Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 383 comments are related to the topic:
breaking news-pilot locked out of cockpit

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 10  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 10 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 383
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 26 Mar 15 16:02
The story of the Swedish football swapping flights is one of close shave.

Due to board the flight of the doomed plane. They decided to spread out on 3 other planes due to a delay at in Dusseldorf for their onward connection.
By:
The Leopard
When: 26 Mar 15 16:05
Pilots have been complaining about pollution getting into c*ck-pit....could affect their mental health.
By:
lovegod
When: 26 Mar 15 16:05
I hope they told relatives that they had changed flights.

Imagine what a horrible few hours it would have been if they hadn't.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 26 Mar 15 16:11
*Swedish football team.

When they landed and turned the phones back on one lad had 200 missed calls, they realised then something serious had gone down.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 26 Mar 15 16:13
only 630 hours in air for 18 months work, apparently had a "prolonged break",  sometime
By:
elise
When: 26 Mar 15 16:27
one german report is that he had been treated for depression, he had a break from flying at that time, report came from a neighbour
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 16:32

Mar 26, 2015 -- 3:45PM, TELL DEL wrote:


"Theres a fatal crash every 1.4billion miles flown."Yes, I was reading somewhere there is more chance of getting killed in a car crash on the way to the airport.In this tragedy if the co-pilot was not a terrorist, but wanted to commit suicide, why didn't he just kill himself, why did he have to kill 150 people.


but that's just an air  industry stat imo ,its not like its using like for like journeys is it ? they use number of miles flown for a reason

why not  number of journeys made ?  they use miles traveled to spin a stat and create a feeling of safety.

like wise they will focus on this crash being a suicide rather than a mass murder

they say it wont be terrorist linked but perhaps the word terrorism needs reassessed ,what will need to be uncovered for it to be classed as such ?

if they found for example the pilots licence was due to expire shortly and he was going to be forced into a huge paycut ...what would his actions be classed as then ?

By:
howard
When: 26 Mar 15 17:06
Interesting elise. That would be something for the company to answer.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 26 Mar 15 17:20
I'm astonished that some airlines allow a person to be alone in a locked cockpit, it's such an obviously flawed policy.
By:
elise
When: 26 Mar 15 17:28
to my mind if someone really wanted to down a plane then it wouldn't matter if there were two up front, not hard to club the other and do your stuff

there was a jal flight that crashed on approach when the captain flipped and just downed it on purpose, at the time there was a flight engineer and a co pilot in the cockpit and together they still couldn't stop him
By:
Zazu
When: 26 Mar 15 17:28
Hows is it a floored policy?


The pilot could have just killed the copilot then crashed the plane!
By:
xmoneyx
When: 26 Mar 15 17:30
a match could do it
By:
Pokermonster
When: 26 Mar 15 17:33
You seem to think that clubbing a person unconscious, or even killing them, is a mere bagatelle.  I would beg to diifer.  Having the extra security of two people in the cockpit at all times seems the very minimum to me.  And, apparently, some airlines agree with this view.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 26 Mar 15 17:34
The Malaysian aircraft disappearance, the Air Asia crash in Indonesia and now this ... almost expect to hear the voice of the Mysterons next.
By:
elise
When: 26 Mar 15 17:37
they might agree with it as it's pretty much the only cheap option they have, but if someone wanted to kill himself and 150 others in a pre planned attack i personally doubt bringing a stewardess into the cockpit to cover for the pilot while he takes a pish would be a deterent
By:
howard
When: 26 Mar 15 17:41
Agree Poker. These budget planes don't even  give you a drink though do they ? If this guy has ever been prescribed  medication for depression during his  break surely he should have been thrown out of flying work ?
By:
Howdi
When: 26 Mar 15 17:41
FECKING DREADFUL INCIDENT. ..1.2 max he has recently converted to Islam.
By:
themightymac
When: 26 Mar 15 17:48
It`s possible the person left in the cockpit wasn`t aircrew. Might have been a terrorist. Forced the crew out the cockpit at gun point and they left thinking he was just a hijacker. When the plane suddenly began descending they started banging the door to get back in to the cockpit? Something dodgy going on here. Tragic for the families of the poor people who lost their lives. RIP
By:
Marcce
When: 26 Mar 15 17:52
but that's just an air  industry stat imo ,its not like its using like for like journeys is it ? they use number of miles flown for a reason

why not  number of journeys made ?  they use miles traveled to spin a stat and create a feeling of safety.


?

Plenty of stats out there comparing number of fatal crashes compared to number of flights.

Doesn't take a genius to understand how many flights are made per day and compare that to the number of fatal accidents either.

I don't think they're doing much spinning in order to show flying is a very safe form of travel to be honest.
By:
elise
When: 26 Mar 15 17:53
or maybe he left his pet dachshund in control?
By:
Marcce
When: 26 Mar 15 17:56
It`s possible the person left in the cockpit wasn`t aircrew. Might have been a terrorist. Forced the crew out the cockpit at gun point and they left thinking he was just a hijacker. When the plane suddenly began descending they started banging the door to get back in to the cockpit? Something dodgy going on here.

Dear God.

Happens to me all the time on flights. I'm sat there minding my own business when someone taps me on the shoulder and asks me to sit in the cockpit while the pilot has a slash.

Your version of events is far more believable than the official explanation isn't it?
By:
Coachbuster
When: 26 Mar 15 18:27
a terribly selfish act if this is true ,but one that is still regarded as 'human error' rather than mechanical fault - you can't take out the human randomness of life .

If someone went for a haircut tomorrow and the barber slit their throat that would be a seriously unlucky customer - but you still couldn't stop it happening  .

This is probably a 3 million to 1 chance happening - you can't allow for all posibilities sadly .

RIP  to those killed (or murdered? )


Tel del -  all things considered and normal weather conditions , there  is marginally greater risk of death  driving 50 miles to the airport at normal speed than taking a 1,000 mile flight
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 18:33

Mar 26, 2015 -- 4:32PM, breadnbutter wrote:


Mar 26, 2015 --  2:45PM, TELL DEL wrote:"Theres a fatal crash every 1.4billion miles flown."Yes, I was reading somewhere there is more chance of getting killed in a car crash on the way to the airport.In this tragedy if the co-pilot was not a terrorist, but wanted to commit suicide, why didn't he just kill himself, why did he have to kill 150 people.but that's just an air  industry stat imo ,its not like its using like for like journeys is it ? they use number of miles flown for a reason why not  number of journeys made ?  they use miles traveled to spin a stat and create a feeling of safety.like wise they will focus on this crash being a suicide rather than a mass murder they say it wont be terrorist linked but perhaps the word terrorism needs reassessed ,what will need to be uncovered for it to be classed as such ? if they found for example the pilots licence was due to expire shortly and he was going to be forced into a huge paycut ...what would his actions be classed as then ?


if it doesn't take a genius Marcce could you provide me the stats that shows you are more likely to have an accident driving to the airport on a  "per journey basis" ?

you could only be more likely on the air industries  total miles traveled bollux  ,not even on "total travel time" could it come out on top

as i said the air industry likes to tell everyone  its the safest form of travel but only by their own  plucked from the sky stats




The most accurate method is to compare the number of deaths with the number of journeys made. So accurate, in fact, that this is the measure used by the industry and its insurers. This makes much more sense, because what matters to the individual is the journey, not how long it took or how far it went. Also, it enables comparison of different types of jet, both long haul and short haul.

By this measure, air travel takes on a rather different complexion. Deaths per 100 million passenger journeys are, on average, 55 for airliners compared with 4.5 for cars, and 2.7 for trains. Only motorbikes, at 100 deaths per 100 million passenger journeys, are more risky than aircraft on this basis.

By:
themightymac
When: 26 Mar 15 18:35
If someone went for a haircut tomorrow and the barber slit their throat that would be a seriously unlucky customer

It sure would be coach Shocked
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 26 Mar 15 18:45
If you drive a car, is there more chance that some else on the road that could be suicidal, a carp driver or p1ssed out of his freakin noggin that may or may not result in your demise???
By:
themightymac
When: 26 Mar 15 18:49
How can a person who reportedly had a history of mental illness retain his Pilot`s license? Absolutely shocking.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 26 Mar 15 18:50
I've always argued against the airlines' take on the statistics, the 'death per miles travelled' calculation is specious in the extreme.  After all, if an aircraft crashes towards the end a long haul flight, it's hardly any comfort that its first seven-thousdand miles or so were perfectly safe.

The 'per journey' method detailed above is a much fairer reflection of safety in my view.
By:
Marcce
When: 26 Mar 15 18:54
I mentioned nothing about journeys to airports breadnbutter.

I was referring to your comment about creating a feeling of safety.
By:
Zazu
When: 26 Mar 15 18:55
Air crashes are likely to be fatal as ur in a 500tonne Lumpur of metal doing 500mph, 6 miles in the sky!

Your not going to drive to the middleeast or USA for a weeks get away

Thousands of cars crash every day in the uk but obviously speeds are much lower.
By:
Zazu
When: 26 Mar 15 18:55
(autocorrect)
By:
Marcce
When: 26 Mar 15 19:01
The 'per journey' method detailed above is a much fairer reflection of safety in my view.

How do you work that out?

We're talking about 2 forms of transport where travel parameters are completely different. There is no obvious commercial flight option that compares with a 2 minute drive to the shop.

The only even remotely fair way of comparing travel between the 2 is to use miles traveled even with it's flaws.
By:
themightymac
When: 26 Mar 15 19:09
Stats are totally useless if you are unlucky to be on the plane that crashes.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 26 Mar 15 19:10
you can't do a per journey comparison - a journey in a car could be one mile .

all you can do is use an hourly calculation - time in flight ,time in car . 

miles travelled is just  as flawed as per journey Marcce .
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 19:12
why don't the insurers agree with you then ?

and why dont the air industry use that method ?

because they could not claim air travel was the safest then could they ?

also ,would love to see the pollution stats for     air v car ....although air dont do pollution chat do they ?
By:
Coachbuster
When: 26 Mar 15 19:15
why don't the insurers agree with you then ?
_________________

dunno
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 19:16
@ marcce

anyway maybe another thread another time Plain
By:
Zazu
When: 26 Mar 15 19:17

also ,would love to see the pollution stats for     air v car ....although air dont do pollution chat do they
?

Do you believe driving 1000 people to Australia would be better for the environent than flying them?
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 19:17
dunno ....Laugh
By:
Coachbuster
When: 26 Mar 15 19:18
i would certainly feel safer flying 10,000 miles than  driving 10.000 miles - but  i'm not sure i'd feel safer  flying 12 hours than driving for 12 hours - even though flying is the safer on both counts .


or 1 hour driving around mid Wales - that place is a death trap
By:
breadnbutter
When: 26 Mar 15 19:19
driving to Australia is a fraught with stats LaughLaughLaugh
Page 3 of 10  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 10 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com