Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 183 comments are related to the topic:
Bayern confirm Pep as new boss

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 183
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 17:39
it's a bit like going to celtic at the mo'

or real madrid if barca didn't exist.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 17:39

Jan 16, 2013 -- 5:36PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:


"Dont think so, he has chosen not to follow the billionaires money"Maybe not but it's not as if Bayern don't spend much. They spent more than City last summer.And they spent more on one player (Javi Martinez) than any other side in the Bundesliga spent in total.


There seems to be the belief that Bayern win every year which they dont.

I have said many times that this Bayern team has won one title in the last four seasons.

They have as their main rivals a team that is stronger than either Chelsea or Man City and arguably Manchester United.

By:
Biscuit1979
When: 16 Jan 13 17:43
It doesn't matter what they've won in the last 4 years, he's taking over next summer. And he's taking over a team on top of their game who will quite likely be champions. Bayern have an established settled side.

Neuer (26), Alaba (20), Badstuber (23), Lahm, Kroos (23), Schweinsteiger, Muller (23), Javi Martinez (24), Shaqiri (21), Mandzukic (26) and then Robben, Ribery and Gomez. Bayern have and buy all the best talent.

Every other side in Germany ends up selling their best talent, e.g. Ozil, Khedira, Sahin, Marin, Holtby, Kagawa, Podolski. Lewandowski has refused to sign a new deal. Gotze will be on his way soon enough.

It's no contest as to whether Bayern is a safe option at this moment in time.
By:
A_T
When: 16 Jan 13 17:45
taken an easy option here - clearly the stress at Barcelona took it's toll and so he's dropped a level rather than go to PL or back to La Liga
By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 17:46
Bayern Munich are one of the most respected brands in world football.

The "safe option" is a misnomer.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 17:48

Jan 16, 2013 -- 5:43PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:


It doesn't matter what they've won in the last 4 years, he's taking over next summer. And he's taking over a team on top of their game who will quite likely be champions. Bayern have an established settled side. Neuer (26), Alaba (20), Badstuber (23), Lahm, Kroos (23), Schweinsteiger, Muller (23), Javi Martinez (24), Shaqiri (21), Mandzukic (26) and then Robben, Ribery and Gomez. Bayern have and buy all the best talent.Every other side in Germany ends up selling their best talent, e.g. Ozil, Khedira, Sahin, Marin, Holtby, Kagawa, Podolski. Lewandowski has refused to sign a new deal. Gotze will be on his way soon enough.It's no contest as to whether Bayern is a safe option at this moment in time.


Biscuit -

I could point out all the talent the teams in England lose just as easily - Fabregas, Modric etc.

Do you honestly believe that Dortmund are a poorer side than Man City and Chelsea. Or that Shalke are poorer than Arsenal?

By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 17:49
how is it a misnomer?

jf he's as good as a lot of people think bayern will be fabulous.

if he's half as good as they think he'll win the league and do well in europe.
By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 17:53
why bang on about "safe option"?

He's the biggest name in management. Bayern Munich are one of the biggest names in football. If he's successful they'll displace Barcelona as the best side in Europe. That has nothing to do with being the "safe option", that's thoughtful career development.
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 17:56
if he's succesful they'll replace barca??????????????????

thoughtful career development, or money for old rope?
By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 17:58
I take it there's a point to all the question marks?
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 17:59
Judge him when he has left.

If they win a title every second year, a cup competition every second year and doenst win the CL then he has carried on the norm as they have had the last ten years.

If he improves on that then he has been a success.
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:01
that's the point jam.

he dosen't need to do too much to be regarded as succesfull.

the success is already there.
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 16 Jan 13 18:03
The only way i see him being under any pressure there is if Heynckes wins the CL this year
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:03

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:01PM, mexicano wrote:


that's the point jam.he dosen't need to do too much to be regarded as succesfull.the success is already there.


No I think you missed the point.

If he takes them to a new level of success than they have not been achieving in the last ten years then that will be him taking them to a new level.

By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:04

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:03PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:


The only way i see him being under any pressure there is if Heynckes wins the CL this year


Biscuit - what would it take for Guardiola to have done a brilliant job at Bayern?

By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:05
well quite frankly that's obvious.

but if he "marks time", he'll still be regarded as a reasonablr success.

hence the safe option.
By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 18:05
He has to win the Champions League. Anything less and he will have failed.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:06

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:05PM, hippie wrote:


He has to win the Champions League. Anything less and he will have failed.


So he wins three league titles and doesnt win the CL and he has failed?

Why would that be a failure?

By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:07
mexicano - was Mourinho a success at Chelsea?
By:
jermaine defonebox
When: 16 Jan 13 18:08
Well he would as he likes to inherit a team.
Incapable of building his own and knows it   
Barca was franks team and he was the luckiest guy on earth anyone on this forum could have took over that team
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:08
hippie 16 Jan 13 18:05 Joined: 07 Jun 05 | Topic/replies: 5,668 | Blogger: hippie's blog
He has to win the Champions League. Anything less and he will have failed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

with a team that should have won it last season.

could be regarded as not a lot to do.

therefore safe option.

but, by the way it wouldn't neccesarily mean failure if he improved the club in other ways
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 16 Jan 13 18:08
JamDav - Win the CL for them.

He'll be taking over a side who will (barring a disaster) be Bundesliga champions and they'll probably win the cup too (they're at home to Dortmund in the quarters).

So let's say he takes over a side who've just won the double. He can only improve on that by winning the CL. Anything else and he's just continuing what Heynckes already did.
By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 18:08
Bayern Munich are judged on their success in Europe. That's how big they are.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:10
So he wins a couple of double etc and improves on what Heynckes has done, but does not win the CL he has failed?

Why is not doing something they have not managed in over ten years a failure?
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:10
of course mourinho was a success at chelsea.

two titles on the trot]first for fifty years]numerous cups.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:10

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:08PM, hippie wrote:


Bayern Munich are judged on their success in Europe. That's how big they are.


So they have not been succesful for over ten years?

By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:11

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:10PM, mexicano wrote:


of course mourinho was a success at chelsea.two titles on the trot]first for fifty years]numerous cups.


But he was brought in to win the CL.

They were the easiest job in the country when he took over and were outspending everyone to win the title and has by far the best squad.

By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 18:12
They were in the Champions League final in May. That constitutes success to me.

They could play the whole season behind closed doors and still make tens of (if not hundreds of) millions of pounds. That constitutes success to me.

They are Bayern Munich. That constitutes success to me.
By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:14
what he achieved was success.doing things the club had never done.

so if you're saying not winning the cl is failure that's ridiculous.

as i said if the club just carries on as they are that will be regarded by some as being successful.

hence the "safe option"
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:14

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:12PM, hippie wrote:


They were in the Champions League final in May. That constitutes success to me.They could play the whole season behind closed doors and still make tens of (if not hundreds of) millions of pounds. That constitutes success to me.They are Bayern Munich. That constitutes success to me.


Sorry but getting beat in the CL final is not seen as success by any of the big clubs.

By:
hippie
When: 16 Jan 13 18:15
you're the spokesman for "the big clubs"?
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:17

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:15PM, hippie wrote:


you're the spokesman for "the big clubs"?


As much as you are I am.

If you think any of the biggest clubs see getting beat in the final of the CL as a success then you dont have any idea at all.

An achievement to get their possibly. Success - not a chance.

By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:17
so by jam's reckoning 99.999% of managers fail.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:17

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:17PM, mexicano wrote:


so by jam's reckoning 99.999% of managers fail.


What on earth does that mean?

By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:18
I am saying the exact opposite. Can you actually read properly.
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 16 Jan 13 18:18
JamDav - in my opinion you can be judged a success if you improve on what has gone before.

Mourinho at Chelsea certainly did that.

If guardiola wins the league or the double then i'm not sure he is improving Bayern. The league is probably expected by the Bayern board at the start of each season.

You keep going on about what they won 2/3/4 even 10 seasons ago, but this is Heynckes team now. He took over in 2011. He's taken them to a CL final and will probably leave having won the double. So Guardiola has to equal or better that really. If he wins the CL, well done, amazing achievement, hats off to him. If he just wins a couple of league titles then i (and no doubt many others) will say 'so what, so he should with that squad and those resources'.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:19

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:18PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:


JamDav - in my opinion you can be judged a success if you improve on what has gone before.Mourinho at Chelsea certainly did that.If guardiola wins the league or the double then i'm not sure he is improving Bayern. The league is probably expected by the Bayern board at the start of each season.You keep going on about what they won 2/3/4 even 10 seasons ago, but this is Heynckes team now. He took over in 2011. He's taken them to a CL final and will probably leave having won the double. So Guardiola has to equal or better that really. If he wins the CL, well done, amazing achievement, hats off to him. If he just wins a couple of league titles then i (and no doubt many others) will say 'so what, so he should with that squad and those resources'.


Biscuit going by last ten years winning a league more than a league or cup every second season would be a success in your book is that correct?

I am not saying a huge amazing success for me that would take the CL also.

By:
mexicano
When: 16 Jan 13 18:21
saying the exact opposite?

you say that getting to the cl final is not regarded as success.

therefore every manager who dosen't win it by definition is unsuccessful.
By:
JamDav1982
When: 16 Jan 13 18:24

Jan 16, 2013 -- 6:21PM, mexicano wrote:


saying the exact opposite?you say that getting to the cl final is not regarded as success.therefore every manager who dosen't win it by definition is unsuccessful.


100% I am saying that the top clubs do not consider getting beat in the final of the CL as success. As an achievement for some maybe but success not at all.

That is totally different to saying that not winning the CL is a failure.

My point about Mourinho was that he was a massive success for Chelsea despite the fact he had the best squad, most money etc but didnt win the CL.

By:
Mighty Whites 2008
When: 16 Jan 13 18:25
Some strange ramblings on this thread.

Whilst some on the betfair forum would like to see Pep take a 'challenge' where he could prove how talented he is or be shown up he was always likely to take a job that he felt would enhance his reputation.

He is a young manager and going to Bayern will give him the opportunity to prove himself.

Why any top manager would touch chelsea is beyond me. With financial fair play on the way the challenge at City and Chelsea will become much harder.

Bayern unlike Chelsea and City are one of Europe's super clubs.
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com