|
By:
330/7 definitely felt a lot better than this...mainly because it felt so far under-par.
As you allude, getting to ball thirty (which is probably the worry with sufficient England batters but we shall see) is the key. Worried about Bumrah taking wickets in clumps. Boring trading, thus far. Hope I didn't miss all the fun (1st session of match) in this one... |
|
By:
Yup not to many big offerings considering the downside but run lines was fun
|
|
By:
Sheesh, if Pope is shelling things we've not got a hope
![]() |
|
By:
Draw price trying to liven things up.
It does look ridiculously easy to bat. Bbut then that one just deviated by about a foot from outside leg! |
|
By:
FFS, England.
Two catches spilled from waist height. (By two of the best fielders in the game) |
|
By:
That was *a lot* trickier than Pope's but boy oh boy, have we wasted some golden chances so far
|
|
By:
Pitch looks ropey, bits and pieces of up n' down.
Indian spinners, English approach. Draw is an expensive but free lay @ 6/1. |
|
By:
*not ropey but like it has (and will) deteriorate!
|
|
By:
Right England, let's bat for 1.5 days please.
|
|
By:
Can’t see anything but an India win
But I want to be entertained |
|
By:
Pitch looks ok still
|
|
By:
Fancy unders on the run line, up to 371 but I shall wait and hope for 400
|
|
By:
50/0. England standard.
|
|
By:
Wow, great stat...
6 out of 7 innings in India, England have made 50+ opening partnership. The one time they didn't, it was 45. Serious foundations, those. It should be inconsistent and overly risky, the England approach. |
|
By:
In case it's not clear, every time I watch this pair I can barely contain myself
![]() |
|
By:
Waiting for the draw to collapse to get laying
|
|
By:
Knight is right, Duckett has gotten Ashwin a little tilted here.
Very rare to see him spray successive deliveries |
|
By:
This is bat sheite crazy!
|
|
By:
Bump him in the temple: bump him and induce false shot: pitched up and beaten.
Great bowling from Siraj. |
|
By:
From England's perspective, shame the big no-ball was the ball before...
|
|
By:
Very unlucky Pope. I did think it was in line but don’t think I would have reviewed
|
|
By:
Well, well - just wonderful from England, once again.
The fact we're making a game of anything is exceeding most predictions before we set sail. That we're one apiece, going toe-to-toe and scrambling Indian heads in their own back yard, is beyond the pale. Bat the same number of overs as India and we'll have 750 ![]() Great to support. Great just to witness. |
|
By:
yup all aboard the england express
|
|
By:
Ended last night with Sunil Gavaskar stating the West Indies should perhaps consider playing T20 style cricket in their Test matches.
Fast-forward seven overs into the morning (where England have - not unironically - gone at under 3 per over)...they lose two wickets and Joe Root should come out and dot his first 20 balls likes Stokes ![]() |
|
By:
There is more nuance than I've gone with there, but still!
|
|
By:
I would come right back at them with the fact we have allowed the bowlers to bowl a little more this morning - in much the opposite way to how our openers typically walk out and play.
And just look what has transpired...! It is certainly easy to walk out at 200/2 and be drawn into a touch of caution and consolidation. We've gotten right into/ahead of the game with yesterday's batting and they're also down a frontline bowler. But Alastair Cook (genuine great that he is) suggesting Root should have come out and tried to 'see off Bumrah' belies everything that they have praised yesterday, and betrays an almighty lack of understanding. Bring in KP, or Eoin Morgan, or DK to shed some legitimate insight into where/how perhaps Root/England have gone awry in the first hour. |
|
By:
Thank you DK & Sunil - some sense, at last.
|
|
By:
morning Apt. - hope u r well mate..
I have a slight issue with Root's approach just because of the quality of player he is ... is he more likely to average 50 playing as he has recently or playing as he used to..? ...a lot of other players don't have the technique to play like him and have more than proved that they benefit by being very aggressive and average more than they would if they tried to play conventionally..not sure that's true of him. |
|
By:
Duckett will learn from this, presume it's his first time 100+ not out overnight in a Test.
Amass bucketloads showing aggression, embracing risk and putting pressure on the bowlers. Resemble a walking wicket the next day prodding, poking and playing defensive shots. Zero blame, and very understandable, but I think he'll look back and kick himself a few times. |
|
By:
of course he might just be a bit out of touch ..
![]() |
|
By:
morning Apt. - hope u r well mate..
morning, fella. Same to you ![]() |
|
By:
I thought it was his time this match (and yet could be).
All I'd proffer is he's averaged more under Stokes/McCullum than prior (which includes this teeny drought) so he's probably capable of going both ways. |
|
By:
Windies have certainly got little to lose with the averages of their top 6/7..
|
|
By:
could well be so Apt...just my take on him.
|
|
By:
not sure if you caught the NZ/SA 2nd XI series at all...but was some wonderful blocking on show...
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
could well be so Apt...just my take on him.
Yup, don't disagree either. I reckon he's not bang in his best nick and as such, perhaps could trim the outlying 10% of his shots until he feels tip-top. Also would add that being becalmed for 5/6 overs and then attempting that as your first foray into attacking realms might be sub-optimal |
|
By:
Haha, fortunately didn't catch any of it
![]() |
|
By:
yep..
Jadeja still not bowled..radio speculating possible injury issue.. |
|
By:
Haha, fortunately didn't catch any of it
![]() |
|
By:
First day was frustrating sense of a missed opportunity.
Second day was mega. Third day disappointing beginnings from such a potentially glorious position. (I genuinely woke thinking 600+ was ~50/50) All the above and we have a Test that can go every possible way from here - love it! |