Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 232 comments are related to the topic:
YORK BOOKIES IN TATTS

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 232
By:
MaxED
When: 18 May 12 20:13
you guys cant have been looking.first race jocky and al cumbria one eighth
By:
MaxED
When: 18 May 12 20:13
you guys cant have been looking.first race jocky and al cumbria one eighth
By:
onthejim
When: 18 May 12 20:20
Got a stammer Maxed!
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 20:54
Come on now, thinking caps on.  How do we stop the shysters?
By:
nineiron
When: 18 May 12 21:22
How's about e mailing the managing director /
Racecourse manager at all the uk courses

I don't mind getting all the details together
By:
nineiron
When: 18 May 12 21:27
Then surely we can bombard them with e-mails if we put
Their e-mail adresses on this thread ?
By:
windmill
When: 18 May 12 21:27
tbf to jocky been around for a while now so must be making the game pay, and a few in the ring are now realising the u can,t beat him so join him scenerio, shame realy but bit like the early days of b,fair.
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 21:32
nineiron, maybe a similar approach could be to get friends to write in to the racecourses complaining?  As for the scenario being like the early days of betfair, that is the path that has lead us to the state the ring is in now.  As for joining him, I can make it pay without lowering myself to preying on the vulnerable.  If I couldn't, I would give up.
By:
nineiron
When: 18 May 12 21:53
I'm at bangor tomoz will update on who played
Straight and who was shafting the punters
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 21:57
I'm at Newbury.  Will report on Jockey and anyone else who didn't play fair.
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 21:58
We could take photos on our mobiles and put up a wall of shame!
By:
MaxED
When: 18 May 12 22:04
1st race today, no value to be had at 1/6th to bf prices then?Crazy
Place terms on here were shocking Grin
By:
daniels mother
When: 18 May 12 22:05
unfortunately no one reads the place odds signs .we bet win only and 'blasted away ' Grinafter turning away half the track we took 18 bets !!
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 22:07
MaxED if that was all they did then it could be defensible.  However, going 1/6th odds 1234 in an 18 runner handicap is not, nor is going 1/5th 1,2,in a 7 runner race when you have 135% in the place book at 1/4 1,2.
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 22:08
Hi dm.  Hope the results were kinder to you today.
By:
daniels mother
When: 18 May 12 22:11
wassie very NEARLY got yesterdays back Excited
By:
wasnot
When: 18 May 12 22:13
Hope business was better on the last 2 days.  Wednesday was as bad as I've known it at York.
By:
daniels mother
When: 18 May 12 22:17
steve took more in the playground apparently ,than wednesday !!probably doubled on thurs and 50 % increase again today
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 18 May 12 23:51
York Tatts, with few exceptions has become embarrassing. Many betting to a sixth the odds in the first inc G Hughes no 1 pitch. I mean is it imposible to frame a win market that makes the place (at a fifth)viable? Most 16-20 runner handicaps 90% books 1/5 odds. Fine I accept punters still betting with them, but isn't this whole thing(given the collapse in slippage) terribly short sighted?
By:
mmmalushka
When: 19 May 12 00:42
Hamilton tonight, almost all the books betting traditional ew terms,aye even BDH well done to him and welcome back,   the extremities of the ring where latham had 3 pitches being the exception plus of course Porter.
Sportsadvisor,these bookies moaning and whingering  about the lack of business whist offering inferier terms  than the high street to punters paying good money to go racing defies belief,treat your customers with contempt and eventually you have no customers.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 19 May 12 00:48
SPOT ON SPORT,BUT UNFORTUNATLY EMBARRASMENT ISNT A FACTOR FOR A LOT OF THESE SO CALLED BOOKMAKERS,TOTALY KILLING THE GAME.
By:
Davy Jones
When: 19 May 12 00:50
how are they killing the game
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 19 May 12 00:54
ARE U SERIOUS DAVY????????
By:
dave d
When: 19 May 12 01:48
mmammalushka !!! porter as you described him bets to one of the smallest win margins on the track ie biggest prices and you can have what you want on !! the fact he goes a 1/5 1 2 is neither here nor there imo.. its his personal business decision .... you dont have to bet ....... Cool
By:
wasnot
When: 19 May 12 07:52
is it imposible to frame a win market that makes the place (at a fifth)viable?

I agree with you sports.  Trouble is we all know from bitter experience that if you go the correct 1/5th and frame your prices to make the places viable, the punters will leave you out and queue up to be on at 1/6th/1/7th/1/8th with slightly bigger win odds.  You do the right thing by the punters and they bet with the shysters instead.  I think the problem is that only a few punters who go racing these days have a clue about betting, unlike years ago where they knew what they were doing and could see a blatant con when they saw it.  The only thing they understand is that 17/1 is bigger than 16/1.  This is why I think the Gambling Commission should be stepping in under their 'protection of the vulnerable' guise.
By:
MaxED
When: 19 May 12 08:05
GOOD IDEA NINEIRON I WILL BE AT NEWBURY TO REPORT ON ALL THE RENTERS SO CALLED REPS WHO BET WITH THEIR OWN MONEY AND ANY SIGHTING OF THE MORRIS FAMILY PLAYING MONOPOLY
By:
carpet1
When: 19 May 12 08:58
wasnot u say most punters dont have a clue,and u want the g/c to tell them to take 16s instead of 17s,ill leave that one for you to explain then,since they know 17 is bigger than 16
By:
adge
When: 19 May 12 08:58
for once i have to support mmmaluska and both he and i know that that is rare.

dave d , neville porter does bet to tight margins but 1/5th 1-2 is neither here nor there. isn't it , that is one of the biggest rip offs arround as those races are the biggest percentages in bookmakers favour.
i also remember he was the very first to go 1/5th odds in the ayr gold cup

not much to report from aintree last night other than the weather ruined it and the liverpool public clearly will not pay £23 to go racing.
[ i'm avoiding mentioning the 6/1 shot fatally injuring itself cantering to the start followed by the 10/11 favouite refusing to line up and the " official " announcement concerning withdrawal rule 4 btw ]
By:
democrat
When: 19 May 12 13:08
Not sure about your beef re Jack Bevan's alias Wassy !! Think you are adopting double standards when your alter ego is JOHN THOMAS !!!! LaughLaugh - or something like that !!
By:
adge
When: 19 May 12 23:13
thirsk today the 1/6th odds widely appeared in both divisions of the maiden.
first was just 103% [ at 1/5th ] and second was overbroke at 97%

any book with any quality would have wom well on both races on places
By:
wasnot
When: 19 May 12 23:30
Jockey waited until the last 2 at Newbury to spring into life them BAM!  17 runner h'cap @ 1/6th odds 1234 and KAPOW! 17 runner maiden where my place book was over 130% he put up 1/6th odds 123.  However, his performance was trumped by Kenny Wager who offered worse place terms (usually 1/6th) in every race.  In the Lockinge he put up 1/7th odds EW.  I had 2 lads look at my board in a 12-15 runner h'cap & choose to ignore my 20/1 at 1/4 odds 123 in favour of Kenny's 18/1 at 1/6th 123.  What on earth can you do?
By:
wasnot
When: 19 May 12 23:34
and my other trading name is not John Thomas demo!
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 20 May 12 08:36
always amuses me at York to watch valuable front line pitch holders stare at my 1/4 odds sign as if I was betting to lose on purpose.
of course whilst they're staring they're not taking any bets..decline to one sixth number of bets over 5 years ago is apparent - why? (number of bets - not average wager size don't forget)
and finally, heads in their laptops, not on what's in front of them
major pitch holder(position wise) told me he was worried when framing his book about the odds of those below him. I wonder what's the point in buying the high ground - if not to bet well?
Shame about Greg Hughes, bets to lose and cares little if he does. 1/6 odds first race Friday. Way to lead
and in the South? Barry Johnson and Martyn Verrall getting it on together - abusing scheduled Y to rent pitches to each other. Shameful examples from so called directors of the ARB - and in Barry's case - the two minute 'bookie' - representing bookies on the AGT and FRB board.
Hang your heads in abject shame
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 20 May 12 08:36
always amuses me at York to watch valuable front line pitch holders stare at my 1/4 odds sign as if I was betting to lose on purpose.
of course whilst they're staring they're not taking any bets..decline to one sixth number of bets over 5 years ago is apparent - why? (number of bets - not average wager size don't forget)
and finally, heads in their laptops, not on what's in front of them
major pitch holder(position wise) told me he was worried when framing his book about the odds of those below him. I wonder what's the point in buying the high ground - if not to bet well?
Shame about Greg Hughes, bets to lose and cares little if he does. 1/6 odds first race Friday. Way to lead
and in the South? Barry Johnson and Martyn Verrall getting it on together - abusing scheduled Y to rent pitches to each other. Shameful examples from so called directors of the ARB - and in Barry's case - the two minute 'bookie' - representing bookies on the AGT and FRB board.
Hang your heads in abject shame
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 20 May 12 08:37
always amuses me at York to watch valuable front line pitch holders stare at my 1/4 odds sign as if I was betting to lose on purpose.
of course whilst they're staring they're not taking any bets..decline to one sixth number of bets over 5 years ago is apparent - why? (number of bets - not average wager size don't forget)
and finally, heads in their laptops, not on what's in front of them
major pitch holder(position wise) told me he was worried when framing his book about the odds of those below him. I wonder what's the point in buying the high ground - if not to bet well?
Shame about Greg Hughes, bets to lose and cares little if he does. 1/6 odds first race Friday. Way to lead
and in the South? Barry Johnson and Martyn Verrall getting it on together - abusing scheduled Y to rent pitches to each other. Shameful examples from so called directors of the ARB - and in Barry's case - the two minute 'bookie' - representing bookies on the AGT and FRB board.
Hang your heads in abject shame
By:
ivorknackerov
When: 20 May 12 09:06
I go racing regularly and if bookies are offering inferior odds and place terms i always use my phone to bet online.
By:
adge
When: 20 May 12 09:10
good post , sports advisor.
the last point was brought to my attention at york this week.
as you say , for those who wish us to look up to and set standards and a good example , their actions cause us to look down at them
i echo , shame on them both
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 20 May 12 09:25
yes good post sportsadvisor
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 20 May 12 09:31
thanks guys. I'm not concerned at total turnover by the way, I'm looking at the number of bets. Even if modest (which we take as a service of course)
Racecourses still delivering attendances, but bets well well down
What are we doing wrong, it's not so much the EW - that's a strong factor yes, but are we just too boring these days?
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 20 May 12 09:33
as barry dennis said the other day to many hobby bookmakers who dont give a toss just like to turn up and show off
Page 4 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com