Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1427 comments are related to the topic:
Tia Sharp the 12 year old girl missing from South London.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 23 of 36  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ... | 36 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,427
By:
Clungehungry
When: 12 Aug 12 15:48
I tend to agree. His behaviour has been more of a guilt-ridden ****wit than a master criminal or psycho paedo.
By:
desperatemunter
When: 12 Aug 12 15:49
this is right - having violence/drug-dealing convictions in no way suggests you are more likely than the vicar next door to be involved in sexual or violence offences against a 12 year old girl.
in fact almost ALL the nastiest people, the lifelong pedophiles and serial killers, once uncovered lived lives of apparently blameless normality - or so it appeared.
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 15:57
She should be more concerned with the fact that she chose to shack up with her daughters ex boyfriend, and that she subsequently chose to leave her granddaughter in his care.  There is no shaking that off.

I'm sorry but I don't buy that. There are millions of Step Parents, grandfathers, uncles etc in these Isles that shouldn't be tarred with the same brush. One bad egg doesn't spoil the box. I have a now grown Step Son that I was left alone with when he was a child. Is that poor judgement on my wife's behalf? I'm sure as AG has pointed out that Stuart Hazell seemed an OK bloke, you can't tar Tia's parents for trusting him.

Cases like this are rare, indeed very rare, thankfully.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 15:58

twomatchpoints 12 Aug 12 15:40 
pixie - that's rubbish

Just because somebody has convictions for violence doesn't mean he will automatically hurt a child

There are probably more nutjobs with no violent record whatsoever, of both sexes, who had got to the stage of divorce and decided to kill their children and themselves


Don't put words in my mouth. Where did I say he would automatically hurt a child? I would suggest, that a man with convictions for violence would be far more likely to repeat offend and become violent again, whether it be with a child or not, than someone who has no criminal record - quite fecking obvious wouldn't you say?

Ultimately, the Grandmother showed appalling judgement in allowing a violent criminal with drug convictions to look after a 12 year old girl on his own. A judgement that most people would not make and people will always judge her for it accordingly.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 12 Aug 12 16:01
Any suggestion of sexual activity at this point is just pure speculation.

Surely there is a correlation between a man having being violent on the past and his likeliehood of re-offending.  Ok, he wasn't violent against young girls in the past, but perhaps the  fact that she is a young girl is not directly relevant to the crime.
By:
BARROWBOY
When: 12 Aug 12 16:03
Clunge,hes certainly no master criminal,but his bbc interview protesting his innocence & elaborating details of tias movements while all the time the girl was upstairs dead portrayed many psychopathic tendancies.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 12 Aug 12 16:03
I have a now grown Step Son that I was left alone with when he was a child

Do you have a criminal record similar to the man in question?  If not, I am not sure that I understand the analogy.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:03
Agreed.^^^^^^
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 12 Aug 12 16:05
Had convictions for dealing crack cocaine and possession of a machete, looks like death warmed up.

Would not get anywhere near my kids in a million years if I could help it.

Not tarring everyone with the same judge - quite happy to judge on appearances in his case, if that's not PC then tough.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 12 Aug 12 16:06
^brush not judge. Plain
By:
BonVivvy
When: 12 Aug 12 16:06
I do love high profile CCDA threads..where even virtual zero initial evidence does little to stop the flow of suggestion.

Feels eevr so like the Karen Mathews thing to me (bar the actual murder)whenever the lid is lifted on the underclass it always leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:08
Do you have a criminal record similar to the man in question?  If not, I am not sure that I understand the analogy.

No but afaik his criminal record wasn't for Pedophilia.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 12 Aug 12 16:08
maybe he was high on crack when incident happened or shared it with tia

still waiting for autopsy
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:09
dealing crack cocaine and possession of a machete

Guess that automatically makes him a child killer then.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 12 Aug 12 16:10
so letting a man with convictions for dealing crack cocaine look after a 12 year old girl is OK then?
By:
Clungehungry
When: 12 Aug 12 16:13
Whilst the 'never offended before, nobody would suspect him, kind family man' cases stand out in our memories, I'm pretty sure that in murder/manslaughter cases in general people with previous for lesser crimes will be much more likely to be offenders. Possibly not with child molestation though. I suspect that wasn't the case here anyway.
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:13
I'm not saying that. I'm saying that Tia's parents should not be criticsed for leaving their child with him. I'm sure there are loads of trustworthy ex criminals that wouldn't harm a child. I feel this is a witch hunt tarring them all with the same brush. Tia's parents and grandmother obviously had no issue with this man minding the child.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:13
Ovalman. 12 Aug 12 16:09 
dealing crack cocaine and possession of a machete

Guess that automatically makes him a child killer then.


Of course it doesn't - but it proves that he's capable of extreme violence and the drugs, potentially dangerous erratic behaviour. Who said he killed her because he was a paedo?
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:15
So you would leave your children alone, with a man with a history of violence and drug abuse then, Ovalman?
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:16
I would leave my child with someone I trusted.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:17
Answer the question.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 12 Aug 12 16:18
might the fact that her mother's boyfriend became her grandmother's boyfriend also have been just a little bit disturbing for Tia?

Imagine when you were a kid if you're mum split up with your dad (step or otherwise) and then your dad went to live with your grandma?
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:19
Yes, if I trusted him. I wouldn't hold his past evictions against him in this case if he was trustworthy. Not every machette wielding maniac is a child killer, I'm sure the stats would prove me correct.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:20
Of course they're not and not every time you cross a road blindfolded do you get run over.
By:
casemoney
When: 12 Aug 12 16:24
People involved in the drugs trade who go round wielding machetes ,generally have a few enemies ,I would not be leaving
children in their care tbh ..
By:
Clungehungry
When: 12 Aug 12 16:25
If that was merited then fine. If he ended up killing her though, your trust was misplaced and you should indeed be criticised.
By:
boggle
When: 12 Aug 12 16:25
Pixie - actually you've got to cut your losses and admit when you're wrong. I am not sure of the degree of the incident involving the machette conviction but I'd failed to notice or ignored it until now. I stand by my comments generally, that people take each other largely on trust and ought to and that people who behave criminally do not habitually go on to harm kids. But yes, if she knew full well of that machette attack and that it was indeed an act of violence, rather than something minor like possession (which still wouldn't excuse her trusting him) then it really is perhaps an error of judgement that ought to haunt her.
By:
A_T
When: 12 Aug 12 16:25
dealing crack cocaine and possession of a machete

not exactly a reference
By:
MC Roller
When: 12 Aug 12 16:25
I don't like these threads. Betfair should be ashamed of themselves.
By:
Ovalman.
When: 12 Aug 12 16:27
OK I understand, everyone that gets convicted with a machette is an automatic child murderer. I should have guessed, I'm sure you have the data to back up your assumption.
By:
Clungehungry
When: 12 Aug 12 16:29
I think you're talking nonsense there Ovalman.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:29
boggle 12 Aug 12 16:25 
Pixie - actually you've got to cut your losses and admit when you're wrong. I am not sure of the degree of the incident involving the machette conviction but I'd failed to notice or ignored it until now. I stand by my comments generally, that people take each other largely on trust and ought to and that people who behave criminally do not habitually go on to harm kids. But yes, if she knew full well of that machette attack and that it was indeed an act of violence, rather than something minor like possession (which still wouldn't excuse her trusting him) then it really is perhaps an error of judgement that ought to haunt her.


Where am I wrong? You have changed your mind now you are aware of the facts and are now agreeing with me!

Jeez, some people on this site.....
By:
desperatemunter
When: 12 Aug 12 16:29
MC Roller be ashamed - suggesting its anything other than right and proper for people to have an exchange of views on the most important things that happen in society.
By:
casemoney
When: 12 Aug 12 16:30
Oval would you not be worried about former enemies possibly turning up at the house or something simular ?
By:
BARROWBOY
When: 12 Aug 12 16:31
has anyone explained why tia was staying overnight at her grandmas house on a regular basis especially so when the gran worked nights.what was wrong with her own home.
By:
pixie
When: 12 Aug 12 16:31
Of course he is Clunge. Can't admit he's talking complete and utter bawlarks and is too stupid to come clean.
By:
boggle
When: 12 Aug 12 16:34
pixie, I meant when I am wrong
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 12 Aug 12 16:35
He actually had quite a long list of offenses under his belt. Nothing that would shout out 'child murderer' (although I'm not quite as sanguine as you are about 'possession of a machete'!), but certainly there were plenty of suggestions that sensible people shouldn't be leaving their children in his care. 

I don't blame the grandmother so much (who quite possibly wouldn't believe anything bad of him), but the mother and stepfather shouldn't have been allowing their child to go over there so much. In most cases the child wouldn't have come to any harm, but in this case she quite clearly did. And that almost certainly wouldn't have been the case had the mother and stepfather thought 'can we really trust this guy around our little girl?' Sorry, but those are facts.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 12 Aug 12 16:35
Ovalman.

Ovalman.
12 Aug 12 16:27
Joined:
29 Nov 02
| Topic/replies: 10,122 | Blogger: Ovalman.'s blog
OK I understand, everyone that gets convicted with a machette is an automatic child murderer. I should have guessed, I'm sure you have the data to back up your assumption.


Nobody on the thread has stated or even assumed that and it's downright embarrassing to suggest otherwise.
By:
tobermory
When: 12 Aug 12 16:36
the crying on a park bench may well have been self pity rather than guilt
Page 23 of 36  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ... | 36 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com