|
By:
The twot must have had his fingernails kangoed from his chair..
|
|
By:
I think it's very telling of the culture within politics that Theresa May hasn't felt confident enough to sak this lot.
Vaz is calling for them all to resign. The fact that he's not lobbying for them to be sacked says all we need to know about the parasites who take no responsibility and can sue for wrongful dismissal (and win). |
|
By:
Eleven men were arrested for the same thing in Aylesbury recently.
I missed the news on the first 10 arrests. But the 11th one was from Bradford. |
|
By:
Was the luvvie Guardian reader Facts one of those that said the original allegations in the Daily Mail (his favourite paper to slag off) were just racism?
This thread is on its 7th page, and he hasn't appeared yet. |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
coz no one wants to know or mention the muslim content - it is quite obvious - they are so glad the scottish question is blanketing the news!!
|
|
By:
back to the story - repugnant sow Joyce Thacker has signed off long term sick...
Reacting to the news of Ms Thacker’s sick leave today, Keith Vaz, the chairman of the Home Affairs committee said she should resign. He said: “Ms Thacker will still receive her six figure salary, and will be able to return to her position in the near future. This leaves children’s services in Rotherham in limbo at a time when they need positive and strong leadership. “Ms Thacker should take note of the other resignations and follow suit, and if she does not, then Rotherham Council should make the decision for her.” . http://www.doncasterfreepress.co.uk/news/crime/joyce-thacker-goes-off-work-on-sick-leave-rotherham-council-confirm-1-6847577?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed |
|
By:
Dragging every penny she can out of the system. What a biatch..
|
|
By:
Officers face 'gross misconduct' inquiry by police watchdog over Jimmy Savile case
In the Telegraph.Four officers I believe. |
|
By:
Thacker's resigned now.
|
|
By:
Not before time.
No doubt she will find another non performance rated job on a labour run council somewhere local. |
|
By:
She should be barred from working with kids for life.
|
|
By:
Plenty more to weed out yet..
|
|
By:
'not allowed to bet' is spot on.
Rotherham and the other councils where this abuse has been covered up/encouraged is the bigger story and should be front page for weeks. The police are up to their necks in this ****. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
It has emerged Labour Members of Parliament in the North of England may have conspired to ignore the abuse of young girls by Pakistani grooming gangs because of the "vast reservoirs" of votes the "Kashmiri Muslim" community afforded them, and that crucial detailed evidence about the scandal has "disappeared" from archives.
. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/12/Rotherham-Kashmiri-Votes-For-Silence These b*stards must be made to pay. |
|
By:
Any 'missing' files from those in charge or from any other source, should be met with threats of perverting the course of justice. Under which i think it is called 'spoliation of evidence'
|
|
By:
EDUCATIONAL VIDEO WARNING OF MUSLIM GROOMING GANGS HARDLY USED AMID FEARS OF “RACISM”
SEPTEMBER 21, 2014 GROOMING, ISLAM, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS An educational video warning schoolgirls about Muslim grooming gangs was commissioned for schools in 2007 but was never promoted in the UK amid fears of appearing “racist.” The 20-minute film, My Dangerous Loverboy, features an Asian man in his 20s grooming a younger white girl – lavishing her with gifts and getting her drunk before forcing her to have sex for money. groomingIt was commissioned by child protection chiefs based in Yorkshire following reports of vulnerable girls being passed around groups of men for sex, according to a TV producer who worked on the project. Despite winning plaudits at international media festivals, the video was hardly used as it was thought not to be politically correct. Yorkshire has since been shaken by the revelation that 1,400 girls were abused by Asian gangs in the town of Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. The female TV producer, who preferred not to be named: said: “The project was set up to specifically raise schoolkids’ awareness of the dangers. “The police and social workers were very clear it was Asian men who were seducing white British girls. “I can’t help wondering how many girls the film might have saved from being sexually exploited if the UKHTC and police had put their needs before political correctness.” Truly sickening and what the country has now become thanks to the Labour party. |
|
By:
Correct.
|
|
By:
Party politics aside, I'm still disgusted that this case is not front and centre on every news channel. One thousand four hundred kids! Fúck the sensitivities of the muslims and the politically correct, a spotlight needs to be shone on these gangs, and the Pakistani culture in general, to help prevent a similar thing happening in other communities.
|
|
By:
But, yes, all political parties, and particularly Labour, need to hang their heads in shame over this scandal. I cannot think of anything worse than abusing children, yet it's difficult to get one's head around the sheer numbers involved in this horrific case.
The abuse of one thousand four hundred kids trumps any possible worry about offending anyone. If they're that sensitive, fúck 'em, the truth has to be told: namely that muslims have no interest whatsoever in fitting into British society. It seems to me they just want to recreate a miniature version of the shíthole they or their parents left behind. The sooner we say enough is enough and stop letting the fúckers in the better in my view. |
|
By:
quite right pokermonster,I see facts is conspicuous by his absense.
|
|
By:
Damn well said Pokermonster....
|
|
By:
Hard to comprehend how Labour politicians some who were controlling the police were supplying Pakistani paedophiles with the care home addresses of thirteen year old white girls?
Labour like to call for enquiries with things made public,not in this case though,they like to protect and cover for their friends and voters and there will be no cries of racism in these clearly racist attacks and assaults,Dianne Abbott has not been seen. |
|
By:
Naturally, the criminals are asians, she only loves blacks.
|
|
By:
Just bringing this thread back to the top where it belongs.
|
|
By:
We are still waiting for an enquiry to begin as the new chair travels around in her day job ! Now,if it had been John Terry of course......
|
|
By:
South Yorkshire Police Criticised Over Child Protection Report
30th September 2014, 09:15 The under-fire police force at the centre of the Rotherham child abuse scandal has faced fresh criticism from inspectors over how well it deals with vulnerable children in care homes. South Yorkshire Police had 'limited understanding' of the risk posed by offenders who target vulnerable children while officers showed an inconsistent response to child sexual exploitation, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) said. In one case, officers failed to sufficiently protect three girls identified as at risk, who were sexually assaulted by several men and were reported missing from care on several occasions. Officers were also found by inspectors to have failed to properly tackle men who are sexually exploiting young girls within the force area. South Yorkshire Police came under heavy fire after Professor Alexis Jay's report revealed at least 1,400 children were abused in Rotherham over 16 years and criticised officers for ''regarding many child victims with contempt''. Inspector of Constabulary Dru Sharpling said: 'We are concerned that force practice is inconsistent so not all children receive the standard of treatment they deserve. 'We were also concerned about the lack of understanding of the risk posed by offenders who target vulnerable children, and shortcomings in the protection of children in care.' There were particular shortcomings in care homes in Doncaster, one of four districts covered by the force, inspectors said. In one case, three young girls had been placed in a children's care home and police and children's social care services identified that they were becoming involved in increasingly risky behaviour. A meeting took place with partner agencies and all agreed that the three girls needed to be separated immediately, but it took a month for this to happen. Plans put in place in the meantime did not sufficiently protect the girls, inspectors said. The girls were reported missing on numerous occasions, they were found drunk and under the influence of drugs, they were arrested several times for offences such as criminal damage and assaulting care home staff, they were sexually assaulted by several men and one was detained in police custody for her ``own protection''. The report added: 'Although officers knew and were concerned that the girls continued to be at risk of child sexual exploitation, they reported a sense of helplessness and did not escalate their concerns to senior officers.' However, the report praised the force for undertaking ``prompt and thorough'' inquiries in most cases. A previous HMIC report said officers in South Yorkshire Police's public protection unit, which deals with rape and serious sexual assault, spend a ''great deal of time'' trying to ''disprove'' the word of victims. The earlier report said an ''investigate to record'' process was particularly evident in the unit, which also deals with honour-based violence and domestic abuse, adding there was ''a great deal of time spent trying to disprove the word of the victim from the outset''. South Yorkshire Police welcomed the recommendations of the inspection and said inconsistencies highlighted by the report regarding the force's response to child sexual exploitation were being addressed. Assistant Chief Constable Ingrid Lee said steps being taken to address the issues included a central referral unit for referrals relating to children, multi-agency teams in every district, a liaison officer to engage with children in care in Doncaster, known sex offenders given polygraph tests and more information about child sex offenders and domestic abuse being shared with the public. Ms Lee said: 'We understand the complexities of child sexual exploitation and we don't shy away from difficult investigations. All victims receive the highest standards of service possible. 'If we find evidence that appropriate action has not been taken we will ensure that is dealt with properly and robustly.'' 'We continually look at different ways to prevent harm to our young people and, where harm does occur, we are relentless and robust in pursuing those responsible. Today, we're absolutely clear on what needs to be done and this report, like the Jay report, recognises the improvements we have made and continue to make.'' |
|
By:
Ms Lee said:
'We understand the complexities of child sexual exploitation and we don't shy away from difficult investigations. All victims receive the highest standards of service possible. Is that how they spell 'whitewash' these days? |
|
By:
This nearly slipped off page 2!
In light of the police review of 56 rapes in middlesboro it should be back on page 1 where it belongs. |
|
By:
I agree.
|
|
By:
Any social worker on record as saying that girls as young as 12 or 13 year old had made 'lifestyle choices' shagging under age should be prosecuted as much as Jimmy Savile should have been. Instead of chasing after veteran DJ's the CPS should be looking at the police and public sector staff who turned a blind eye to all this.
|
|
By:
Hmmm. There is, of course, the problem of how to restrain the girls from sneaking out to make these rendez-vous. You can't handcuff them to the radiator and I'm not even sure that you can lock them in against their wishes. They aren't in prison.
![]() |
|
By:
Absolutely true but when the issue is clear the social workers and police should ensure they focus on the problem of UNDER AGE sex and prosecute their partners ???????
|
|
By:
I agree. Sex between an adult male and a 12 or 13yr-old is rape. Even if the girl plays the leading role.
|
|
By:
Council chiefs in Rotherham have hit out at protest groups destroying trade.
Traders lost business on Saturday when far right group Britain First marched through the town calling for arrests and prosecutions following the publication of the Jay Report. It is the second time Britain First has marched through the town over recent weeks and the English Defence League staged a national rally there last month. Traders have launched a petition calling for the Home Office to take into account the economic and social impact of demonstrations before giving groups the automatic right to protest. Karl Battersby, Rotherham Council’s Strategic Director for Environment and Development Services, said “On the whole, the people who attend these marches are not local to the area and have no stake or interest in the town. Instead they force ordinary members of the public to change their plans, leaving traders and businesses out of pocket. “We acknowledge that any group has the right to peaceful assembly or protest and that only the Home Secretary has the powers to ban marches or processions. But there is also a limit to how a town of this size can cope with so many repeated marches. “Our town centre traders are totally fed-up." . http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/local/council-chiefs-say-demonstrations-not-welcome-in-rotherham-1-6879405 |
|
By:
It is the second time Britain First has marched through the town over recent weeks and the English Defence League staged a national rally there last month.
The BBC missed out on reporting that, they generally love to. I wonder why. Were the UAF there as well? |
|
By:
I agree. Sex between an adult male and a 12 or 13yr-old is rape. Even if the girl plays the leading role.
"In March 1999, Rix was sentenced to 12 months in prison, of which he served six, for having underage sex with a 15-year-old girl. He was also ordered to be placed on the sex offenders' register for 10 years" So if its a year in prison for consensual sex with a 15 year old, what should it be for a 12 or 13 year old? |
|
By:
Karl Battersby - 'Strategic Director'.... Give me strength...
These public sector boneheads are so far up their own arses it's no surprise they can't see the bleedin' obvious. |
|
By:
Council chiefs in Rotherham have hit out at protest groups destroying trade.
How is the trade in white schoolgirls to Pakistani paedophiles by the Labour council going ,good or have the protest groups destroyed that trade? ask them. |