Nov 13, 2012 -- 7:17PM, barrycool wrote:

The paradoxA casino offers a game of chance for a single player in which a fair coin is tossed at each stage. The pot starts at 1 dollar and is doubled every time a head appears. The first time a tail appears, the game ends and the player wins whatever is in the pot. Thus the player wins 1 dollar if a tail appears on the first toss, 2 dollars if a head appears on the first toss and a tail on the second, 4 dollars if a head appears on the first two tosses and a tail on the third, 8 dollars if a head appears on the first three tosses and a tail on the fourth, and so on. In short, the player wins 2k−1 dollars if the coin is tossed k times until the first tail appears.What would be a fair price to pay the casino for entering the game? To answer this we need to consider what would be the average payout: With probability 1/2, the player wins 1 dollar; with probability 1/4 the player wins 2 dollars; with probability 1/8 the player wins 4 dollars, and so on. The expected value is thus    E=\frac{1}{2}\cdot 1+\frac{1}{4}\cdot 2 + \frac{1}{8}\cdot 4 + \frac{1}{16}\cdot 8 + \cdots        =\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} + \cdots        =\sum_{k=1}^\infty {1 \over 2}=\infty \,.Assuming the game can continue as long as the coin toss results in heads, in particular that the casino has unlimited resources, this sum diverges without bound, and so the expected win for the player, at least in this idealized form, is an infinite amount of money. Considering nothing but the expectation value of the net change in one's monetary wealth, one should therefore play the game at any price if offered the opportunity. Yet, in published descriptions of the game, e.g., (Martin 2004), many people expressed disbelief in the result. Martin quotes Ian Hacking as saying "few of us would pay even $25 to enter such a game" and says most commentators would agree. The paradox is the discrepancy between what people seem willing to pay to enter the game and the infinite expected value suggested by the above naïve analysis.

What price would you pay?  One thing about this is that you can't spend an infinite amount of money.  So the practical value is only how much you would be willing to pay for a chance to win so many millions.  eg if you stopped the game when the pot got to £4m the right price would only be £11.50.