|
By:
£2 matched at 1,000 in here = £4 matched
£2 matched at 1,000 on scamarkets = £2,000 matched So, if the charlatans claim a 15k figure, it could be as little as £30 actually matched, some 500-times the true figure! A fine example of mugging the mugs. |
|
By:
Well, perhaps they read the posts on here of Timber? He has been adamant about Trump being reinstated and so have multiple other diddies on twitter/you tube conspiracy sites.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Lord denning was master of rolls
in appeal court. When talking about contract law He said something like... I quite agree that the more unreasonable a clause is, the greater the notice which must be given of it. Some clauses which I have seen would need to be printed in red ink on the face of the document with a red hand pointing to it before the notice could be held to be sufficient. |
|
By:
timbuctooth • November 25, 2021 3:01 PM GMT
£2 matched at 1,000 in here = £4 matched £2 matched at 1,000 on scamarkets = £2,000 matched So, if the charlatans claim a 15k figure, it could be as little as £30 actually matched, some 500-times the true figure! A fine example of mugging the mugs. Tim, how many times do you have to be told? Smarkets model isn't the same as Betfair. |
|
By:
Hey, maybe Timber is correct regarding the Arizona audit etc and all the others. Perhaps Trump was cheated. If so, the folks backing him stand to win a right few bob at huge odds.
|
|
By:
£2 matched at 1000 is 2000quid
£2 matched at 1.01 is £2.02 Would be great if exchanges standardised system and got it right. |
|
By:
They are all different, they have different models regarding matching, rules and things such as premium charge.
|
|
By:
I find all of them useful, for different reasons.
|
|
By:
Let's suppose on Smarkets Tim wanted £1000 at 15.0 on the market above and I layed him the money. Tim will have layed out £1000 and I will have layed out £14000. Total matched £15000.
|
|
By:
Easy to work out
But would be great if they were accurate! Remember the days of opening accounts on betfair and matching £10 to open forum. Just lay 1.01 for £10 Lol |
|
By:
Don`t forget, most of any amount matched on scamarkets is their own money, a bookie offering prices in what looks like an exchange; again, designed intentionally to fool the mugs. And, because it`s their money, once they`re on the wrong side of any bet, they can claim it as `unfair`, and void it, up to FOUR DAYS LATER!!!
All in all, prime charlatans, so good, they even have their mug punters defending such outrageous practices! |
|
By:
In all the years I have been a member, I can't recall any of my bets being voided. Settlement and payment is prompt upon official result (unlike another place).
|
|
By:
^^^Translates as; `I`m a mug, I`ve never, EVER!, got the value, scamarkets love me!`
|
|
By:
As I am a member and you are not, I am in the position to assess value whereas you are just a guesser that only backs the outcome that politically you want to happen.
|
|
By:
I`ve lived off gambling all my life, never had a proper job, so it seems to be working. You, on the other hand, seeeeeethe with envy at real punters, real gamblers, so much so that you even feel the need to call yourself `punter`, feel the need to forever proclaim to the world what you`d like to be. But you didn`t have the cojones to live such a life, the closest you can get to those aspirations is stalking me!
|
|
By:
You will never win long term tim because you only back who you want to win, driven by your political ideology. Here is a very simple thing to look out now regarding value. One of the most active UK markets currently is the upcoming North Shropshire by election. In one place you can bet the LibDems best price at 5.2 for £20. In another place you can bet the LibDems best price at 5.6 for £177. Which one is the best value?
|
|
By:
Btw, I don't consider myself a gambler. The folks who bet against me are gamblers.
|
|
By:
politicspunter Joined: 20 Mar 18
Replies: 3381925 Nov 21 15:39 You will never win long term CHORTLE! A lifetime, my lifetime, isn`t `long term`? Definitely worth another CHORTLE!!! |
|
By:
You are a proven loser.
|
|
By:
Link, please?
|
|
By:
These are some of your lay bets of Biden AFTER he had won...
Layed £5,000 at 1.02 losing £100 Layed £41,000 at 1.03 losing £1,230 Layed £53,500 at 1.04 losing £2,140 Layed £45,280 at 1.05 losing £2,264 Layed £15,000 at 1.06 losing £900 Layed £15,000 at 1.07 losing £1,050 Layed £4,000 at 1.08 losing £320 Layed £2,100 at 1.09 losing £189 Total layed £180,880. Total lost £8193. |
|
By:
Cherry-picked eight plays out of hundreds I had in a winning market; link to me being `a proven loser`, please? Or are you LYING again?
|
|
By:
I have just shown you some of your losing bets on a market where you were wiped out. How crazy can someone be to lay the winner after the result was known?
|
|
By:
not this shyte again
![]() |
|
By:
Crazy? No, just someone who knows what he`s doing, a lifelong winner at this gambling malarkey. Let me try and help you by pointing out that your inability to figure out how I won on that market, despite you having spent hours trawling through the PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE, merely serves as confirmation to the world that you haven`t got what it takes to be a punter. Ask nicely, I`ll put you out of your misery, run you through it, explain it to you step by step. But you`ll then have to be careful, scamarkets will suddenly start voiding your bets!
(Sorry to all other readers who don`t need such explanations, but pp`s a desperate case, needs all the help he can get and, as a good and right thinker, I`m feeling charitable to the poor soul) |
|
By:
I have posted some of your losing bets in a market you were wiped out on. You heavily backed Trump/Layed Biden because of your political allegiances where as usual you only back who you want to win. Once you had lost a packet on the result, Trump said it was fraud. You were so foolish that you believed him and started to lay Biden (some bets above) even AFTER the result.
|
|
By:
So many lies in that post^^^! Here again is the PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE as proof; have another study, see if you can spot it, if not, just ask nicely
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq1E1UhR29p65vk2bkVmuaQ |
|
By:
I have posted the legible bets. The rest are illegible through your manky monitor (your house must be Abraham Lincoln). Feel free to post them.
|
|
By:
politicspunter 25 Nov 21 16:29
I have posted the legible bets. The rest are illegible No you haven`t, no they`re not. More lies. Do you EVER stop? |
|
By:
They are illegible. Feel free to post them. What's stopping you?
|
|
By:
I assume it's because the vast majority of them are backing Trump/ laying Biden pre election I suppose.
|
|
By:
Doesn`t matter what the vast majority were, all that matters is the final p or l. I won, you lied.
|
|
By:
Post your bets.
|
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq1E1UhR29p65vk2bkVmuaQ
|
|
By:
Organisers of the rally that occurred outside of the White House on 6 January minutes before the Capitol was attacked by Trump supporters reportedly used “burner” phones to communicate with the president’s inner circle, including Eric Trump.
From the indy. Not seen a huge amount of coverage but can't be long before hes asked about this infront of folk and under oath. |
|
By:
i just got back after 5 pints and found my 20 lay at 5.7 on that 2025 smarkets trump market had been matched, im not sure about smarkets, the date stamp shows 23/11 at 9.21 pm, thats a couple days ago, maybe thats when i placed it, or maybe ive been totally mugged off offering a ridiculous price
|
|
By:
Eric Trump coordinated the january 6th unrest
LMAO |
|
By:
you sure you've read the rules properly on that market
if he wins in November 2024 that doesn't count? |
|
By:
Will Donald J Trump be inaugurated as US President again before 2025?
|