|
By:
why didnt they start this at like 11am or 12noon
|
|
By:
because that would make sense
|
|
By:
any 3-1 win for Djokovic could finish in time for women at 2pm and good chance you could get a 5 setter done in time
|
|
By:
Sorry Kate, you're not as pretty as Megan.
|
|
By:
Women must be well pissed off having their allocated start time for their final infringed upon
|
|
By:
I don't think Serena or Kerber cares too much about that. It's tennis and they're used to it.
|
|
By:
It's going to look pretty bad when the women come out to a half empty stadium after 20-18 in the 5th here.
|
|
By:
the men should be on CC obviously, the calls about being on Court 1 are silly. but they could have took better steps to inconvenience nobody
|
|
By:
WImbledon is just lucky Djokovic will win in 4
![]() |
|
By:
earlier start time today wouldn't have been fair on Novak and Rafa.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
doesn't matter if it's a final or not or what they're waiting for imo. But we would have to ask them to know for sure.
|
|
By:
wasn't this the case with Super Saturday at USO anyway?
|
|
By:
of course it matters, it's meant to be a day where all the attention is on their final, it's not a run of the mill round 1 match in a premier
|
|
By:
Super Saturday was the worst
|
|
By:
feminist mes showing the sexists (caramba) what for
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
djoko too casual might give rafa a chance to get back in it
if he doesnae go walkabout rafa for all his spirit can't beat him imho |
|
By:
this all but confirms 5th set tiebreaker will get introduced
|
|
By:
Nadal working overtime here already
|
|
By:
game 1: 10 minutes
|
|
By:
that's just a lame diplomatic answer, you sound like you could one of the organisers.
Imagine being them, it's their day, the biggest match on the WTA tour, and everyone is now more interested in this semi final. |
|
By:
finish this mug novak
|
|
By:
of course they are..this is real tennis
what comes after is a mugfest |
|
By:
cause they could either go for usual tb or extended but then TB
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
12-12 is being talked about too, I suspect something is going to happen though after this. Retirements on CC last year drove action, and that stuff had been happening for years. They won't want a repeat of this.
|
|
By:
Should have put the womens final on court 1 so it could start on time
|
|
By:
pure common sense caramba, they're hardly likely to be happy.
|
|
By:
BBC switch already
|
|
By:
Funny thing is I see people complain about 1pm is too late to start men's semi-final day now. Sounds guff to me, doesn't men's SF day in RG start at 2pm? Or it's 1pm earliest anyway. And they have no roof and on a surface where average match length must be longer.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
crucial 4 rafa that
|
|
By:
They won't be happy, but they will get on with it. Every player has done some waiting around at some point in their careers. It's not ideal, but they know the possibilities going into the day, also with there being a 30 minute break between this and women's final, they will have plenty of notice whatever happens.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm still not totally into the new LL rules, on 1 hand it's better to not have a load of retirements. On the other it's kinda weird you're now getting like 8+ lucky losers into every slam as players will late withdraw for half their paycheck. This doesn't seem ideal to me either, though I suppose no-one partic cares about qualies, but you're making the last round of qualies almost pointless.
|
|
By:
Yeah, those rules are muggy. My point is that even Wimbledon is willing to make changes.
|