Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 232 comments are related to the topic:
IF AIDEN IS A GOD, HOW COME HIS SONS CAN WIN GROUP1S STRAIGHT AWAY

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 232
By:
brigust1
When: 07 Jul 20 18:52
AOB works for one set of owners at Ballydoyle. It is no surprise he trains so many winners because the owners have the best horses. It is a bit like saying Joseph was the best jockey in Ireland. Complete rubbish.
By:
brigust1
When: 07 Jul 20 19:03
Vincent built Balldoyle from the start but he was his own man.

The top horses he trained Alleged, Nijinsky, Sir Ivor, Apalachee, Ballmoss, El Gran Senor, Thatch and The Minstrel. Compare that to AOB's Hawk Wing.

I can see a Cecil, Stoute, Gosden et al to achieve great things with the goodies they have.
By:
know all
When: 07 Jul 20 19:17
Movewiththetimes07 Jul 20 14:36Joined: 21 Mar 12 | Topic/replies: 1,899 | Blogger: Movewiththetimes's blog
Serpentine (Morning price: 25/1 20/1 22/1 25/1 28/1 25/1 22/1)
(Ring price: 22/1 20/1 18/1 22/1 25/1 22/1 25/1 28/1 25/1) SP 25/1


A small bet from the coolmore operation (10 grand eachway) surely would of moved it

i seem to remember it was 16/1-20/1 with books midweek so they did very well to get 25/1, bet they are still laughing at that price they got, the really shrewd operators get it under the radar and as a smoke screen bet a few to confuse, they could get more of a kick out of this winning betting game for smaller returns as they have more than enough from breeding and must get a bit boring winning everything. if some have ever been successful betting you will know its not how much you won but how you plotted it up and knowing you out foxed the market thats the real high not how much
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 07 Jul 20 19:32
^ You do know bookies don't make the prices the punters money does Crazy
By:
mukdahan
When: 07 Jul 20 21:57
By the same logic then lester must have been an awful jockey for only being able to win 30 classics as he was often on the best horse or had a choice of them, im sure aiden with over 90 european classic winners must be worried that hes not getting it right, some crap posted on this forum.
By:
firstimevisor
When: 07 Jul 20 22:18
The reason for the Ballydoyle dominance is Galileo, not Aiden O Brien. There are any number of trainers who would be just as dominant if they got 80 Galileos to train every year.
By:
brigust1
When: 07 Jul 20 22:24
Lester only rode one horse in each race AOB runs any number. I wonder how many Derby's Lester would have won if he rode 6 in each race.
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 07 Jul 20 22:27
Lester used to have to jock other jockeys off the best horses to get his Derby winners, Moore has the choice and they still can't get it right CryCryCryCryCryCry
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 07 Jul 20 22:29
It's simple if you think Moore is in Lester's class and Adian is in Sir Henry Cecil's class then you're reading the game all wrong.
By:
G Hall
When: 08 Jul 20 00:23
If Vincent had Hawk Wing he would probably have been retired to stud unbeaten.

Vincent trained six Derby winners, but some years didn't really have a Derby horse, or certainly not one good enough to win it.

Coolmore want to win it every year, and don't care what it takes, so they just throw the darts.
By:
elisjohn
When: 08 Jul 20 07:36
thats sad for me, g hall, but youre correct they just want to win and dont care which horse , they just throw darts, coolmore  quantity factory  rather than quality,
By:
elisjohn
When: 08 Jul 20 07:40
do you whats nice, on saturday theres a group1 thats exciting, i can study the form book etc, without worrying which of coolmores 5 are trying to win etc etc, takes me back into the 80s 90s this race,a proper race  the july cup , no obrien runners, bloody great.
By:
Big Black Cat
When: 08 Jul 20 09:13
The sheer financial clout of Coolmore means that they can throw as many darts as they like in the big races.

How many trainers can realistically go to an owner and tell them that a horse that's just broken his maiden at the 3rd time of asking the week before should be entered in The Derby (£10k this year I believe).

One of his horses (Order of Australia) that ran in both the Irish and French Derbys (with credit admittedly) is now a 4 race losing maiden, two of which were classics!

If you rocked up to an average owner and asked him to shell out the money to do that they would think you were nuts.

The Irish derby this year was arguably the worst classic ever seen, with the winner a G2 winner, the second a maiden winner and the 3rd and 4th maidens!
By:
elisjohn
When: 08 Jul 20 09:33
bbc, do you know that love in the 1000 gns , 3rd is a maiden after a dozen races,the 2nd has won 1 maiden, in the oaks bar the 2nd fav, you had maiden winners who between them had only won about 6 races in approx  25 attempts, yet love is being hailed as the next oh so sharpLaugh. ps by the way the worst irish derby has to be 2 years back , latrobe, listed class at best, was in a hcap few races later
By:
impossible123
When: 08 Jul 20 10:36
Coolmore do not splash out in sales unless to improve their breeding portfolio or create interest to shore up the prices of their produce at the sales; they produce their own in abundance, and competitive and superior their produce are too. As such, they can afford to throw as many darts as necessary to win. But, they will not run their top filly against their Derby winner except in The Arc, the most prestigious on the planet, in my opinion.

Until Love wins The Arc she cannot be put in the same category as Minding who was a prolific miler, only surpassed by Almanzor over 10f. But, she'd be if running and beating Enable in the King George at Ascot.
By:
knoxville
When: 08 Jul 20 11:05

Jul 7, 2020 -- 6:16PM, brigust1 wrote:


Well I must be a proper fool because I don't think he is a good trainer. He gets horses beaten than should not be beaten. He places them like a shotgun and runs them continually over the wrong distance. I am convinced had many of our top trainers had the opportunity to race these horses they would get beaten less, be better placed and achieve more. Of course he may not be in place to achieve what every other trainer tries to achieve so I may me judging him when he is achieving everything his bosses want him to achieve.


yes
you are a fool.
thanks for opening your mouth and confirming it.

By:
knoxville
When: 08 Jul 20 11:07

Jul 7, 2020 -- 9:57PM, mukdahan wrote:


By the same logic then lester must have been an awful jockey for only being able to win 30 classics as he was often on the best horse or had a choice of them, im sure aiden with over 90 european classic winners must be worried that hes not getting it right, some crap posted on this forum.


Fact

By:
brigust1
When: 08 Jul 20 12:05
This is just a domination of our sport. Look at mares like Found, Winter, Peeping Fawn, Imagine and Minding, to name but a few. Bred through a company owned by Coolmore. Look at the number of stallions they have in Ireland, America and Australia. Can't see Excelebration anywhere.
The horses they have bred can go to the sales ring and they can buy them back. How does that work? At least if they pay themselves enough it keeps the market prices up. What about tax? What chance have the smaller breeders got?
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 09:50
yes
you are a fool.
thanks for opening your mouth and confirming it.
  Laugh
By:
G Hall
When: 10 Jul 20 10:12
That's not very nice
By:
G Hall
When: 10 Jul 20 10:12
I would think brigust has forgotten more, than most of us have learned.
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 11:13
The sheer financial clout of Coolmore means that they can throw as many darts as they like in the big races. I think the Arabs have more money.
If you rocked up to an average owner and asked him to shell out the money to do that they would think you were nuts. The average owner would be lucky to ever own a horse as good as the 2 you mentioned and would enter them in a heartbeat. I think you are guilty of underestimating the equality of the quantity they have.
By:
jumper3
When: 10 Jul 20 13:12
Some points from above. I think Heffernan being based in the yard much be a massive bonus compared to Moore, even more this year. I cannot imagine Ryan Moore has been near Coolmore since February. It does appear that Ryan Moore has first option, he is stable jockey after all, but the 'scraps' on offer to the others, in other stables, these horses would be their No. 1s, by a country mile. If it was me, I'd want my no. 1 stable jockey in my stable most days, as part of the team. Still think Johnny Murtagh was the best arrangement they had with a jockey they had as No. 1.

I think with Coolmore it is all about winning Group 1s. Lower Group races are stepping stones to these races.

I always got the impression, going back to Aiden's NH days, that it was very much a partnership between him and Mrs Aiden. She was McCartney to his Lennon. I could be entirely wrong on that point but that was the perception to me. The icing on the cake has been Gailileo. I said in another thread, they would probably still have enjoyed tremendous success without this Sire, but with him, it has been off the charts. Galileo is now 22 and won't be around forever. Can they maintain all this? Probably, but by no means a certainty.

I agree if you are an Ante post punter, it must be a nightmare, thinking ahead to the Classics.
By:
brigust1
When: 10 Jul 20 15:41
Yes, you are probably correct Honcho. However, I believe irrespective of the clear playing field they have and the multitude of mares and stallions they have they are breeding mediocrity or training appallingly.

Just take a look at their Derby winners over the last 20 years.

Serpentine, Anthony Van Dyck, Wings of Eagles, Australia, Ruler of the World, Camelot, High Chaparral and Galileo. None made the Timeform list.

Now compare with the 20 years of the 70's and 80's with no Coolmore/Ballydoyle. The Derby winners that made the Timeform list.

Nijinsky, Mill Reef, Grundy, THe Minstrel, Troy, Shergar, Old Vic, Teenoso, Slip Anchor, Reference Point, Shahrastani and Nashwan.
And doesn't include Dancing Brave.

You make your own mind up.
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 15:47
You don't race against timeform, you race against other horses. Its about winning races. The ones behind the recent winners must be really crap as well then. Still it's the same outcome, they are head and shoulders above everyone else.
By:
elisjohn
When: 10 Jul 20 15:54
truehoncho, trouble is our trainers, horses are crap, the standards is terrible for years now, i said that frankel covered up the cracks for few years.
By:
impossible123
When: 10 Jul 20 16:04
I think the trainers over here are more scared of the runners from AOB/Coolmore than the punters here trying to guess which of AOB/Coolmore would be their most probable winner.
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 16:05
I don't know if that is true, it may be. I sometimes think they old rose tinted glasses make the past look better. My argument against it is (and it's not very strong), that if all the big breeding operations were breeding worse horses why aren't smaller breeders having more success?
By:
brigust1
When: 10 Jul 20 16:43
I think AOB has too many top class horses, he cannot give them the attention they deserve. The shotgun approach is not working. Australia should not have been beaten. Hawk Wing should not have been beaten. Look at Zoffany finished 2nd in the St James Palace to Frankel beating Excelebration and Dream Ahead. Excelebration and Dream Ahead went on to win three Gr1's each yet Zoffany won diddly squat.
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 18:12
Frankel wasn't beaten because they didn't try that hard with him. Zoffany is worth a good deal more at stud than either of the other two, isn't that the real win. You don't breed to race, you race to breed.
By:
brigust1
When: 10 Jul 20 18:54
That's crazy, surely? Had he won more he would be charging more? That's the real win. You win more you get more. Underachieving is never the aim of a breeder.
By:
cacique
When: 10 Jul 20 19:08
truehoncho • July 10, 2020 4:05 PM BST
I don't know if that is true, it may be. I sometimes think they old rose tinted glasses make the past look better.


Comparing to human athletics, (according to Wikipedia), the 100 meter world record in 1891 was 10.8. Now of course that was hand timed, but in 1891 they weren't exactly professional.

Fast forward , technology, diet, training, equipment - the record is 9.58.


Same argument could be said that if Vincent O'Brien had all the modern equipment that AOB has, he would have won more that 3 Grand National, 4 gold cupsand 3 arcs.


Or HRAC, Stoute, Darling, Porter, Dawson for that.



Would AOB have done it pre 1996?

So no I don't think they are rose tinted.
By:
TOP3MAN
When: 10 Jul 20 19:23
Its because he gets perfectly bred horses because of his dad is. His dad is very modest when they go on about him being a Genius, because he is that smart to relaise that he has the arsenal at hid disposal that no other does!!
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 19:31
Cacique, I'm not saying you are wrong but there is a dynamic you are missing. It is generally accepted that horses are no better now on average than they were 50 years ago (maybe more). They have bred then to the point where improvement now is extremely marginal. Humans on the other hand are far more likely to improve for technology and improved training techniques as they are not bred to be athletes. As far as who is the better trainer I would hazard a guess that AOB would have done better than VOB but its only a guess (and it doesn't really matter). As far as whether Zoffany could have charged more well my guess is if he had been with someone else it would have been less and certainly he would never got the chances he had when he retired.
By:
truehoncho
When: 10 Jul 20 19:56
I go racing a lot (when allowed!!). I don't miss many meetings at Newmarket and have horses in training so travel around a fair bit. I probably go racing a couple of times a week in the season and a few times a month on the all weather. I can honestly say that no other trainer comes anywhere near to impressing me as much as AOB. I spend most of my time at the paddock and any will tell you that AOB's are out first every time and walked for 1/2 - 3/4 hr before racing and he has been doing this for years and years. They always look settled even though  they have just flown/travelled in from Ireland and even if  they are on their toes or walking a bit short by the time they leave the pre parade they are settled and stretching well. No other trainers do it, I don't give a fudge what any one else tells you they don't.  There are never any dramas with him or his team and no one is ever rushing around. I have never heard any of them moan about anything even when the triple crown was lost to a drug cheat horse. This team gets lots of horses ready for racing week in week out and rarely do we hear of their good horses getting injured (unlike Darley Military March injured Quorto dead). The idea that anyone can compare this guy to trainers from the past to try and dis him is a joke. If people who post on here really knew what it takes to get these horses to the track and perform week in week out they would only admire him and his team.
By:
elisjohn
When: 10 Jul 20 21:06
i dont like what theyre doing to horse racing , but i do admire theyre professionalism , but i just cant have him as a genius trainer
By:
brigust1
When: 10 Jul 20 21:53
Sorry, Honcho but you are completely wrong. Firstly you are talking about a team where money is no object. Few trainers are in that position and those that are have produced more from their horses than AOB has.
But the main reason I think they are bad for racing is they have the ability to cheat as long as they gain. So when you know they have that ability how do you know when they are being honest?

I see nothing about them that racing gains from, absolutely nothing.
By:
kevo
When: 11 Jul 20 00:08
Galileo. Trained by Aiden O'Brien, owners Coolmore

Frankel: Sire Galileo. Unbeaten colt Trainer Sir Henry Cecil.
By:
cacique
When: 11 Jul 20 07:28
brigust1 • July 10, 2020 9:53 PM BST
Sorry, Honcho but you are completely wrong. Firstly you are talking about a team where money is no object.


I would have said money was the objective for Coolmore..... they don't do it for the fun of it.


Darley on the other hand money is no objective and all they did in the 90's was buy Sadlers wells offspring, all they did in the naughties/teens was not buy Galileo's offspring.


Are the Darley boys that bad at picking good horses to win classics that they let Coolmore do what they want, in the sales ring and at the breeding sheds?


Not too sure if there was foal share arrangements, but Australia was bought at auction, Camelot, Wings of Eagles, Was, Forever Together, Leading Light, Magna Grecia, Footstepinthesand
By:
brigust1
When: 11 Jul 20 10:32
That is exactly what I meant Cacique. They are not trying to save money unless through evasions.

Of course, there will be purchases to avoid too much in-breeding that will always be part of the plan but I guess providing the sire will have huge benefits.

Well spotted Kevo. Now check how many opponents AOB fielded against Sea the Stars in his 3-year-old season and compare it with the number they fielded against Frankel in the same period.
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com