|
By:
Sounds reasonable F. I will be taking a price on BOG depending on what is on offer and with whom. I can often get on small with outsiders but lumpy, for me anyway, can be a problem especially with knock backs. I will almost certainly end up on here but the bookies seem to hold down these prices early on so it will have to be nearer the off anyway. Good luck. We'll be collecting I'm sure, just how much.
![]() |
|
By:
I think the drift on Australia was more about the forecast good to soft going than anything else. I can't see there being a big move for Eagle Top, a horse beaten last time by two of the older horses opposing him here and who doesn't particularly look as though the drop down to 10f is especially going to be in his favour. Therefore unless it comes up soft I'd be surprised if he touched evens, but you never know, even if he does I reckon that's only around his true odds anyway.
|
|
By:
I meant if it comes up good to soft, I imagine they'd withdraw if it got genuinely soft.
|
|
By:
*drift on Australia in the Derby
|
|
By:
Ladbrokes have completely left this market alone.
|
|
By:
theres about 5 mils of rain mon and tues on the forecast i use what is usually pretty reliable dont see the ground any worse than good and a good chance the track could miss it, the only time i remember it being wrong the rain the day before the king george at ascot.
|
|
By:
This is how I see it on figures:
116 Mukhadram 116 Telescope 116 Australia (possible scope for improvement) In terms of Mukhadram against Telescope,I think it's a Golan / Nayef scenario, where a very tight King George finish will translate into a win for the speedier animal at York. To my eyes, Mukhadram travelled better than Telescope into the final 2 furlongs. However, I suspect Australia will be able to pounce late on for a narrow victory. In terms of fatigue, Mukhadram has had 3 big races but he did have a 3 month break after the World Cup, whereas Telescope has been on the go since late April. Australia should be a fresh horse and ten furlongs should be fine, but it does intrigue me that there have been precious few 'vibes' about him over the last two months. At the prices I will be backing Mukhadram. Sorry if that makes no sense to you, Brigust. |
|
By:
Why on earth is The Grey Gatsby such a big price?
|
|
By:
O'Brien voicing "fitness concerns". as if he's going to send Australia light to the Juddemonte. Covering all angles, if he gets beat he wasn't 100% and will come on for run, if he wins he's won despite not being at full fitness so must be a wonder machine.
|
|
By:
That makes absolute sense H. For every backer there is at least one layer. If Australia doesn't turn up or is over rated then Mukhadram must have a very good chance. I wouldn't be laying him anyway.
I read that Wickedt. I think I ave made my thoughts abundantly clear about the Coolmore set up. This is far from new. How can you bet with confidence? |
|
By:
Does anyone else think it is incongruous for AOB to claim the horse will need the run while his son is breaking his balls to ride it?
|
|
By:
Brig, there definitely seems to be a Coolmore smoke screen developing, concerns about fitness and the possibility of overweight but why come all the way to York in a tough Group 1 for a "prep" race for other Autumn targets. If AOB can`t get one ready to run then I don`t think they would be running.
There is always the possibility that Australia is not good enough to beat the others but we`ll only find out on Wednesday. The Derby form has not really been franked with Kingston Hill not being good enough in the Eclipse against the older generation. Kingston Hill runs in the Voltigeur which may be over his optimum trip and if he can`t win then for me is another negative but if he wins comfortably I see that as a positive for Australia. Overall I would be waiting till the last half hour before deciding what to do. Currently Australia is around 8/11 with a further 2% to be squeezed out of the market. If Australia drifts and the drift is sustained I will not be a backer and if this is the case the other runners presumably will shorten and I will try to trade my bet on The Grey Gatsby for a small profit and then just watch and let it all unfold. Bottom line if I back Australia it will be small in comparison to Derby bets. Good luck whatever you decide to do. |
|
By:
Thanks F. My plan was three and a half at 4/7, five and a half at 8/11, seven and a half at 4/5 and a k on anything bigger. I reckon this is the crunch race. If he doesn't win here then the Irish Champion and Arc can almost be forgotten. None of these would win an Arc, it's his best trip and the ground should be perfect plus he gets the allowance. Plus I always think a good colt will beat a good filly and look what the filly did. If he loses and heads for Ireland I think it is very likely he will be very short in an uncompetitive race. And the Arc would almost certainly be out of the question.
It's not uncommon for trainers to say something negative about their horse before a big race and it's usually because they expect it too win and look for any reason it may not. I thought this horse would beat these easily and I still think that. |
|
By:
And guess what? Laddies has finally stepped into the ring and they are saying loud and clear they don't want bets on this horse.
|
|
By:
laddies always open up too short brig, I learnt that from my hols as only bookie near by, no bog in store ever there, rancid firm
|
|
By:
Australia should win if he's anything like top class as the rest aren't top nothcers. Not sure this is Mukhadrams track so at the prices I've backed Telescope, and to a large extent Ryan Moore, in the hope that the drop in trip will see him do a Royal Anthem type performance.
|
|
By:
I think mukh will tow Australia into the race and if Australia is good enough he wins imho at least he will have beat by kingman on his cv
|
|
By:
Now that the field has cut up Australia's task has become a bit easier than it could've been. The two older horses are the ones most likely to give him a race, although I wouldn't be surprised to see Telescope run below his best as he looked to have a hard race last time. In an 8 runner field I would've backed Mukhadram win and place but I'm less tempted to back him for only 2 places. On my figures Australia should come out on top but by not much more than a length, so unless he's improved again I don't see him winning easily. I'd make him a slight odds on fav mainly because he's had a better preparation for the race than his main rivals, I still think he's too short but there isn't really enough of a discrepancy there for me to make him a lay at current odds.
My view is the opposite of Feltfair's, if he became a drifter I'd back him. I take O'Brien's comments with a pinch of salt, my view is he's not quite so sure anymore that the horse is his best ever and is getting the excuses in first just in case. I doubt he'll drift much though. If he was to harden further to something like 1/2 I would be interesting again in laying him but as things stand I'll just watch. |
|
By:
I agree about the price Fig, the bigger he is the more I will have on.
I don't agree about the proximity though AOB's comments may make me eat my words. I think he will win well because I don't rate his two older dangers. I think the course will be too fast for both of them and when you consider Mukhadram was 14/1 for the Eclipse and he finished alongside Telescope last time puts it into perspective. Apart from the JOB weight issue and 'fitness' comments this is the perfect scenario for me. You need some opposition to give you a price. |
|
By:
Or in the event of JOB putting up a couple of pounds overweight I'd lay him at current odds.
|
|
By:
I would n't be overly concerned about a 53 day lay off for Australia nor the alleged weight gain as a developing 3yo (as long as he does n't show up looking fat as butter!)
UP's thoughts about the track for Mukhadram are interesting, he is 1/1 there but was hardly impressive when disposing of Grandeur at 4/9 last summer - Haggas concedes he was n't at his best that day and initially thought he was n't suited by going left-handed - however, it transpired he was lame after the race which is more likely to have had a bearing on his performance.His only other left- handed run was a perfectly respectable effort in the Dubai World Cup. Anyway, I think Mukhadram should be clear second favourite - he's perenially underrated - probably partly due to a non existent juvenile campaign and a less than stellar 3yo season - more pertinently, he gave Telescope a nice tow in the King George and was coming back at him right at the death, prior to the King George Telescope's entourage were adamant that 12f on fast ground were his optimum conditions wheras Wednesday's race will be far closer to Mukhadram's optimum conditions if the excuse for his (winning) performance at the track last summer is legitimate. I'm similar to Figgis but might be prepared to back Mukhadram ew two places... will have a think about it and see if there's some 13/2 knocking about come race day. I an also see the argument for The Grey Gatsby being overpriced (he definitely likes the track!) but it's really hard to see him reversing the 2,000 Guineas form with Oz given 10f is likely to see the latter to best effect. |
|
By:
Australia is worth opposing IMO: looks like a 12f horse and might not be good enough anyway.
|
|
By:
Arod will finish in front of the Grey Gatsby
|
|
By:
Add to that, of the main bookies, Laddies are clear top priced Australia's dangers.
|
|
By:
Cant see why Arod should finish in front of The Grey Gatsby.Was the French derby win a fluke?
|
|
By:
Any suggestions about will break the mould tomorrow and go longest first? I suggest Laddies will have an empty Australia book, they open it very late and went longest on everything else, while taking bets for everything else. Will they stand it or balance it? Laddies to break rank first.
|
|
By:
Don`t you use Betfair Brig?
|
|
By:
Yes I do F it's just deductions I try to watch out for. Outsiders often offer better odds on here and BOG can be inviting. In the end close to the off I bet on here depending what I have left to put on. I decide my stake then where to get it on. Often I find the shorter ones on here can be beaten on the books. In the ARC the first three in the betting on here can be beaten on the books. Do you only bet on here?
|
|
By:
Almost exclusively.
|
|
By:
Where most bookies went 8/13 and Laddies went 4/7 that has now started to move. Some bookies are easing to 4/6 while Laddies has strengthened to 1/2 alone. They don't want Australia at all.
|
|
By:
Do you find a benefit on here as opposed to the books F? I guess you leave it very late? I have a range of bets I invariably cannot leave it to the very last minute on. Sometimes if I leave it late on here I can find myself chasing down a price. I try to back it and it's gone. I try to get the shorter price and that's gone etc. I look at the books and the price is better so I take that if I can then find the price has recovered on here. Do you find that?
|
|
By:
Invariably I get bigger prices on here and will only go to the big firms when I think they have got it wrong but they tend to be very defensive. The last time I remember going into the local betting office was to back Camelot to win the Derby at 3/1 with Betfred and Dawn Approach at 5/1 for the Guineas with Ladbrokes. I have to admit I rarely look these days and have joined the cash less society.
|
|
By:
I must admit I haven't done any research on it, I suppose if I get the time I will. I do like to go racing on the odd occasion though. I cannot remember the last time I had a bet in a betting shop.
I have tried something a little different for a bit of fun. I have backed Oz on here for the Arc at 11s with a view that when he wins tomorrow his Arc price will detract and I can cash out at a better profit and a free bet. We will see about that one. |
|
By:
Sounds reasonable.
|
|
By:
Gone for TGG as he represents value e/w , he won the French Derby doing Cartwheels, hard to believe any three year old with the exception of perhaps Australia could have won more easily . We know for certain that TGG improved for stepping up to ten furlongs , theoretically Australia may well do the same , but theory is all very well when an animal has some punting value to mine but in his case there is none and the ground is not firm which would make him a very hard horse to beat , we do not have to speculate over TGG because this exuberant and enthusiastic runner he is clearly better over ten GL
|
|
By:
Laddies still making it abundantly clear they don't want any bets at all on Australia. They are also going longest on all of his opponents and even in the place market they are miles shortest at 1/7. They are stand out by some way.
|
|
By:
get yourself to jam staines then brig, 8-11 still available
|
|
By:
First bit of good news backed Kingfisher at 254 last night and layed 190 this morning
![]() |
|
By:
I can see a scenario where Telescope and Mukhadram beat each other up allowing Australia to take advantage (if he's able) just like what happened in the King George. Ryan Moore may plan to attempt to get past Mukhadram later than at Ascot, or even allow Australia to hook up with Mukhadram for the first duel and pick up the pieces from their battle. Mukhadram is such a good horse and difficult to pass that it may go against whichever of the other two tries it first leaving the other to pick up the softened rivals late on.
|
|
By:
obviously in the KG it was Taaghrooda and not Australia
|