Jun 7, 2014 -- 2:57PM, aaronh wrote:

is Grant the mug on basketball forum who said Norris Cole was no good at basketball because he wasn't as good as Russell Westbrook and Stephen Curry?

yes, he had a fabulous game 1 in the finals didnt he, whats the score again? oh 1-0 spurs hahahahahahahaha

Jun 7, 2014 -- 2:56PM, aaronh wrote:

Jun  7, 2014 --  2:54PM, ciani wrote:Jun  7, 2014 --  2:53PM, caramba wrote:Jun  7, 2014 --  2:49PM, ciani wrote:wonder when will the umpire warn sharapova, its ridiculous what she is able to get away withHe did tell her that the she has to speed things up between serving during the change over.yeah i heard, but its a farce, she is never really punished for her gamesmanshipthe time violation really is kinda pointless anyway and never followed

its only pointless because its never followed :) its the same with slow play in golf

Jun 7, 2014 -- 2:58PM, mesmerised wrote:

Don't believe the Hypelep

you see the thing is, all of us who argued Simona's slam winning potential still said she wouldn't win today so

Jun 7, 2014 -- 3:00PM, n88uk wrote:

The thing with following time violation rule is enforcing it actually makes for a bad look for the sport anyway. You end up with the player arguing, the crowd whistling, enforcing it is more hassle than it's worth, when the actual time taken doesn't take away from the spectacle.

yes it does

Jun 7, 2014 -- 2:58PM, mesmerised wrote:

Don't believe the Hypelep

You had nothing to say in the first 5 games

Jun 7, 2014 -- 3:01PM, GRANTCKING wrote:

Jun  7, 2014 --  3:00PM, aaronh wrote:Jun  7, 2014 --  2:58PM, smb360 wrote:Jun  7, 2014 --  2:57PM, GRANTCKING wrote:Jun  7, 2014 --  2:57PM, aaronh wrote:is Grant the mug on basketball forum who said Norris Cole was no good at basketball because he wasn't as good as Russell Westbrook and Stephen Curry?yes, he had a fabulous game 1 in the finals didnt he, whats the score again? oh 1-0 spurs hahahahahahahahawtfit would be like saying, 25 ranked tennis player in the world sucks because he's no Djokovic or Nadaland you would be correct in that assumption, still tho, hope u didnt back heat...

I did

Jun 7, 2014 -- 3:00PM, n88uk wrote:

The thing with following time violation rule is enforcing it actually makes for a bad look for the sport anyway. You end up with the player arguing, the crowd whistling, enforcing it is more hassle than it's worth, when the actual time taken doesn't take away from the spectacle.

true but only because its not followed. if it was regularly enforced, it would be the norm, and there would be no point in complaining

Jun 7, 2014 -- 3:00PM, tenniso wrote:

Sharapova holding for the first set could be where she goes from hero to zero

1.11 lay 1st set winner about to trade out

Jun 7, 2014 -- 3:03PM, caramba wrote:

Jun  7, 2014 --  3:00PM, n88uk wrote:The thing with following time violation rule is enforcing it actually makes for a bad look for the sport anyway. You end up with the player arguing, the crowd whistling, enforcing it is more hassle than it's worth, when the actual time taken doesn't take away from the spectacle.in the short run yes. if it was actually enforced all the time, players would respect the rules and it wouldn't take as much time. one problem with enforcing it all the time though is that sometimes players need extra time to recover, for instance after a mega long rally, and if they don't get it quality of play would be suffering.

Exactly. There's no definite rule that actually works in tennis.

You put a shot clock on the court, it simply doesn't work. What if the French crowd are in a frenzy when the time hits zero?