|
By:
Walking on the cracks on the pavement
Wearing a loud shirt in a built up area Being in possession of an offensive wife Do any of these warrant a kick in the head dusty? Beso Presi x |
|
By:
Stop being a total tit man
It’s a policeman, and armed response at an airport Gets a call for whatever reason and finds two colleagues knocked down and there a risk of losing a firearm You comparing that to a civilian on a street with no gun? What if the guy were to have got the gun, and it’s not exactly unknown for people to go around knifing folk, what if they got the gun? You really are a pathetic simp lad |
|
By:
The involvement of firearms officers means little - police officers on airports get an extra kickback if they are allowed to carry firearms - c £50 per shift - so of course, it happens more often than not.
What need is there for a full independent investigation. Manchester police have all the information - otherwise what is the point of a body camera? Any delay serves a cover up:- watch the evidence disappear. |
|
By:
Any protests being held for the injured police?
Thought not. So what's so special about criminals? |
|
By:
watch the evidence disappear.
Evidence of what? |
|
By:
'compliant detainees' don't tend to get tasered
as in the sorry tale yesterday, we know these stories as we've seen them all before. the cünt who is assaulting armed police officers is not evidently white, therefore way higher up the grievance hierarchy than the women who were assaulted. all the incriminating footage has been cut out so only the most effective police response has been deployed can be seen, when the treat is being neutralised. |
|
By:
Cider, dusty, Crippen….. are you the same person sharing the same brain cell?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
it probably is a bit ott, but generally people reap what they sow. good to see some karma now and again, many of these runts think they can do or say whatever they want (will be true the way things are going)
|
|
By:
Wow a new disciple
You sow the seed You grow the seed You reap what you sow Welcome padawan! |
|
By:
'compliant detainees' don't tend to get tasered
are you disputing this, death. all the usual apologists making out there's no context and this is just an innocent, blameless person getting booted in the head. and not someone who had just assaulted female police officers and no doubt threatening a lot worse |
|
By:
It's a bit unsettling to know that if Cider saw someone in a uniform kicking someone in the head he would just shrug and say "karma" and walk straight past dustybin watching with his pants around his ankles.
|
|
By:
I am not disputing anything except it is generally considered an offence in Law to kick a man in the head and then stamp on his head even if as dusty says the lad may have goaded him!
We need to have more information before we rush to judgement Perhaps some of you should acknowledge that and stop spread your hate and display your prejudice’s particularly our special correspondent from Karachi! |
|
By:
most likely I would have saw him break a womans nose, and wish it was me handing out the retribution
usually we don't give scum who batter woman any sympathy. but I suppose it now depends upon where they sit in the hierarchy |
|
By:
What law allows Police to hand out retribution?
Ard you saying you think the police officer was handing out retribution? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm saying that was probably part of the context. When they see fellow officers getting assaulted then the situation is somewhat elevated. Extreme provocation.
|
|
By:
Let me get this right are you saying you can kick someone’s head in if you are provoked?
|
|
By:
The officer did not look provoked. The man he kicked was lying face down on the ground with his arms by his side. He lay motionless and was not a threat.
What Law allows someone to kick him in the head? |
|
By:
We all have lines of morality and seeing a 'man' smash the face of a female crosses mine. I don't care where the perpetrator sits on the hierarchy, taste of their own medicine is deserved.
|
|
By:
I want to see the officer named, shamed and dishonourably discharged.
I want to see him promoted, and used as an example of how the police should deal with law breakers when they resist arrest. |
|
By:
I want to see him promoted, and used as an example of how the police should deal with law breakers when they resist arrest.
I know. I don't know what you or dustybin look like but when I mentioned the subjects on their knees drooling before a figure of authority, I was thinking of you. |
|
By:
Good for you, UB.
You've got imagination. Lefties have a lot of that. |
|
By:
They imagine treating criminals as victims will make them decent people.
It doesn't work. We have to treat them for what they are. That's what works. |
|
By:
UB lives on WD’s sky island
Do I believe there could be reason for a copper to kick somebody in the head-you bet The problem is those making out there can’t ever be a reason are disingenuous lackeys who have previous for undermining security by crazy logic that panders to others solely based on them being of a certain origin. Like there hasn’t been evidence enough that those with chips on the shoulder who plot destruction arn’t always ready to do harm. Coppers are damned either way walking a fine line. No way would I have risked having a gun taken off me, if the circumstances suggested the guy either needed knocking out or shooting then he’s getting knocked out, or shot. Like I said, those who protested lastnight protested only on the fact the lad was of the same origin as them, not on whether it was justified because they can’t possible have known. |
|
By:
![]() The legal expert |
|
By:
Did those who tackled that extremist killer on the bridge consider the legal implications of hurting him with that tusk?
No, because while you farting around wondering whether you should do something or not, decisions have to be made |
|
By:
No way would I have risked having a gun taken off me, if the circumstances suggested the guy either needed knocking out or shooting then he’s getting knocked out, or shot. - but you can only hold a gun in your mind's fantasies, dustybin. And even delving "down there", if the guy either needed knocking out or shooting then, by your own precepts, it would have happened.
But that plainly was not the case. So not a "happy finish" for you. |
|
By:
They’d attempted to tackle him already and failed
Belt and braces, I don’t care if he’s face down atm, he’s getting taken out just in case |
|
By:
The job would be to immobilise him
Your job would be to mince around calling the protective police brutes |
|
By:
Still can’t explain how come those protesting know fault was the coppers
|
|
By:
The job would be to immobilise him
Pretend you're that policeman, dustybin. You have a taser, you have back up, you have the man submitting on the floor How would you immobilise him? Kick him in the head until he has brain damage? |
|
By:
You’d have to take in more than the few seconds you got on loop
How difficult is the guy being, what’s he just done how likely is it he will get up again? |
|
By:
Looks neutralised at the end of the clipped footage.
|
|
By:
Ofc all you are implying is this is evidence of brutality by a person responsible to keep the peace
And you seemingly only care because of the colour of his skin |
|
By:
Won't be battering any more women. In the short term at least.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Like I said earlier
The same argument was made about Israel not allowed to go after Hamas. |
|
By:
Hamstrung is how certain people want those tackling those with intent.
|
|
By:
We have been assured by the "victims" lawyer that he has developed a "cyst on the brain" making him incredibly special and due a shedload of benefits and compo.
|