Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Records tumbling again. Train rails buckling. Europe on fire.
All scientists demonstrating that global warming is a direct result of burning fossil fuels.
Never mind we have serious analysts to keep us right.
I mean who needs scientists when we have extremist Trump supporting bigots to tell us the real truth about global warming on a betting forum?
All scientists demonstrating that global warming is a direct result of burning fossil fuels.
Never mind we have serious analysts to keep us right.
I mean who needs scientists when we have extremist Trump supporting bigots to tell us the real truth about global warming on a betting forum?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 231
|
By:
If climate change was happening why do we not get 40 degree days every day - including the winter ?
instead we get a few good days if we are lucky and then guess what , it’s cold and rainy when the weekend comes |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Cryer, that simple he doesn't understand we are in SUMMER
Here's some Janet & John reading for you cryer https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/learn-about/met-office-for-schools/other-content/other-resources/our-seasons |
|
By:
"All Scientists"? That's a barefaced lie for a start.
|
|
By:
it's mostly people who failed at school who watch youtube videos which convince them they are cleverer than those who did well
|
|
By:
As I have no idea of the academic achievements of others on here, I couldn't venture to confirm or deny such a generalisation. Perhaps you are better informed?
|
|
By:
Sweeping generalizations and insults tend to be the go-to tools employed by screaming bitter leftards unfortunately
|
|
By:
cryoftruth 19 Jul 22 08:29
Records tumbling again. Train rails buckling. Europe on fire. All scientists demonstrating that global warming is a direct result of burning fossil fuels. ...................... You mean all the scientists they put on TV and radio I think. Like covid, they won't have any scientist on who differs in opinion. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Only by design eduardo
 |
|
By:
Fun fact - 98% of scientists agree with whoever is funding them
|
|
By:
There is no grift for the scientists with morals and scruples who deny man made climate change
Carbon credits is a very lucrative business No grift if you oppose max vaccinations of experimental drugs |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm becoming Timber.
 |
|
By:
Timber what happened to the 64 people on board Flight 77 that you believe didn't crash into the Pentagon on 9/11?
|
|
By:
Global warming is rowlocks https://dailysceptic.org/2022/07/18/another-glorious-day-for-the-climate-alarmists-to-scare-us-all-to-death/
|
|
By:
Saddo (and I guess Timber now):
saddo • July 19, 2022 9:53 AM BST You mean all the scientists they put on TV and radio I think. Like covid, they won't have any scientist on who differs in opinion. Everybody is free to look for publications or on alternative media if they think that the scientists "they put on TV and radio" are talking bull and that there is truth to be had elsewhere. Let's leave the scientific side of things aside for a moment though and focus on the money side of things that many of those without a scientific background often like to focus on. Man-man climate change has been published on for decades. During all these decades, fossil fuel companies have had unimaginable wealth and ressources. Some of whom are starting to have to pay quite a bit of money in punishment fees for the climate and nature disruptions they have caused and continue to cause. Some of the companies have entire countries behind them. Countries that are literally financing themselves through the sale of fossil fuels and have achieved great prosperity through it. Yet, even after all these decades and with these unimaginably wealthy actors that would have tremendous interest in denying/discrediting that the burning of fossil fuels causes a change in climate, the best they can come up with are memes about some place being cold for a few months and constant, deliberate misportrayals on things like e.g. Milankovitch cycles as recently again brought to the forum by intellectual Überflieger Timber. What's your hypothesis on why this is? |
|
By:
I don't know anyone who doesn't think the climate is changing, but it has always done so and that is irrefutable.
The question is whether the more recent changes are down to mankind. If it is, there is an easy fix, we are too many and need to reduce populations worldwide. Instead they accept future rising populations as a given, and all their increasingly expensive and hugely inconvenient remedies are aimed at less pollution from more and more people. It cannot be done. |
|
By:
Here's the actual question ... why now ?
after many many years of 'the science' tells us 'doom'.. why choose now to act ? couldda got jiggy beards ago couldda got a tad more nuclear decades ago |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Everthing they do in the next decade is expensive waste. At some point, if those who want to save the planet really do want to save it, they will admit we are too numerous for the planet to sustain.
|
|
By:
Replacing energy sources
Like the germans... with coal from South Africa It's going to be a long winter |
|
By:
Electric Vehicle Reportedly Sparks Wildfire That Has Displaced Thousands In France
|
|
By:
clouded leopard • July 19, 2022 10:56 AM BST
Here's the actual question ... why now ? after many many years of 'the science' tells us 'doom'.. why choose now to act ? couldda got jiggy beards ago couldda got a tad more nuclear decades ago Now? Countries started having treaties and agreements on the reduction of greenhouse gases literal decades ago. Go look it up and do some research for a change. The human is simply a complacent being and with climate change being rather abstract and distanced, actually doing policy changes in the countries has always been a tough sell and often didn't receive the urgency and ressources the countries had committed to internationally. |
|
By:
Timber • July 19, 2022 11:05 AM BST
Replacing energy sourcesLaugh Like the germans... with coal from South AfricaLaugh It's going to be a long winter Indeed, Timber, indeed. It is a lot easier, or at least legally less problematic, to buy coal from South Africa for this winter than to kill half the population ahead of December. |
|
By:
They'll be bulldozing more towns in Germany soon to get at the stuff, if pootin turns the gas off you just know who'll do better than the rest in the EU this winter.
|
|
By:
Need to start banning all of their Private Jets. U had that Prince boy yesterday telling us the World is on fire. All he does is fly around the world in his Private jet and uses a big guzzler SUV to travel on land. You couldn't make the hypocrisy up.
|
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
|
|
By:
That's a true teuton right there. Can you imagine being enough of a total wimp to change course towards this Russia and its government because you can't stand the idea of washing yourself before 11 pm?
|
|
By:
*washing yourself with warm water before 11 pm
|
|
By:
Well, of course you, Timber, can imagine being enough of a total wimp. Silly question, sorry.
|
|
By:
It's about time the EU redefined coal as a green transition fuel, it is after all, organic in origin.
|
|
By:
Just imagine if Germany had listened to Trump re Russia AND not shut down their nuclear stations
|
|
By:
Germany funding the Russian war machine, amazing stuff
|
|
By:
Foinavon, they give a power station not far from here a billion pounds a year subsidy to burn wood ships instead of coal, same emissions. The argument is that the trees are replaceable while coal is not. We don't need to replace the coal, and it would buy us time to plan things rather better than they have done so far.
|
|
By:
Trump wanted to sell Germany more expensive US LNG, without Germany even having an LNG terminal or the infrastructure to get the gas from LNG terminals abroad to the places where the gas from Russia goes.
|
|
By:
|