Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 206 comments are related to the topic:
LIVERPOOL 2.24 AND I KNOW THE REASON WHY
LIVERPOOL 2.24 AND I KNOW THE REASON WHY
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 206
|
By:
Liverpool to win 4.1
 Should be around 6 + shirley ? |
|
By:
The odds now Newcastle are one-up are nearer now to what they should have been before the game started.
|
|
By:
Lay of the season has still not landed, there is still a lot of value in Newcastle at evens so i cant fully green out
|
|
By:
Newcastle 1-0 up and still even money to beat inferior opposition in their own ground
|
|
By:
I feel like I am missing something with the odds !
|
|
By:
I maybe mad but fancy liverpool to get back into this based on first 27 mins
I know this game story of season so far but they will get more chances |
|
By:
Think if youre watching this game
Liv are having most of the possession COmmensurate, one would have to say, with a team originally priced at around 5/4 Doesnt mean they are going to win But its the right price all the same hth |
|
By:
They might do High Lander. That kind of thing happens.
|
|
By:
Liverpool clearly the better team here.
|
|
By:
Newcastle RAVAGING liverpool. ONE WAY TRAFFIC 3-0 final score
|
|
By:
certainly the strangest odds I've ever seen since the PL started - completely upside down - the explanation can only be that some person / people - probably in the Far East (huge liverpool fans in thailand and its perfect eveing time for noodles and footy) have had huge bets on this and the money has found its way here - don't suppose they'll be in a hurry to do it again
|
|
By:
is this game fixed? 1-0 up and still even money is available
|
|
By:
you're right educee certainly something v strange going on
|
|
By:
Newcastle are marginally too big, nothing as to what you and the fora in general are making out.
|
|
By:
I cant understand these odds...do the Liverpool backers think it's 1982? This is not the former mighty Liverpool who won European Cups for fun. This is mid-table mediocre Liverpool of 2012
|
|
By:
liverpool so lack a sniffer
someone like darren bent, would have at least 10 more points this season given chances they create just not enough movement in box on the crosses |
|
By:
High Lander. Even I'm starting to agree with you.
|
|
By:
newcastle crept more into it last 5-10 mins
certainly liverpool threat of first 30 mins not there as much |
|
By:
Liverpool started this game the better team, created way more chances. PLayers have made some really bad decisions in great positions - Caroll, and why didnt bellmay square that to Suarez? Feels like the momentum is shifting Newcastles way now
|
|
By:
I agree Steptoe. Liverpool started how I expected the whole game to be.
|
|
By:
Bad players make bad decisions, that's why they are bad players.
|
|
By:
I completely agree RMB. Newcastle's price was marginally big. This forum is getting carried away.
|
|
By:
Newcastle's price was ridiculous! If you cant see that kind of value when it's so blatantly smacking in the face, then you shouldn't be gambling.
|
|
By:
Now they are laying the sh1t out of Newcastle again at half time.
|
|
By:
thats just wrong rowan, you dont back liverpool at 2.16 based on the facts available uness you are very very stupid or you expect someone to do you a favour - and if someone expected mr atkinson to help out they have been badly let down
|
|
By:
Honestly High Lander, it wasn't ridiculous. This match, Liverpool V Wigan last weekend and West Brom V Newcastle last weekend has provided substantial evidence that Newcastle might actually be better than Liverpool, but ignoring that, the price made perfect sense. I'd say that Newcastle were marginally big because of the three games I mentioned.
|
|
By:
looking at the newcastle record at home and liverpool away price should be high as 2.5 2.8 not 3.5 and liverpool who last 8 matches away won once draw once and lost 6 times ,2.2 was a big joke and went all over it laying
|
|
By:
you're spouting bullocks rowan mate - when any side has lost 5 out of last 6 and has 19 points away compared with the home side's 29 you just can't justify them at less than 3 - let alone favourites - let alone 2.18 ! - no matter what you've read in your tea leaves
|
|
By:
ahahahah green army. I'm not spouting sh*t. Newcastle have played fairly sh*te recently. West Brom away was a really big turnaround as was Wigan beating Liverpool. I can see exactly where that price came from, although it was marginally big.
|
|
By:
Rowan, there is no way Liverpool should have been favourites for this game. Liverpool are away from home against a side that are 8 points above them in the league. Liverpool's away form has been poor while Newcastle's home form is good. The odds at the beginning of the game made no sense whatsoever.
I'm going to put your blindness to this down to your bias towards Liverpool. In future you should refrain from betting on Liverpool. |
|
By:
ha ha ha ha
|
|
By:
pmsl
|
|
By:
I hope your delusion is restricted to the scouts gits rowan or you must be a v poor punter - hey perhaps you should go back to being mr bean
|
|
By:
2.20 was an amazing price to lay
|
|
By:
rowan doesnt deserve abuse
he had an opinion on the game, like everyone else I thought liverpool were very short pre-game but could have been 0-2 up after 15 mins and in fairness looked a 2.26 side in first 20 mins Not sure anyone has right to say hes a poor punter or have a dig |
|
By:
I'm sure Rowan makes more than all of them. You'll get decimated long term if you're making Liverpool 3.0+ shots in this fixture. The fact they are 2-0 down makes no difference, any result is possible in football, another day it could be 0-2 and I'm sure Rowan wouldn't be on here gloating.
|
|
By:
No noe deserves abuse for any opinion give , but 3.5 newcastle was a mighty rick , no certainties but given the performance against WBA and home advantage it was a gift
|
|
By:
Of course Liverpool should have been favourites for the game. You actually think the odds were that wrong that Newcastle should have been wrong?! You're insane. I'd say Newcastle were a little bit big, but not by as much as you're making out! I'm a Newcastle fan that has an irrational hatred of Liverpool by the way, but that's irrelevant.
|
|
By:
All Rowans said is he thought Liverpool were too short, but not to the extent people were making out. The most accurate statement on this thread. If people had Liverpool at 3.5+ then they'd be millionaires on here. The only way to make money on football is to find out of kilter prices, and hit them hard, but you'll be hard pushed to find any 2.2 shots which are 3.5 EVER, maybe on Special markets.
|
|
By:
Of course Liverpool should have been favourites for the game. You actually think the odds were that wrong that Newcastle should have been favourites?! *
|