We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Sandown, ok, thanks for the reply and I approximately agree with how you price GH on the different ground scenarios.
We all have our favourite races and we all have different opinions of what constitutes the 'best' of anything so that is a pointless debate that I won't get into. The Arc is the 'best' 12f race in your opinion, fair enough. However in view of your earlier opinion on the effect of the draw and it having even more importance on faster ground then doesn't that mean therefore that most Arc winners, particularly those on faster ground, are slightly overrated, as the draw usually plays very little part in the way handicappers assess the results? Does this sit well with you for a race that is supposed to be the 'best'? |
|
By:
Does this sit well with you for a race that is supposed to be the 'best'?
The way a race is rated doesn't really matter that much imo. Is it still the best race in terms of the horses that run in it? Yes. Is it generally reckoned to be the best race however its rated? Yes. I would prefer the official handicappers to rate the race, any race, on the bare facts, and leave interpretation i.e trip handicapping, to those who wish to do it. Then we can make our own adjustments. Given the variety of things that effect the outcome of a race, I can't see why we should worry too much about draw effect as opposed to any other influence.. How we rate the race as independent handicappers is part of the fun and skill of the game, isn't it? |
|
By:
The way a race is rated doesn't really matter that much imo
Again, fair enough. I didn't pose my question properly as along with the way winners are rated I also meant do you think a race that is supposed to be the best should be significantly (in your view) influenced by numbers out of a hat? |
|
By:
Godolphin own most of JH and they have only Manatee running for them. Can't understand it.
Maybe a deal has been done with Golden Horn. |
|
By:
On the draw I also think it's absurd the way the do it ,I would give previous years winner first pick ,followed by top 3yo races like Derby ect and go on prize munee or ratings ,followed by grp1 races and finishing positions in previous years race ect ect but a random draw for such an important race is not right .Fastest qualifiers in trials should also get preference over a horse who has little in the book .Would also try and get last years winner to turn up and give the race form some longevity
|
|
By:
do you think a race that is supposed to be the best should be significantly (in your view) influenced by numbers out of a hat?
No, I suppose not. Maybe picking owners/trainers out of a hat and letting them choose might be a tad fairer. Allocating by rating? Possible I suppose, but wouldn't that favour those who have already got proven form over those who are lightly raced with lower ratings? Is that fairer? At least they have stalls. Lining up w/o stalls must have produced some heat." Triers at the front," I recall, was the starters instruction.Before my time, of course. |
|
By:
Thinking again about GH on soft ground, its very hard looking back to say beforehand just how badly a horse might run. Camelot in 2012 ran 22 lbs below PB, St Nicholas Abbey ran 23 lbs below Workforce ran 16 lbs below best PB in 2011Galikova 13 lbs below in the same race in the same race.Sixties Icn ran 13 lbs below in 2006. If horses run below their best, they may well fade dramatically at the end. If GH has had enough he probably wouldn't come within 10 lb of his best. But how do we know that beforehand. Its dangerous to write any horse right off.
|
|
By:
But how do we know that beforehand. Its dangerous to write any horse right off.
It's true we can't know. But we can use past experience, not just in the Arc, of similar situations where horses have had busy seasons, hard races and recent form that might be a sign that their best form is behind them. When can one race be predicted as too many? It can't because all horses are individuals. Even though Dylan Thomas had the form to win that year's Arc I wouldn't have been surprised if he'd run below par with the season he'd had. As it happened it was his very next run in America that proved one race too many. All we can do is estimate the average chances of a horse running below par after a season like Golden Horn's had and judge whether we think he's already showing signs that he might not be quite as good as he was earlier. One thing I have noticed in the past is when a horse does hit a downward turn the deterioration is emphasised even more on soft ground. |
|
By:
I do not think some people quite understand what it would mean to Mr Magnier if Sheikh Mohammed’s jumped up Darley stallion Dubawi knocked Galileo, the world’s foremost stallion, off the top spot in the prestigious blue ribbon European sires' championship. As of today there is just £23,497 between the leading stallion Dubawi and the long reigning champion Galileo. Over the past month or so, and certainly the last few weekends, Mr Magnier has clawed back a monumental deficit by throwing every Galileo under the sun at all the Group races of value. Significantly, Coolmore have a shed load of regally bred Galileo juveniles to call on in the forthcoming 2yo championship events in relation to Dubawi and Darley, they even have ten or so Galileo juveniles entered in the £500,000 Tattersalls Millions 2yo Trophy.
However, since the Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe is the richest race in Europe, and 3x more valuable than any other championship race left this season, it will have a crucial impact, even if just playing for place money behind Treve, as will winning the Champion Stakes, the 2nd most valuable. From the perspective of the Coolmore breeding empire trying to stop the Darley thoroughbred breeding operation, it has appeared in recent weeks that Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe all evolves around Galileo’s filly Found and Dubawi’s representatives from the classic generation in New Bay and possibly Erupt, and the older horse Postponed, with the Galileo colts, Bondi Beach and Order Of St George (and Highland Reel) quarantined before supposedly leaving for the Melbourne Spring Carnival. Surely one can see this leaves Mr Magnier with the scantiest of hand in the Arc, given his sole play thus far is a doubtful stayer. However, it was a certainty that Mr Magnier would shrewdly refrain from letting the Darley entourage know his true intentions until the confirmation of entry and supplementary stage on the 1st October. At the first forfeit stage this morning (Tues 28th), Darley openly scratched Postponed their one trump card highlighting total tomfoolery, a play Mr Magnier had to wait and see to believe. At the same time he played Tapestry, his decent older filly alongside his already known card in Found. What might have gone unnoticed is that John Oxx’s Sea Moon also stood his ground. When you gather that he is owned by Mr Magniers’s associate, Aussie magnet Lloyd J. Williams, does that set off any alarm bells? Now tomorrow at the 2nd forfeit stage I doubt there will be a significant incident, however, at just after 11.30am CET on Thursday the noble 3yo colt Order of St George will be supplemented (and possibly even Bondi Beach now we know now of Sea Moon’s likely participation) and entered into an already maximum size field (20). Matters not as Handicap French Galop will scrub those rated lower than him. Later in the day will come news that Order of St George, owned in partnership by Mr Magnier and Lloyd J. Williams, will be ridden by Ryan Moore. The name of the aforementioned colt from Ballydoyle is also quite fitting in this instance. The Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George is a Roman Catholic order of chivalry, an Equestrian Order dating back to the Emperor Constantine and one of the oldest Orders of Knighthood. It has the motto In Hoc Signo Vinces ("in this sign you will conquer"); conquer in this case means to finish in front of the Dubawi’s in the richest race in Europe on the first Sunday in October. Winning the Epsom Derby and the Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe may be quite something, but these bear no comparison to the real blue ribbon, the title of leading sire in Europe. It belongs to the Coolmore lineages, human and equine, entrusted and overseen by the exceptional Mr Magnier. His shining Knight Order of St George will shortly be upon us. |
|
By:
That's inspired Madhu. Youve put your head on the block for sure.☺
|
|
By:
Oppenheimer had Golden Horn in the sales as a yearling I believe, he mostly keeps the fillies and sells the colts.
|
|
By:
Excellent stuff Madhu.
|
|
By:
I like it Madhu.
|
|
By:
Tongue in cheek perhaps.
|
|
By:
Meanwhile, back in reality, Free Eagle reported to be running.
And btw Madhya, something you've repeatedly said on here that is blatantly false, there is no replica of Longchamp at Ballydoyle - I can't believe people have actually backed OSG :/ |
|
By:
And as low as 33/1,.for a horse in quarantine ... sold to run in the staying handicap.
|
|
By:
Chad Collins
Friend of mine works near the track, she posted me a picture yesterday that looked like the track being watered. Will post the photo as soon as it is approved... Time for you to come forward again Chad. Who is telling porkies..... your friend or France Gallop? |
|
By:
If nothing else it's a bloody good read though, 'ffs' - leave him be
![]() Must admit the idea of swerving a softish or holding or gluey or whatever ground Arc with OOSG to run on a baked track in Melbourne is bonkers. We all know that, he wants dig. Kingfisher has the best chance for them down there - I'd go so far as to say he's been plotted up since Royal Ascot - and it would not surprise me one bit if we got a wild supp tomorrow. Order Of St George would certainly fit the bill (as would Intilaaq ) |
|
By:
Yowsa, didn't think a picture would cause an international incident. If FG say it is Auteil, fair enough. My friend out there is NOT a horse racing fan, but saw a racecourse on the BdB being watered and sent it to me!
So, I'd say it was a mistake, but a pretty easy one to make. Only presented as info that folk might be interested in, and couched in pretty equivocal terms, I thought. |
|
By:
3 out - Sea Moon, Karaktar, Criterion. At least one of those was left in by mistake yesterday and it would not surprise if it were two. Shambles.
|
|
By:
There will be at least 3 supps tomorrow - Golden Horn, Shahah and Spiritjim
|
|
By:
Shambles indeed.
Treve for me with Dolniya the e/w value at 33/1. |
|
By:
Weather and Ground Report
FRENCH GROUND AND WEATHER Updated - 30 September 2015 Disclaimer: We are no longer taking the responsibility for the accuracy of the ground reports from France. What we put up on this website is what we are told the ground conditions are. We will put officially beside the status if it comes from France Galop or the racecourse itself and it is the responsibility of the trainer to make further inquiries from a different source if they believe that the reports underneath are inaccurate. ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* The ground at LONGCHAMP is officially GOOD TO SOFT (30th September) We have been informed that Longchamp expect the ground to be Good at the weekend. They have stated that they will not water For up to date weather reports please click on the links below: |
|
By:
Weather and Ground Report
FRENCH GROUND AND WEATHER Updated - 30 September 2015 Disclaimer: We are no longer taking the responsibility for the accuracy of the ground reports from France. What we put up on this website is what we are told the ground conditions are. We will put officially beside the status if it comes from France Galop or the racecourse itself and it is the responsibility of the trainer to make further inquiries from a different source if they believe that the reports underneath are inaccurate. ************************************************************************************************ ************************************************** The ground at LONGCHAMP is officially GOOD TO SOFT (30th September) We have been informed that Longchamp expect the ground to be Good at the weekend. They have stated that they will not water For up to date weather reports please click on the links below: apologies |
|
By:
I really hope they don't water and that is pocket talking
![]() |
|
By:
Chad Collins
Fair enough.Everyone makes mistakes I suppose but not knowing Auteil from Longchamp? How long has your friend lived in France? Anyway, good to know that even in France the Betfair A/P forum is read even by FG. Still think you were right to post it as you were told it was Longchamp. |
|
By:
put the corn out chad and the chickens will come pecking!!
|
|
By:
Now now chaps. I think it would be very easy to confuse two racecourses in the same area if you are not a racing fan, and have next to no knowledge of the sport! Honestly posted in good faith as thought it was interesting. Thanks to FG and other eagle eyed experts for being able to tell the difference and setting us right.
|
|
By:
Anyway, on the arc itself Dolniya and Erupt EW for me!
|
|
By:
Treve drifting! Maybe on the back of the conditions
![]() |
|
By:
Almost certainly the conditions and more support for Golden Horn. I still find it odd in these supposedly more enlightened times how a horse can gain a reputation for requiring specific ground conditions despite the overwhelming evidence that suggests otherwise. Sometimes it's just because of a comment from the trainer, which is often just a scapegoat excuse for a poor run. Anyone who believes Treve needs cut is conveniently ignoring her Prix De Diane win a couple of years ago.
|
|
By:
But thats not the point is it Figgis? She might be versatile (I still think she's better on softer myself), but her main rival Golden Horn clearly prefers it on better ground, hence the drift.
|
|
By:
I've already just said there has been more support for GH on account of the ground, but there still remains a belief that good ground or quicker will lessen Treve's anyway, there has been no drift on New Bay.
|
|
By:
Yes I know you have, whilst at the same time criticising those who think Treve is better on soft.
|
|
By:
whilst at the same time criticising those who think Treve is better on soft
Yes, why is she better on soft then? |
|
By:
"Anyone who believes Treve needs cut is conveniently ignoring her Prix De Diane win a couple of years ago."
Figgis, The key part of that sentence is the last five words. Most on here should know a horses's ideal ground conditions can change as they get older, frequently veering towards a soft surface, as old bumps and bruises stack up against them. A win on fast ground might not mean anything two weeks later let alone two years. Take Workforce as an example....he smashed the clock in the Derby but was jarred up afterwards and needed dig to be seen at his best subsequently. |
|
By:
Yes, why is she better on soft then?
Not so sure she is but she is also less of a risk on soft. Trainer reported at the time that her hooves affected her at Ascot and she has had back problems. Trainer also reported that new shoes had solved the first problem. That leaves the back issue. If she feels it then she may run below her best. Can't see that the ground will be too firm for her however, so don't think it is an issue in any event. If the ground rides good on Sunday then I suppose that GH's supporters will get stuck in. |
|
By:
Take Workforce as an example....he smashed the clock in the Derby but was jarred up afterwards and needed dig to be seen at his best subsequently.
Headmaster, there's a big difference between a horse needing cut in the ground to show its best and connections wanting cut in the ground to look after the horse's long term welfare. If a horse didn't act on fast ground then there would be little chance of it getting jarred, it's a big effort on the ground that does the damage. |
|
By:
Figgis. Its an opinions game... there are no such things as cold and hard facts. As Headmaster points out, one run a couple of years ago doesn't conclusively prove that she is just as good on better ground.
You're entitled to your opinion that ground makes no odds to her, and you may well be right. But its a bit daft to mock others with differing opinions to your own. |
|
By:
To be fair Figgis you make a good point on whether she wants it soft or not, easily her best performance on the clock is last year's Arc which was run on officially good ground and where she went 2.26.05 compared with the 2.32.04 in the soft conditions they time before. I suppose because the visuals of her performances on soft going especially beating Orferve by 5L make it look like she wants softer going when in fact probably her best time against the clock and I don't know this for sure but her best timeform figure may well be last year's Arc.
The performance in the Prince of Wales and Vermille have maybe clouded the judgement on her with regard to the going, maybe she was just sick over the summer and took time to recover. It is certainly something to ponder as my first thought was to agree she would prefer soft but on close inspection of the videos I am not so sure ![]() |