ABDUCTION!   

egner 21 Oct 13 14:07 Joined: 11 Jan 07 | Topic/replies: 9,937 | Blogger: egner's blog
guinness2dear   
...not sure if it is classed as a criminal record.....google McCann CATS file.
(strange to have a number generated but no details???!!!!!!!!!!)

Did as you suggested - is anyone else aware of this allegation?
http://goodqualitywristbands.blogspot.com/2012/01/did-jim-gamble-sanitize-gerry-mccanns.html

"Gerry McCann was convicted for child sex abuses in 2002, althought the evidence has been hacked and emptied from the case file by someone who has access to the National Sex Offenders Register, namely Jim Gamble though the CEOP mainframe connected to every police station crime files in the UK, the reference for this conviction still exists in the judiscial reference files and confiemes that Gerald P McCann was placed on the Child Sex Offenders Register following conviction in court, and is still on that register today! .

Much more than that I don't feel it's necessary to post; principally because there are mountains of stuff to be had by searching the net:

Gerald McCann CATS system registration number 19309"

OMFG!

Gerald McCann: CATS system - registration number 19309

A search of the local section of the child abuse shows a registration number 19309 in the CATS system. A consultation with the DC Soand from the department in question confirms that this is just a file reference, but as a complement to Operation Task system for the purpose of reference, if any investigation should be necessary by the department. No work has been done on the basis of this file.


This was knowledge over three years ago and why details were wiped just leaving the reference was never released to the public.
That registration alone, even though details had been wiped, should have put him under suspicion, shouldn't it? No not at all just wipe details off and keep it from the general public and everything will be alright, the majority are onside now, we know that from running a few polls, all this will die down soon enough!

Mucky and murky..

No idea if this is true or not but on a more general question can you be sued for saying things on an internet forum which are not true.

don't know paddletoe......

..but these blog pages are still up and have been for months and years....plenty of time for them to have been challenged successfully and forced to take them down/retract I would have thought.

think there was far more vitriol on twitter the other night than there is on here.

Because he may be a mason

also you wont hear too much about the details of Operation Ore anymore.....

you can also google that yourselves.....join the dots, and draw your own conclusions

no wonder they wont do any lie detector tests

the whole thing becomes more and more depressing and disturbing.

I can see this thread getting pulled

why should it get pulled now akabula....

the link to basically the same info was posted at the bottom of page 4 almost a week ago.!!!!!

the thing is AT....

that blog was from a couple of years ago.....the mccanns have already won libels against others for implicating them in this incident...and are currently doing the same in Portugal as we speak...

so why not challenge something of this magnitude and force the blogs removal????!!!!!

I really think people should stop talking about these allegations for their own benefit. I simply can not believe they are true.

They've been talked about for years..

taken from Christopher spivey website. The german report apparently came up with different findings.

Here is the UK reports conclusion:

By contrast, the search for increased risk levels near to nuclear power generation sites (by the use of other methods) shows no pattern of excess cases of childhood cancer close to the sites of these types of nuclear installation.

Our analyses confirmed the excesses in areas close to the Sellafield, Dounreay, and Aldermaston, Burghfield and Harwell sites, which were already known.

There is, therefore, little support for the hypothesis claiming that there is a link to radioactive discharges as a general cause of childhood cancer in Great Britain.

It is possible that at least one or two of the three unusual aggregations around nuclear installations could be a result of the more general non-random case distribution we have described.

This is less likely with the excess in the village of Seascale near Sellafield due to the prolonged nature of the case occurrence and its range of cancers.

At both Sellafield and Dounreay, population mixing has been put forward by some authors as a possible explanation for the cases of childhood leukaemia occurring nearby  Source

And now the best bit.

One of the doctors of COMARE’s sub-committee of medical practitioners gathering information for the report was none other than Dr G P McCann AKA Gelly Baby Source

The fact that Gerry McCann is a Cardiologist, a doctor who specialises in treating heart disease makes his appointment to a sub-committee investigating cancer, and in particular childhood Leukaemia, to my way of thinking; extremely fxxxing odd.

Maybe an explanation why friends in high places.

ta

re my earlier post, I wasn't making an allegation - I was simply making the point that the information was freely available on the internet although I wouldn't have known about it unless directed there by an earlier poster.

Seems the info has been in the public domain for more than 2 years

What has happened to investigative journalism? - seems the mainstream media are not interested.

if you are on registers list,impossible I would have thought to work in a hospital

nov 5th

I thought it said 'deferred'. However, it's your post...so it's your rules.

I`m still not sure where I stand on this but this thread has been most illuminating, and has probably changed my mind.
On the Crimewatch programme, there was a glaring discrepancy, which may be insignificant, especially as I haven`t seen it being discussed on here, or anywhere else, bur let me throw it into the mix.

One of them, (I think it was Gerry, first,) said something like `I tucked them in, and TURNED OFF THE LIGHT` A few minutes further into the programme, the other one (Kate?) declared that SHE had turned off the light.  Anybody else notice this?