Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 412 comments are related to the topic:
Why do councils need PR departments?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 11  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 11 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 412
By:
Java
When: 25 Jan 12 14:53
Laugh
By:
Mister E
When: 25 Jan 12 17:29
Another gem;
a telephone number to phone the County Council re "portion Control"
SadCry
By:
Java
When: 25 Jan 12 17:33
What has the world come to?

You phone the council to ask how many peas to put on your plate?   And someone is there to answer that question?

Surely we can half the deficit tomorrow just by sacking these nomarks?
By:
Burt06
When: 25 Jan 12 18:01
To be fair to karla she has answered your just badgering now.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 25 Jan 12 22:27
Burt

I can only speak for myself when I say that in my view what she has answered is a question of her own choosing and one which we already knew the answer to. We know what PR departments do so it seems perfectly reasonable to ask for clarification on why it is necessary for councils to employ them to do this. It goes to the heart of what a council is and what it should be doing and it would be very interesting to hear the inside view of someone who clearly feels this is a legitimate way to spend taxpayers money.
By:
Java
When: 26 Jan 12 07:42
Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?
By:
Java
When: 27 Jan 12 11:11
I have a good feeling that this weekend we'll actually get a response.  Plain

Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 11:16
LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh

She can run but she can't hide.
By:
Mister E
When: 27 Jan 12 11:22
java,
by all means keep going, but I think the point is proved.

As I said; forty years ago ratepayers could SEE their councils providing a service; they did not need an army of spin doctors to "get the message out".

My lot have just circulated us with a joy of volunteering propaganda sheet; it arrived two days after a Court injunction put a temporary stop on replacing staff who do a good visible job with volunteers. Clearly they have not got this particular "message out", as well as they hoped, a body of council taxpayers have taken them to court.

Communication problems?  or just people sick and tired of being fed patronising BS.?
By:
Java
When: 27 Jan 12 11:36
The reason I am so persistent, is Karla is so smug when insisting that it is "obvious" why taxpayers should pay for the council to have the luxury of a £3 million a year PR department, yet she won't answer the simple question of why it would not be better to use this money on core services or, heaven forbid, actually give people a reduced council tax bill.

Her best attempt so far has been some gibberish about communicating their message.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 11:43
Not forgetting that her stock in trade is condescension and abuse which we find is backed up by absolutely nothing. At least those of us who like to get stuck in are prepared to back up what we say or defer to a fair point.
By:
Mister E
When: 27 Jan 12 12:05
I am not sure that the whole Karla thing isn't a complete wind up.

Seems to be a total caricature to me; although undoubtedly there are plenty of them out there.
By:
Java
When: 27 Jan 12 12:13
If it is a wind up it is a very clever one, as little nuggets of information are dropped here and there over time:

- the 85k salary
- the gibberish job description which she maintains is "invaluable" to the community
- the large inheritance giving the champagne socialist aspect
- the modelling contract which was turned down post university

If all the above it just intended to drive the right wingers crazy, then fair play to her, but it takes a lot of patience to develop a fake persona like that.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 27 Jan 12 12:18
I am not sure that the whole Karla thing isn't a complete wind up.

Eo, seems to have fallen for it hook line and sinker.

Mind you it doesn't take much to wind him up.
By:
Arleystation
When: 27 Jan 12 13:05
An opportunity has become available for a Deputy HR Relationship Manager within the Customer and Communities/Environment & Infrastructure HR Relationship Team.

Deputising for the HR Relationship Manager, the Deputy HR Relationship Manager plays a key role in the strategic direction of the service by providing thorough and technically comprehensive advice on a range of human resource and organisational development issues.

As Deputy HR Relationship Manager you will work in collaborative partnership with the client group at a senior level to establish an excellent understanding of the client’s challenges and identify creative opportunities for operational and strategic intervention. Using established proficiency across the range of HR & OD fields, you will provide the highest level of technical advice to colleagues and customers in order to resolve highly complex and sensitive casework where there is a significant risk to the organisation.



Here's another non-job from the esteemed Surrey County Council. The salary is only £46K per annum though. Can anyone understand what that load of bol locks actually means? Surrey's your neck of the woods,isn't it Blackie, why don't you give this a try?Devil
By:
Comrade_Karla
When: 27 Jan 12 13:27
Maybe you should start a thread titled - Why do councils need HR departments?

Once you've done that I will give the obvious answer and then for the next few weeks we can laugh at Mr Java and Mr Eeternal stomping around the thread demanding "answers".   ( many smilie faces )
By:
Java
When: 27 Jan 12 13:31
Any chance of an answer from you since you are here?

Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?
By:
Mister E
When: 27 Jan 12 13:59
arleystation,

It is Surrey that churn out these patronising "information" sheets;

Keep a blanket in your car this winter
"Lovely leftovers" recipe recommendations

etc.
By:
blackburn1
When: 27 Jan 12 13:59
arley I'm a Kent lad, besides I would rather starve to death than steal for a living, which in effect is what these people do.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 17:32
Karla

You are a complete and utter shower. It is clear you have no intention of ever contributing anything in life or on the forum. Feel free to keep taking but remember that you have been completely and utterly found out here.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 17:33
Crippen

Me? I'm not the one stomping around trains looking for innocent bags to throw down the aisle. LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 17:35
Karla

Wewon't be laughing at anything. Those of your fellow lefties who aren't laughing at you are peering through their fingers at the slow motion car crash that you have created for yourself.
By:
bongo
When: 27 Jan 12 17:55
For Leicester Council:
'The new PR team organisation will have 25 people, including digital media officers and "brand managers". The highest-paid position will be the director of marketing and communications who will earn £75,000.
The lowest salary in the department will be £26,000, paid to two of the council's marketing officers.'

Ffs, the lowest salary is massive - for a grade with no supervisory responsibilities - and people still believe that wages in the private sector are comparable Sad
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 17:59
Brand manager? FFS. CryCryCryCryCryCryCryCryCryCry
By:
Comrade_Karla
When: 27 Jan 12 18:02
Mr Eeternal

You are a complete bozo. I spend my life contributing to my community in ways an extreme Libertarian like you could never comprehend. You have found nothing. I answered your stupid rhetorical question, the fact you don't like or understand the reply is your problem. And the only thing that people will find amusing is the site of you and Mr Java parading around this thread demanding another answer as you didn't like the one I gave. Don't you criticise the EU for continuing to ask until they get the answer they want?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 27 Jan 12 18:14
EO.

Me? I'm not the one stomping around trains looking for innocent bags to throw down the aisle.

And before on the railway thread.

Of course I might then throw the knnobhead who was being a prick down the aisle.


Make your mind up.
By:
bongo
When: 27 Jan 12 18:48
Yet more dirty linen which the last administration should explain.
http://www.crazycouncil.co.uk/special-executive

Looking at the numbers of employed staff for the ahem randomly chosen council in the link above we see that in
2002: 3480 employed staff ( this was the last year the UK ran a balanced budget )
2008: 4709 employed staff ( this is the recession year when tax revenues dived )
2010: 5827 employed staff ( because the way to fight a recession is to borrow recruit and spend yet more )
I suspect some errors in the figures, and some variation in part-timers, but how in the name of Andrew Jackson did this one disrict come to require 67% more local Council employees in the space of 8 years.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 23:45
Crippen

Instead of smiley faces I'll send you an extra special sign next time I'm having a joke with you.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 27 Jan 12 23:49
Karla

Look at the replies on this thread from people from the left. The right aren't the only ones sick of people like yourself making fortunes from fantasy jobs. We all want to see bobbies on the beat, nurses, doctors, firemenLaugh, binmen, cleaners etc etc. None of us want lesbian trombone facilitators or precious imbeciles like yourself miling the system. Get a job you leech.
By:
moisok
When: 28 Jan 12 09:55
Arley - looking at that job description makes me ask what does that person actually do  !!??
By:
Arleystation
When: 28 Jan 12 11:46
Exactly, moisok. Personnel Departments have long since become Human Resources Departments full of jargon. These departments (and PR departments) have escalated in size and self importance.

For so many small businesses the payment of rates has become the straw that breaks the camel's back. How many pubs, shops and workshops could have remained open, providing employment and serving the local community, if they had not been compelled to pay for the odious self service that so much of Local Government has become.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 28 Jan 12 12:13
Don’t you just love council departments?

I was on an electricians forum elsewhere the other day.
The certified tradesmen on there were complaining about cowboys who can easily undercut them simply because they don’t bother with charging for and issuing safety certificates.
These safety certificates introduced by New Labour serve little purpose other than to create extra work and put up the price of the job, and have led to more cowboys doing work now than there were before.

They couldn’t see that enforcing and maintaining any legislation has got to be paid for, and it’s the legits who are traceable and play by the rules who have to do the paying and get priced out of the market.
By:
moisok
When: 28 Jan 12 12:33
wouldnt it be interesting if you got rid of both and the bosses of other depts did their own PR, job interviews and looked after their people in their own department
By:
Java
When: 28 Jan 12 17:22
Still claims to answer the question when no such thing has happened. Cry  If you feel you have answered the question below please paste it again so the forum can decide for themselves if you are answering or not.

Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?
By:
Mister E
When: 29 Jan 12 09:49
My Council is advertising for a Corporate Communications Manager, to help "celebrate the Olympics and Diamond jubilee".

Only for six months though.
By:
Java
When: 30 Jan 12 09:17
Ahh - she flitted onto the forum during the night to imply that another poster is a racist in her smear mongering way but still won't answer a simple question:

Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 30 Jan 12 17:34
Maybe we should put the pot chomper out of her misery and allow this thread to die of her embarrassment?
By:
Comrade_Karla
When: 30 Jan 12 20:09
I will keep this thread at the top for as long as I remember. It is a testament to the sad,obsessive, needy, and utterly stupid examples of Human-Beings that you and Mr Java are.

Maybe the people that have read my answers such as Burt and Arley can explain to Mr Java and Mr Eeternal where they are and put them out of their misery. I could but obviously it's too much fun watching the obsessive frieks make such fools of themselves. ( smilie faces infinity )
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 30 Jan 12 20:51
Well they are as welcome as you to post where you said why councils need to get their message out. As I have pointed out we all know what PR departments do the issue is why do councils feel the need for them to do it?

As I said I may have missed you clarifying the matter.
By:
Java
When: 31 Jan 12 09:04
Karla you must be one of the stupidest posters on this forum.

Do you think that your post

"Each message from each council will differ. It still has to be communicated. You would have thought it's all pretty self explanatory but I think some of you right-whingers need assistance crossing the road."

Answers the following question:

Karla - why do you consider it necessary and a good use of taxpayer money for councils to "get their message out"?  Why don't they either increase spending on their services instead or reduce the council tax bill?

If you think it does answer the question then you are an imbecile.

Now...........care to have a crack at answering the question that has been asked of you for the last 3 weeks?? 

Or do you concede that your are a thicko?
Page 4 of 11  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 11 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com