|
By:
Which ever way you look at it,he's putting his selections up and if you only look at the last 5 day results he is in front.The point that most are making is this,it's only a matter of time before it goes wrong,maybe 1 week ,2 weeks,who knows but even with it being a mythical bank ,it's still a good follow and thread.
|
|
By:
Quite right Grocer.
|
|
By:
it's a bit ironic that the martingale staking has actually led to less profits than backing all of the selections at level stakes so far.
i said the success will not be based on the staking but rather the ability to pick enough winners. so far the OP has produced enough winners. this week would have produced more profit at levels, bne interesting to see how this pans out. |
|
By:
*should have added not just the staking but the stopping at a winner too.
|
|
By:
This is without doubt the best thread to read and follow at present
I find it very strange when certain posters put up accusations about this being mythical etc In answer to a previous post....I am not the OP....The OP is different gravy, I have never picked so many winners or placed horses like the OP has done here I enjoy this thread which is more than I can say about most of the rubbish and slagging off I read elsewhere |
|
By:
thereisnowayyoulayedthat, you are choosing to believe the OP, which is your prerogative, I for the reasons cited many times by many others on this thread have reservations, which is my choice, not exactly sure how that makes me a guesser, but I won't lose any sleep over it, have been called a lot worse...!
|
|
By:
I think if you are interested in doing crazy bets and you have a spare £2,000 to lose, with an aim of making a hunded quid a day I think I'd rather find a 20/1 shot and lay it for two grand.
|
|
By:
Whippin Piccadilly I am not defending the OP and am sure the OP can handle the negative comments made
Cork Langer I have no reason to believe or disbelieve the OP, I enjoy visiting here to see how the OP is doing and am very impressed with the selections and methods so far I am also above mentioning mythical bets etc |
|
By:
op picks winners, anything else matters not a jot .
|
|
By:
thereisnowayyoulayedthat, the fact that you are impressed with the method being used says more about you than anything else you have or could post, and my congratulations on having superior standards, must get very lonely in your ivory tower...!
|
|
By:
Heres the deal
The mathematicians versis Whatyoulookingat Fair odds in a match the mathematicians 100/1 on whatyoulookingat 100/1 against. Thats a zero book lump on and you can be on |
|
By:
Cork Langer I call the hell out of many posters comments from behind my monitor but I would never post them in a good thread like this one
|
|
By:
zipper I find your conributions to this topic very amusing
|
|
By:
thereisnowayyoulayedthat, is it just coincidence that you are doing the laying thread based loosely upon the same parameters as the OP is applying on here...?
|
|
By:
Cork Langer No it is not a coincidence, I have read many posts about Martingale and decided to follow in the OPs footsteps to show it can be done, the last two selections are win bets so it has now become a lay and win thread
|
|
By:
have i missed todays winner
|
|
By:
Nowway you got a very long name and to be honest i dont give a dam
this muppet is odds on to lose .or i dont know FA |
|
By:
Yes and a big price at that
|
|
By:
It can only end in tears.
|
|
By:
well done so far whatyoulookingat keep up the good work
|
|
By:
Martingale? Bank £2000 ? Starting bet £25 ? 10 losers ?
25 L -25 50 L -75 100 L -175 200 L -375 400 L -775 800 L -1575 1600 L -3175 ....oops 3200 L -6375 6400 L -12775 12800 L -25575 |
|
By:
What if the OP is actually Gideon playing with bigger stakes as in Our Money and trying to make 1 Billion a Day.How can anybody want him to fail because if he does fail then we all fail. All he is trying to do is prevent a triple dip recession and I think you need to get the f*ck of his back because Gideon knows what he is doing!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
whatyoulookingat and Thereisnowayyoulayedthat - both posters have the same IP address. Are you the same person or do you just live together ?
![]() |
|
By:
good morning lads day 8 todays selections are as follows
wheres reiley 12.20s well mett 1.10t dark energy 1.30l young mags 1.40t quan 1.50s a decent excuse 1.55c savant bleu 2.10t drumshambo 2.30l laylas boy 2.50s doormouse 3.10t as usual we will be stopping at a winner good luck if you get involved |
|
By:
Any comment on Smiley Jack's post of 8.46 today...?
|
|
By:
or your quote after your laying thread went tits up last year
|
|
By:
Jekyll & Hyde
Starsky & hutch Cagney& lacy |
|
By:
plus the forum names are a similar concatenated style
|
|
By:
well i live with my wife if anybody else lives here
they must be invisable and should start paying towards the bills imo as for my quote after last years laying thread i repeat it lost on that day in question but overall i was still in front. fair enough it was a big hit to take, but since then my bets have changed, anybody has a right to make their own choice in how they bet surely you can understand that |
|
By:
thanks, was only asking a question that you repeatedly blanked,
good luck with the project |
|
By:
your mate should be along in a minute to back you up.
|
|
By:
no probs the dealer good luck to you also
|
|
By:
These type threads have been done many times before and usually with the same ending but if you pick 10 selections a day using SAW and the first wins then do the next 9 suddenly become cr@p selections? If not then why not carry on doing them and starting the staking again after having had the winner anywhere in the sequence as opposed to just stopping at a winner?
If you went 9 losers on the day using the staking system and then had a winner with your tenth and last selection that day then your first selection the next day would still be you next bet so why is there a break in bets if say on the day before you had an early winner? As for the stats on 3/1 shots, I don't think the OP is saying he backs all 3-1 shots, just that he picks selection that are 3-1 and better. |
|
By:
This is how I make £100 a day. Simple and disciplined.
|
|
By:
nice price on well mett in the next
should be called 'well backed' ![]() gl |
|
By:
Good luck with young mags 1.40t
|
|
By:
wd you have got through another day
big gamble too! |
|
By:
well done !
|
|
By:
below the 3/1 rule though so no bet unfortunately
![]() |
|
By:
it was 3.5 when the 1.40 went off and didnt get near 4
|