Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Mr Hill
10 Nov 09 10:19
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Oct 08
| Topic/replies: 435 | Blogger: Mr Hill's blog
wrong,wrong,wrong imo.

i am not **phobic, although i dont agree with their hanging around toilets policy, i just feel that children deserve to have a balanced upbringing with a mother and a father figure...

should not be allowed in any case for me....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 7  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 275
By:
maverick
When: 10 Nov 09 10:20
I think you meant to say that you are **phobic
By:
master of multys
When: 10 Nov 09 10:21
rather be raised by 2 fruits then some of the disasters i see on the jermey kyle show
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:21
lol, no i am not **phobic
By:
Ronka'sMcDonaldsAccountManager
When: 10 Nov 09 10:22
Not an especially high percentage of your Utopian families exist these days, Mr Hill.
By:
Panther65
When: 10 Nov 09 10:22
no they shouldnt...they cant have kids naturally down to their sexual choice, so why on earth should they be allowed to raise children as a natural family
By:
Surrey
When: 10 Nov 09 10:22
Go and live in the 1950s.

Amazing some people bigoted attitudes.

What about mixed race couples? Clown
By:
RoyClaytonsTash
When: 10 Nov 09 10:23
Mango and Kumquat?
By:
adybabybaby
When: 10 Nov 09 10:23
lmao...yeah no matter how down you are just watch jeremy kyle and you soon realise life isnt too bad

but as for the thread,i agree children shouldnt be raised by pillow biters,children need a mother figure and a father figure

in the words of alan....'god made adam and eve not adam and steve'
By:
adybabybaby
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
surrey....surely hes entitled to his opinion with out you resorting to name calling???
By:
Ronka'sMcDonaldsAccountManager
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
Fack me, Nash has a disciple.
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
i know its a shame ronka, people have kids on whim nowadays, usually to claim extra benefits, society is **ed now, real shame
By:
maverick
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
the ability to bear children has zero correlation to the ability to raise them. If 2 people can provide a loving secure home for a child in need of one then it should be encouraged regardless of their sexuality
By:
NobbyClarke
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
Can you imagine the stick the kid would get if 2 blokes, one wearing a dress, turned up at parent's evening?
By:
The Forum Breader
When: 10 Nov 09 10:24
How about a butch, manly lesbo and a more femenine lesbo? They would be ok imo.
By:
Kippers
When: 10 Nov 09 10:25
i'm all in favour of this - the problem with the youth today is they come from broken homes

single muffa with 8 kids and no father to be seen - youths today lack a father figure in there lifes

at least this way they will have two dads
By:
Ronka'sMcDonaldsAccountManager
When: 10 Nov 09 10:25
Well you can be fairly sure that a gay couple adopting are not doing so to claim extra benefits! Kind of opposes your own view doesn't it?
By:
RMB doesn't aftertime
When: 10 Nov 09 10:25
There was a tv show in the late 1980's called My Two Dads. This was a good programme. Thank you for reading.
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:25
ha ha lmfao @ surrey, what the ** did i say about mixed race,

you sir are the clown with statements like that
By:
Surrey
When: 10 Nov 09 10:26
What stick nobby? **phobia.

I'm amazed at the amount **phobia around at the moment. Would you say this about different coloured people?

Not attacking anyone personally, sorry if it seems that way.

Live and let live
By:
layer1982
When: 10 Nov 09 10:27
Why fck an innocent kids brain up??? No way shud gay couples have kids...
By:
adybabybaby
When: 10 Nov 09 10:28
everyones overlooking the fact that the 2 dads would end up bumming poor little timmy....yes ive named the adopted child timmy

gays should be given pirelli necklaces
By:
NobbyClarke
When: 10 Nov 09 10:28
Can they not cure **sexuality nowadays?
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:29
omg surrey why the hell do you keep going on bout mixed race lol
By:
Kippers
When: 10 Nov 09 10:30
i like to know where they all keep coming from, it's not like they can reproduce
By:
Surrey
When: 10 Nov 09 10:31
What is the difference between discriminating against sexuality and discriminating against race?
By:
maverick
When: 10 Nov 09 10:31
some really pathetic views being aired here. I'm sure most of it is tongue in cheek but a nasty undercurrent
By:
master of multys
When: 10 Nov 09 10:31
i agree with surrey, stop being racist mr hill please
By:
alfie bhoy
When: 10 Nov 09 10:32
How are racism and **phobia being compared here? Don't think anyone believes it's morally wrong to be black/asian etc.
By:
alfie bhoy
When: 10 Nov 09 10:32
How are racism and **phobia being compared here? Don't think anyone believes it's morally wrong to be black/asian etc.
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:32
you silly man, a woman is a woman and a man is a man regardless of colour...i really think your missing the point on this one
By:
adybabybaby
When: 10 Nov 09 10:33
i think surrey had 2 dads who were mixed race...did they make you play games late at night?

get the bnp in and theyll sort it out for us anyway.end of
By:
Surrey
When: 10 Nov 09 10:33
You are being **phobic.

It is as bad as being racist or sexist.

What is hard to understand?
By:
NobbyClarke
When: 10 Nov 09 10:33
Thought it was funny when Elton John wanted to adopt some eastern European kid and a Government minister said they didn't allow Fat Old Queens to adopt their kids.
By:
master of multys
When: 10 Nov 09 10:33
mr hill im close to physically being sick thanks to your disgusting racial attacks, i hope your happy with yourself
By:
adybabybaby
When: 10 Nov 09 10:34
now we mention it though**are**,lol cant we get rid of them aswell while were getting rid of the donut poopers?
By:
Panther65
When: 10 Nov 09 10:34
im white, my daughter in law is coloured...i have no problem at all with mixed race...

but i wouldnt like to see 2 irons or dykes bringing up children as a normal family, when a normal family is a man and a woman as parents
By:
sugarfoot
When: 10 Nov 09 10:35
i am not **phobic, although i dont agree with their hanging around toilets policy, i just feel that children deserve to have a balanced upbringing with a mother and a father figure...

----------------------------
I think you are confusing **sexuals with cottagers
Not all **sexuals are cottagers (nor do they have a 'policy' with respect to cottaging), nor (and this may surprise you) not all cottagers live as **sexuals.

If you want to ban cottagers from looking after children, you may have a point, who knows?
By:
Mr Hill
When: 10 Nov 09 10:35
surrey stop it, i kow ur playing now, nobody can be seriously that daft
By:
Surrey
When: 10 Nov 09 10:38
i think some of you are confusing **sexuals with child molesterers.
Page 1 of 7  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com