|
By:
This never would of happened under the NAZIs!
|
|
By:
mad paddy, i did say please lol
|
|
By:
typical surrey - no sensible reply. Can only vilify those that disagree with his one-dimensional views
|
|
By:
I assume that most posters on this forum were reared by heterosexual couples.
When I see the level of maturity, manners & general conduct that is the norm on here, it is hard to believe that any other group would be likely to do the job less well. |
|
By:
i wondered how long it would take for surrey bring nazi into the forum
|
|
By:
redrich, surrey may or may not be a bigot but he is most certainly a hypocrite.
|
|
By:
KILBOWIE KELT 10 Nov 13:21
I assume that most posters on this forum were reared by heterosexual couples. When I see the level of maturity, manners & general conduct that is the norm on here, it is hard to believe that any other group would be likely to do the job less well. nice 1 |
|
By:
no he is a bigot. And a hypocrite!
|
|
By:
redrich 10 Nov 13:18
Surrey 10 Nov 13:14 Because it shoots theirs down in flames. And they will not change their beliefs. Again you have categorized everyone who disagrees with your opinion into one convenient pigeon hole rather than perhaps thinking that they are probably form a variety of backgrounds and with varying outlooks. Now tell me who the bigot is? -------------- tbf it is my opinion he refers to! and i am not trying to catgorise anyone, just searching for a logical answer to my point - but it is being ignored in such a manner as to suggest there isnt one. and mr hill, you started this thread, people have tried to offer reasoned debate, but you do not seem to be interested. |
|
By:
[Irony]Yeah I am I hate fags disgusting practice[/IRONY]
|
|
By:
he also comes across as a bit of a thicko tbh
|
|
By:
pmsl, kilbowie kelt makes an excellent post and mr hill congratulates him
|
|
By:
bacontrout - I will read your point and respond, Wat time did you post it?
|
|
By:
KILBOWIE KELT 10 Nov 13:21
I assume that most posters on this forum were reared by heterosexual couples. When I see the level of maturity, manners & general conduct that is the norm on here, it is hard to believe that any other group would be likely to do the job less well. That's how it should be done. In out and the idiots too stupid to realise they have been merked. |
|
By:
Something tells me surrey doesn't undertand how he is being hypocritical. Considering he is better educated than the rest of us this is surprising.
|
|
By:
redrich 10 Nov 13:25
bacontrout - I will read your point and respond, Wat time did you post it? --------- lol, cheers, it is the 13:07 one, but its a bit out of context now, iv posted it three times! |
|
By:
http://api.ning.com/files/TAQisU8LBDTC4tC2heaDQOeZS-Rrz2YNGCp-ALFZ1sJzULMurkS8G5BTohOglWuUPCEePfSXGLMBkHkrH2gmH7CuAYuO65-A/arguingontheinternet.jpg
|
|
By:
yes maverick i agree whole heartedly with him
|
|
By:
That's how it should be done. In out and the idiots too stupid to realise they have been merked.
translates as I'm leaving the debate because I've been exposed as a bigoted hypocrite |
|
By:
I'm leaving this debate, your intelligence and wit are too much for me. You are fine examples of what makes people in this country so proud to be British.
I am an idiot for thinking that **sexuals are equal to heterosexials. I can see my mistake now. The love people of the same sex!!! lol. I'm so glad you have shown me the light. I would like to thank Jesus for this thread. |
|
By:
Charles1980 10 Nov 13:03
Mr Hill I posted to Templeton with a completely valid point and got no response (mainly because he will be aware that there IS no response that is acceptable) Hmm, I haven't responded because I was constructing a book case and then deciding on which order to place the books. I'll carry on reading but so much has been written since your statement that it may be irrelevent. I've also not had lunch and am hungry. |
|
By:
Mr Hill - I don't think you do tbh. Try reading it slowly
|
|
By:
Again a retort of what he perceives to be comedic ironic responses when infact he has for the umteenth time refused to respond when he has been found out.
|
|
By:
the only people being rude on this thread are the politicaly correct, selfish, idealistic prats who just havent got a clue, with no thought for the child itself...
im getting dragged down to their level now, so am off for some lunch down the blue oyster with my cross dressing friend toooodle doooo |
|
By:
maverick hes referring to the forum as a whole i believe, not taking one side over another....
|
|
By:
ok, try and have someone else read it to you
|
|
By:
mr hill hes actually saying if heterosexual couples raised the nutters on here, then surely gays cant do any worse of a job!!
|
|
By:
KILBOWIE KELT 10 Nov 13:21
I assume that most posters on this forum were reared by heterosexual couples. When I see the level of maturity, manners & general conduct that is the norm on here, it is hard to believe that any other group would be likely to do the job less well. That's how it should be done. In out and the idiots too stupid to realise they have been merked. |
|
By:
As expected, there's little to comment on as it's becoming name calling.
Charles, was your point the one about the black people adopting because black people commit a disproportionate amount of crime? I think black people should be allowed to adopt. I expect a check into their criminal background will be done by the agency. There is not one reason for **sexuals to not adopt, there are a number of reasons which accumulate to be the reason why they shouldn't be allowed. You can give an analogy to each point but not to the whole. For what it's worth, I think the age of having a child should be an enforced 21 and there should be a huge cut in the benefits system. This will be one of many necessary steps in trying to create a better society for both those in it and those being born into it. |
|
By:
Surrey 10 Nov 13:29
I'm leaving this debate, your intelligence and wit are too much for me. You are fine examples of what makes people in this country so proud to be British. I am an idiot for thinking that **sexuals are equal to heterosexials. I can see my mistake now. The love people of the same sex!!! lol. I'm so glad you have shown me the light. I would like to thank Jesus for this thread. Surrey - you really are a showing yourself up as a prise idiot. Since when have I said that **sexuals are not equal to heterosexuals. You are labelling people as bigots, nazis, **phobes merely for disagreeing with you. Grow up ffs! bacon - i will respond to you shortly |
|
By:
its very wrong
|
|
By:
Templeton Peck
Take this test. Step off the tube 20 times. Count the number of immigrants who barge on before you get off and count the number of whites. You'll be amazed. They have no manners. For the benefit for the forum i will take the test over the next 2 weeks. Why that long you ask? Well 1stly i think we need a greater sample size than 20. 2ndly we have to factor in what tube stop i am getting off and on 20 times vis a vi demographics. So if you see someone on the underground behaving rather oddly, waiting for trains but seemingly not that will be me. I'll report back as i go |
|
By:
Templeton Peck
Take this test. Step off the tube 20 times. Count the number of immigrants who barge on before you get off and count the number of whites. You'll be amazed. They have no manners. oops |
|
By:
:0
|
|
By:
r0yst0n y0u live in L0nd0n, why d0 y0u supp0rt man u then?
|
|
By:
will you have time to interview everyone to determine their place of birth before the train leaves?
|
|
By:
Eh? The relevance being? Or did you just want my results? I must admit I've not kept a written record but I do check it each time I use the tube and what I stated has continued to be the case over the last couple of weeks.
|
|
By:
Templeton Peck 10 Nov 13:39
For what it's worth, I think the age of having a child should be an enforced 21 and there should be a huge cut in the benefits system. This will be one of many necessary steps in trying to create a better society for both those in it and those being born into it. --------- Regardless of what i think of your other points, I agree wholeheartedly with this, there is not really an argument against it imo. ------------- Templeton Peck 10 Nov 13:39 Charles, was your point the one about the black people adopting because black people commit a disproportionate amount of crime? I think black people should be allowed to adopt. I expect a check into their criminal background will be done by the agency. There is not one reason for **sexuals to not adopt, there are a number of reasons which accumulate to be the reason why they shouldn't be allowed. You can give an analogy to each point but not to the whole. -------- however, would you not similarly argue that **sexuals (along with everyone else) would also have checks involving psych tests, history of sexual diseases etc, in general their suitability to have a child (stable home life etc) - if they ARE found suitable, what distinction is left? purely their sexuality? |
|
By:
Maverick, please read the thread from where it came. Context and answers can be found there.
|
|
By:
Bacontrout, nice to see someone who can agree with some points and not others from the same forum user.
I don't hold much trust in psych tests. And, like I said before, there are a gamut of reasons and it's the reasons as a whole rather than individual ones (such as whether they have an std) which matter. I think it's a case of putting the rights of the **sexual couple first rather than the child. I know if I was a kid then I wouldn't want to be brought up by two gay dads. Unfortunately, the kid won't have much choice. |