|
By:
I know that such simplistic views as expressed by Charlton are not in the majority on this thread, thank goodness otherwise survival at this game would not be possible. I thank all those who have contributed much to the debate whether I Agee with them or not. At least they show their knowledge and experience whereas Charlton does not.
sounds like sour grapes from another loser wondering how the simple approach managed to back winners at 7/1, 3/1, 6/4 and 4/5 all in the same race. |
|
By:
But to dismiss the going and the draw belies an unbelievable lack of understanding.
what moron dismissed the going? |
|
By:
5 5+ olds are at a disadvantage at the weights compared to 3 yr olds at this time of the year over 12f
hihm please |
|
By:
Fallen Angel 04 Oct 15 19:49 Joined: 06 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 1,999 | Blogger: Fallen Angel's blog
Timeform did an article about three days ago saying there was a very small draw bias stalls 1-4 in the Arc but nothing discernable for any of the stalls outside of this. It heavily swayed me, I can add a link on here. Rate reply: | report block user RozelKid RozelKid 04 Oct 15 19:12 Joined: 20 Aug 09 | Topic/replies: 1,210 | Blogger: RozelKid's blog Well i will ignore the draw in future - at the end of the day the best horse in the race always wins ...whatever the draw. the angel and the kid know |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
sounds like Donald Trump - you's are all losers, total lightweights, you just gotta check the ratings, I'm a ratings machine :D
|
|
By:
muhaarar top rated 1st 3/1
simple verse top rated 1st 7/1 solow top rated 1st 11/10 where's the mug who said you can't make money backing the top rated? |
|
By:
fascinating - "big step up on performance"
check the ratings and send the hihm in please top 3 rated - 1st 2nd and 3rd |
|
By:
FASCINATING ROCK who recorded a career best last time and should relish the conditions.
watch and learn boys |
|
By:
zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz
|
|
By:
snooze you lose fella. i'm guessing you don't withdraw much from this a/c
|
|
By:
Absolute prate prat
|
|
By:
zzzzzzz zzzzzzz zzzzzzzz
|
|
By:
prat
is that what the losers call the winners? |
|
By:
zzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
By:
Anyone have the Charlton2005 post count (1) before Arc (2) after Arc ?
|
|
By:
This thread is still anoying the feck out of me , and been thinking ,there is a right few donuts that posted on it ,but there was a few whos total contribution was to make sure the thread was not going to deliver ,they sidetracked continually and a think they need named shamed and given very short thrift on the next one ,not sure about all the steaming afters ,but he sounded very angry indeed ..... A think he failed to back the winner after listening to the utter tripe that was pasted on here
![]() |
|
By:
In the Breeders Cup, Found won the race, but more importantly Golden Horn won the ratings, :P
|
|
By:
Personally I thought it was a decent thread, with people coming at the race from different angles and offering stats and opinions on a variety of factors that can influence the outcome of the race. The opinions weren't all agreed on but they were opened up for debate which is always a good thing in my view. I think the only real divide is between people who see a race purely as a puzzle to be solved and those who see it as an event with a multitude of possible outcomes where the challenge is to accurately price those possibilities.
|
|
By:
Figgis,
that's quite a good point, and it reminds me of the old dichotomy of whether to "back the winning horse, or the best value horse". maybe it's more interesting to search for the outright winner, but no doubt if you value money then you search for value, Anyway, it's clear the ground played a major role in Golden Horn winning. Moreover, given his form on fast going he should probably have been about joint favourite. Great thread and great race as always, and a very worthy winner. |