Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1538 comments are related to the topic:
Madeleine McCann

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 25 of 39  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | ... | 39 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,538
By:
TELL DEL
When: 20 Oct 13 16:23
"I don't wish to defend them but in their own eyes they don't feel they neglected the kids."

and it wasn't just them, all of the group left their kids and they were going back at regular intervals to check them, just don't understand why none of them used a babysitter (as these services were available).  So they were all as bad as the McCann's for leaving their kids.
By:
A_T
When: 20 Oct 13 17:27
This was why they all refused to return for the reconstruction - they were afraid the scale of their negligence would be exposed. So much for "no stone unturned".
By:
bigmo
When: 20 Oct 13 17:37
I agree TELL DEL but what this case is sadly lacking in is evidence to bring to justice who is responsible.
By:
pandora1963
When: 20 Oct 13 18:13
found this topic on a forum,certainly raises a few eyebrows and not heard much of it in the media!!!

http://www.bernardomahoney.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1180
By:
fronter
When: 20 Oct 13 18:13
But you would do anything in your powers to bring your child back and that includes answering ANY questions - if you are innocent !
Why refuse to answer - also some of the shuffling and ear scratching when the awkward interview questions were asked is surely a sign there's more to this than meets the eye!   But who knows - that's the question WHO DOES KNOW??
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 18:14
Suggest they are paedos?

Who are the names of these wedding guests / good friends / and holiday companions

where are their quotes stating this

and where are their previous convictions

quite strange to have wedding guests and friends if they think you're a pervert.

This is what you call smears.
By:
1st time poster
When: 20 Oct 13 18:21
the exeter connection health professionals best friend of mrs mcaan at uni
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 18:32
where are the quotes saying they are paedos?
By:
akabula
When: 20 Oct 13 18:33
I've no time for the nccanns, Gerry in particular, but some of the claims made on here are just nonsense.
The claim that they are part of a paedo ring really beggars belief.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 20 Oct 13 18:42
I've no idea about the guilt or otherwise of the McCanns but God help anyone who doesn't come over well on tv  because the great British public will hang em.
By:
akabula
When: 20 Oct 13 18:43
Greatest jury in the world T&C. Never wrong.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 20 Oct 13 18:44
if they answered the questions it woul dhave helped and not raised peoples suspicions.
By:
A_T
When: 20 Oct 13 18:44
There is a witness statement from a doctor who holidayed with the McCanns and another Tapas couple that alleged an inappropriate gesture in relation to Madeleine - as result the doctor would not let the Tapas dad bathe her kids.

Paedophile ring is taking it too far. But remember these forums were full of innuendo about Sir Jimmy Savile. Turned out it was right.
By:
A_T
When: 20 Oct 13 18:46

A_T     21 Sep 12 23:08 
Sir Jimmy indulged himself in ways we can only begin to imagine. He didn't "die" he simply moved to a higher plane of existence. Even now his lawyers cast fear into newspaper editors throughout the land.


Shocked

By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 20 Oct 13 18:48
But remember these forums were full of innuendo about Sir Jimmy Savile. Turned out it was right.

Oh well there you are, case proven  Hang Em
By:
A_T
When: 20 Oct 13 18:49

A_T     04 Oct 11 19:24 
Let's hope they lock up the morgue at night

Only kidding! The man's a legend. Also has no recollection of ever visiting a children's home in Jersey. His lawyers are even better than the McCanns'.

Get well soon Sir Jimmy!


Laugh

By:
akabula
When: 20 Oct 13 18:53
That's some analogy. Nobody was surprised when that feckin creep was outed.
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 19:23
A_T 20 Oct 13 18:44 Joined: 27 Jan 06 | Topic/replies: 5,473 | Blogger: A_T's blog
There is a witness statement from a doctor who holidayed with the McCanns and another Tapas couple that alleged an inappropriate gesture in relation to Madeleine - as result the doctor would not let the Tapas dad bathe her kids.

Paedophile ring is taking it too far. But remember these forums were full of innuendo about Sir Jimmy Savile. Turned out it was right.




Saville was known to be a creepy old man, unfair to lump the mccans in with him

also - can you post a link or quotes reporting that this witness statement happened - and can the statement if made be backed up by anyone else other than this person.
By:
1st time poster
When: 20 Oct 13 19:28
its about 4 pages back ,backed up on one occasion by her husband,statement given to lecestershire police,thought you read all the posts on this thread ayre
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 19:34
repost it pls
By:
1st time poster
When: 20 Oct 13 19:40
page 19 buzzers 11.58 post
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 19:54
one way to find out would have been to ask - since she saw him do it twice why didn't she just ask?, I wonder if he has a criminal record? I find it hard to believe one grown man would make sexual jokes about another mans child infront of him, it does seem odd though.
By:
1st time poster
When: 20 Oct 13 20:01
you dont need friends like that but all adds to the information that we dont no about and starting right at the beginning,htf do the tapas 9 get sky, the beeb itv scrambling areoplanes within 2 or 3 hrs heading for the algarve ,when by the time they all got their including government officals maddie could have walked through the door
who are these people think we have a right to no
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 20:20
So do I.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 20 Oct 13 20:39
this stuff about all the kids(how many ?) getting bathed in turns by the group does not sound right .

how many folk on here would want to bath someone elses kids or have someone else bath their own ?

it was stated that one member of the group never new the mcanns kids but he was allowed to check on them ? this sounds wrong in so many ways ,if the kids were awake when he went into their room it would be unfair on him and the kids .

How were/why were the kids being bathed by one person ?  all in the same villa ? or separate ?  if all in the same villa why not just bed them all down in that villa and take turns watching them ?  sounds sensible no ? and we are talking about educated logical people here ....profesionals .

Also it was never put into the Brittish Media that Kate McCann trained as an anesthetist ,if this info was made public when the cops were alledging the kids were sedaited the public opinion might be very different ,this is what bothers me so much about the reporting.
Its been edited and manipulated to paint a favourable picture .Was reading that the portugese cops were struggling to find a DNA sample of Madelaine in portugal or a picture of her ?  Is this correct ? 

the implication is that Jerry returned home to collect both of these ,is this correct ?  If the Portugese police could find no DNA in that appartment of Madelaine that would be very strange ,and even stranger is the allegation that DNA was later discovered in the wheelwell in the boot of the renault scenic they subsequently hired .

Some very strange goings on and they do need explained ...maybe the police are completely at it ,its happened before ...

Also the car was hired (23 days ? ) after she went missing ,i will ask again ...where did the car come from ?  was it local ,was it in the village they were staying ...could she have been in the boot before they hired car ...who owned the hire company who worked their ?

this is the part of the story which has put so much doubt in everyones mind ....but we know SFA about the car ,where it came from and where it went .A proper release of all the facts surrounding this case is needed imo .

If the McCanns have nothing to hide what are they afraid of ?  the case is in effect closed imo ...why the need to suppress what little facts there is ?  the whole thing reeks ....
By:
egner
When: 20 Oct 13 20:47
AyersRock...

its the "Gaspar" statement.
By:
naydam
When: 20 Oct 13 20:57
Hmmm. Breadnbutter. I'd imagine that if you've got a body that's been dead for over three weeks, you wouldn't need to send siome dog from England to tell you about it!
Unless, of course, you'd stuck it in the fridge with a sign on saying 'do not open'...just to fool any cleaning ladies or nosey policemen.
By:
tobermory
When: 20 Oct 13 21:04
Depends if they had somewhere to hide it.
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 21:11
"it" do you not know her name toberWink
By:
tobermory
When: 20 Oct 13 21:20
Crazy
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 21:24
1.01 landed
By:
iamajambo
When: 20 Oct 13 21:32
The use of 'it' is grammatically correct in this context.

For what it's worth Ayers,I am concerned about your,and others,obsession with views on this sad matter.

No comment so far on the front page of today's Sun,not that I would give any credence to this comic,which showed that the photo-fits indicated a likeness to two British paedophiles currently serving time for abduction,and possibly murder(was just looking at the newspaper front pages whilst waiting for a train so unaware of the full details),as reported???
By:
AyersRock
When: 20 Oct 13 21:36
iamjambo, I am just providing the balance, it's not me reading up on obscure websites and following the trial in Portugal - from people actually going tothe trial daily to post blogs about - those are the people with unhealthy amount of interest if aanyone has
By:
akabula
When: 20 Oct 13 21:44
Got to assume from your comments iamajambo that you are a frequent visitor to the thread. Wink
By:
guinness2dear
When: 20 Oct 13 21:45
AyersRock: Just who started the court case?

So you have decided to be the balancing factor by producing exactly what?

Everyone on here who doesn't agree with the whitewashing going on has produced clips and their thoughts on this matter and you have taken it upon yourself to try and disprove them by err producing what?

All you have done and are doing is asking others to produce evidence. Where's yours?
By:
A_T
When: 20 Oct 13 21:49
the two paedos were linked to this case 2 years ago

.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1384705/Madeleine-McCann-Police-quiz-convicted-murderers-Kate-McCann-gives-chilling-account-moment-daughter-missing.html

the efits have been around even longer yet this is presented as news
By:
brendanuk1
When: 20 Oct 13 22:06
Bizarre that they show both efits and then both photos of the peados like there is a match when we know the efits are for the same person Confused really dont understand what uk papers are doing except talking alot of compete bollox to confuse the public
By:
brendanuk1
When: 20 Oct 13 22:10


There is clear implication that the efits are 2 people and they match the 2 paedos Confused What is the purpose of that nonsense Confused
By:
guinness2dear
When: 20 Oct 13 22:13
Deflection..
By:
brendanuk1
When: 20 Oct 13 22:15
Its not helping the search for Maddie though is it?
Page 25 of 39  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | ... | 39 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com