that we had to ensure that these documents were released,” she said.
According to senior officials, the auditor, a British accountant named Robert Galvin, has repeatedly written to Mr Welle and the bureau expressing his concerns. His reports disclose that “critical actions” needed to fix the problems have either been ignored or implemented too slowly.
Mr Galvin found persistent problems with how “personal entitlements” and perks, which were worth £81 million in 2006, were paid to civil servants. In 2008 the auditor identified “several areas of considerable risk”.
According to the auditor, administrative staff have been paying expenses to themselves or relations with other officials getting double payment or getting allowances they were not entitled to.
“Personnel [need to] raise awareness of its file managers of the risks of conflicts of interest and to instruct them never to handle their own or their relative’s personal file,” he warned.
The reports found “critical” irregularities and conflicts of interest concerning procurement contracts worth more than £600 million a year.
Even in the department of the parliament’s president, the auditor found “significant” and “materialised” problems with procurement and contracts.
At the time with which the reports were concerned, there were persistent rumours of nepotism in the department. The auditor noted that officials should in future "avoid inappropriate treatment of selection and exclusion criteria
In the parliament’s finance department, which has a budget of £298 million, the auditor found a “lack of assurance that the best value for money is obtained” and “ineffective” controls over contracts. The latest audit, from July this year, noted that the department had not replied to the auditor’s concerns.
“Systemic” problems were identified in the information and logistics department, which has a budget of £158 million.
Audits also found that political parties were given funds even though they had refused to abide by the rules.
The cash is paid without proof of “eligibility of costs” or any proper audit checks that the money is spent properly. In 2006, three EU political parties, which can receive subsidies of more than £5 million a year, refused to “disclose fully their sources of funding” in breach of the rules.
Martin Callanan, the leader of the Tories in the parliament, said: “It is appalling that these activities were kept secret for so long. Instead of addressing the problem, the authorities tried to stifle publication. The Telegraph is to be congratulated for its persistence in bringing this information to light,” he said.
Marta Andreasen, the former whistle-blowing chief accountant at the European Commission and a member of the parliament’s budgetary control committee, said: “The parliament’s bureaucracy operates with a total lack of transparency, which is how it gets away with these irregularities.”
David Lidington, the minister for Europe said: “Clearly, reports such as these are worrying and further emphasise the need for increased transparency across all EU institutional budgets.”
A European Parliament spokesman said: “The very aim of these reports is to improve the parliament’s management by identifying risks and weaknesses. The auditor makes recommendations to the management, which are then carried out and followed up again by the auditor, as the internal auditor points out himself.”
Is it time for Britain to rethink its relationship with the EU?
No, the financial situation is too serious to make changes now
Yes, we should take back some powers but not withdraw from the EU altogether
Yes, we should get out of the EU
VoteView Results



EU
News »
World News »
Europe »
Bruno Waterfield »
Related Partners
The best way to transfer money overseas
In EU
Migrants and refugees arrive at Hegyeshalom station on Saturday after travelling across Hungary
Walking with migrants: my 15-day journey from Piraeus to Munich
A combat vehicle with a Russian flag makes its way towards the town of Kramatorsk 
Ukrainian troops confront separatists
A collumn of Ukrainian men riding on Armoured Personnel Carriers is blocked by pro-Russian activists in Kramatorsk
Ukraine on brink of war

Loss of 3m jobs on EU exit 'a false perspective'
David Cameron: I will settle the Europe question with EU referendum
Cameron's promise: EU referendum by 2017
PMQs: Ed Miliband challenges David Cameron over EU referendum
PMQs: Miliband grills PM over EU vote
By:
workrider
When: 26 Jun 16 19:18
Social media. Love it or hate it, it’s here to stay. A way to instantly jump into the whirlpool of public discourse, a way to instantly react to events across the world, social media undeniably has many pluses, but it also has its minuses too.

The UK’s decision to leave the European Union has been the catalyst to some very ugly exchanges this week on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. From the safety and anonymity of bedrooms up and down the country people have been hurling abuse around in the most unedifying way. Bitterness is in the air.

I have watched in growing horror as the threats have become ever uglier, ever more vehement. Bad losers are one thing, but losers who turn to intimidation and bullying are a different thing altogether.

From the girl bemoaning the fact that her ‘cheap flights’ and ‘phone charges’ are going to increase due to ‘old, senile, white racists’ to someone whose life of leisure on the Spain’s Costa del Sol would seem to be under threat from self-same ‘old, racists,’ the discourse is heading towards a very, very dark place.

Here, in all its glorious technicolour, is one such rant from yet another disappointed Remain voter, one whose community arts-based business benefits from various public funding streams, a fact which may or may not have informed the following invective:

I know that most of my friends are sharing in my feeling of horror and revulsion this morning, however if you are one of those stupid deluded nationalist ****wits that has done this to us, please do me a favour and de-friend me now - I don't think I will ever be able to forgive your pathetic ignorance, wilful stupidity and sick and twisted racism. Enjoy the brief feeling of glory before you have to acknowledge the full horror of your bigoted twisted views. Don't try to justify, defend or sugar coat, just close the door on your way out. I feel sick to the stomach and horrified at what you have done.

As I write the BBC and Guardian are indeed doing their very best to whip up rhetoric that is as divisive as it is aggressive. And judging from the comments just quoted, they are succeeding, too.

Specifically, they are attempting to fuel inter-generational hostility, an old v young polarisation of the recent EU Referendum i.e. by voting out, old, senile, white racists have ruined the future prospects of an entire generation. For organisations forever berating those who ‘divide’ us and propagate the politics of ‘hate,’ it’s nothing if not an interesting way of framing the debate.

Such reporting not only smacks of sour grapes, but is also highly inflammatory and just plain reckless. Have a peek on Twitter or such like and you will encounter some very highly charged messages from ‘young’ people accusing ‘old’ people of screwing up their lives and worst. The tone is hard, mean, recriminatory…

Not that this concerns the BBC and Guardian unduly, a couple of media organisations still licking their wounds after what has been a resounding rejection of their neo-liberal globalist agenda. And boy how it hurts. It hurts so much that these ‘enlightened’ left-wing news outlets are now out for vengeance.  Oh yes, they’re looking for a target upon which they can unleash their ire.

Step forward, ‘old people.’

According to those charming people who call the Liberal-Left home, old people don’t matter that much. Soon enough they’ll be dead, right? So why the hell should they be involved in a future that doesn’t concern them? Nice.

Among some highly dubious contentions, this latest BBC and Guardian ‘narrative’ has to be one of their most hideous to date, a narrative specifically devised to cause distrust and unrest. A narrative calculated to divide. A narrative calculated to fracture,

Having watched how the EU referendum has unfolded these past few weeks I have been particularly struck by not only the nastiness of the Remain side as realised by the BBC, Guardian and the likes of Geldof, but the
By:
workrider
When: 26 Jun 16 19:21
but the sheer scale of their selfishness and entitlement has been truly shocking.

From the good folk of Gibraltar through Peter Mandelson’s and the Kinnock’s EU pension rights to our friends worried about cheap phone tariffs, a substantial number of these people seem to have no other reason for supporting the EU other than financial incentivisation.

The list is a long one too, for the tentacles of the EU reach long and far.

The BBC, virtually the entire arts industry, the mainstream media, the bulk of the political class, charities, universities, bankers, global capitalists… follow the money and there’s a very good chance all roads will inevitably lead to Brussels.

Despite the incessant narratives of the Liberal-Left, this referendum was actually never about old v young. General Elections have never been about old v young, yet it is well known that older voters favour Conservative, while younger voters favour Labour. So why the ageism? And why now?

The answer to that question gets to the heart of the neo-liberal agenda favoured by elitists such as the Guardian and BBC. For this is the agenda of a globalist elite who have decided that, as self-declared progressives, they know what is the best way forward for the little people like you and me.

And now that their globalist agenda has been rejected they are smarting.

Expect in the coming weeks therefore plenty more recalcitrant Leave voters to be door-stepped by cunning BBC and Channel 4 journalists. Expect these highly selective and edited ‘interviews’ to be models of regret and shame as these ‘old’ and very contrite voters reveal their disgusting working class ignorance.

Expect plenty of sneering from the effete Liberal elite telly gang lead by the likes of Evan Davis, Matt Frei and the utterly repugnant Jon Snow. Expect the old v young ‘narrative’ thus to be propagated without cessation and, most worryingly, without any consideration for the effects upon the immature minds of those upon whom this invective is intended to inflame.

If, God forbid, this narrative does push one of these brainwashed, hate-driven millennials into an act of violence against one of the BBC’s reviled ‘old, white, racists,’ then I hope and pray these Left-wing hyenas will finally stop with their hateful narratives. Somehow I doubt it.

In the world outside the media and political elitist bubble, accepting defeat gracefully allows individuals to retain their dignity, to walk away with their heads held high.

What a quaint thought, the mind-set no doubt from a bygone era, the choice of behaviour of those horrible 'old' people. The past. Who needs it?
but the sheer scale of their selfishness and entitlement has been truly shocking.

From the good folk of Gibraltar through Peter Mandelson’s and the Kinnock’s EU pension rights to our friends worried about cheap phone tariffs, a substantial number of these people seem to have no other reason for supporting the EU other than financial incentivisation.

The list is a long one too, for the tentacles of the EU reach long and far.

The BBC, virtually the entire arts industry, the mainstream media, the bulk of the political class, charities, universities, bankers, global capitalists… follow the money and there’s a very good chance all roads will inevitably lead to Brussels.

Despite the incessant narratives of the Liberal-Left, this referendum was actually never about old v young. General Elections have never been about old v young, yet it is well known that older voters favour Conservative, while younger voters favour Labour. So why the ageism? And why now?

The answer to that question gets to the heart of the neo-liberal agenda favoured by elitists such as the Guardian and BBC. For this is the agenda of a globalist elite who have decided that, as self-declared progressives, they know what is the best way forward for the little people like you and me.

And now that their globalist agenda has been rejected they are smarting.

Expect in the coming weeks therefore plenty more recalcitrant Leave voters to be door-stepped by cunning BBC and Channel 4 journalists. Expect these highly selective and edited ‘interviews’ to be models of regret and shame as these ‘old’ and very contrite voters reveal their disgusting working class ignorance.

Expect plenty of sneering from the effete Liberal elite telly gang lead by the likes of Evan Davis, Matt Frei and the utterly repugnant Jon Snow. Expect the old v young ‘narrative’ thus to be propagated without cessation and, most worryingly, without any consideration for the effects upon the immature minds of those upon whom this invective is intended to inflame.

If, God forbid, this narrative does push one of these brainwashed, hate-driven millennials into an act of violence against one of the BBC’s reviled ‘old, white, racists,’ then I hope and pray these Left-wing hyenas will finally stop with their hateful narratives. Somehow I doubt it.

In the world outside the media and political elitist bubble, accepting defeat gracefully allows individuals to retain their dignity, to walk away with their heads held high.

What a quaint thought, the mind-set no doubt from a bygone era, the choice of behaviour of those horrible 'old' people. The past. Who needs it?
but the sheer scale of their selfishness and entitlement has been truly shocking.

From the good folk of Gibraltar through Peter Mandelson’s and the Kinnock’s EU pension rights to our friends worried about cheap phone tariffs, a substantial number of these people seem to have no other reason for supporting the EU other than financial incentivisation.

The list is a long one too, for the tentacles of the EU reach long and far.

The BBC, virtually the entire arts industry, the mainstream media, the bulk of the political class, charities, universities, bankers, global capitalists… follow the money and there’s a very good chance all roads will inevitably lead to Brussels.

Despite the incessant narratives of the Liberal-Left, this referendum was actually never about old v young. General Elections have never been about old v young, yet it is well known that older voters favour Conservative, while younger voters favour Labour. So why the ageism? And why now?

The answer to that question gets to the heart of the neo-liberal agenda favoured by elitists such as the Guardian and BBC. For this is the agenda of a globalist elite who have decided that, as self-declared progressives, they know what is the best way forward for the little people like you and me.

And now that their globalist agenda has been rejected they are smarting.

Expect in the coming weeks therefore plenty more recalcitrant Leave voters to be door-stepped by cunning BBC and Channel 4 journalists. Expect these highly selective and edited ‘interviews’ to be models of regret and shame as these ‘old’ and very contrite voters reveal their disgusting working class ignorance.

Expect plenty of sneering from the effete Liberal elite telly gang lead by the likes of Evan Davis, Matt Frei and the utterly repugnant Jon Snow. Expect the old v young ‘narrative’ thus to be propagated without cessation and, most worryingly, without any consideration for the effects upon the immature minds of those upon whom this invective is intended to inflame.

If, God forbid, this narrative does push one of these brainwashed, hate-driven millennials into an act of violence against one of the BBC’s reviled ‘old, white, racists,’ then I hope and pray these Left-wing hyenas will finally stop with their hateful narratives. Somehow I doubt it.

In the world outside the media and political elitist bubble, accepting defeat gracefully allows individuals to retain their dignity, to walk away with their heads held high.

What a quaint thought, the mind-set no doubt from a bygone era, the choice of behaviour of those horrible 'old' people. The past. Who needs it?
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 22:23
A nicely written and well composed piece, Wonks.

Have you had a brain transplant or are you copying and pasting without attribution?

The UK is in danger of re-entering the Dark Ages, I would hold off on the cheerleading.
By:
workrider
When: 26 Jun 16 22:41
Just shows your friends REAL side , scum of the highest order ,all the pretence slipping away now eh ?
By:
The Gotchee
When: 26 Jun 16 22:46
An Italian financial journalist has delivered a devastating verdict on the European Union - saying Britain is far better off out and hoping Brexit will help destroy the ‘anti-democratic project”.Paulo Barnard was presenting his regular slot on economic talk show La Gabbia days before Britain voted to leave the EU, when he exposed some of the most common held myths about Brexit.

Asked if he thought Brexit would create a domino effect in Europe, Barnard replies: “I hope. I hope it will destroy this rubbish.”

He continued: “If a Brit overlook’s Dover’s cliffs, what does he see?

“He sees a Europe that from 2007 to today has lost its GDP to the point of not getting it back.

“He sees an unemployment rate that’s double that of the UK. He sees banking gaps for €1.7 trillion in Europe, that nobody is covering.

“He turns around to the other side and sees an America that from 2007 to today has regained all of their GDP and added 10% to the national wealth.” Barnard then cites data from economic think tank Open Europe that says the maximum loss for the UK in leaving the EU would be 1 per cent of its GDP. In London, the loss was 1.1 per cent.

Barnard then addresses the threat of a commercial block being placed on Britain.

He says: “There’s just one small detail that no-one considers - Europe exports to the UK 10 times what the UK exports in Europe.

“It will be very difficult for France, Germany, Italy and Spain to lose billions of exports by blocking the UK.”

On leaving the single market, Barnard says: “There are 500 million potential European consumers that are in great trouble.

“While the UK, deregulated and outside the EU, has something like 2.2bn potential customers in emerging countries.”
He dismisses the impact on British business as “bulls**t” saying it will effect 0.4 per cent of the UK’s largest companies such as Shell, GlaxoSmithKlein and Unilever. 

To loud applause, Baranrd concludes: “Now the UK wants to leave from this Economocide, from this authoritarian EU and from this nomenclature. Then for what are the Bilderberg’s men trembling for? What are the huge companies afraid of?

“They’re not scared of economic loss - they are scared over the loss of control over a neb-feudal, authoritarian and anti-democratic project called the European Union.”
By:
pa lapsy
When: 26 Jun 16 22:47
Likes of yourself D'ozy brought about the vote the way it went.

You screamed and ranted in agreeing with Merkel to leave every chancer enter the EU, no one wanted that foisted on them.
There you go.
By:
workrider
When: 26 Jun 16 22:57
Pa , the Facists never really went away just changed their name to the Labour Party..Proving their lust for power even after losing!
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:00
Cry ^ where do you begin trying to correct that last post Cry
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:04
Thar ya go, indeed, Pa.

Have you looked into immigration in the likes of Norway and Switzerland by any chance?

Britain is facing the prospect of a return to the Dark Ages.....they won't have an ar$e in their troosers but look on the bright side...at least the downtrodden and displaced can cling to the impossible and futile dream of a return to racial purity.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 26 Jun 16 23:08
I think myself that was the breaking point WR,it was a demand by Merkel at the time,most European countries feel the same and if a referendum was held tomorrow in most it would now go the same way.
I think i was pro european most of the time but one voice never makes a "community".
Agree with The Gotchee to an extent,i.m not sure they have too much to worry about,maybe their financial part may have to move but for the ordinary person slightly dearer foreign holidays,cost of living and the cutting off of the cheap supply of plonk and snout.
I do think though people have voted a bit blindly and a lot would change their vote even on some of the minor points above.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 26 Jun 16 23:13
You were so short minded in "the they are not dangerous thread" Oz, msybe now for reasons posted on that and the consequences that they were dangerous indeed.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:20
I don't now how you can lay this at the door of Syrian Refugees, unless of course you are not very bright.


*******************************************************

Majority of lemmings in favour of jumping off cliff

A new poll has revealed that over 50% of the lemming population favour jumping off the cliff to an almost certain messy and agonising death.

“The poll results are fascinating,” said lemming pollster Simon Williams.

“Lemmings have a happy, comfortable, enjoyable life on top of the cliff and yet many of them believe that a suicidal jump onto the jagged rocks below would give them a better quality of life.”

A senior lemming figure from the ‘Vote Jump’ campaign group explained.

“Some lemmings say that a huge drop onto jagged rocks would be fatal, but the fact is that no lemming really knows what would happen if we all jumped onto a bunch of jagged rocks; we could bounce, the rocks could disappear, or we could strike up a robust trading deal with the rocks.

“All of these are all very real possibilities.

“To say that we would all be broken and killed by the rocks is just blatant scaremongering by a centralised elite group who seemingly have no confidence in the resilient nature of us lemmings.”

A ‘Vote Jump’ supporter agreed.

“Yeah, we’d be better off jumping for definite,” he said.

“I mean, yeah, being on top of the cliff and not dying and everything is great, but there are so many voles and guinea pigs coming in now that it just doesn’t feel like a lemming cliff anymore, you know?”

In other news, a recently conducted poll has revealed that Turkeys intend to vote for Christmas.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 26 Jun 16 23:26
You scathed me when i maintained that the vast majority were not refugees and scoffed at my 20% estimate that were genuine but were still being left in.
Maybe not very bright but realise you quickly changed your tune all the same to only encompass "Syrian refugees" you can deny that if you want but we both know better.
You and your ilk are at the heart of the leave vote like it or not.
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 26 Jun 16 23:30
Brilliant Ozy, Baldrick showing off too that he can now copy and paste Laugh
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:31
You must think I am some sort of gobsh1te if you think the point of that thread was to suggest that we should let EVERYONE in....that's the interpretation you seem to have mistakenly drawn.  Not even Mother Teresa would e suggesting an open door policy.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:37
Is it true, Rock, that they are dusting down the Leyland factories and unsealing the Mines?  That should compensate for the potential loss of jobs in the City and the loss of Multinationals who chose to have their EU HQs in the UK.

Aye by gum, lads, we have our country back Cry
By:
pa lapsy
When: 26 Jun 16 23:42
The point of that thread was a reaction i think, maybe you fell for the image of the picture or maybe it was a wind up to myself and others more conservative on the forum and i do hope that was the case, you did estimate the genuine cases very highly around 80% if i remember rightly. If not for people like yourself feeling the need to show their "compassion" in public (pledge a bed) you may not be in the situation you are cribbing about now,ye brought it on yourself, reap what you sow.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 26 Jun 16 23:56
What nonsense you sprout. 

I suggest you re-read the thread.....and fact check your erroneous recollections....its extraordinary that a thread about genuine people in genuine need should incense you to the extent that it has.

Falling for the picture?  A massive displacement of Syrian people has taken place, a catastrophe not a scale not seen about WW2, and you harp on about people falling for a picture.  As if the refugee crisis dd not exist.  Talk abut being in denial. 

I am a Conservative FYI, I also happen to be compassionate and my compassion extends beyond my family, my people, my county, beyond people of my own skin colour and creed.

Very few Syrian Refugees have been resettled in UK fwiw.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 27 Jun 16 00:03
No nonsense you and i know that.
You obviously took the time to re read the thread yourself.
We both know you maintained that 80% were at least genuine when in fact only 20% were.
You are no man,only an oil snake salesman.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 27 Jun 16 00:24
Twice the uncouth vulgarian has parrotted the line " Britain is about to enter the dark ages "
That's it for this foul mouthed gent,no attempt to back up this ludicrous statement,no comprehension of the irony of the statement but not to worry a picture will soon be posted.

Its unsettling that the shallow slogan shouter has no idea of what happened,no idea of the reasons.
He first blamed people of low IQs,he then shifted to the old ( presumably the one she wanted to euthanise )

Another Greek bailout is imminent,the EU is going for more expansion,an EU army is next in line.
The EU is crumbling and will implode shortly.

Britain will prosper governing itself again,it will have the jump on all the other European countries when they too must govern themselves.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 27 Jun 16 00:26
The part in parenthesis should read   ( presumably the ones he wanted to euthanise )
By:
keen leader
When: 27 Jun 16 01:08
"Britain about to enter the dark ages".

don't make a fool of yourself.

here is what is going to happen.

1- there will be no re-vote, Britain accepts the will of the people in referendums. Re-votes are for diddy nations like Ireland that can be bullied/bribed by the unelected Eurocrats such as Sutherland and his peers.

2- it will take a few years, but inside a decade the UK will have the strongest economy in Europe and the EU will be exceedingly jealous of it(at this point, in ten years, expect another few countries to have jumped off the EU train).

3- in ten years will the Euro still be in circulation? if they ever get around to examining the books in the likes of Italy, the arse hole would fall out of the currency and the Greek situation will seem like small fry...........meanwhile in ten years, Sterling will be regarded as the safe haven currency in the world.

4- Scottish Independence? much that I would have  liked the idea in 2014, I think the SNP reached a high water mark too soon in the general election in 2015, and despite all the talk about wanting to stay in the EU...inside about 3 years, it might actually prove more beneficial to the Scots to remain within the GB, than move to independence and hitch to a shaky EU..........in fact listening to the wily old Sammon the other night,I detected that the last thing he wanted was another quick Scot Indep Referendum........if a second one was lost inside a 5/6 year cycle, the game would be up for 30 or more years on the idea.........in fact as a party goes, the SNP are far better served existing as a party seeking independence, if they did achieve their goal, the party probably vanishes in no time.........
hence Sturgeon will be doing loads of barking but no biting and ultimately Scotland will not depart as mothership UK is a safer bet than mothership EU.

5- The vast majority of british people will see little or no material difference to their lives in the next 5 years due to the exit from EU....it will not effect the poor one jot........the only losers will be a small section of hitherto comfortable middle/upper class groups, some of whom may now lose because their  grants will end or others may have the inconvenience of uprooting and moving elsewhere.

6- the result of this referendum proved conclusively once and for all, if you did not know already, that the so called brains trust/brokers within money markets and banking institutions(the majority of whom punted heavily on Stay), well these geezers are simply market guessers pure and simple, they are the ones squealing the most, because they backed a loser.

7- finally Brexit and the upcoming aftermath of the divorce will be a great test to see the elements of active and reactive in the departure settlement, as it will pitch GB v EU.........on this match up, I would want my shirt on GB all day long.
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com