South Africa v India - 3rd Test at Jo'burg > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › Cricket Forum › South Africa v India - 3rd Test at Jo'burg

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

Cricket

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 1355 comments are related to the topic:
South Africa v India - 3rd Test at Jo'burg

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 7 of 34 • Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 34 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 1,355

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:08

draw plunging terry, get ready to bail

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:10

shhhh

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:10

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:11

this forum is spooky some times,and the ump teases with no ball

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:11

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:13

painful viewing

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:16

be brave Ishant

By:

Injera When: 24 Jan 18 14:18

So bad from India.

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:21

Rain!! IThere's more moisture on one of Grant's blow up dolls

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:24

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:26

draw never dies, its coming terry!

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:27

you and juce smash it down a wee bit

By:

VardonVoo. When: 24 Jan 18 14:27

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:21PM, jucel69 wrote:

Rain!! IThere's more moisture on one of Grant's blow up dolls

I read the other day about some guy opening up a s3x-doll "brothel". I guess that get's around any legal issues.

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:28

I've been out for 3 hours at the night market, having a few jars and some German fare

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:28

i was looking for a cheeky 10 ticks when Phelu was bowling poor,then Morne comes on with no vaseline

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:30

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:28PM, TerryHurlock wrote:

i was looking for a cheeky 10 ticks when Phelu was bowling poor,then Morne comes on with no vaseline

Like the 'Last Tango in Paris'

By:

VardonVoo. When: 24 Jan 18 14:30

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:26PM, tomtimtum wrote:

draw never dies, its coming terry!

Dum da-da-dum daaah
Dum dum dum
Dum da-da-dum daaah
Dum dum dum...

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:30

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:31

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:30PM, jucel69 wrote:

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:28PM, TerryHurlock wrote:i was looking for a cheeky 10 ticks when Phelu was bowling poor,then Morne comes on with no vaselineLike the 'Last Tango in Paris'

Marlon and his knob of lurpak

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:34

Bumrah needs to get in those nets and put the graft in, shocking stats

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:34

144-4 and then

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:35

wtf happened there

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:35

wtf was that

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:36

Madness!

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:39

morne looking a bit stiff there

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:40

It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:41

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:40PM, jucel69 wrote:

It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.

Reminds me of that vid they made where they filmed all the quick bowlers and everyone was 90mph+! Yeah right

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:42

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:41PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:40PM, jucel69 wrote:It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.Reminds me of that vid they made where they filmed all the quick bowlers and everyone was 90mph+! Yeah right

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPDW7hj1yfs

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:43

I've played to a fairly high standard and on a poor pitch everything feels rapid, especially when it jumps off a length

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:43

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:41PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:40PM, jucel69 wrote:It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.Reminds me of that vid they made where they filmed all the quick bowlers and everyone was 90mph+! Yeah right

It's utter crap, the WI bowlers were not quicker, they just played on decks that looked like corrugated iron!

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:44

You seen those youtube vids of Fred Tyson? The quickest of all time? Keeper is about 5 yards behind the stumps!

By:

tomtimtum When: 24 Jan 18 14:45

Frank Tyson rather!

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:45

It's like comparing Stan Matthews with Arjen Robben

By:

GRANTCKING When: 24 Jan 18 14:46

its like comaring AYT to BOB

By:

jucel69 When: 24 Jan 18 14:46

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:43PM, jucel69 wrote:

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:41PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:40PM, jucel69 wrote:It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.Reminds me of that vid they made where they filmed all the quick bowlers and everyone was 90mph+! Yeah rightIt's utter crap, the WI bowlers were not quicker, they just played on decks that looked like corrugated iron!

exactly, there are loads of stories that are embellished over time. Once heard a story where WG Grace was batting and they ran 3 before the catch was taken. Absolute unadulterated bolloxs

By:

TerryHurlock When: 24 Jan 18 14:47

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:42PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:41PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jan 24, 2018 -- 2:40PM, jucel69 wrote:It really makes me laugh when former players talk about the pace of previous bowlers. THEY were not quicker at all, just played on ropier & sometimes uncovered pitches. When a pitch is difficult, like this, everything happens much quicker and therefore the bowler is deemed to be rapid. If you put today's quicks on 1960's 1970's pitches, Boycott, Chappell et al wouldn't get a run.Reminds me of that vid they made where they filmed all the quick bowlers and everyone was 90mph+! Yeah righthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPDW7hj1yfs

will watch that later,cheers

By:

ayt When: 24 Jan 18 14:47

cooper lost massive on keys earlier

By:

GRANTCKING When: 24 Jan 18 14:47

hi ayt

By: