Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
OliasOfSunhillow
02 Jul 16 18:26
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Apr 12
| Topic/replies: 2,532 | Blogger: OliasOfSunhillow's blog
Another piece of very sad news today but the industry and profits generated from cancer roll on. This primarily food borne illness continues to attract millions of our money for cures when the same amount of money dedicated to prevention would slash cancer rates to those found in other populations where it is pretty much unheard of. I would not give a penny to the likes of Macmillan so they can promote coffee and cake mornings nor would I give a penny to the British Heart foundation so that they can get in bed with Warburtons and promote bread consumption, a product directly linked with heart disease.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 6  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 231
By:
saddo
When: 02 Jul 16 18:35
My bruv believes the same. He has rheumatoid arfritus but won't go on the meds and uses diet, sometimes fasting.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:39
Intermittent fasting a proven method for disease prevention and longevity. Encourage him to continue
By:
the.mad.dog.man
When: 02 Jul 16 18:41
macmillan nurses rearly are angels if i ever won the lottery they would be the first to get a gift
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:43
Bread consumption and heart disease

when did this happen ?
By:
saddo
When: 02 Jul 16 18:44
Wheat aint what it used to be
By:
the.mad.dog.man
When: 02 Jul 16 18:45
i also got rheumatoid arthritis take 5 tablets every monday helps a lot
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:45
I have no beef with Macmillan nurses other than they clearly believe most of the propaganda put out by their organisation. They are helpful in mopping up the mess contributed to by macmillan who help keep the real causes of cancer hidden and promote treatments that in a recent survey 80% of oncologists would refuse.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:46
No it isn't not since 1960ish when it was genetically modified.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:47
There is no scientific evidence to suggest a link with bread and heart disease
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:47
Unless you are filling it with rubbish
By:
MC Roller
When: 02 Jul 16 18:49
I disagree mad dog, I thought they were cold and uncaring, and the heartless bstards will never get a bean off me. I'd rather die than donate. Support, what support, they never gave a damn about us, we just had to get on with it. Sad

Two weeks after the funeral, knock knock, can you spare us a donation.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:51
Not true edge, in the 'China Study' which is a huge epedemiological study with accesable data the greatest correlation between any food factor and heart disease was between wheat and HD. It was not just slightly significant  but had a whopping p value which means it had a high correlation. You should also read 'wheat belly' and 'Grain brain'
By:
saddo
When: 02 Jul 16 18:52
mad dog, don't know if it's the same meds but my bruvs were very toxic and life shortening, and as it is an episodic condition he reasoned he didn't need em all the time. If he feels it coming on he will fast before considering meds again, been off em for about 7 years. Veggie no gluten no dairy.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:53
these studies never identify a single factor properly Olias and if you believed every food related scare in the last 20 years you would eat dust only.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:54
Excellent, good for him Saddo, he has a brain as well as a free will
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 18:55
Edge, that might be true if you are reading these scrares in the daily papers but I restrict my research to more reliable sources such as PubMed.com
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:56
Ie a stressful smoker that drinks and never exercises, eats a lot of red meat or eats a varied diet and has no genetic predisposition is no different to someone who has a balanced healthy lifestyle and none of the other risk factors.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 18:56
your sources are reliable but none of the medical research would back this up, scare mongering of the highest order and dangerous.
By:
saddo
When: 02 Jul 16 18:57
He's a clever man Olias. I put him on a train to Dublin yesterday with pushbike and camping gear, don't know how he carries it all. He's having a month racing tour culminating in Galway.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:00
that simply not true, it has been shown that drinkers, smokers etc have far greater risk for disease than those that do not. As for the genetic argument well thats another huge red herring which although may have some relevance in some cases on the whole it is going to pounced on pretty soon by the drug industry to legitamise earlier drug treatment for people with no symptoms but some 'perceived' genetic risk. Heart disease for example has little to do with genetic disposition at least not to the extent that it provides the answer.
By:
ladycarla
When: 02 Jul 16 19:00
You can't live forever no matter what you do in life! What makes me laugh most is when I'm in a traffic jam and you see joggers running on the pavements, lungs working overtime breathing the deepest you will ever breath getting those car fumes deep inside the lungs SadSadSad
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:03
'Medical research' that would be the studies funded by drug companies or food lobbyists... highly reliable. You wont get too many large scale studies on brocolli funded by the brocolli maufacturers but I can tell you there was one very good study that pitched the Med diet Vs Statins. They had to call it of half way through for ethical reasons. The Med diet group was anialating the stating group in terms of favourable outcomes.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:03
Olias

That's my point about drinking and smoking, are the drinkers and smokers taken out of the study are those with a genetic risk factor accomodated for.

is the rest of the diet taken account of?

is exercise accounted for?

stress?

that would be some study that links bad health with bread in the western diet Cry

As for saying genetics play little part in these diseases , get a grip man!
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:04
I agree Carla but more importantly research shows that the most benefit comes from around 40 minutes of brisk walking
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:06
Yes any good research study accounts for factors that you have mentioned. populations such as pre 1960 Japan had little or no heart disease but when groups emigrated to USA they came down with it within a generation unless they held on to their japanese way of life.
By:
ladycarla
When: 02 Jul 16 19:06
But not in a cityCool
By:
appformat
When: 02 Jul 16 19:06
yes, the car fumes that shouldnt even be there. no excuse not to be using 100% electric cars in the 21st Century - other than the trillions the elite are making out of oil....
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:08
I agree, if you want to improve your chances get out of the city
By:
appformat
When: 02 Jul 16 19:08
and if you any need proof that our mainstream madia are in bed with the pharma companies, google 'noel edmonds cancer'
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:10
I forgot about car fumes! another factor that you would not separate out of a food study.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:11
Yes shocking but not surprising how he was villified for daring to speak publicly about any kind of alternative approach to cancer treatment.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:12
The china study was conducted on various rural chines populations which have distinct diet patterns. Car fumes would not have been an issue
By:
ladycarla
When: 02 Jul 16 19:12
If you took your statement at face value this would be the conclusion;

Little or no heart disease pre 1960 but living longer in 21st century so even though bread gives you heart disease it's far better to eat it as it keeps all the other diseases at bay which killed people pre 1960.

Or as i conclude, we see more heart disease in the 21st century than we did pre 1960 because we're living alot longer than we did! hence the heart wears out which I don't blame it as it beats 72 times a minute every minute every day till you dieCool
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:13
The new thinking of the best exercise is short bursts that raise the heart rate with short recovery periods then repetition a few times.

But as you age this may very well kill you if you are not in decent shape to start with/living a healthy lifestyle in general.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:13
You know there are tow profile doctors called Dean Orish and Carl ESSELTYN who have shown that they can not only stop heart disease but reverse it with dietary and lifestyle approaches. Ornish is now showing that the same approach is having positive effects on prostrate cancer victims. You wont hear about it though at least not to the same degree that you will be told by the media about the latest drug coming on the market
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:14
the china population would not be stuffing their faces with a lot of the junk the western diet involves
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 02 Jul 16 19:15
Heart disease was checked in older groups and it did not appear which kind of squashes the we are living longer argument. The people of Okinawa or any othe other blue zones who live the longest are not going down with heart disease as a cause of death
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:16
diet is essential in a healthy heart

fats, sugars and processed meats have all been shown to affect health in a a number of alarming ways.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 Jul 16 19:16
were them people stuffing their faces with processed meats?
Page 1 of 6  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com