Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 586 comments are related to the topic:
Why won't Angela Rayner disclosure the Capital Gains Tax Computation...
Why won't Angela Rayner disclosure the Capital Gains Tax Computation...
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 586
|
By:
Ha Ha - Whispering just can't seem to understand why savers are loving high interest rates , and also believes that if you don't lap up all the left wing drivel , that you must by default support everything the Tories have ever done.
Open your mind. |
|
By:
HMRC's tax review probably went something like this - "Over 6 years old - Tax year closed and too late to reopen " . Review concluded.
Still strange that she won't publish the advice she was given. Why might that be ? What does she not want us to know ? There will be plenty who will now question everything she says. |
|
By:
if you don't lap up all the left wing drivel , that you must by default support everything the Tories have ever done.
not everyone johnny just you |
|
By:
lol, keep digging jtg.
do you think that hmrc should have applied different rules to her then?  |
|
By:
tories tried to draw in everyone they possibly could to smear her - epic fail
|
|
By:
No - of course not - that's HMRC's rules.
|
|
By:
then this has been a complete farce jtg has it not?
same story with the representation of the people act. yet you were happy to throw mud at her. |
|
By:
Can't believe the left wingers loving dodgy tax planning from their high priestess, but scream blue murder at the legitimate stuff carried out by others.
|
|
By:
i aint no left winger, thank you very much
|
|
By:
Liar sunak was guilty too, as spaffer Johnson grassed him up
for grassing him up in first place. Liar Sunak got spaffer Johnson sacked and stabbed him in back, so they shafted liar Sunak and inserted mad lizzy, went well so inserted liar Sunak. Still going well but but but starmer But but but rayner Only a piece of cake... |
|
By:
oh dear, just petty political point scoring from you all along, i am shocked.
mind you, you are the clown who hasnt stopped wanging on about the joke letter left by liam byrne 14 years ago but who now has no problem saying that labour will spend years blaming everything on the tories  |
|
By:
Have another guess johnny, nothing to see here, move along.
|
|
By:
jtg, what, in your opinion is worse, possible capital tax evasion by rayner which (may well have been accidental) for at most a few grand or badenoch hacking and altering the website of one of her political opponents?
|
|
By:
oops which should have been inside the brackets
|
|
By:
Of course they will need excuses , when they are actually thrown the ball and they realise they aren't got a clue - I would do the same in their shoes - it's called politics.
Do you really think they will sort out - NHS, Social Care, Defence spending , Education , Trains , Energy, National Debt, Social Inequality etc ? Of course they won't , not even one of them. |
|
By:
jtg, can you answer a straight question?
|
|
By:
AR demanded that Boris resigned , when he was under police investigation. She refused.
AR demanded Rishi publish years of tax returns. She refused to publish a single piece of tax advice. She is a hypocrite. |
|
By:
correct, it is called politics
|
|
By:
the difference is she should not have been investigated as her possible 'crimes' were well past their statute of limitations.
|
|
By:
I know nothing about what KB may or may not have done. If what you are stating is true then it does not seem appropriate behaviour for a senior politician (both cases in fact).
|
|
By:
here is an interesting article explaining why she wont be prosecuted despite admitting her crime jtg
https://www.engadget.com/2018-04-10-uk-politics-website-hack-mp-kemi-badenoch.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAN0ptstfR8t2SjBP_iRIVqM7il6lGDBgAvSdmHoIpFbQ7FcAxcOeyD5C72Je7Cyh_LK43aCLFrRMPrhFAL_JktxNO4x94-leTk0HxGQ0MVt7R5NLCYG1aOZzTPK_2RGGBR-K4fcIUNMXpGKG78eef69Ggz2hfiJLEp-TO82hOL3E perhaps you can read it and then tell me which is worse in your opinion. |
|
By:
Questions needed to be asked - we have to abide by the rules with regard to our affairs - I expect the same of those that aspire to govern us.
|
|
By:
yes but it was well past the statute of limitations, you are highly partisan, that is why you started this thread.
|
|
By:
The plebs in Stockport tried to drop her in it
didn’t they? |
|
By:
Good result for landlords all over the country
 |
|
By:
I didn't like her hypocritical stance - screaming for others to do something that she wasn't prepared to do herself.
Not a trait I like in anybody and certainly not a potential top government official. |
|
By:
and is she more or less suited to a potential top government post than computer hacker badenoch?
|
|
By:
HMRC never really investigate these things
you don’t pay capital gains on housing unless you volunteer it |
|
By:
KB's offence is trivial, (as is AR's as I have previously acknowledged).
Based upon the two "offences" I'm more likely to believe what KB tells me than AR. |
|
By:
wow, someone who purposely hacked and altered a website is more believable than someone who seems to have possibly, but not certainly, broken the very complicated tax laws (dan neidle who you claim to respect pointed out how easy it is to accidentally break these laws).
imo badenoch isnt fit to be in parliament. how could one possibly take her seriously on the very important and common subject of computer crime when she is a computer criminal herself. |
|
By:
imo, if these offences or alleged offences as in rayner's case were the other way around you would think rayner should not be in parliament.
you are a hyper partisan which is why you seamlessly switched from supporting trussonomics to supporting sunak clearing up after trusssonomics. but labour. |
|
By:
You make it sound like she was a serious hacker, she had a bit of fun , guessed a password and then changed a few words. No harm was done , the person whose website she amended wasn't bothered and didn't report it.
|
|
By:
if she did that now and was caught she would likely get a serious punishment, it is a much more serious crime now. what a victim of crime thinks should happen to a criminal is a bit ....
what harm did rayner do? it is an actual crime, you started a thread about a potential crime which was long past its sell by date. |
|
By:
I bet most people are more concerned about politicians cheating their tax than posting a joke blog post. Well ordinary people anyway.
|
|
By:
what about the law dotchinite, which would the law treat more seriously?
|
|
By:
Tax fraud.
|
|
By:
for £1500?
|
|
By:
Pretty sure I haven't mentioned "crime" , but I may have slipped up.
You have to be some sort of master criminal for HMRC to take out criminal proceedings. ( Her lawyers would no doubt have told her that she was never going to get a criminal conviction with regard to the capital gains tax side of things anyway) In most cases HMRC seek redress for tax under declarations by not taking criminal proceedings but agreeing a financial/ civil settlement. She has still not explained how her and her husband were allowed two tax exempt homes when every other couple in the land is only allowed one ? (Dan Neidle thought it all looked strange as well) |
|
By:
zahwai was caught for forgetting millions and he just had to pay a penalty, i wonder what rayner would have got if she was guilty and it was within the relevant timescale??
|
|
By:
She would have been asked to pay the tax + interest + a penalty.
|