Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1387 comments are related to the topic:
New Zealand V England (3rd Test)
New Zealand V England (3rd Test)
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,387
|
By:
i agree, totally eradicate england from the equation, let nz relax in the belief the draws in the bag and a big chance of victory
|
|
By:
Had to load up 1.73 .....time up soon i hope..
|
|
By:
460+ and still batting
 |
|
By:
Maybe the target is 500
|
|
By:
yeah they have to go 500 now you'd think
|
|
By:
pointless really, hoping England save game really to prove otherwise
 |
|
By:
england scored at 2.28 1st innings
 |
|
By:
500, Even Botham may think England may struggle to get that.
|
|
By:
bit of a sickener for nz if eng finish 330-9
|
|
By:
well will ony have themselves to blame but NZ should still win
|
|
By:
Think this is pretty pointless imo, 21 runs for 500, would be surprised if they carry on after that.
|
|
By:
250 surely in the bag now as well - southee still with the pads on. mcC having a drink
|
|
By:
hurrah
|
|
By:
quick trade out!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
shouldnt be a draw imo
|
|
By:
4% chance of making 481. yeah right.
|
|
By:
who has backed eng down to 25 on the dec
|
|
By:
draw should be out of equation so maybe thats why
|
|
By:
laughable darlo..its never been done but bettings says 4 times out of every hundred
|
|
By:
How and why is draw out of the equation?
|
|
By:
draws a big player
|
|
By:
Monty bowled four straight maidens, then his next five overs went for 52!
|
|
By:
for trading 1st 10 overs maybe at 25/0 then probably a good back but shouldn be a draw imo
|
|
By:
surely england just bat for draw
|
|
By:
was the market expecting nz to get a 600 lead...42 into 25's astonishing
|
|
By:
topped up on d DRAW .
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
140 overs is a long time.
|
|
By:
so truth you dont think eng can bat 4 sessions on this track
|
|
By:
this total is not gettable, england just play defensive and bat time
|
|
By:
Why does the market think something which has never happened in 2083 previous Tests could happen 4 times in 100 now?!
|
|
By:
In how many of those 2083 tests has it had the chance to happen though?
|
|
By:
Why does the market think something which has never happened in 2083 previous Tests could happen 4 times in 100 now?!
------- because it's a deceptive sample set. the vast majority of those instances aren't really comparable. |
|
By:
where do you get the figure of 2083 from Don Barlo?
|
|
By:
Even in the first innings of a match, not every side are going to score 481 in 143 overs even if they could get sent back in again after losing 10 wickets. 25s is ridiculous.
|
|
By:
are you saying there were 2083 instances where a team needed to score so many runs in the last innings to win the match because if its how many matches since the record was set its like a relevent stat.
|
|
By:
out
|
|
By:
not a good start
|
|
By:
I'm saying this is never going to happen. It's not a 0.5% chance, never mind 4%.
|