Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 318 comments are related to the topic:
Copeland by election

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 8  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 318
By:
donny osmond
When: 06 Feb 17 17:51
amazing
By:
CJ70
When: 06 Feb 17 18:11

Feb 6, 2017 -- 5:35PM, donny osmond wrote:


you think he was ?


Of course.

Apart from people denying all sorts of crazy despots are socialists to avoid association with them, it's not really debatable is it?

By:
donny osmond
When: 06 Feb 17 19:33
not worth the bother of debating it, but im staggered that anybody could
have that view.

frankly worrying
By:
CJ70
When: 06 Feb 17 22:59

Feb 6, 2017 -- 7:33PM, donny osmond wrote:


not worth the bother of debating it, but im staggered that anybody couldhave that view.frankly worrying


Why so?

It's very hard to argue otherwise I'd have thought. You have to do quite a lot of mental logistics to disassociate him from not being a socialist. The Huff Post article is particularly bad at trying to do that.


The only argument I can see is the same one which appears when any socialist state turns into bedlam 'It's not real socialism because..'

By:
alleged22
When: 06 Feb 17 23:06
wasn't hitler anti socialist anti communism at hid peak
By:
CJ70
When: 06 Feb 17 23:11

Feb 6, 2017 -- 11:06PM, alleged22 wrote:


wasn't hitler anti socialist anti communism at hid peak


I suggest anti-Marxist is a better description.

By:
alleged22
When: 06 Feb 17 23:19
all I know is he blamed the mainly socialist supporting jews for the death of 100k german soldiers during ww1. read into that what you will, but to call him a socialist is way off the mark imo
By:
donny osmond
When: 06 Feb 17 23:24
its a staggering reworking of fact

but cj enjoys that
By:
CJ70
When: 06 Feb 17 23:30

Feb 6, 2017 -- 11:19PM, alleged22 wrote:


all I know is he blamed the mainly socialist supporting jews for the death of 100k german soldiers during ww1. read into that what you will, but to call him a socialist is way off the mark imo


While I don't see very much point in discussing Hitler, as he mortifies every right thinking person. It's a long stretch of the imagination to say he wasn't a socialist even after we know he self-identified as one.

I'll link to the 25 point plan on wikipedia. If you can read that and still think it's nothing to do with socialism then nobody will ever change your mind. If you changed the name and edited out the obvious bits, you'd get your student activists signing up to quite a lot of this program.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

By:
CJ70
When: 06 Feb 17 23:30

Feb 6, 2017 -- 11:24PM, donny osmond wrote:


its a staggering reworking of factbut cj enjoys that


Yes, well done.

By:
Meadow X1
When: 07 Feb 17 12:18
Some folks were discussing on another forum if Labour were concentrating their forces on Stoke and giving up on Copeland. This poster appeared to refute that suggestion...

As a longstanding local campaigner Gill Troughton has got lots of local activists involved, and there does seem to be a lot of support from her Church and from Christians on the Left, as well as both public sector and nuclear unions. The Shadow Chancellor was campaigning there yesterday, and quite a few other MPs too. Copeland is not being sidelined. I suspect that Tim Farron has soft pedalled in Copeland though. There has not been anything on my LD daily emails calling for help.
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Feb 17 12:25

Feb 7, 2017 -- 12:18PM, Meadow X1 wrote:


Some folks were discussing on another forum if Labour were concentrating their forces on Stoke and giving up on Copeland. This poster appeared to refute that suggestion...As a longstanding local campaigner Gill Troughton has got lots of local activists involved, and there does seem to be a lot of support from her Church and from Christians on the Left, as well as both public sector and nuclear unions. The Shadow Chancellor was campaigning there yesterday, and quite a few other MPs too. Copeland is not being sidelined. I suspect that Tim Farron has soft pedalled in Copeland though. There has not been anything on my LD daily emails calling for help.


Anecdotal and possibly politics in play, but most of the Con canvassers I know are highlighting the lack of Lab activity on the ground in the area.

Of course the way canvassing works is that the parties may well be working different wards due to demographics.

By:
Meadow X1
When: 07 Feb 17 13:04
Yes, that may well be the case. Labour concentrating their forces in the Whitehaven area itself and the Conservatives targeting rural areas in the constituency. If the Libdems are faking a sickie and lying low that surely must help the Tories in those areas away from Whitehaven.
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 11 Feb 17 21:42
I think Labour complacency (typical of the region) and negligence (they can't even connect with their own members let alone the electorate) will do for them here.
By:
Burt06
When: 11 Feb 17 22:34
given the accuracy of IDIEMYHAIRPINKE's predictions I wish he would tip labourPlain
By:
CJ70
When: 14 Feb 17 11:24
May is travelling to Copeland. Suggests Con internal polling is good.

Price has crashed to sub 1.50, was intending to top up.
By:
shockster
When: 14 Feb 17 11:57
test
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 14 Feb 17 13:24
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
By:
SHADDER
When: 16 Feb 17 17:26
Whitehaven News poll

Who will you vote in by election?
Labour 24%
Cons 23.2 %
Lib Dems 33.4 %
UKIP 9.6%

Total Votes 1835
By:
Meadow X1
When: 16 Feb 17 17:46
Thanks Shadder, who received the other 10% of the poll?
By:
SHADDER
When: 16 Feb 17 19:20
Meadow
3% undecided the other 7% split between the other candidates.
Not sure how reliable the poll is , it was an online one, suppose anyone could vote a 1,000 times for the preferred candidate to give a false impression.
Have to be honest I have seen or heard very little coverage of the Lib Dem.
By:
Meadow X1
When: 16 Feb 17 19:24
Have you had any canvassers at your door?
By:
SHADDER
When: 17 Feb 17 10:24
I would say Gillian Troughton is an over whelming favourite in the Whitehaven area.
What little window & garden posters there are the majority are Labour.
For the second time in recent weeks they had a four page advertising spread on the cover of the Whitehaven News , although the paper declares itself politically neutral that is a powerful piece of PR even if people do not buy the paper it is staring them in the face in every supermarket, local shops & garages.
I have not met Ms Troughton but my 83 year old mother was suitably impressed with her visit to the local community centre to fill in her postal vote for her which I have just posted.
My 25 year old daughter whose partner works at Sellafield and has 2 young children is typical of many in the area, she would not know if Gillian Troughton , represented Labour , Conservative, Lib Dems , Ukip or Monster raving loony party but she was doorstepped last week and was won over with her arguments to vote for her, she is not voting Labour, she is voting for Gillian Troughton to represent our area which this by election could be more about than party politics.
If this was just the traditional old style constituency of Copeland I would rate Labour strong favourites, however with the boundary being pushed south & east it appears difficult to call.
No doubt Rebecca Harmson will have a strong following to the south where she lives and could pick up a lot of votes in those rural areas.
To the East we have now Keswick included whose issues would be far removed from those in the West which to my mind really complicates the issue. Their focus will primarily be on the leisure & tourist industry as opposed to nuclear , and the relevance of West Cumberland Hospital services would have little relevance to them as they can access Penrith & Carlisle hospitals just as quickly.
As stated previously I am no political expert but am a keen better and are struggling to see how the current odds of 1.44 Cons 3.5 Labour stack up in which to my mind is a coin toss , feel free to tell me where I am going wrong.
By:
Captain Wurzel
When: 17 Feb 17 10:28
Always good to get some local knowledge - thanks shadder.
By:
Meadow X1
When: 17 Feb 17 10:40
Thanks very much Shadder.  I hadn't given much thought to the Keswick area being nearer the hospitals at Penrith and Carlisle. Everything else you say is very much along my own line of thought including the current prices as I am also a keen bettor.  One particularly interesting thing you mention is regarding Rebecca Hanson, the LibDem candidate. I thought she may be concentrating on the remain voting Labour concentrated Whitehaven area but if she is instead campaigning in her own rural patch that may help Labour and hinder the Conservatives.  She seems to have spoken well both when interviewed and at hustings.
By:
Burt06
When: 17 Feb 17 12:22
there have been reports that the labour vote on the doorstep is down 30%. the report said that only 70% of people questioned who voted labour last time intened to do so again. i have no idea how accurate that report is but were it to be anywhere near then labour have already lost regardless of where those votes end up. the fact that the national vote for labour has collapsed to around 24% also plays in. jezza has been told to stay away while TMay was up there the other day.

i backed the tories at 2.0 and do think 1.44 is very very short but i wouldn't have this as a coin flip at all. keswick is one of the richest areas in the country and some house prices there are not far off london prices. it is a tory heartland. whitehaven is clearly the polar opposite but i can see the old retired types in keswick all going out to vote whereas i don't see the same in whitehaven.

we will all know by this time next week.Cool
By:
Burt06
When: 17 Feb 17 12:24
also UKIP got 6148 votes last time. some now question what is the point of the party. if half of that 6148 feel like that then i think it's most likely that they will go tory.
By:
Burt06
When: 17 Feb 17 12:34
and if we look a little more into the numbers since the 2010 boundary change.


we have labour in 2015 with 16750 votes, 2010 with 19699
we have the cons  2015 with 14186 votes, 2010 with 15866
we have the Kippers 2015 with 6148 votes, 2010 with 994

so labour have lost almost 3000 votes and the tories almost 2000 votes from 2010 to 2015.  UKIP have gained a little more than that. so if the labour slide continues, if the jezza affect were to take more votes from them and if some of the UKIP vote switched back to tory then it's over.

i cannot see any new UKIP voter that was labour switching back. why would they? for jezza and a remain MP? i hardly think so.
By:
Meadow X1
When: 17 Feb 17 17:31
Burt,

Of course you are correct on the figures here. However, there is a good case to be made for Labour holding this...
1/ The local candidate is well respected as working and campaigning for the local hospital.
2/ She has been clear,  no ifs no buts in her support for the nuclear industry workers.
3/She is well respected in the local christian community.
4/ She has always said she will fight for every vote and from shadders account above that seems accurate.
5/ The local gmb union are campaigning hard for a labour victory.

And a couple of things that don't help the Conservatives..

1/ Their candidate may lack experience.
2/ Rural constituencies take longer to canvass votes from than urban areas like Whitehaven.
3/ The Libdem candidate may be after those rural votes.

I think the price for the Conservatives is very short with no polling data to support it.
By:
Burt06
When: 17 Feb 17 18:18
all valid points and we don't have long to wait for the result.


but for me, the report of a 30% drop in the labour vote did come from labour sources. the collapse in support for corbyn cannot be denied. whilst it's all alright her saying she 100% supports nuclear that would not matter one jot if corbyn was PM as he wants it all gone. now i realise he will never be PM but that must play on the mind of voters there, especially when you consider the brexit situation. if you live there, work in nuclear and voted brexit why would you vote labour? they know corbyn is useless and might conclude to not vote or switch so as to vote labour next time if they get a credible leader.

i suppose her local popularity is the big unknown for us looking in. if she does hold this seat it will be one hell of an achievement against the odds and despite the leader and the party. for me, that's all too much to ask.

as i said as well, i expect the former tory ukippers will switch back.
By:
SHADDER
When: 17 Feb 17 18:52
Whitehaven news poll update
Labour 24.4
Cons   23.3
Lib Dems 31.7
Ukip 10.5
Green 2.7

Votes 2101
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 17 Feb 17 19:00
That poll allows multiple votes when you clear browser history.
By:
Burt06
When: 17 Feb 17 21:09
analysis here:

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/pol2d_Copeland.html

The table below shows all the wards in the seat, along with these quantities (sorted by EU leave share):

that table on the link is interesting.
it details each ward with the highest brexit vote to the lowest and who won which ward in the 2015 GE.
UKIP only won 1 ward and not surprisingly that ward was the highest amount of brexit vote - 75%.
but look at the bottom 8 wards - all won by the tories and most of them remain. of the top 12 wards to vote brexit, 9 of them are labour wards.they only won 3 other wards. this seems like a big problem for labour to me. wards where they win want brexit, wards where they lose don't. to take the 4016 votes in keswick as an example i just cannot see remain conservatives going over to labour, but i can see brexit labour voters simply not bothering.

this analysis predicts a con win 39% to 37.8%. personally i think the gap will be wider.
By:
Meadow X1
When: 17 Feb 17 22:45
Of course there are historical reasons in this seat why the Conservatives will be struggling to increase their share of the vote.  This is former mining country, families with links to that industry will not vote Tory under any circumstances (they just might not vote Labour).  These folks include UKIP voters who may not vote, switch back to Labour but under no circumstances will they vote Tory.
  By the way, I am also hearing that Brexit is very low priority in this seat. Local hospital and nuclear are the top issues by a mile.
By:
SHADDER
When: 18 Feb 17 08:11
Agree Meadow Brexit not really an issue here.
Nuclear, Hospitals and local Infrastructure the big issues.

Burt , I fully respect your analysis and feel the inclusion of Keswick & the surrounding area could well be the game changer here.
As stated previously the priorities of those voters are far removed from the core of the constituency, many people I have spoken to are unaware of the boundary changes and are amazed that area is included in Copeland and not Allerdale
By:
Meadow X1
When: 18 Feb 17 08:25
Keswick, Crummock, Dalton and Derwent Valley were included in boundary changes here for the 2010 general election. The Conservative vote has gone up since that election but Labour have still held on (just!).
By:
xmoneyx
When: 22 Feb 17 12:45
2/5 tory
9/4 labour
By:
donny osmond
When: 22 Feb 17 13:03
1.44
3.35 on here
By:
The Biscuit
When: 22 Feb 17 13:06
I've got a feeling that Storm Doris will help the Tories get home, in a remote area such as Copeland many people will be registered to vote by post but everyone who has worked on elections knows that postal voting favours the Tories.
If it's a wet and windy day many Cumbrians who don't have cars and who wound normally vote Labour might think 'I don't fancy going out in that and I don't like Corbyn anyway'
If the Tories win by a couple of hundred or less, they can thank Doris.
By:
Meadow X1
When: 22 Feb 17 13:13
I really think this is far too close to call.  I agree it may come down to hundreds rather than thousands of votes.  On the betting front PaddyPower went 3/1 Labour this morning for a while.
Page 5 of 8  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com