Forums

Australian

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1671 comments are related to the topic:
Labour= tax tax tax......and tax again

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 16 of 42  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 42 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,671
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 28 Jun 10 21:59
Labor are the masters at re-election campaigns - sometimes I think the Coalition need to push for more vigorous "blow for blow" re-election strategies to combat the mudslinging nature of Labor campaigning.

Even if they have rabble & lying bar stewards at the helm - HQ know how to fight.

They do it well.  Very well.

But the situation if you look around at the Labor states and now federally (and we have only seen the simmering start with Rudd-Gillard Governing).....

NSW = Basket case, NSW Labor execution pending.  Enough said.
QLD = fked, joke state, water, rising costs, no accountability on spending.
TAS = Labor rotten to the core, a breathtaking decision taken by GG to hand government back to incumbents, sets dangerous precedent.
SA = People wanted change, but didn't quite build up enough anger.  Rann suffered a massive swing at the last election - again, the botched projects & Labor debt is rife.  Canny campaigner Rann.
VIC = Brumby probably the most competent of all Labor premiers.  Hides the litany of problems reasonably well, though the Coalition now in an election winning position.  Still difficult election to win.  Victoria the most left-leaning state behind Tasmania.
ACT = Stanhope treats the territory like a socialist experiment group.  Trialling all of his socialist experiments on the community.  Nice bloke, woeful government.  Again, the ACT Labor machine, very well oiled and canny.  Canberra Liberals looked good last election, but Greens sides with Labor, naturally.
NT = Hanging on by the flared nostril.  Gone next election.

Over the years, Labor haven't "changed".  They've learnt how to hide the rot a lot better, in addition to ways and means of "hoodwinking" the electorate - and they're master campaigners in an election.
By:
secong coming.
When: 29 Jun 10 00:30
methinks the masses are starting to cotton on jez....lets hope so
By:
wombleoz
When: 29 Jun 10 11:34
secong - there has been effectively nothing, well nowhere close to enough, spent on upgrading electricity infrastructure for way too long under any other government, would it change under the liberals, probably not but they will sell it off quickly

All the states that have had Labor in for years are struggling, governments get stale and run out of ideas - just look at Howard but they are all the same.  If the oppositions were stronger at the state level changes would've been made, they are all shockers though.

Jez, the liberals in the ACT are a basket case lol, The Greens have more seats than they do!!!

Election August 28 is my guess - hope everyone is ready
By:
Mrben
When: 30 Jun 10 00:30
julias first "backflip "should come this friday as the miners have twigged that the spin about "consulting" about the  resources tax is just talk.Miners are  correct to set a deadline as  hulia will call an election asap to capitalize on her honeymoon period.
  I was  vomiting yesterday as the same old same old rudd tactic of being photographed with plenty of kids around her was splattered around the media outlets.Same old same old coming this friday. No changes will be made.
  We all know the labour prime minister is the puppet of the powerbrokers and must do their bidding.Bring on the election hulia- your not fooling anyone.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 08:57
Wombleoz - when you make a statement, at least, ensure you check the facts

In Australian Capital Territory;

The ACT Division of the Liberal Party have 6 members in the assembly.
The Labor Party of the ACT have 6 members in the assembly.
The ACT Greens have 4 members in the assembly.

The Greens held the balance of power at the last election.  There was in fact a decent swing away from the Stanhope Labor government - the result was deadlocked - with the Greens siding with Labor.

In fact, Dr Bob Brown, Greens Leader federally called for the ACT Greens to side with the Canberra Liberals - it would of been awkward, and this was ignored locally, they jumped back in bed with Stanhope.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 09:00
Wombleoz:

So sad that you proudly defend the disgraceful, deceitful, rotting position of your Labor state governments - hurting the people, they vouch to protect the most - the battlers.

More tax, less policy, scandals galore, plenty of spin and deception after deception.

Not only a comrade, but a blind one.

Clearly, the blind leading the blind.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 09:04
And isn't this a surprise.....




AAP Wires 30th June 2010

Julia Gillard should not have used her VIP jet to attend a Labor Party fundraiser in Brisbane, the opposition says.

The prime minister is under fire for travelling on Tuesday night to a function for backbencher Yvette D'Ath, who holds the marginal seat of Petrie.

The opposition's special minister of state spokesman Michael Ronaldson said it was wrong for Ms Gillard to use her taxpayer-funded RAAF jet to attend a party political event.

"Julia Gillard should not have used her VIP jet to attend a Labor Party fundraiser in Brisbane, the opposition says.

The prime minister is under fire for travelling on Tuesday night to a function for backbencher Yvette D'Ath, who holds the marginal seat of Petrie.

The opposition's special minister of state spokesman Michael Ronaldson said it was wrong for Ms Gillard to use her taxpayer-funded RAAF jet to attend a party political event.

"Julia Gillard should not be using taxpayer-funded entitlements for such blatant party political purposes," Senator Ronaldson told AAP.

"What she has done is not illegal but it's certainly outside the basic principle that's applied to every other MP."

Since coming to office, Labor has tightened rules relating to MPs' entitlements.

Printing entitlements have been changed so printing material is strictly limited to parliamentary or electoral matters.

Senator Ronaldson hasn't called for tighter rules to be applied to Ms Gillard's use of a VIP jet.

But he said her resources should not be used to travel to political events.

"Let's not forget that Labor changed the rules to specifically ban the use of MPs' entitlements for party fundraising," Senator Ronaldson said.

"Why should she be treated any differently?"
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 09:07
Federal Poll : Finding No. 4519 :

On June 25-28 2010, the four days immediately following Julia Gillard’s swearing in as Australia’s new Prime Minister, support for the L-NP is 51.5% (up 4.5% since the Face-to-Face Morgan Poll conducted June 19/20, 2010) ahead of the ALP 48.5%, (down 4.5%) according to this week’s special telephone Morgan Poll.

If a Federal Election were held today the Liberal-National Coalition would have won a close election to defeat the ALP according to the Morgan Poll.

The telephone Morgan Poll showed an L-NP primary vote of 45.5% (up 4.5% since the Face-to-Face Morgan Poll of June 19/20, 2010) well ahead of the ALP 38.5% (down 2.5%) with the Greens down 3.5% to 9%, Family First 1.5% (unchanged) and Independents/ Others up 1.5% to 5.5%.




What have I told you about counting your chickens so early Wombleoz?
By:
wombleoz
When: 30 Jun 10 09:34
Sorry Jez, got my Canberra numbers wrong - I blame old age [:)]

Greens doing a great job there and Tassie, bring on the balance of power in the senate

Morgan?  Seriously - find a real polling company Jez LOL

Mrben - is there a politician anywhere in the world that doesn't kiss babies???
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 10:23
A great job? Shocked

Are you serious? Laugh

The expansion of land release and development in the ACT (and the issue of affordable home ownership) is under great threat in the ACT, courtesy of the Greens.

They have no ability to be balanced or rational, and consider life in the "real world".  I will even say....seriously....they block policy from the ALP that doesn't deserve blocking. 

There are so many misconceptions about the Green in the community - all total BS.  People aren't aware of what they're voting for (besides a Labor preference) when they vote Green. 

Wombleoz.  Last time Tasmania had a minority government involving the Greens - the state went back 20 years.  If you weren't there, you wouldn't know.  The Green's support dissolved.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 10:27
Didn't mean for the contradiction there.  Exclude the "all total BS" remark Silly

Also, in relation to preference flow from the last election.

It looks like it will be a MAXIMUM 60% preference flow from Labor at the election.
Thats best case scenario.  The ALP needs a higher primary vote to win, than previous campaigns.

Support for the Coalition, primary vote is still above 40% - we are in the game.

I live and breath this business of politics and I know plenty of Labor hardmen who are still quite nervous about this campaign.  Julia is not the golden child, just yet.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 30 Jun 10 10:28
(Preference flow from last election from Greens was 80%)
By:
wombleoz
When: 30 Jun 10 22:55
Shows how easy it is to get the figures wrong when we get a little excited Jez [;)]

The Greens 20 years ago and the Greens now are two very different things - I'd suggest if Nick McKim or someone similar was leading the Greens federally rather than Bob Brown we'd have a serious third part in play and this election would be very similar to what happened with the Liberal Democrats in the UK.

Land release everywhere is politics at it's worst, deals done with developers etc etc etc - there's nothing wrong with the Greens trying to make it work better while at the same time trying to protect the environment.

There was polling the other day that 87% of female Green voters would preferred Gillard to Rudd - the 80% flow is VERY safe and will be more than enough

What does Abbott think of the mining tax???  Seems to be sending mixed messages Cool
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 01 Jul 10 21:59
Um, Wombleoz.  The Labor party accept they will not receive 80% flow on from preferences.  Your starting to sound like the federal member for Canberra, Bob McMullan. 

He was saying early last week, Newspoll had Labor well in front and in a comfortable position, no problem at all....business as usual....we're all behind Kevin.  He even started throwing accusations around about different commentators (including of left persuasion) who were expressing concern about Labors vote. 

How the fk does that polling have anything to do with the Green's and their preferencing options?

LaughLaughLaugh

You will not get 80% of preferences.  Well below that in fact.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 01 Jul 10 22:05
Wombleoz.  Start concentrating on Labor's GOVERNING rather than the opposition.

Failure, backflips, broken promises, litany of botched projects and debt - this is an unescapable record.

This mining tax development overnight demonstrates yet another backflip from Labor.

Polling I'm seeing Wombleoz doesn't look as wonderful as you would think for Gillard.  Labor will call a early poll this weekend.  They're prepared for a tighter contest than publicly acknowledged, but hope the regurgitated "new leadership" 2007 slogan will get them over the line.

Internal polling speaks a lot louder than any other.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 01 Jul 10 22:12
I'm going to be a Parliament House this morning - no doubt will hear Julia's spin and lies.

8:30am AEST press conference to announce her back down on the great big super tax on mining.

Then a weekend visit to the Governor General.
By:
wombleoz
When: 01 Jul 10 22:21
The 80% figure is the one you quoted above - there is no reason they will get less this time and even you will acknowledge that Green preferences will decide the election

Some headlines will say backflip - they should say "Gillard gets biggest miners to agree to pay more tax"  -  that's a win I'd suggest Cool
By:
scoobeck
When: 01 Jul 10 23:01
The only thing this change proves is what a total crock of shyt the adds the miners paid for were.
By:
Mrben
When: 02 Jul 10 00:16
todays news


Prime Mininster Julia Gillard caves in to mining industry

   

Julia Gillard

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has released some details of her deal with the mining companies this morning / File Source: Herald Sun

THE Government will lose $1.5 billion in revenue after agreeing to cut the resource super profit tax from 40 per cent to 30 per cent.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has also agreed to water down other key aspects of the tax, which will apply to just 320 companies involved in mining iron ore, coal, oil and gas. More than 2450 companies were originally flagged in the deal.

The new tax is called the minerals resource rent tax.

In another major concession, the tax will apply from a much higher rate than originally planned 10-year Commonwealth bond yield.

The new cut-in rate has been adjusted to the long-term bond rate plus seven per cent - an approximate rate of about 12 per cent..

The current petroleum resource rent tax will be extended to all onshore and offshore oil, gas and coal seam methane projects.
.

Other commodities will not be included in the tax regime.

Revised tax to hit bottom line

The new measures come at a cost, attracting $1.5 billion less in revenue than the planned resource super profits tax.

To offset that loss, the Government will cut the company tax rate to 29 per cent from 2013/14.

Small companies will still benefit from an early cut to the company tax rate to 29 per cent from 2012/13.

A planned lift in compulsory superannuation contributions - from 9 per cent to 12 per cent by 2020 - remains unaffected.

"The breakthrough agreement keeps faith with our central goal from day one: to deliver a better return for the Australian people for the resources they own and which can only be dug up once," Ms Gillard said.

"It is the result of intense consultation and negotiation with the resources industry.

"We believe these improved reforms offer the best chance of delivering for hard-working families and small businesses around Australia while protecting and growing our great mining industry.

"All along, our objective has been to deliver Australians a better return for the resources they own, which can only be extracted once, and this plan will deliver on that commitment."

Ms Gillard's predecessor, Kevin Rudd, caused major controversy when he announced the super tax - and many speculated it was one of the policies that lead to his recent downfall.

HEADLINE SHOULD READ" PRIME MINISTER CAVES IN TO BETFAIR FORUM TAX TAX TAX THREAD"LaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
Aussie Punter
When: 02 Jul 10 04:43
Cost of deal as 1.5 billion is questionable MrBen, could be a lot more- no idea who came up with that figure
By:
Mrben
When: 02 Jul 10 05:44
actually aussie P it could be less.Companies will now re ignite the projects cancelled under rudd.Waters are now clear so the projects that are profitable can be worked out.The impact of the tax now is relativly small compared to the  nightmare  kevin 07 wanted.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 02 Jul 10 08:49
Wombleoz.

The flow from the last election was 80%.

Bob Brown has made it crystal clear over the past months.
1) Greens will not formally recommend a second preference to Labor.  (ETS trashing to blame).
2)What will likely occur is a 60:40 share for the ALP - at best.

Changes the scenery quite a bit when you take into account all polling (published) is based on last elections preference flow.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 02 Jul 10 09:05
LMAOLaughLaughLaugh

Love it how this Gillard Mining Tax so called "deal" this afternoon is a breakthrough.

Its a whopper of a backflip!.......Spin Spin and more Spin...........you can't trust Labor.
By:
wombleoz
When: 02 Jul 10 15:11
Now I could be mistaken, I've been on the drink all night but I hear that Abbott has a new favourite song by Wendy James that goes something like this

I don't want your money honey, I want your love :)

Surely he isn't serious, the miners have done a deal to pay $10 billion extra in tax but he doesn't want it - WHAT THE???

I though the Abbott moment would come after the election, it's arrived early LOL
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 02 Jul 10 23:24
I thought you were a full-time drinker Wombloez, the stuff your starting to dribble continually on here!

A massive backflip from the Rudd-Gillard Government on this tax.  Look at the details wombleoz - I know your not one for details, clearly Laugh

Get real.  Do some study on politics.  Honestly.

Abbott moment?  WTF?  Its not rocket science Wombleoz.

The next election is a referendum on tax.
Labor supports a great big new tax on mining; the Coalition doesn't.
Labor needs the tax because it's addicted to spending.
Labor needs the tax because it's turned a $20 billion surplus into a $57bn deficit
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 02 Jul 10 23:27
I love the previous silence from wombleoz on matters he clearly doesn't understand.

Its gold.  LaughLaughLaugh

The ALP needs more supporters such as yourself..........


Same horse, different jockey!

Taxes, chronic failure, backflips, broken promises, litany of botched projects and debt - this is an unescapable record for the Rudd-Gillard Government in this election.
By:
wombleoz
When: 03 Jul 10 01:34
Which matters Jez? you ramble on so much it's hard to follow at times [;)]

The governments ambit claim put to the miners changed by $1.5 billion over the forward estimates - a drop in the bucket. The miners want to pay more tax but we should say no?  Yep, there's an election winning strategy right there LOL

Labor needs the tax because it wants to lower company tax, increase super contributions and pay for more infrastructure - the miners themselves admit they aren't paying enough so why wouldn't any sensible government hit them harder

Labor is in deficit because they spent up to avoid recession during the GFC - it worked - unemployment is 5.2% - hundreds of thousands of people in jobs that would've been on the dole, where would we be if they'd spent nothing???

Time to get ready for the races Jez, if any of the bookies offer to pay me better odds today I don't think I'll take the Abbott approach and say no Laugh
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 02:18
More tricks and excuses from Labor and you swallow it like honey Wombleoz.

Super contributions - Employers pay this Wombleoz (besides public sector) - don't let Mr Swan lie to you about it otherwise - in addition it is now likely that employees will have to cough up for most of the increase out of their own pocket.  Courtesy of this massive backflip from the Rudd-Gillard Government.

Infrastructure = What, more billions wasted, like we've seen so far in the Education Revolution on Ms Gillards watch?  Excellent, just what the country needs.

Lower company tax = No bingo.  With this fanciful "deal" made yesterday the govt has announced it will "SHELVE" indefinetely a large part of this company tax cut.  Nice try though.

This is shambolic.  Sussex Street has come to Canberra.

New leader, clean slate?
No way! Same horse, different jockey.
By:
Aussie Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 13:51
Penalty rates have kicked back in from July 01st, won't take long for unemployment to skyrocket.Construction Industry slowing massively and squeeze on hourly rates.Reportedly from $45 to currently $30-$32. A mate received a 120 applications for one construction job recently advertised.Storm is coming and Keynesian economics won't help Labour this time without a massive Budget surplus, which they haven't got.China is starting to pullback the levers as no one is buying from them and are going domestically for growth.Housing Industry flat... dark economic clouds are gathering no matter how much the pundits talk it up
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 14:08
Its alright AP.

Rudd-Gillard Labor have us on the straight and narrow. Laugh

After all, they've proven themselves with their record. Laugh

Julia has just done so much in a week, she is so much better at spinning than Kevin. Shocked

Don't worry AP.  As she has said over the past few days....
She understands your anxiety.  She feels it. Laugh
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 14:10
All this smoothing over, clean slate and blame Kev for everything business is making me nauseated.

The honey is swallowed by the electorate now, but for how long?

You notice how its just all politics now with Labor.  There's no strong direction or plan or mention of the future.

Its all about the power of winning this election.  Cause once their in, they'll just change it all.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 14:15
AP - what concerns me the most, is Labor threw the baby out with the bathwater.

We needed a responsible response to the GFC with stimulus, BUT

NOT a typical Labor spending spree of BILLIONS with a vast majority wasted.  Our money.  Wasted.

What if the proverbial hits the fan later this year or next?.....

Get the rosary beads out if Gillard is PM, let me tell you! Shocked

You can really feel the Sussex Street puppetry-spin-politics moving into Canberra.........[>o]
By:
Aussie Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 14:41
LaughJez, their is no what if , the monsoon winds are gathering force.
Absolutely right-If i hear one more time that condescending" I understand" which is code for " We are going to do it anyway"
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 14:53
I think I would of preferred Rudd than Gillard if this country has to cop a few over the side in terms of rough economic times.

Gillard will drive this country into the ground.  Its just a matter of how deep she goes.

Mr Abbott may be a devout catholic and have some strong socially conservative views - but they are personal opinion - and they can be seperated from his centre-right ideology.

But Ms Gillard has strong deep ideological views, and I have no doubt she will honour these views in office.  And they're not centre-left.  She wasn't a Socialist Forum/Fabian Society senior for no good reason.

Anyway.......


Now, where did I put my rosary beads.........................................................................
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 03 Jul 10 15:05
Things must be getting bad within the ALP if faithful comrades like Phillip Adams are quitting the party.

The Sussex Street boys have taken over - Labor are all faceless men - factional/union bosses.
By:
wombleoz
When: 04 Jul 10 02:33
The new tax directly funds an increase in super contributions for low paid workers Jez - i.e. the extra $500.  Of course employers will reduce wage increases to pay for the move from 9% to 12% BUT it happens over 8 years or so and people will be better off in the long run, so a little short term pain for long term gain.

AP what's wrong with penalty rates?  If someone is forced to give up their weekends why shouldn't they be compensated for doing so - only fair I'd suggest.

28th of August guys - will be a very interesting election campaign.
By:
Jez Melb Punter
When: 04 Jul 10 05:14
Your certainly one of the faithful wombleoz.

Let me be truly honest.  This will be a tough campaign for the Coalition.
Its not easy to beat a first term government.  History naturally suggests this.

I accept that.  But politics is a fickle business.  Election campaigns can make or break you - and turn trends, polling and predicted outcomes - on there head.

But let there be no mistake, the Rudd-Gillard Labor record is atrocious.  It is boldy......BAD.
No doubt, the most overhyped political outfit in Australian history. 

Delivery has not been a hallmark of this government, nor has being honest, open, accountable and up front with people.  We all know the true deep ideological values Ms Gillard holds dear, and they are a major threat to, imo, our way of life. 

More broadly, Labor can change faces, spin, and trick and make excuses, only for so long...but let me tell you where you'll end up........................

......in the same state as NSW Labor
By:
Mrben
When: 04 Jul 10 06:59
Aussie Punter Joined: 09 Apr 08
Replies: 815 03 Jul 10 13:51   


Penalty rates have kicked back in from July 01st, won't take long for unemployment to skyrocket.Construction Industry slowing massively and squeeze on hourly rates.Reportedly from $45 to currently $30-$32.

aussie P is that australia wide or just nsw? I heard it was just nsw?There is no way retail can just absorb those rates so prices just have to rise.Im in sydney at the moment and was surprised today{sunday} how many shops were closed.Value of all business that employs people on weekends will value., more labor led wealth destruction.
By:
Aussie Punter
When: 04 Jul 10 12:57
MrBen: Will have to check , but it was my understanding that their was a timelimit put on the workchoices contracts , it may indeed vary from state to state, that time limit/expiry. But it is certainly applicable Australia wide that when workchoices contracts expire , the new system replaces.
It is probably worth noting that the rates were being paid by employers that decided to trade those times, before workchoice legislation.IMO were partly designed for big buisness to open more and not pay weekend or night penalties and to be able to cost wages at flat rates.Personally I don't see anything wrong with big retailers closing one day a week and leave it for the small buisness traders if they choose to do so.Benefit for smaller operators to give them a bit of a kick along.
For eg: The local Hotel was paying flat rate of $17 per hour Chrissy day in the first year of workchoices.When the staff found out they weren't getting penalty rates they all walked out leaving a packed restraunt and a manager to rethink his "scrooge" mentality"[;)]
By:
laythefave
When: 04 Jul 10 15:16
It's been an interesting debate on here. I am what is commonly called a swinging voter. I have voted for both the major parties in the past.

I don't know how old some of the posters on here are, but I can tell you with a fair degree of certainty, that if the old Labour Party blokes like Arty Callwell got out of their graves and took a look at todays party, they wouldn't recognise it. Fact is that the Labour part have, since Bob Hawkes' days, moved to right. Yes, they are still reasonably strong on social issues, but they have managed to convince the big end of town that they won't fck them completely.

I have always felt that Abbot was unelectable. It is my opinion, that the general public don't want a hard right wing person of strong religious beliefs as Prime Minister of this country. The trouble is, that just like the Labour Party, the Libs don't have a lot of talent on their front bench and he virtually became leader by default. Remember, he only won by 1 vote against Turnbull and Fran Bailey, a Turnbull supporter, was in hospital and couldn't vote.

The hardened Lib supporters are saying that Gillard backflipped. The hardened Labour supporters say that she just used her brains and worked out a compromise that everyone could live with. I reckon that the figures are rubbery. Others say they aren't.

But here's the thing. It doesn't really matter what I think, or what most of the posters on here think. Not because our vote doesn't count, but because the mining companies have told us what THEY think is going to happen.

If they thought that Abbot, who, to this very day, still opposes the tax, had any chance of winning, there is no way known that they would have reached a compromise with Gillard. They have told Abbot, and the Australian public for that matter, that they are prepared to pay more tax, that they are happy with the deal that's been done, and as for Julia, well she's the ants pants for doing the negotiations in the manner that she has.

The only major, miner, to have come out against the tax, is Clive Palmer and he is both a card carrying member of the Liberal Party, and by far its largest financial contributor. So his protestations have no credibilty.

The hard facts, from an unbiased poster, are that Gillard will win. She will lose seats, but hold on to Government. Abbot and the Libs will run the mother of all negative campaigns, but the general public especially the women, appear to like the woman, and I reckon that the more he knocks her, the less popular he'll become.
Page 16 of 42  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 42 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com