They at least knew it was going to happen.

What an odd series of events. Operation Able Danger is the key to proving the CIA knew.

This will explain WTC 7 collapsing like a demolition job.

Had forgotten just how much of a nutter Sunset Cristo was....and keeping it on topic there's no way that 9/11 was accomplished without inside help of some sort, whether it be planning or simply looking the other way and allowing it to happen. And I'm not in Manxy's camp where it comes to WTC7 coming down due to fire...no way ever.

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, while

government dupes are crazy and hostile




http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/07/17/new-studies-conspiracy-theorists-sane-while-government-dupes-are-crazy-and-hostile/

and all you paranoid and unstable believers, I'm not laughing at you, so don't go all mental and start stabbing random strangers who you think are "in on it".

'That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority'.

They have been for years Angel

he would have been a go go

We are all forgetting the pentagon hit,the most protected building on the planet,only Cctv footage came from one camera which did not prove a plane hit the pentagon,old tv footage,cannot see any engines from said plane,it's all very dodgy,also wtc building 7 comes down after the BBC reporter says it comes down,she is clearly seen saying it has come down,on the tv footage it is clearly in tact just over her shoulder unbelievable.

and there was that **** and bull story about how the accused took flying lessons in america but were adamant that they only wanted to learn how to fly - not how to take off and land and apparently this did not arouse any suspicions, also they found their passports, what a miracle.

NG

It is strange people can make their minds up without investigating matters further. I guess it`s easier to go with the crowd for some people rather than taxing the grey matter with an abundance of information which the nutters believe, so why bother.

I have no problem with people looking into it and still saying for example `oh i just think the Americans are just being secretive about revealing images of the Pentagon crash etc...at least they have taken the time to understand why so many are dubious about the events..but i have known people trying to hold the higher ground of sanity without even knowing about WTC7 or Operation Able Danger. It can be frustrating to debate probably for people on both sides. However for balance sake, the people who believe the official line should actually be aware of the foundation of facts before they mock.

AG - I agree with that but when there's incontrovertible evidence (in my opinion) I start to suspect that such staunch believers in the official version of events are just taking the piss and winding me up, as there really is just ONE conclusion (concerning WTC7 & The Pentagon) for any rational person to arrive at.

I reckon that 'ribbing' they do is their 'cover' for when the FACTS eventually become official, so they can claim they too knew all along and were never really THAT gullible.

At the risk of being ridiculed (I don't give a fcuk) I must admit that I think most conspiracy theories have legitimate substance to them - here's a link to one that sounds far fetched but as usual, things check out;

FEMA Camps with millions of plastic 'coffins' hovering around that can house 4/5/6 people!
Just WTF are they planning?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4W82h-9urk

How many conspiracy theories have been proved to be true?

Are you saying WTC7 was a controlled demolition navel?

and indeed WTC1&2 ?

It certainly is leading to an Orwellian societal situation. The thought policing system is on it`s way.

The establishment need the majority on their side and activists will be labelled `potentional threats to National Security`, this is already happening.

well , just a few of the answers will do to be getting on with . I'm easily pleased

That`s the problem with cover ups though Crispy. The proof is covered up.

NG

The public do not get to see military technology for years, so could military technology have been used to collapse the towers into their own footprint? Of course and this seems more likely than WTC7 being the only steel framed building to collapse at near free fall speed into it`s own footprint..due to not structural damage but office fires

For any sickos like me that dare to have a penchant for the truth, Jesse Ventura's 'Death Ray' episode is a compelling watch;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Tey6xg8uqQ

I hope some of you believers give this an airing and then get back to me.

I'd better STFU now because thinking about it all makes me angry...I need to calm down

what do people mean by actual proof? steel cannot melt unless its above temperatures of 2500°F, jet fuel burning is a lot less but the whole structure wilted, that is proof itself the building was brought down under a controlled explosion,

How on earth is that proof Ayers? Steel doesn't melt until upwards of 2750F granted but Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F (jet fuel burns between 800 - 1500F, hotter with added combustibles) more than enough for it to bend and sag.

Are you honestly suggesting explosives were planted in advance without a single employee seeing a single thing? Explosives that then survived the initial explosions and resultant fires around the impact floors without being compromised?

seriously?

Ayers, what would you expect to happen to a building supported by steel, when the steel loses half it's strength.

Why did you even mention the melting point, are you aware that steel at 2450C is not as strong as steel at room temp?