Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
pxb
30 Dec 15 22:35
Joined:
Date Joined: 07 Jun 10
| Topic/replies: 8,019 | Blogger: pxb's blog
Only 2 days away.

As I said in the previous thread, can't see SAF batting improving much and no Steyn makes their bowling weak. The only thing stopping me majorly lumping on Eng is it has been a very long time since anyone except Australia has beaten SAF here.

Weather not an issue at this point.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 15  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 595
By:
Fatslogger
When: 30 Dec 15 22:49
England looked pretty good and SA pretty poor in Durban but can't see England being a back at scarily close to evens. England has been an extremely inconsistent test side since recovering from just being fairly generally bad under Moores. I wouldn't especially use the recent series of 7 games alternating wins and losses to predict a loss next test for England but equally, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a far worse performance. Whether SA can bounce back with Steyn out and a whole load of selection dilemmas and form issues is perhaps the bigger question than how England will play though.
By:
dylansdad
When: 31 Dec 15 15:21
73 years since England last won at Newlands playing 5 test since, SA record in that time 20 wins 6 draws 7 lost, in more reason times losing just once in 13 tests, so have a good record at cape town, looking at the current SA team I can't see then extending that run,a few out of form (alma) and a few not 1/2 as good as the lads that good them to number 1,so an Eng win for meGrin, happy and prosperous new year to you all
By:
pxb
When: 31 Dec 15 20:54
Steyn not definitely out but Abbot is. New fellow Viljoen set to play. Apparently seriously quick.  Assuming Rabada in for Steyn, SAF bowling may be rather better this match. de Kok may come in and take the gloves.
By:
pxb
When: 31 Dec 15 22:11
Big move up on the draw and down on SAF. Maybe the market likes the 2 new SAF bowlers. Quite often a bowler on debut takes wickets because batsmen haven't seen him before.
By:
detraveller
When: 31 Dec 15 22:40
Is there any way to lay the draw without exchange? I mean in the normal sportsbook? One option would be betting on 'England or SA' but betfair does not provide that bet.
By:
pxb
When: 31 Dec 15 22:42
Why would you use the sportsbook?
By:
detraveller
When: 31 Dec 15 22:44
Betting exchanges are not legal in Germany.
By:
Foinavon
When: 31 Dec 15 22:45
You back both teams to win the same amount, it's called Dutching.
Here is a calculator to help you work out how much to stake.
https://www.aceodds.com/bet-calculator/dutching.html
By:
Foinavon
When: 31 Dec 15 22:47
Perhaps it should be called Deutsching in Germany.
By:
detraveller
When: 31 Dec 15 22:51
haha good one :) Thanks for the link :)
By:
Foinavon
When: 31 Dec 15 22:57
You're welcome, And good luck.

I already layed the draw early for this match which appears to have been a good move so far as the price continues to drift. Doubt very much this will be a draw.
By:
pxb
When: 31 Dec 15 22:59
I don't think it will be a draw either, but I always like to have the draw onside day 1, as it usually shortens when up around 5.
By:
Foinavon
When: 31 Dec 15 23:09
Yes, it can improve your profitability as long as you don't mind being locked in on the wrong side of the market occasionally, but that also happens when laying the draw too.
By:
jucel69
When: 01 Jan 16 00:52

Dec 31, 2015 -- 10:11PM, pxb wrote:


Big move up on the draw and down on SAF. Maybe the market likes the 2 new SAF bowlers. Quite often a bowler on debut takes wickets because batsmen haven't seen him before.


Can go two ways. Cummins or Kerrigan!

By:
jucel69
When: 01 Jan 16 00:56
interesting

http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/Quotas-to-drive-Viljoen-to-NZ-20150421
By:
detraveller
When: 01 Jan 16 12:46
""Patriotism is out the door," said De Villiers. "

That is exactly the reason why SA aren't the same team. You can see that the players aren't interested anymore. WC2015 semifinal was a disgrace and since then even AB has seem uninterested in the game. No wonder there are rumours(threats) of his retirement. I am a big SA fan but now there is no more motivation to follow them. Sadly.
By:
detraveller
When: 01 Jan 16 13:09
Just realised that that quote above was from Fanie DeVilliers, not AB. Though I would love AB to come out on this issue. He has serious concerns over it but somehow they have managed to keep him quiet.
By:
DAN1974
When: 01 Jan 16 13:16
why the sudden flip flop ?? have i missed something ??
By:
Injera
When: 01 Jan 16 14:16
No Steyn and Jimmy likely to come back in for England. Yet, the market thinks SA's chances have somewhow improved. Laugh

An incredible flippage indeed.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 14:23
I think the market over reacted in favour of England after the first test but England at over 3s look a bit appealing. Disappointed I didn't get any draw when it was around 5 thinking I might get slightly over. Not that I expect a draw but 5 is a pretty good back to lay price.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 14:25
At under 4s the draw just looks like a lay instead, mind. May get some orders in. Will look for any word on pitch.
By:
Injera
When: 01 Jan 16 14:27
I'm wary of taking on the draw at this stage. I know little of SA's replacement bowlers and if they're filth England could post a very big first innings score.

I would have thought this pitch won't break up like Durban and batting should be easier. It's certainly going to be hot work for the bowlers.

Hopefully we'll see the draw sub 3s again at some point.
By:
Injera
When: 01 Jan 16 14:28
More surprising price movements. Draw was 4.4 10 minutes ago Shocked
By:
DAN1974
When: 01 Jan 16 14:50
An amazing drift on England , i would of thought an injury to Root or Cook would have to happen to cause that. The market has gone the opposite to what i expected. I will wait to lay the draw aswell, three overs without a wicket in the morning will see it around 3 imo.
By:
tomtimtum
When: 01 Jan 16 15:26
Has Anderson been ruled out? Big drift on England
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 01 Jan 16 15:37
Touring teams invariably perform better in a 2nd test than 1st, I've gotten on Eng anyway.  Those who have been matched at over 3.0 you lucky sods, wish I was paying attention when that was happening.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 01 Jan 16 15:37
Touring teams invariably perform better in a 2nd test than 1st, I've gotten on Eng anyway.  Those who have been matched at over 3.0 you lucky sods, wish I was paying attention when that was happening.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 15:57
Tried and failed to get on England over 3 but have got on draw at 4.5, which feels like a good enough back to lay price.
By:
DAN1974
When: 01 Jan 16 16:23
looks like we are heading for another flip flop again now, strange goings on indeed.
By:
pxb
When: 01 Jan 16 16:48
FWIIW, people will keep SAF price shorter than it should because of SAF's remarkable record here. With Anderson back and Steyn out or carrying an injury, Eng should be a good bit shorter.
By:
Injera
When: 01 Jan 16 17:04
Draw price seems large again. I would have thought there will be a lot of runs in Cape Town.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 17:42
Agree Injera, the draw felt big at 4.5 on a good batting surface, despite the flaky batting on both sides and I've doubled up at 4.7 as it drifted further. I don't expect the new ball to swing and seam much for either attack, certainly on day 1 so if the opening batsmen (or even the top 4 assuming and early wicket or two) aren't idiots the draw could easily come in a very long way with the typical market over reaction to the start of a game. Even if the first side to bat gets blown away, they'd still be a bit of hope for a draw back with the second innings likely to do better with the best batting days 2 and 3.

Don't see huge interest in the prices of either England or SA at the moment although a SA lay is a bit appealing at around 2.5. Oddly, the SA price has been relatively stable while the draw and England have danced about. Gutted I didn't get any of England over 3, although was too greedy wanting 3.1 I think before dropping it.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 17:47
Just thinking, the thing to say against a draw back is that both sides have very flaky opening partnerships. Cook is a good batsman and quite likely to do better this time but Hales is a dodgy pick while neither SA opener remotely convinces. At first drop Amla of course is badly out of form but Compton is a draw backers dream (albeit not remotely in the class of real stonewallers like Dravid) so even if Hales is out early,  a Cook Compton blockathon could bring the draw right down. In fact, worth pointing out that a draw lay the moment Compton is out is probably a winner all series, as the batting gets a lot more dynamic after he's out, especially if you're down to Stokes by then.
By:
pxb
When: 01 Jan 16 17:58
Draw generally drifts at this point with no weather in the forecast. I expect to see it over 5 before the toss.

A back to lay looks on the cards if Eng bat, but unlike you FS, I don't have any confidence in an Amla return to form.
By:
dylansdad
When: 01 Jan 16 18:20
Eng drift from 2.38 up to 2.68 then topping out 3.2, now back around 2.5Crazy
By:
Injera
When: 01 Jan 16 18:41
Good points FS.

I partly disagree though that both sides have flaky batting. England were superb at Durban and that was without anything from Cook. The new lads took their chance.

Down the order, one of Moeen, Johnny, Woakes or Broad will always do something. Oddly it was Broad's partnership with Finn that was vital.

Most probably Woakes will be dropped but the depth of Eng's batting will still hurt SA in the next 3 matches. And if Hales gets going, it could be carnage.
By:
rob999
When: 01 Jan 16 18:54
On the topic of who England leave out to make way for Jimmy -

Clearly it won't happen but how long is it going to be before those in the know realise that our golden boy, Ben Stokes, needs to be considered? He's obviously got all the potential in the world but he still remains an all rounder that doesn't score enough runs and doesn't take enough wickets. A Test average of 27 with the bat and 40 with the bowl is nowhere near good enough yet I can't recall any discussions from commentators etc. about his worth to the team.
By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 19:02

Jan 1, 2016 -- 5:58PM, pxb wrote:


Draw generally drifts at this point with no weather in the forecast. I expect to see it over 5 before the toss.A back to lay looks on the cards if Eng bat, but unlike you FS, I don't have any confidence in an Amla return to form.


Don't remember saying I was optimistic about Amla finding form but he is a class player and it was as recently as the WC run up when he looked like he couldn't stop scoring tons. Guess my big draw worry is Anderson plays, SA bats and the excellent England attack just doesn't stop taking wickets. That's not at all implausible but one has to take some risk.

Thanks for advice on draw price, appreciated as always.

By:
Fatslogger
When: 01 Jan 16 19:30

Jan 1, 2016 -- 6:41PM, Injera wrote:


Good points FS. I partly disagree though that both sides have flaky batting. England were superb at Durban and that was without anything from Cook. The new lads took their chance.Down the order, one of Moeen, Johnny, Woakes or Broad will always do something. Oddly it was Broad's partnership with Finn that was vital. Most probably Woakes will be dropped but the depth of Eng's batting will still hurt SA in the next 3 matches. And if Hales gets going, it could be carnage.


Cheers. I suppose assessing England's batting depends partly on whether the new batsmen who've come in continue to do well. I rate Taylor and Compton as reasonable rather than exceptional batsmen at test level so they ought not drastically to change England's allergy to draws on anything but the flattest of shirtfronts (of 14 tests in last year, 1/3 drawn in WI and 1/3 UAE, others all results, mostly not threatening tea on the 5th day). The really big deal is the quality of the five man attack though, with little let up unless Stokes or Ali is having an off day. The attack likely to take the field tomorrow is likely to be the best one England's fielded in ages, with the consistently excellent Anderson and Broad plus Ali in form and him, Stokes and Finn all a bit more confident and battle hardened than the good but somewhat inexperienced version of the same attack that tore the Aussies some new holes at Edgbaston.

The thing about the depth of the batting is that it's deep with hitters, not blockers, so on the occasions when the lower middle order or below get stuck in, the game moves pretty fast in England's favour. Of course you'd not want to have layed the draw, see England get to 200/5 off 65 overs then see them get to 430 all out even if they did it in another 45 overs but you'd hardly have seen a draw killed by that kind of work.

So actually think a draw is a pretty seriously unlikely final outcome but quite prepared to start with some backs to be able to get some really hard lays in.

Page 1 of 15  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com