|
By:
no car but access to a bike
|
|
By:
Big strong guy (6'2") and works out a lot. Would have had no problem lifting the body over a wall. Why dump it where he did?
|
|
By:
Did she use her clubcard when buying the pizza?
|
|
By:
Presumably killed in his flat as if it were hers he could just have left her there. One scenario, she gets home carrying lots of stuff. Puts pizza down to free hands to open door. Gets in but slightly tipsy so forgets pizza. Takes shoes off. Opens cider, quick drink before pizza. Hey where's my pizza? Oh...must have left it outside. Goes outside, door closes behind her. Goes to neighbours cos it's cold and she needs to phone someone. He's all "Hey baby, why the hurry..."
|
|
By:
Because the murderer wanted the body to be found.
|
|
By:
The sooner it's found, the more tthe police can find out.
|
|
By:
Maybe he used the car of the girl living in Aberdeen Road, assuming she has one. She is currently in Chile.
|
|
By:
Just seen a CCTV pic of him on Channel 5 news. Not sure of the relevance...
|
|
By:
He is an architect.
She is an architect. He says, "Hi Jo" She says, "That building you designed is sh*te. You're sh*te. The Dutch are ****." Professional provocation and mitigating circumstances surely? |
|
By:
He says, "Hi Jo"
She says, "No wonder your girlfriend dumped you. You're a pathetic excuse of a man and a lousy architect." |
|
By:
the.mad.dog.man Joined: 11 Dec 01
Replies: 1647 23 Jan 11 18:31 the police in bristol are a ![]() ![]() ![]() stockI think you'll find that chit chat defectives are the laughing stock The police got their man (allegedly)where all you lot did was flounder about all over the place with inconclusive evidence. |
|
By:
police did fk all
and they did it slowly |
|
By:
horseman 23 Jan 11 19:15
Only sure fire conclusion i can come to after reading through this monster of a thread Talk about an unhealthy interest You read through 47 pages & accuse others of unhealthy interest ![]() |
|
By:
Mr Winkle, we were not given all the runners though
![]() Who's come second iyo ![]() |
|
By:
Can anyone make sense of the following....
''police got their breakthrough 3 weeks ago with CCTV footage of the car used to dump the body going over the suspension bridge, though initially the driver was ruled out as a suspect'' ![]() Read this in a couple of places. How did they know that car , of hundreds going over the bridge, was used to move the body ![]() If they knew it was , how on earth was the driver initially eliminated ![]() |
|
By:
the number plate was guilty 1
|
|
By:
zilzal1 24 Jan 11 00:39
Mr Winkle, we were not given all the runners though Who's come second iyo 2nd The McCanns 3rd Maggie Thatcher obviously ![]() |
|
By:
It looks like the chit-chat judicial system works a bit differently to the normal one. Isn't there something like one of those court-case thingies supposed to happen? A Trial! Yeah, that's what it's called...a Trial. With a jury and stuff. And evidence and a verdict, like. You've all seen 'em. In fact I think some of you might have seen a few too many!
![]() There are some rather fanciful scenarios created on here as to who thought what and how the drama played out. No doubt these storylines will require a little modification in order to compensate for the latest 'fact'. I think I can see now why we scrapped the Death Penalty. ![]() |
|
By:
True Naydam, 3 people would have been hanged before anyone had heard of Tabak.
|
|
By:
That's another problem, Tobermory. They would have only hung the first one and then closed the case!
![]() |
|
By:
I'm still not convinced by the "stalker" theory.
He just doesn't fit the profile, yes he had broken up with his missus, but usually he would take any anger out on her, not a neighbour! Plus if he did do it from a spurned advance than it would be a typical "crime of passion" where he would leave the body where it was and panic, not think to himself "Ooops, just killed someone, do I have a big suitcase? I know, lets call a taxi" It all shows a decent level of premeditation, not a crime of passion. |
|
By:
Think sparkmaster has it right in that Jo locks herself out with pizza so flat never entered after that and they can look in Jo's flat as much as they like but won't find anything.
Plod always say she got back there but don't know where murdered.... more likely (if Tabak's the culprit) in his place which is why body had to be moved. Re taxi I doubt he called one up to his address. could have dragged suitcase to a cab rank. |
|
By:
Is he related to Jimmy Tarbuck?
|
|
By:
LMansini Joined: 15 Oct 05
Replies: 2361 24 Jan 11 00:34 police did fk all and they did it slowly you're wrong |
|
By:
She's in a good mood, we see her laughing and smiling on bargain booze CCTV. She texts an old friend to go for a drink.
Meanwhile, (Allegedly) Tabak is alone, he knows Jo's BF is away for the weekend, he's seen Jo around and fancies her. She always smiles and is friendly when their paths cross. He reads too much into that. He hears her arrive back, his heart beat quickens, he's nervous and exited, now's his chance! She opens the cider and takes a drink. There's a knock at the door. It's Tabak..! |
|
By:
hope you are not on jury
![]() |
|
By:
I hope I am on the jury
![]() |
|
By:
Will he have to pay her estate for the pizza?
|
|
By:
Back in court next week, have they charged him to buy more time?
|
|
By:
From the BBC website:
"It is thought that a bail hearing will take place at Bristol Crown Court on Tuesday." Under what circumstances would a suspected murderer be released on bail? Especially a foreign national who could possibly attempt to skip the country. Presumably if they have sufficient evidence to charge him then they must think he's guilty and could therefore be a potential danger to society. So what would be the point of a bail hearing? |
|
By:
It's his legal right, it doesn't mean he'll get it.
|
|
By:
iT'S JUST THE LAW MOMM ,you can't just throw the key away there is a process
|
|
By:
Procedure, from ITV news reporter.
no requirement to make a plea yet, that comes at a later date. bail hearing tomorrow - they don't know if he is applying for bail. preliminary hearing scheduled for 31st Jan. |
|
By:
I realise that but if it's simply a formality then why didn't it take place at the hearing today?
It just seems a complete waste of taxpayers' money. |
|
By:
Lots of stuff to do with law enforcement and the judicial process are simply a gravy train, imo.
|
|
By:
The waiting around, hours "worked", time wasting I saw just when doing jury service was astounding.
|
|
By:
Many of these delays are caused by the accused pleading 'Not Guilty'. Of course, sometimes that's the correct plea 'cos they didn't do it!!
![]() |
|
By:
I think the police have handled this whole case very badly. From very early on it looked like the killer knew Jo and it was a crime motivated by an attraction to the victim. The man now charged should have been one of the first people under suspicion if only to be ruled out. It never looked like a premediatated crime but you would thought that a young man living next door would need to be ruled out first.
|
|
By:
paddletoe think he was given an alibi that threw plod off the scent
|
|
By:
Is the landlord still a suspect ?
|