Forget aoc, no chance! The tide has turned against her and her evils, America has seen through the squad, with the less-evil dems distancing themselves from her, preferring to be known as `normal` dems. She`s finnnnnnnish.

Joe Rogan. MAGA. LETS GO JOE. Has a ring to it

Personally I have found them very fair.

no it's mine

Here`s the relevant rules from their Ts and Cs. (I`ve discussed this on another forum; at the bottom there`s my summary, which I posted there, can`t be bothered to write a different one)

Clearly Erroneous Bets Policy
1. Erroneous bets
Smarkets may consider bets to be clearly erroneous in cases of obvious and significant input error, whether with stake, price or identification of a contract, and where best price execution cannot account for the error and bring the bet within the defined boundaries of the ‘fair price’ as described below. Please note that the price differences noted below are in absolute difference in percentage price unless stated otherwise. For example a bet matched at odds of 50% (2.0 in decimal format) is considered 10% different to the price of 40% (2.5 in decimal odds).

3. Outlier transactions
Outlier transactions are defined as bets matched at a price that exceeds +-20% of the determined fair market price at the time the bet was matched.

4. Defining fair market price
When a complaint is filed, Smarkets will use any available resources, including but not limited to, recent trades on the Smarkets exchange and prices available elsewhere at the time, to determine the fair market price at the time the bet was matched. If the erroneous bet was matched at a price of +-15% of the fair market price at the time, Smarkets reserves the right to void the bet.

In addition to recent execution prices and prices available on other platforms at the time the bet was matched, Smarkets may also consider a number of additional factors when deciding whether a bet is clearly erroneous.

These include, but are not limited to, system malfunction, the volatility of the contract, new information becoming available in the public domain that may significantly alter the price (such as team news for a football match), whether the result of the bet had been unconditionally decided before a complaint was raised, whether betting on the market was recently halted and resumed, the start price of the selection and if the complainant had taken any steps to limit their exposure to the erroneous bet.

For example if the price of a contract is particularly volatile at the time a bet was matched, due to new information becoming public or otherwise, it is less likely bets will be voided under this policy as the fair price would be more difficult to determine objectively.

In cases where Smarkets cannot provide a reasonable determination of the fair price of the contract, no bets will be voided.

5. Reviewing bets on Smarkets’ own motion
Smarkets may also conduct reviews of bets on their own initiative. In normal office hours, and excluding the case of outlier transactions, users will be alerted to the investigation and informed of a decision within 120 minutes of the bets being matched.

Where the erroneous bet occurs outside normal office hours, a decision will be conveyed by 18:00 GMT on the next business day, defined as Monday to Friday and excluding national holidays in the UK.





So, any whinging loser (Messrs G`n`T?) who says `I made a mistake, pressed the wrong button! Yes, I was happy with it until the market went against me, but now that I`ve lost, I`ll scweam and scweam until you bail me out!` can have the bet cancelled, even after the event! As for this whole `fair price` tosh, well, if bf applied such stupidity, I`d never win a penny! Worse, smarkets seed the markets, so many `erroneous` and `unfair` prices cancelled will be them saving themselves money, for their own mistakes!

And to compound it all, you could have a decent winner Friday evening, whisk the mistress off for a nice celebratory weekend in New York to spend all your winnings, get back Tuesday evening, just in time to receive an email telling you the winning bet was now, and only now, four days later, being void!


As I said; charlatans, steer well clear

I have been with Smarkets for some years. I have had one or two disputes with them which were settled amicably and fairly. As I only bet on politics it would be unfair of me to guesstimate of any issues that any folks have had outwith that topic. Their customer service is truly excellent.

Oprah - 320.0 betfair exchange
Clooney- 200.0 Betfred and ****
Meghan- 260.0 Betfair exchange

Purple? Boilers?

Your position must be below desperate PP

Indeed.

There was evidence of that on other thread.

Long time to wait for 4% return.

But then again there were
Plenty of mugs backing him
after he lost last electiin
..

And 28% think he's back in the
Whitehouse by Jan 22!

Lol

https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-become-president-before-2025
.

£2463 matched now.

Ryan Struyk
@ryanstruyk
· 15h
Do you believe Joe Biden won the 2020 election fair and square or only won it due to voter fraud via Monmouth poll:

Democrats:
97% fair and square
2% voter fraud

Republicans:
22% fair and square
73% voter fraud

Wyoming GOP votes to stop recognizing Cheney as a Republican

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-liz-cheney-wyoming-casper-1966d793df2baa85e0fecad4026b0e99
.

I see my scammer troll has arrived

politicspunter 16 Nov 21 06:35 
https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-become-president-before-2025
£2463 matched now.

Another lie from s(cam)markets, deliberately aimed at fooling the unsophisticated mugs, a lie that you`ve fallen for! On bf, a £2 bet is counted as £4 matched, regardless of price. The scammarkets, in a deceptive attempt at seeming to be matching similar amounts as bf do, instead count £2 matched at 1.000 as £2,000. Meaning, with £2400 `matched`, that could be one bet of £2.40 at 1,000! In this case,(without me wanting to go near the scamsters website to check), it seems from what I`ve read on here that, with The Don being matched at 50-odd, that means about £50 actually backed, giving a true matched figure of £100;

Charlatans.

You`re forever posting their lying numbers as part of your advertising campaign, trying to big up the scamsters. If that £2,400 was measured in the bf way, you wouldn`t have posted that there had been a fiver matched. You`re either unaware of their lying ways, or you`re shilling for them. Either way, not a good look.

Not sure I believe that, but even given the benefit of the doubt, why post a matched figure that could amount to one single bet of £2.47p?

You`ve spent over a year and hundreds of looks at my winning 2020 bets, trying to figure out how I won, and still can`t see it, so I have no faith in your ability to understand anything, let alone scamarkets matching procedures. Indeed, only last week, you couldn`t work out how I laid Youngkin and backed macauliffe and won!
If we give you the benefit of the (huge!) doubt, then why post about a potential bet of £2.47? Are you paid to spread FAKE NEWS? Is bf aware of your blatant breaking of their rules?

Prime wriggling! Avoid the charge, deflect, try to pull a clinton `It depends on what the meaning of the word `is`, is` 
Just for fun, though, let`s answer; the `we`, is those of us on here your FAKE claims are aimed at fooling.