|
By:
went short did u get the 3-1 plus prior to plunge?
|
|
By:
what about when he posted them this morning
i don't know when he backs them ? |
|
By:
he couldnt DCI he had to wait for the 1.40 to run
he has to wait till the previous one runs or how can he stop at a winner? |
|
By:
Well done with Quan
|
|
By:
Surely you can't back them until the previous one runs, by which time the odds were no better than 3.5 as already said. Therefore, this cannot be ruled as a winner unless the "3/1 rule" is being ignored.
|
|
By:
yes i know but it was bigger 5 mins before race wasnt it just after his last horse lost not 100 % sure
|
|
By:
no it was 3.5 when the 1.40 went off
|
|
By:
funny sh1t, you people need to get a life.
|
|
By:
There is always a possibility that a gambler will place ammounts of money on horses at early prices etc if he feels the price is good for a system like this one, the gambler could then lay off most of the moneies placed once a winner was struck IMO
|
|
By:
monies
|
|
By:
his rules mate not mine, as he has clearly stated for his SYSTEM.
|
|
By:
just checked and manxy your right lol and was under from last loser till quan went off so was a no play
|
|
By:
one of the many flaws of the SYSTEM
|
|
By:
Smiley_Jack
15 Nov 12 08:46 Joined: 03 Feb 12 | Topic/replies: 168 | Blogger: Smiley_Jack's blog whatyoulookingat and Thereisnowayyoulayedthat - both posters have the same IP address. Are you the same person or do you just live together ? I have a comment to make regarding the above post and will keep it simple as I am obviously dealing with a poster that lacks knowledge and humour There is no way (excuse the pun) that the IP of the OP is the same as my IP and there is no way the poster Smiley_Jack has access to IPs on this site....Is there Smiley ![]() |
|
By:
yes the dealer next one under as well 3.20 currently but on flip side one helped him out earlier that went under, must be hurtful when u miss out maybe even by 5 cents and it walks home
|
|
By:
i do wish him all the best with it but for me when it gets like this 5 losers its like a game, hit a winner or run out of money, a race to see what comes first.
|
|
By:
he still hasn't answered the question of what happens when it comes to the end of the day and he hasn' had a winner AND his bank is not exhausted
Does he start afresh tomorrow and write of today's loss? or Does he continue tomorrow with today's loss brought forward? |
|
By:
swiftys thinkin aboot trying it look.
|
|
By:
Good luck with Drumshambo if you are still needing a winner
|
|
By:
i hope he wins out to be honest dont like seeing anyone lose
|
|
By:
Very well done with this
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Thats two winners now, that should shut the knockers up for another day
|
|
By:
whats that now 2800 i the kitty,take abit of bustin that will, just trying for a ton + stakes retrieval.
|
|
By:
Smiley_Jack Have I wrongly assumed that you are one of the knockers of this great winning run?
|
|
By:
this guys a funny nugget int-he
|
|
By:
manxy Makes a good point...Perhaps you should tweek things just a touch to make things safer for the future
|
|
By:
is that not what most of his knockers have said, the system dont work in the long term
|
|
By:
Perhaps doing the same system in the place market would add to the OPs wealth
|
|
By:
the longer it goes on the harder it is to bust, no-one seems to be ackowledging that fact, if he has a system that produces 20 percent strike rate, he needs enough bank, or enough luck until hs bank grows.
if he was doing this for a tenner with a 2k kitty, carried forward for a year, he would have 5650,getting harder and harder to bust as it grew. |
|
By:
and ps.
price is not as important as strike rate for this kind of venture, capital being paramount |
|
By:
thanks for all the comments lads its another winning day
i have thought about tweaking the system but could go on all day about ifs and buts. this suits me fine at the moment and i shall carry on doing it the same way manxy you have hit the nail on the head thats what people cant see. as i have already stated i could afford to lose 2k now and would still be in front i will have to be wrong a lot of times now for that to ever happen the other thing about betting this way is that it can be done anywhere, doesent just apply to the exchanges good luck today with the rest of your bets see you all soon |
|
By:
Another winning day, the dealer is seething.
|
|
By:
Sorry, if I sound too negative, but how can you afford to lose £2000 and still in front ? I thought the most you can win per day is £100 ? You have to be doing it more than 20 days to make you're statement correct, surely.
Am I missing something here ? |
|
By:
your under-funded mate, for the levels your betting.
i will a real-lie example of a 'proper' stakes retrieval plan, feel free to ask for random days in 2012, i.e. 5th to 7th of march for example. |
|
By:
as i have already stated i could afford to lose 2k now and
would still be in front you are a suspect £800 in front - how could you lose $2k and still be up? |
|
By:
The seethers are seething
|
|
By:
manxy Is being really sensible here and has mentioned how the growing bank is making this less and less breakable by the day
|
|
By:
well done again ! .
|
|
By:
WFT he has a bank of £2000 but to date he has got nowhere near using it having won £100 fairly qickly and he stops with bank intact and growing.
|