lfc.... forget about the fecking statue ffs.

It wasn't important to the protesters lfc, it was an excuse for a gathering.

I believe it was important to the protesters and many other people besides

I believe it was important to people in the American south, and the north .
Everyone in Anerica should respect that statue.

andrew breitbart edited a video to make it look like shirley sherrod (a black woman) was racist. he then pimped his video to the right wing lap dogs like fox who gleefully played it and called for her to be sacked. she was forced to resign her job. when the unedited video was shown it showed she was not racist at all. indeed she became friendly with the person she was suppose to be racist against and he spoke up for her. more koolaid needed trader.

actually i should have said brietbart PERSONALLY  edited the video. after his death his estate paid out quite a lot of money to shirley sherrod.

i dont care if its nazi or not, mr breitbart personally edited a video to paint someone in a bad light. his estate subsequently paid the victim lots of money. yet you still wont condemn breitbart. its not an allegation its a fact, just one you dont like so try to ignore trader.

i ask again, what chemical weapons were used?

Murder clearly.

so why post a link of someone being pepper sprayed on a thread about a murder by a right wing nutjob? if it was an islamo nutjob murderer and someone posted a link with someone being pepper sprayed what would you say?

you continue to ignore questions you dont like.

for the fourth time, what chemical weapons were used?

i havent mentioned nazis at all, i'm not talking about nazis i'm talking about breitbart blatantly lying to get an innocent person sacked. the shirley sherrod case shows what breitbart was all about, the fact that you wont admit it shows that you are not at all open minded. the unedited video shows she was not racist at all (despite her dad having been murdered by a white man) yet still you obfuscate.

i dont know anything about about a video on that website, i do know that breitbart edited a video which resulted in an innocent woman losing her job. his estate subsequently paid her lots of cash.

The chemicals used were pepper spray and urine. How many more times?

What is the mission that you think I agree with?

I never said I agree with everything in any publication.

I try to go to lots of sources. Raw footage if possible.

My point about Breitbart is STUDYFORM said it was a Nazi publication which I see no evidence for. He uses right wing and Nazi interchangably which is wrong.

That does not mean I agree with everything in it. Every outlet has some sort of motive behind it.

trader you dont strike me as a bad person at all but i'm afraid your sources of 'news' are just a bunch of lunatics on a mission.

so, in your last post instead of saying chemical weapons (as you did earlier) you now say chemicals. wouldnt you agree that the term 'chemical weapons' implies something far more serious than the use of pepper spray? by the way i still dont get why you mentioned its use at all on a thread about a murder by a right wing nutjob.

the mission you agree with? you want me to answer your questions but you wont answer mine, nevertheless i will. breitbart clearly felt the media were on some kind of liberal/leftist/whatever else silly name you care to use mission and you appear to agree with this. and he saw himself as some kind of saviour of the truth. to that end he was prepared to PERSONALLY edit videos to make people he felt were on the other side look bad. it really is rather telling that you wont admit he did a hatchet job on shirley sherrod.

there is a poster on here called detraveller who is often labelled an apologist, whereas in fact, imo, he sees what is really going on. all the time the so called left attack the so called right the people at the top of the pyramid continue to make off with their ill gotten goods.

your alt news sites are even worse than the corporate media, use your own brain and dont believe any of them.

oh dear, you've taken to completely ignoring the questions i asked. i never said breitbart was a nazi publication, yet again you ignore the inconvenient truth about them. they lied about shirley sherrod, something which is a a fact, but you still wont admit.

i am out of here, the truth will never defelect you from what you believe even if you cant disprove the truth, that makes you deluded imo.

shirley sherrod was hounded out of office due to breitbart's lies, that is a a fact.
.

oh dear i find myself drawn to this rubbish like a fly to sh1t

so you now seem to be admitting that he did shirley sherrod up like a kipper. doesnt it show that he is just as unreliable as any of the sources you rail against?

cnn and news of the world have sweet fa to do with this discussion, you only mention them in your desperation. another poor attempt at deflection, imo.

in my world cnn are unreliable as are breitbart, in your world i am not so sure.

many times i have said that i dont care about the nazi accusations, breitbart are scum who lie to further their cause, do you agree???

Insider Trader seems like a perfectly temperate, reasonable poster. But he really blew his cover  on this thread on 14 Aug 17, at 16:41.

What has Shirley Sherrod got to do with a forum discussion about an alleged Alt-right racist multi murder attempt ?

people, in the left are throwing the racist term about a lot, maybe that has something to do with it,
jollyswagmsn mentioned her in relation to a news media.
Never heard what it was she said.

Ive just taken a look, I'm suspicious of people like you so I decided to look for myself .

Thus is what she said:
I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do
I did enough. So that when he, I assumed the dept of agriculture sent him to me either that or the Georgia dept of agriculture, and he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him.

Now those are the comments , and those are racist comments
Who could deny that ?

That's why I became suspicious of the moneyshot, right there and decided to take a look.